logo
Kyiv spent US$57 million on shelters in 2024

Kyiv spent US$57 million on shelters in 2024

Yahoo06-02-2025

Kyiv allocated UAH 2.4 billion (US$57.5 million) in 2024 to set up bomb shelters, enhance fire safety in schools, prepare them for winter, and establish learning hubs for the Defence of Ukraine course.
Source: Valentyn Mondryivskyi, Deputy Head of the Kyiv City State Administration
These efforts have created 34,000 new shelter spaces, allowing more children to attend in-person classes.
Quote: "Right now, 37 dual-purpose facilities are under construction in the capital. In case of danger, they will serve as shelters for students, teachers, and residents."
Kyiv's 2025 budget includes UAH 1.8 billion (US$43.2 million) for building and upgrading shelters.
Once completed, these projects will provide an additional 22,500 safe spaces for students and teachers.
Background: Analysts from the Territorial Office of the Bureau of Economic Security in the Kyiv region prevented the misappropriation of nearly UAH 3.5 million (US$83,842) during a shelter construction tender.
Support UP or become our patron!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelenskyy: We're very close to point when Russia can be forced to end this war
Zelenskyy: We're very close to point when Russia can be forced to end this war

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Zelenskyy: We're very close to point when Russia can be forced to end this war

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy believes that Ukraine and its allies are very close to the moment when Russia can be forced to end or at least halt the war, but this would require the United States to impose tough sanctions on Russia. Source: Zelenskyy in an interview with ABC News; a full video has been posted by the press service for the Ukrainian President's Office Quote: "Frankly speaking, we are very close to the moment when Russia can be forced to end the war, at least to stop. We feel it. Our operation Spider's Web… even though they [the Russians – ed.] are furious, they understand everything – that if there are cases like the one involving 20,000 rockets [that the US had planned to send to Ukraine but redirected to the Middle East – ed.], then we'll rely on our own strength… We don't want the war to continue, but we'll fight for ourselves if that is the only way out. We're very close. We need strong support from the United States. The US needs unity with Europe and still needs to put pressure on Putin. He doesn't want to end the war, but he can end the war under pressure from partners. In my opinion, that gives us a chance. And this doesn't sound pessimistic at all – I'm talking about reality." Details: When asked whether Trump wants to impose sanctions on Russia, Zelenskyy replied: "He is the leader of the United States of America, he has to do it. I hope so, we do believe that the US is the leader of the civilised world". A journalist reminded the Ukrainian president that Trump had recently even mentioned the possibility of imposing sanctions on Ukraine. "There has been a lot from the Russians against Ukraine," Zelenskyy said. "We certainly don't want anything like that from the US either." He stressed that Ukraine supports all US-proposed initiatives concerning a ceasefire, ending the war or any format of negotiations. Quote: "There is no need to find a balance between us and the Russians. The Russians don't want this. Sometimes there is no alternative. It's only the Russians who don't want to end the war. It doesn't matter who wants to impose sanctions on them – America must impose sanctions. There is no alternative in either case." More details: Zelenskyy said he believes "the president of the United States has all the potential, all the tools to pressure Putin – starting with sanctions, economic blockades, arms packages and rallying other European leaders who want this around him". Quote: "They [European leaders – ed.] view President Trump as the leader of the world – the free and democratic world – and they say: 'Please, be the leader. You're the leader. Stop Putin, and we'll help you, because Europe isn't as strong as America'. Europe still has to become very strong. But today, the struggle continues. President Trump can do all of this, I believe." Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

Iran says Israeli ‘treasure trove' of secret documents to be unveiled soon
Iran says Israeli ‘treasure trove' of secret documents to be unveiled soon

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Iran says Israeli ‘treasure trove' of secret documents to be unveiled soon

Iranian Intelligence Minister Esmail Khatib has said sensitive Israeli documents related to its nuclear facilities, its relationship with the United States, Europe and other countries, as well as its defensive capabilities, will be unveiled soon. Khatib told state TV on Sunday that the documents obtained by Tehran were a 'treasure trove' capable of strengthening the nation's offensive posture, but he did not provide any immediate evidence. The Israeli government, which has never revealed details about its nuclear arsenal, said to comprise substantial atomic weapons, making it the only country in the Middle East with nuclear bombs, has not yet commented on the report of the leaked documents. However, there have been arrests of Israelis allegedly spying for Tehran amid its war in Gaza. It was not clear if the materials were connected to a reported hacking of an Israeli nuclear research centre last year. 'The transfer of this treasure trove was time-consuming and required security measures. Naturally, the transfer methods will remain confidential, but the documents should be unveiled soon,' Khatib said. He described the volume as 'talking of thousands of documents would be an understatement'. 'The sheer volume of the materials and the need to securely transfer the entire shipment into the country necessitated a period of media silence,' state broadcaster IRIB reported, citing sources, and adding that the documents had reached 'secure locations'.The latest development comes as part of a broader campaign of covert operations that Iran and Israel have waged against each other for years. While Tehran has accused Tel Aviv of assassinating its nuclear scientists, Israel has blamed Iran for supporting armed groups across the region that target its interests. Iran and Israel exchanged limited strikes in April 2024 after Iran retaliated for Israel's bombing of its embassy in Syria's Damascus, but a war was avoided. Recently, the United States Donald Trump administration has told Israel to stand down on any plans to attack Iranian nuclear sites as negotiations between Washington and Tehran are ongoing. There is also a sharp focus on Iran's nuclear programme following a report last week by the United Nations nuclear watchdog that said Tehran had carried out secret nuclear activities. Iran will likely face censure this week from the Board of Governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency over these questions about its programme. While Iran has denied wanting to create or have nuclear weapons, it has insisted that it intends to develop nuclear technology for peaceful, civilian purposes. That is a key sticking point in the concurrent Iran-US indirect talks, several rounds of which have been held in Oman and Italy about a possible nuclear deal aimed at resolving a decades-long dispute over its nuclear ambitions. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday that the current US proposal to abandon its uranium enrichment programme was '100 percent against our interests'. 'The rude and arrogant leaders of America repeatedly demand that we should not have a nuclear programme. Who are you to decide whether Iran should have enrichment?' he said, without mentioning stopping the ongoing talks. Iran's parliament speaker said on Sunday that the latest US proposal for a nuclear deal does not include the lifting of sanctions, state media reported, suggesting negotiations may have hit an impasse.

Afghans who helped US war effort feel betrayed by Trump's travel ban
Afghans who helped US war effort feel betrayed by Trump's travel ban

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Afghans who helped US war effort feel betrayed by Trump's travel ban

When President Donald Trump issued a proclamation last week blocking nationals from Afghanistan and 11 other countries from traveling to the United States, it added to the fear, uncertainty and sense of betrayal that some vulnerable Afghans were already feeling. There are a number of immigration pathways for Afghans to come to the US, but practically all of them have been impacted during the Trump administration. Thousands of Afghans have already been left in limbo by cuts to services and offices intended to help them apply for visas. Those who qualify for refugee status have been affected by the almost total shutdown of resettlement efforts. Others already living in the US under Temporary Protected Status may now have to leave as the administration announced it is ending that program. Wednesday's travel ban does provide an exception for people with Afghan Special Immigrant Visas, or SIVs, which are reserved for those who worked for or on behalf of the US for at least a year during the country's nearly two decades of war in Afghanistan. But scores of others who helped the US do not necessarily qualify for SIVs, advocates say. Some may not meet the one-year employment requirement, for example, or do not technically meet the definition of having worked directly for, or on behalf of, the US government. They and others like family members with any affiliation to the US remain at risk of reprisal. Advocates have welcomed the SIV carveout, but many note that in practice, it does very little because of the administration's other cuts and policy changes. 'The issue with that exception is that it is sort of a straw man, because separately, under different auspices, the administration is dismantling the Office of the Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts. They're shutting that office down by July 1,' said a former State Department official. The State Department has told Congress in a notice that the Office of the Coordinator for Afghan Relocation Efforts 'will be eliminated and its functions will be realigned to the Afghanistan Affairs Office.' The former State Department official also noted the administration is ending Enduring Welcome, a program that helps Afghan SIV recipients and applicants get to a third country to finish immigration processing. Because the US does not have a diplomatic presence in Afghanistan, applicants must complete their visa interviews in another country. 'It sounds nice that there's a carveout for SIVs and we need to have a carveout for SIVs, but we also need the supporting infrastructure to help them get here and begin a life in the United States,' said retired Lt. Gen John Bradley, who founded the Lamia Afghan Foundation, which provides humanitarian aid in Afghanistan. The State Department did not immediately reply to a CNN request for comment Afghans who received SIVs and spoke with CNN said they still have family members and friends in Afghanistan or third countries like Pakistan – which has returned hundreds of thousands of refugees to Afghanistan, according to the United Nations. 'There are some obviously just tragic cases of folks that had to flee the Taliban and had to leave family members behind, and so it's really important that those SIVs are able to reunite with their spouses and children,' said Andrew Sullivan, the executive director of No One Left Behind, a charity that supports former interpreters and US government employees who are eligible for Iraqi and Afghan SIVs. Although immediate family members should fall under the SIV carveout, many SIV holders who spoke to CNN still expressed confusion and fear about whether the fate of their loved ones who remain in limbo will be affected by Trump's proclamation. Advocates noted that although organizations are trying to explain the ban's impact, it is likely not fully understood on the ground. 'Frankly, our immigration system, while it is working as it was designed, it is designed to be confusing, and so people aren't sure what this travel ban means for their particular type of case,' the former State Department official said. One Afghan, who said he worked alongside US forces in Afghanistan and is a US service member, has been trying to bring family members to the US since Afghanistan fell back under Taliban rule in 2021. CNN is calling him H. — he and others in this story spoke anonymously for fear of retribution for their loved ones. H. said it's not clear whether the travel ban impacts his younger brother, who does not qualify for an SIV and fears for his children and wife under the harsh repression of the Taliban. 'I wouldn't even know what this travel ban means and how this is going to affect people,' H. said. H. said his brother is no longer concerned about himself, but wants his wife and daughter to be able to lead a normal life by being able to go to school and out in public. The Taliban has increasingly excluded women from public life, imposing a swathe of draconian laws since it regained power. Zia Ghafoori, a former interpreter who now heads the Interpreting Freedom Foundation, which helps interpreters with the SIV process and US resettlement, called the administration's moves a betrayal. 'I voted for our new administration, for our president, Donald J. Trump,' said Ghafoori, who was recognized by Trump in remarks at a Medal of Honor ceremony in 2019, 'and I was super happy that now we could able to help our veterans and our allies because most of those high-ranking officials have been deployed to Afghanistan, and they have seen our Afghan partner services that they provided for them.' 'There was a lot of happiness on our allies' faces when they took over, they thought they will make it to the US. But unfortunately, that's opposite, and every month or two, we are putting a different policy and different rule for each status of Afghan holders,' Ghafoori said, noting that many of his former comrades still in Afghanistan or Pakistan have lost hope. Another Afghan in the US, who CNN is calling M., said it's also unclear what the ban means for his family still in Afghanistan because his own future feels up in the air. He qualified for entry to the US under a number of categories, having worked for the US during the war. But he came to the US under the Fulbright Program and his SIV visa was approved after he arrived. He has now applied for a green card, but he doesn't know its status. He is hopeful that once he has his green card, his wife and daughter will be able to join him despite the travel ban. He has yet to meet his almost-4-year-old daughter, as his departure from Afghanistan was accelerated as its government collapsed in August 2021. 'They booked my flight on the 15th (of August 2021),' he said. 'My baby girl was born on the 19th, and I've not seen her.' Even if someone has an SIV and can get on a flight (some private organizations have stepped in to pay for them), there are concerns that the ban will be mistakenly applied to them. The travel ban goes into effect on Monday. According to guidance sent by the State Department to its diplomatic posts, the ban does not affect existing visas. Anna Lloyd, who runs Task Force Argo, a volunteer group that worked to evacuate thousands of Americans and Afghans when the Taliban took over, said organizations will be carefully waiting to see whether the exceptions are honored when the ban goes into effect. 'Whichever Afghan ally arrives at a port of entry on June 10, we are all going to be watching,' Lloyd said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store