UN commission finds violence against Syria Alawites likely included 'war crimes' - Region
The violence in March unfolded along Syria's predominantly Alawite Mediterranean coast, where security personnel and their allies were accused of carrying out summary executions, mostly targeting civilians from the religious minority, with a war monitor saying more than 1,700 people were killed.
The UN commission said in its report Thursday that the violence committed by "members of the interim government forces and private individuals operating alongside or in proximity to them... followed a systematic pattern across multiple, widespread locations".
"The violations included acts that likely amount to war crimes," it said.
The commission documented cases of "murder, torture and inhumane acts related to the treatment of the dead, widespread looting and burning of homes all of which displaced tens of thousands of civilians".
Syria's new authorities have accused gunmen loyal to ousted ruler Bashar al-Assad of instigating the violence by launching deadly attacks that killed dozens of security personnel. The UN commission also found that pro-Assad forces were implicated in the violence.
Around 200,000 pro-government military reinforcements converged on the area, according to Damascus.
Human rights groups and international organisations have said entire families were killed, including women, children and the elderly.
Gunmen stormed homes and asked residents whether they were Alawite or Sunni before killing or sparing them, they said.
The UN commission documented similar cases in which men were "identified as belonging to the Alawi sect and then separated from the women and children before being led outside to be shot".
'Deeply disturbing'
During his rule, Assad -- who is himself an Alawite -- had cultivated an image as a defender of minorities, even as his authoritarian tendencies plunged the country into civil war.
Since his December ouster at the hands of Islamist-led rebels, violations like those on the coast have raised questions about the new authorities' ability to provide security and manage sectarian tensions.
The UN commission -- which said it had been granted "unfettered access" to the area by the post-Assad government -- based its findings on more than 200 interviews with victims and witnesses.
It said there were "reasonable grounds to believe" that members of the security forces and other private individuals engaged in "serious violations of international human rights law".
"The scale and brutality of the violence documented in our report is deeply disturbing," said commission chair Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, urging the government to hold those responsible to account.
"While dozens of alleged perpetrators of violations have reportedly since been arrested, the scale of the violence documented in our report warrants expanding such efforts."
The commission said it "continues to receive information about ongoing violations in many of the affected areas, including abductions of women, arbitrary arrests and enforced disappearances".
It said it had "found no evidence of a governmental policy or plan to carry out such attacks", though their systematic nature "in certain locations may be indicative of an organisational policy within certain factions or groups".
Commissioner Lynn Welchman called for greater protections for affected communities, as well as screening processes to keep perpetrators out of the ranks of the security forces.
In its own inquiry, a Syrian committee formed by the authorities documented "serious violations against civilians on March 7, 8 and 9, including murder, premeditated murder, looting, destruction and burning of homes, torture and sectarian insults", according to a report released last month.
The committee confirmed "the names of 1,426 dead, including 90 women", and identified "298 individuals by name" who were suspected of involvement in the violations.
Follow us on:
Short link:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East
18 hours ago
- Middle East
OPEN// Egypt strongly condemns Israeli plan for 3,400 settlement units in West Bank
CAIRO, Aug 14 (MENA) - Egypt has strongly condemned Israel's approval of plans to build 3,400 settlement units around occupied Al-Quds (East Jerusalem) describing the move as a fresh indication of the Israeli government's insistence on expanding land seizures and altering the demographic makeup of the territories it occupies, in flagrant violation of international law, relevant United Nations (UN) Security Council resolutions, and international conventions. In a statement Thursday, the Foreign Ministry denounced extremist remarks by the Israeli finance minister advocating the imposition of Israeli sovereignty and settlement expansion in the West Bank, calling them an alarming sign of 'Israeli arrogance and extremism' that would not deliver security or stability for the region, including Israel, without meeting the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people. Egypt reiterated its categorical rejection of such settlement policies and inflammatory statements by Israeli officials, warning that they fuel hatred, extremism and violence. Cairo also cautioned Israel against delusional beliefs that the Palestinian cause could be erased or that the so-called 'Greater Israel' project would be realized, stressing this is neither acceptable nor permissible. The statement said Israel's expansionist agenda runs counter to intensive regional and international efforts to achieve a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in the Middle East, adding that any attempts to displace Palestinians, confiscate their land, or expand settlements are doomed to fail. There is no alternative to a two-state solution and the establishment of a Palestinian state under international law and UN resolutions, the statement read warning that Israel's persistence in rejecting peace and pursuing extremist policies remains the main driver of instability in the region. (MENA) M S H/S A S
Egypt Independent
a day ago
- Egypt Independent
Here's what Putin really wants from Trump – and it's not peace in Ukraine
Anchorage, Alaska — Alaska is unlikely to have been on many peoples' bingo cards as the venue for a key summit between the leaders of the United States and Russia. Yet America's biggest, remotest state is where Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are now set to meet for one of the most potentially consequential encounters of their presidencies. That's certainly the view from Moscow, where pro-Kremlin propagandists are already flushed with anticipation at the benefits this much-anticipated face-to-face meeting will deliver. Or, more specifically, will deliver for Putin. Firstly, the fact a summit with the US president is being held at all is a massive win for the Kremlin. 'No one is talking about Russia's international isolation anymore, or about our strategic defeat,' wrote Alexander Kots, a prominent pro-Kremlin military blogger on his popular social media channel. He added that the Alaska meeting had 'every chance to become historic.' He may be right. A presidential summit allows Putin to be seen back at the top table of international diplomacy, while thumbing his nose at critics and nations who want him shunned if not arrested on charges of war crimes in Ukraine. And a summit in the US state of Alaska, of all places, is red meat to resurgent Russian nationalists who still bluster about the territory being rightfully theirs. Just across the Bering Strait from the Chukotka region in the Russian Far East, Alaska was once a remote possession of the Russian Empire before being sold to the United States in 1867 for what was, even then, a paltry sum of $7.2 million, about 2 cents an acre. The idea that Moscow got a raw deal still lingers and a visit to 'our Alaska,' as one prominent Russian state TV host dubbed it, bolsters Putin's nationalist credentials. Video clips of Trump misspeaking at a White House news conference ahead of the summit, saying he was going to 'Russia' to meet Putin, have also been trending on Russian social media with captions saying the US president had finally 'admitted it is ours.' For the rest of the world, though, the sole focus of this presidential summit is the war in Ukraine and whether Russia is prepared to make any concessions to end it. The White House has said Trump expects to focus squarely on ending the war in Ukraine, leaving other issues Moscow has said could be up for discussion for another time. A US Air Force plane takes off on July 22 from Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, the venue for a summit between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin on Friday. Airman 1st Class Eli A. Rose/Alamy On Wednesday, Trump promised 'very severe consequences' if Putin doesn't agree to end his war, following a call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders. But so far there's been little sign of real compromise from the Kremlin, which regards itself as having the upper hand on the grinding Ukrainian battlefield. As recently as last month, on a phone call with Trump, Putin reportedly reiterated that Russia would 'continue to pursue its goals to address the root causes' of the conflict in Ukraine – these 'root causes' having previously included long-held Russian grievances that include Ukraine's existence as a sovereign state, and NATO's eastward expansion since the end of the Cold War. On Wednesday, a Russian foreign ministry spokesman said the country's position on Ukraine was 'unchanged,' state media reported. More likely, Putin is up to something else. Details have emerged of a Russian peace offer reportedly made to US presidential envoy, Steve Witkoff, before the Alaska summit was hastily arranged. In essence, the proposals involve Kyiv surrendering territory in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine, in exchange for a ceasefire, an idea the Ukrainian leadership has firmly ruled out. 'I am not going to surrender my country because I have no right to do so,' said Zelensky ahead of the summit, which he was not invited to. 'If we leave Donbas today, our fortifications, our terrain, the heights we control, we will clearly open a bridgehead for the preparation of a Russian offensive.' But Trump, who is expected to discuss the idea with Putin in Alaska, appears to like the sound of a land-for-peace deal, even one so unpalatable to Ukraine and its European partners. That clear difference of opinion represents an opportunity for Putin to portray the Ukrainians and the Europeans – not Russia – as the real obstacle to peace, potentially undermining Trump's already shaky support for the Ukrainian war effort. Trump has lost patience with Zelensky before, the Kremlin will have noted, and may do so again. If he were to cut off the remaining US military aid and intelligence sharing with Kyiv, Ukraine would struggle to continue its fight even with bolstered European support. Ahead of the summit, the White House appeared to downplay expectations of a peace deal, characterizing the high-stakes meeting as a 'listening exercise.' That may suit Putin just fine. Top Kremlin economic envoy Kirill Dmitriev, pictured ahead of a meeting with a US delegation in Saudi Arabia in February, is one of those traveling to Alaska for the summit. Hamad I Mohammed/Reuters It was, after all, the Kremlin who solicited the summit, according to the White House – possibly as a way of heading off a threat of US tariffs and secondary sanctions that Trump said would kick in last week. Keeping Trump talking may be an effective way of pushing back that deadline indefinitely. More broadly, Putin sees a unique opportunity with Trump to fundamentally reset relations with Washington, and separate Russian ties with the US from the fate of Ukraine, a scenario that would also divide the Western allies. For months, Kremlin officials have been talking up possibilities for economic, technological and space cooperation with the US, as well as lucrative deals on infrastructure and energy in the Arctic and elsewhere. The fact the Kremlin's top economic envoy, Kirill Dmitriev – a key interlocutor with the Trump administration – is part of the Russian delegation to Alaska suggests that more talk of US-Russian deal-making will be on the agenda. And, if Putin gets his way in this summit, the 'Ukraine question' may find itself relegated to just one of many talking points between the powerful leaders of two great powers – and not even the most pressing one.
Al-Ahram Weekly
a day ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
NGOs warn Israeli restrictions choke Gaza aid
More than 100 international aid groups have warned that new Israeli restrictions are increasingly being used to block their requests to deliver supplies into Gaza, risking the shutdown of most humanitarian operations in the territory within weeks, according to a joint letter published Thursday. "Israeli authorities have rejected requests from dozens of NGOs to bring in lifesaving goods, citing that these organisations are 'not authorised to deliver aid'," the joint statement reads, as reported by AFP. According to the letter, whose signatories include Oxfam and Doctors Without Borders (MSF), at least 60 requests to bring aid into Gaza were rejected in July alone. In March, Israel's government approved a new set of restrictions for foreign non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working with Palestinians. The law updates the framework for how aid groups must register to maintain their status within Israel, along with provisions that outline how their applications can be denied or registration revoked. Registration can be rejected if Israeli occupation authorities deem that a group denies the allegedly "democratic character" of Israel or "promotes delegitimisation campaigns" against the country. Aid groups say that the new rules are leaving Gazans without help. "Our mandate is to save lives, but due to the registration restrictions civilians are being left without the food, medicine and protection they urgently need," said Jolien Veldwijk, director of the charity CARE in the Palestinian territories. Veldwijk said that CARE has not been able to deliver any aid to Gaza since Israel imposed a full blockade on the Palestinian territory in March, despite partially easing it in May. Last week, the UN called for the Israeli authorities to rescind its requirement introduced on 9 March obliging NGOs to share 'sensitive personal information about their Palestinian employees or face termination of their humanitarian operations in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem,' In a joint statement, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and the Humanitarian Country Team — a coordination body of UN entities and over 200 international and local NGOs —warned against Israeli plans to de-register many international NGO partners working in the occupied Palestinian territories in the coming weeks for refusing to provide personal information about their Palestinian employees. 'Unless urgent action is taken, humanitarian organisations warn that most international NGO partners could be de-registered by 9 September or sooner, forcing them to withdraw all international staff and preventing them from providing critical, life-saving humanitarian assistance to Palestinians,' the statement read. Since May, the Israeli government has relied on the US-Israeli so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) to manage food distribution centres. However, the GHF operations have been frequently marred by chaos and bloodshed as thousands of Gazans have scrambled each day to approach its hubs, where at least 1,700 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli soldiers. The United Nations and international aid organisations have warned that famine was unfolding in Gaza as more than 193 Palestinians, including more than 100 children, died of hunger because of a five-month-old Israeli blockade on the strip. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
