NZCCC Ngā Rau Hotu Supports Calls For Urgent Review Of Funeral Costs
NZCCC Ng Rau Hotu echoes FDANZs call for the Work and Income funeral grant to be urgently reviewed and adjusted for inflation.
NZCCC Ngā Rau Hotu (the New Zealand Cemeteries and Crematoria Collective) supports the recent media release from the Funeral Directors Association of New Zealand (FDANZ) regarding funeral affordability and the need for urgent legislative reform.
Acting Chair Daniel Chrisp says the conversation about funeral costs needs to address the real issues.
'Reducing paperwork for cremations won't lower funeral prices. Many funeral homes already offer affordable direct cremation services from $3,000 or less. Families can also choose to arrange a cremation directly with a council-run crematorium, and many of our member councils are able to guide families through that process. Its important people know they have choices, though this can mean more to organise, like a casket and transport.'
NZCCC Ngā Rau Hotu echoes FDANZ's call for the Work and Income funeral grant to be urgently reviewed and adjusted for inflation. 'The grant hasn't kept pace with rising costs. It needs a market review to ensure it actually supports those who need it most,' says Chrisp.
NZCCC encourages and supports revision of the current government subsidies available for families and agrees that 'Fixing the paperwork' is not the answer to the problem. We support further development of transparency of Pricing and Service options amongst Funeral Providers and Councils so families can make an informed decisions in their time of grief.
The Collective also calls on the Government to prioritise a full review of the outdated Burial and Cremation Act 1964.
'Small tweaks won't fix a system that was recommended for an overhaul years ago. It's time to bring this legislation into modern times,' says Chrisp.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
4 days ago
- The Spinoff
Ten things we could do to better support people into work
A good welfare system should provide a steady stream of highly qualified staff, generated by investing in people at a crucial moment in their lives. This is how Work and Income could better serve the needs of jobseekers and businesses alike. During the nine months I recently spent researching our welfare-to-work system, one contrast jumped out at me. I'd heard an interviewee describing how her 40-year-old brother, a 'typical' Samoan Kiwi, was working as a builder in Norway; despite needing a major operation, he'd wanted to carry on his hard, physical labour. The Norwegian equivalent of Work and Income, however, felt he should be contemplating another career. Having taken the time to deeply understand his background, skills and leadership qualities, they concluded he'd make an excellent teacher – and they'd pay him to retrain. When, by contrast, I sat down with a group of beneficiaries in Nelson, I listened to a 60-year-old woman, previously a cleaner, talk about her dodgy knees and how she was no longer able to clean at the pace demanded by commercial firms. So what kind of employment did Work and Income keep pushing her way? Cleaning jobs, of course. There could be no starker contrast between, on the one hand, a system willing to spend money upfront to build a more highly skilled workforce, and, on the other, a system that takes someone's CV as their destiny and pushes them into the first available job, regardless of suitability. I heard these stories as part of the first research project carried out by the Institute for Democratic and Economic Analysis (Idea), a thinktank I helped launch last year. Improved living standards are a central focus for us, and we'd identified the welfare-to-work transition as a crucial – and neglected – area of policy. One thing we quickly learned is that the Work and Income system doesn't serve businesses' needs any more than it serves those of jobseekers. When Work and Income doesn't screen beneficiaries for their suitability for a position, businesses just spend precious hours interviewing individuals without the required aptitude or desire. Meanwhile jobseekers' potential is left untapped. Even when they find work, it is often wildly out of line with their skills: between one-third and half of the workforce experience serious skills mismatches, with all the attendant problems that creates for productivity. Such issues are especially relevant right now, as unemployment rises and people flock to Australia. When jobs are scarce, we should be investing massively in vocational education and mid-career retraining, both to give people reasons to remain here and to fit them for the positions that will appear when the economy recovers. We should also provide all the other support – wraparound physical and mental health services, wage subsidies, even temporary public-sector job creation – that can help people move from welfare into paid employment, where that's the right thing for them at that point in their lives. Idea's report on this issue, launched last week, is called The Pipeline of Potential because that's what the welfare system should provide: a steady stream of highly qualified staff, generated by investing in people at a crucial moment in their lives. Below are 10 key ways to make that happen. 1. Raise our game on spending. New Zealand currently spends half the developed-country average on supportive welfare-to-work schemes, known technically as active labour-market policies. Other countries spend more, and reap the rewards: people who get high-quality training, wraparound health services and other such support are significantly more likely to find employment and earn more. They also pay more tax and require less benefit spending. 2. Get to know jobseekers properly. Case managers need to deeply understand jobseekers' history, skills, aspirations and needs, as a prelude to building them a tailored job plan. Although it gets crowded out by the focus on sanctions, the government is taking steps in this direction – even if Work and Income caseloads (and attitudes) remain a stumbling block. 3. Reduce case managers' workloads. The typical Work and Income case manager, tasked with helping people move into paid employment, has a caseload of 110 jobseekers, implying they can give each one an average of 20 minutes' attention each week. Providing tailored welfare-to-work support is, at those ratios, extremely difficult. 4. Set new targets. In the absence of other mandated goals, the government's target to get 50,000 people off Jobseeker Support can reinforce the 'any job is a good job' mentality described above. It needs to be balanced with meaningful targets to provide high-quality training and match the right person to the right job. 5. Connect companies and people. The employer-jobseeker relationship should be at the heart of the welfare-to-work system. Work and Income offices need to better understand what local employers are looking for, and equip jobseekers with those skills and attributes. 6. Provide more holistic support. In 12 of 19 health districts, people can access something called Individual Placement Support (IPS), a highly successful scheme that embeds employment specialists in community mental health teams, so individuals can get both kinds of help at once. IPS participants earn over $4,000 a year more than comparable non-participants. The scheme could be rolled out to the rest of the country for as little as $10 million a year. 7. Help jobseekers support each other. Several European nations have had great success with 'launching pad' schemes that bring groups of jobseekers together, under the supervision of a trained job coach, to share life lessons, build self-esteem and develop plans for training, employment and entrepreneurship. By breaking down the isolation many jobseekers experience, and creating a supportive environment for skills-building, such schemes generate dramatic increases in employment. 8. Prevent workforce churn. Of the people who leave benefits, just 40% are still in employment 18 months later. We need a greater focus on matching people to the right job, more post-placement support for those new to the workforce, and a push to eliminate the worst forms of low-paid and precarious work. 9. Support people through redundancy. In mass redundancy situations, which may become more common owing to climate change and AI, trusted locals should be employed to help the affected people find new work. Employers and unions should also be funded to upskill staff ahead of such disruption. 10. Introduce a circuit-breaker job guarantee. Building on successful overseas models, New Zealand should offer a year-long job placement to any young person at risk of long-term unemployment. This would involve the government creating temporary jobs or paying for placements in firms, NGOs and local councils. By boosting people's CVs, work habits and skills, and making a powerful statement that the government has their back, such schemes overseas have significantly lifted permanent private-sector employment for the under-25s.
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
Older people struggling to find and keep employment
New data shows growing ageism in Australia with 25 percent of employers classifying over-50s as being older, while only 10 percent thought so two years ago. Photo: RNZ Sue has decades of experience in law and engineering. She is competent and can solve complex problems. But when she was out of work last year, she was applying for half a dozen jobs every day for four months. But she had no luck. Now 66, Sue thinks her age was the problem , and she has reason to believe so. "I got one response. She phoned me up from Australia and asked me over the phone: 'I need to verify your age.' And when she found out what age I was, that was it." Sue came back to New Zealand in 2020. It was during the Covid pandemic and she felt safer to be home. However, other than a few contracts Sue landed through a connection, she had no luck anywhere else. Sue did not want to give her last name because she does not want her client to know her age made job hunting so hard. "I think everybody brings something unique to a job and maybe people think that because you are older that you're going to be slow or maybe you can't use technology or maybe you want too much money. "But those are all assumptions. The guiding principle is that assume makes an ass of you and me." New data shows growing ageism in Australia with 25 percent of employers classifying over-50s as being older, while only 10 percent thought so two years ago. People like Sue think it is not much different in New Zealand. Yvonne Weeber is now 64. For the last 20 years she has removed anything on her CV that may give away her age. "As soon as you start getting into your 50s, even in your late 40s, people start looking at you and wonder why you haven't become a manager. For me it was more about I enjoyed the role I was in. I do enjoy leadership skills but it's not my main thing." Weeber said she spent her entire working life specialising in one field, but decided to change her career path in 2021 after a six-month redundancy. She said it is often perceived that older people are incapable of learning new things. But that was not true. While it took her some time to learn the new systems and ways of doing work, she ended up doing quite well. "Initially I thought if this doesn't work out I'd need to start looking for other jobs, and at one stage I was. And then I thought actually I really enjoy what I'm doing, I started to see ways of actually improving things and getting things to work better." Employment lawyer Jills Angus Burney said ageism not only affected those who were job hunting - older people were often affected during restructures . "Some of those people are not eligible for the pension, they've got to stand down for weeks and weeks to get the unemployment benefit and they're competing with other people to try and get another job. And they've got to keep looking for work because otherwise they're questioned by Work and Income as to whether they're entitled to get an unemployment benefit. It's catch 22." Employment lawyer Jills Angus Burney. Photo: supplied Angus Burney said over the last 18 months, she had been seeing more cases of older people being made redundant through improper processes. Since 2022, unemployment rate for those age groups over 45 had been increasing steadily. Those between the ages of 55-64 historically saw a lower unemployment rate than those aged 45-54, but this had changed over the last two years. Unemployment among over-65s had now risen to above 2 percent for the first time since September 1993. So, is it fair for employers to consider personal circumstances like age when making redundancy decisions? "You can't discriminate in employment law. You can't discriminate on the basis of age or whether someone's got three kids or not, or whether someone's got grown up kids, or got grandchildren. You can't take into account someone's personal situation. And if you're releasing people based on qualifications, you got to show how you reached that position. You've got to be transparent." Grey Power national president Gayle Chambers said redundancy did not get easier as you aged. She said even for people who retired at 65, many of them still had mortgages to pay. "Quite often people are still not mortgage-free when they leave work, and I know of one man in his 80s who still had a mortgage , quite a high mortgage actually." And competing for jobs was not getting easier either. "As far as getting a job is concerned, it is definitely a lot harder for older people to get positions of any note. They will be employed in the likes of supermarkets and as motel cleaners, rather than jobs of administrators or an lawyer's office." She calls for employers to think about what they are loosing to ageism. "If you've got a loyal employee who is still giving the same degree of competency to their job, they should not be discriminated against because of their age, because those people, when they leave a job, maybe they've been there, 10 or 20 years, you've lost all that knowledge." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
The Spinoff
10-06-2025
- The Spinoff
High cost of dying under scrutiny as MPs call for change
A new select committee report confirms what many already know: funerals in New Zealand are often too expensive and reform is long overdue, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. The high cost of dying in New Zealand is once again in the spotlight, following the release of a health select committee report examining cremation costs and broader funeral affordability. Triggered by a submission from advocacy group Death Without Debt (DWD), the report found that current funeral regulations impose unnecessary expenses and are outdated and difficult to navigate. 'We consider that the current process and regulations impose high costs on the public and create a barrier for people who want to organise their own funerals, particularly when their loved ones are about to be cremated,' the report concluded. The Ministry of Health has committed to reviewing the cremation regulations this year. A nation where dying costs too much New Zealand is one of the most expensive countries in the world in which to die, with funerals starting at around $7,500 for cremation and $10,000 for burial, although they can often cost a lot more, especially when venue hire and catering is included. DWD founder Fergus Wheeler blames the entrenched role of funeral directors, saying families are routinely steered into expensive packages when cheaper, simpler options exist. He argues that with minor changes to online death certification systems, families could bypass funeral directors for cremation approvals, saving themselves hundreds of dollars. The Funeral Directors Association of New Zealand (FDANZ), which represents 75% of the industry, has pushed back against what it called 'allegations of predatory behaviour', RNZ's Kate Green reports. FDANZ says staffing, compliance and property costs are the real factors behind the cost to consumers. But in its submission to the select committee, it agreed reform was needed – particularly a requirement for more transparent pricing and increases in financial aid for those unable to pay. The cost of farewell and the gap in support The issue of funeral affordability has been widely covered in The Spinoff's annual Death Week series, including a 2023 piece by Stewart Sowman-Lund that highlighted the financial stress many families face when a loved one dies. Like everything else to do with money, the poorest among us tend to suffer most, given that the Work and Income funeral grant is just $2,445 – far less than even the cheapest funeral service available. FDANZ chief executive Gillian Boyes is calling for an increase to the grant, along with a lift in the $10,000 asset-testing cap that applies to prepaid funerals, to allow elderly people to set aside more realistic sums before they enter subsidised long-term residential care. She told RNZ's Victor Waters that the government needs to 'provide better support for families, provide clearer rules around funerals, and just help the industry out. But, you know, just changing paperwork is not going to fix funeral debt.' Flameless cremation arrives in NZ As calls grow to reduce funeral costs, alternatives are emerging. One is water cremation, or alkaline hydrolysis, available for the first time in Christchurch. This morning in The Spinoff, Alex Casey reports on the inaugural NZ use of the method, which uses water and alkaline solution to dissolve remains, resulting in 90% less environmental impact than flame cremation. While its main draw is sustainability, it's also slightly cheaper than standard cremation and doesn't require a casket. The arrival of water cremation adds to a growing menu of alternatives, from eco-caskets to DIY funerals. Both the Funeral Directors Association's Boyes and Dying Without Debt's Wheeler, who holds regular public seminars on DIY funerals, say they have been frustrated by bureaucratic inaction on giving people more choice in how they farewell their loved ones. Even if water cremations remain a niche option, their arrival helps bring the prospect of cheaper, more personalised funerals a step closer for everyone. More from The Spinoff:
