Israeli president denies pursuing regime change in Iran — goal is to 'remove' nuclear program
Israeli President Isaac Herzog said Wednesday that his country was not pursuing regime change in Iran, and its attack on Tehran was aimed at eliminating its nuclear capabilities.
Speaking to CNBC's Dan Murphy, Herzog said that regime change was "not an official objective of ours," and the goal was "to remove the Iranian nuclear program."
Herzog, who accused Teheran of "cheating" and "rushing to the bomb," added that a "change in [regime] can also bring peace in the region."
The International Atomic Energy Agency in a statement on June 9 urged Iran to "fully cooperate" with the agency, or else it would "not be in a position to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful."
On June 13, Israel launched a series of airstrikes against Iran, targeting locations it said were related to the country's nuclear program. Both sides have since been trading strikes.
"One has to be tough sometimes in order to remove imminent threats. That's exactly what we're doing," Herzog told CNBC, adding that the strikes on Iran have had a genuine impact on its nuclear program.
U.S. president Donald Trump reportedly said on Wednesday that Iran was "very close" to having a nuclear bomb, putting him at odds with the testimony of his National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard gave to the U.S. Congress in March. "The IC [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003," Gabbard said.
Earlier this week, the Group of Seven countries expressed support for Israel, while condemning Iran as "the principal source of regional instability and terror," and reiterated that "Iran can never have a nuclear weapon."
This was in contrast to China's stance. In the aftermath of the Israeli attack, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said that Beijing "explicitly condemns Israel's violation of Iran's sovereignty," and said that it supports Iran in "safeguarding its national sovereignty and defending its legitimate rights and interests."
When asked if there was a diplomatic ramp off available to de-escalate the situation, Herzog said "there is actually a lot of back channel. National talks and dialogue with world leaders is actually quite intensive."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
32 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's rebuke of MAGA isolationists is smart foreign policy. We must stop Iran.
Trump's rebuke of MAGA isolationists is smart foreign policy. We must stop Iran. | Opinion Trump's approach to the Middle East has been very competent. He has stood by Israel, continued to position the United States against Iran, and has not taken American military action off the table. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump teases possible strike on Iran but says it's not too late for deal "I may do it. I may not do it." President Trump teased a possible strike on Iran but also said it is not too late to negotiate. President Trump rebuked Tucker Carlson's isolationist stance on the Middle East. Trump remains firm on preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Trump's actions have distanced him from isolationist figures like Carlson and Gabbard. President Donald Trump on June 16 called out fired Fox News host Tucker Carlson by his new nickname, 'kooky Tucker Carlson,' who has called Trump "complicit" in Israel's strikes against Iran. Trump also emphasized that 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' Carlson represents a faction on the right that is against American involvement in the Middle East, regardless of our interests. Despite his rhetorical embrace of these voices during his third presidential campaign, Trump's approach to the Middle East has been very competent. He has stood by Israel, continued to position the United States against Iran and has not taken American military action off the table. One of my chief concerns about a second Trump presidency was that he was embracing voices like Carlson and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. But Trump's latest rebuke of the isolationist right is a welcome turn of events, and it improves my view of him as president. Opinion: Israel's successful attack on Iran is proof American support is worth the money Trump's stances on Iran have been commendable Trump has been unwavering in his stance that Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon, and he has held the line against any compromise that allows them to enrich uranium. While he initially pushed for a diplomatic resolution, it is clear that Iranian leaders will not willingly sign a deal that prevents their continued enrichment programs. Whether Trump signed off on the Israeli strikes or not remains up for debate, but Trump has had no problem taking credit regardless and has said it's almost too late for negotiation. Opinion: Trump must back Israel against Iran. 'Kooky' Carlson is wrong about nuclear threat. Trump's approach to Israel in his second term has been nothing short of stellar, and the fact that he has been consistent on this issue is rather remarkable considering how he has changed his mind in so many other areas. Trump's willingness to keep all options on the table in the Middle East marks a parting of ways from the isolationists who helped to shape his reelection campaign. MAGA isolationists got played by Trump's 'America First' approach The isolationist right thought they had a hero in Trump, but they really just fell for a campaign strategy. Isolationists thought they could mold Trump into their dream candidate, one who lets the happenings of the world go on without American intervention, regardless of our interests in the matter. They were wrong. Many chalked up Trump's first term peace-through-strength foreign policy to the establishment Republicans advising him, and thought that his America First movement could be co-opted to meet their isolationist dream. It turns out that Trump still understands the value of America's influence abroad, at least in some regards. Carlson has been one of the chief skeptics of America's relationship with Israel on the right, often even dipping into the very antisemitic tactics that he used to denounce. Trump has been asked about Carlson plenty in recent days, and the president has been dismissive of his viewpoints. Another such figure is Gabbard, whose appointment to be the director of national intelligence rightfully worried conservatives. Gabbard recently has been warning that we are 'closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before' (which is ridiculous on its face), and suggesting that pro-interventionists are apparently fine with this because "they will have access to nuclear shelters for themselves and for their families.' This type of fearmongering represents nothing more than an effort to influence the Trump administration back into her camp. Trump also rejected some of Gabbard's assessments of the Iran situation, telling reporters that 'I don't care what she said, I think they were very close to having" an Iranian nuke. He continues to put American interests above the views of these fringe isolationist voices, and I am pleasantly surprised that he is. The isolationists do not have a true foreign policy ally in Trump. His second term has been reassuring to conservatives who feared the worst. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
Business Insider
38 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Surprise! You literally owe the tariffs
Kat Omecene thought she was keeping things simple by asking her bridesmaids to buy whatever dresses they wanted for her wedding — as long as it matched her color palette, of course. But now, one of the women is in quite an expensive bind. In April, the bridesmaid ordered two dresses from the online retailer Six Stories for $400. Neither quite worked, so she wound up returning the items for a refund and thought she was in the clear, out only a small restocking fee. A few weeks later, however, she got a bill in the mail from FedEx, for $600. "At first she thought it was a scam," Omecene says. "It looked like a scam to me." The bridesmaid hadn't realized at the time, but the dresses were originally from China — meaning they were subject to President Donald Trump 's tariffs on all imports from the country. It was particularly costly because the packages arrived in the US just before Trump reduced tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%. Omecene and her bridesmaid have confirmed the bill is actually from FedEx, and the seller has washed its hands of the situation despite her sending the dresses back, saying it's just a case of unfortunate timing. Plus, in the fine print, the seller's website says that any import duties are the customer's responsibility. Omecene is warning her other bridesmaids to be careful with their dress shopping, but the possibility of more tariff surprises around her wedding has her on edge. It's not always easy to tell where products are coming from or whether import duties are already factored in. "We're trying our best to keep a budget, but I feel like things like this make it a lot harder," she says. Many consumers are bracing for tariff-driven price increases. They've spent months expecting retail prices to creep up amid Trump's trade war. Some have even bid adieu to Shein and Temu, or at least have accepted that things from the Chinese e-commerce companies may take longer and come with a higher price tag. But by and large, people expected the tariff impact would be somewhat subtle. A dollar on top of the old price here, an extra fee there. For some consumers, however, tariff charges are slapping them in the face. Unexpected, steep import bills are landing on their doorsteps from logistics companies such as FedEx and UPS. The carriers have already paid the US government the import duties, and they're just passing along the bill — whether or not the seller alerted the buyer. Omecene's bridesmaid is trying to figure out what to do about the sizable FedEx invoice. When I ask Omecene whether she feels pressured to reimburse her bridesmaid for the snafu, she sighs. "If it was a bridesmaid other than my sister, 100% yes, but because she's my sister, a little bit less so, which is probably horrible," she says. "She might not agree with that." At the very least, perhaps it will eliminate the need for a wedding gift. From the consumer perspective, the e-commerce experience has gotten super seamless. A few clicks and voilà, a fun little treat (or three) arrives at the door in a matter of days, often shipped for free. The painless process makes it really easy to overlook the logistical hurdles involved, from labor to shipping to taxes — including import taxes, or as you may have heard them called recently: tariffs. But what was once an afterthought is becoming front of mind under Trump's trade regime. I've spoken to multiple consumers who say they've had to do a lot of thinking about tariffs, because they're getting hit directly with the bill. The existence of duties and tariffs isn't new. What's new for American consumers is that a lot more stuff is subject to duties, and the duties are higher. Casey Armstrong, chief marketing officer at ShipBob, a logistics and fulfillment company, explains that when consumers buy products from abroad, import duties and tariffs apply based on the declared value of the items and the type of items coming in. In many cases, the carrier pays the duties up front to get the package through customs and then bills the recipient afterward. This is called "delivery duty unpaid," or DDU (as opposed to "delivery duty paid," or DDP). It means the customer is responsible for import taxes and fees, the fees aren't included at checkout, and the carrier acts as a broker who pays customs up front and recoups the cost later, sometimes with additional fees for their trouble. The duties might still be owed even if the item is returned, because it technically was imported. "It usually catches people off guard," he says. Shoppers may not realize their package was shipped internationally, or the website looks local, or the retailer doesn't say at checkout whether duties and taxes are included. "Some shipments may be over-declared in value, leading to inflated duty calculations," he adds. Take Kevin Wood, who ordered a crypto wallet ring for about $160 from Tangem, a blockchain company headquartered in Switzerland. He placed the order in February, but the item was delayed, and it wound up arriving in May. Everything seemed good and fine, until a few weeks later when he got a nearly $250 bill from FedEx to cover the import costs. The seller hadn't mentioned tariffs when he placed the order, but despite Tangem being a Swiss company, the ring appears to have been manufactured in China. OK, but surely, he thought, FedEx wouldn't just drop an item off without clearing the extra charge — but that's not the case. He went as far as to reach out to Customs and Border Patrol, which said the situation seemed odd but confirmed the information on the bill tracks. FedEx said the bill's real. Tangem told him they'll look into it, but on their website, they state plainly that customers cover import costs. "I had no notification, because if I had known this thing was going to cost me $400 to get to my door, I would have rejected it," Wood says. "I'm just trying to chase down what's real and what's not." When Wood scrutinized the packaging, it looks like the order came just days before the Trump administration cut tariffs on China. "I'm kind of like, well, bad luck of the draw," he says. A spokesperson for Tangem said in an email that a small number of customers have reported similar issues and that they're investigating each case "closely." They said that as an act of goodwill, they are reimbursing customers hit by tariff charges. "I thought, 'UPS is charging me for what? Are they charging customers for delivery now?'" Amanda Ivanelli, a lifestyle influencer, went viral on TikTok in May after posting a video about getting a $1,243 invoice from FedEx after ordering a haul of dresses from online retailer ASOS. The original order was about $800, but she returned all of the dresses but one, which cost around $150. "I literally did not like any of them. They smelled really bad," she says. A number of media outlets picked up the incident. Ivanelli's comments section filled up with political vitriol, as people assumed she was a Trump voter who got what she had coming in the tariffs. All the attention wound up being fruitful. She's heard from multiple people who had the same experience. The money she made off the TikTok post's engagement was enough to pay the FedEx bill, and all the attention seems to have gotten FedEx's attention, too, because it forgave the charge. "We just kept calling back, and they were like, 'OK, well, one time, we never do this, but we'll waive it for you," Ivanelli says. It's not just FedEx that's passing along fees. One woman I spoke to for this story was able to head off a charge from UPS on an $850 bag she'd ordered from Lupo, based in Spain. Before she got the item, she received a text from UPS saying she owed $250 for the delivery. She thought it was fake, but then a UPS driver at her door told her she owed it, too. "I thought, 'UPS is charging me for what? Are they charging customers for delivery now?'" she says. She wound up refusing the shipment and is still waiting for the refund on her bag, minus return fees. Some consumers have begrudgingly gotten used to tariffs being the cost of doing business. Fernando Rivero recently bought his girlfriend a collectible Japanese figurine from an online shop based in China, and wasn't surprised when he got a bill for over $60 in "government charges" on top of $38 for "brokerage charges." He runs a side hustle helping small businesses set up their AI operations, which often entails sourcing hardware from China, so he knew that the extra costs were legit since he has passed on similar fees to his clients. Rivero has stopped making personal orders from China and is just waiting out the storm. It's really the brokerage fee that irks him, UPS's extra add-on for its service and expertise, which goes to the company's bottom line rather than offsetting the cost of tariffs. "That has to add up very quickly at the scale that UPS is operating at," he says. "I've never had to pay money to pay taxes." The people I spoke with for this story ordered from a website that suggested somewhere that customers would be responsible for any duties and taxes. In no case was the information obvious or easily available. Still, Armstrong says, people shouldn't necessarily be shocked — consumers in many countries outside the US are used to this because of their countries' trade regimes, and in cases where duties applied for US customers, this has long been happening, too. "People have been getting this beforehand, it's just with some of the changes recently, people are seeing it more commonly," he says. Sellers should tell customers up front and clearly that they will be on the hook for tariffs, but they're probably not going to get into any legal trouble if they don't. Given how chaotic all of Trump's trade actions have been, they might not even know themselves what import taxes will apply. Sebastian Vasquez, a customs broker at Omega CHB International in California, says that in many cases, the original seller, or "origins" in broker parlance, isn't really cluing in their customers to the shifting trade winds. "That's why people all of a sudden are like, 'Oh, I didn't know I had to pay that.' But it's like you kind of have to pay it now if you want to get your stuff," Vasquez says. "It is what it is." The combination of modern capitalism and technology has made it all too easy to never have to think about where we buy things from or how we get them. In an email, a FedEx spokesperson emphasized that the amount of duties and taxes and who is invoiced for it is not decided by logistics companies like FedEx — they're just facilitating the required payment to the government on behalf of sellers and/or buyers. They added that when completing an international shipping label, shippers decide whether they or the recipient are responsible for paying, and if a party isn't identified, the recipient is the default. If the shipper doesn't tell the buyer about the fees, the buyer is informed when the shipping company sends them an invoice. I'll be honest, when I first heard that people were getting hit with tariff bills, I was shocked. But the more I've dug into it, the more I've realized this shouldn't be that big of a surprise. When I reached out to Peter Quinter, a longtime customs and trade lawyer at Gunster, and described the horror of the $600 bridesmaid dress tariff in detail, his reaction was nonplussed. "It will happen to them more often," he says. He deals with corporate clients on a much larger scale who have built out operations in China and are now discovering their businesses are no longer financially feasible under Trump's trade regime. "It's a surprise to the US importer who's not knowledgeable whatsoever about US customs import requirements," he says. "So, nevertheless, it's always the importer's responsibility. So if you're a US consumer and you're buying something online and you don't know where it's made, and when you finally get the item or a bill for the item and it's made in China and you're going to pay more, that's your responsibility." Some online shoppers are, essentially, unwitting importers and thus responsible for paying import taxes. At some point, one would presume, much of this will get ironed out. Sellers have incentives not to be up front about tariff costs, because said costs will probably deter people from buying. But as more tariff-related horror stories spread, many will hopefully get better about telling customers what's what. Perhaps carriers will get faster at alerting people about potential charges, though their role here is really as a law-abiding intermediary. Some of the dust around Trump's initial trade moves has settled, giving buyers and sellers alike a better lay of the land. And some tariffs have come down. All of the logistics people I spoke to for this story acknowledged it's difficult for the average consumer to decipher whether they'll get charged for tariffs. When making a purchase, they should check whether the seller has already factored in duties and taxes or ask the seller directly, but they may not think to or even realize the item is coming from abroad. "If you're hit with a bill and it was not disclosed at the checkout or clearly, reach out to the brand," Armstrong says. The combination of modern capitalism and technology has made it all too easy to never have to think about where we buy things from or how we get them. Tariffs, for better or for worse, have thrown a wrench into that in a multitude of ways, including proving to be a rude awakening for unlucky and unsuspecting online shoppers.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CNN's Frederik Pleitgen Arrives In Tehran; First Western Journalist To Enter Country Since Start Of Latest Conflict With Israel, Network Says
CNN's Frederik Pleitgen filed his first report on Wednesday after arriving in Tehran, reporting on hearing anti-aircraft gunfire as well as the sounds of potential Israeli airstrikes or some sort of interceptions. 'There's very few people actually though here. A lot of people appear to have left,' Pleitgen said of the streets of the city. In his report on The Lead with Jake Tapper, he reported that there was 'a good amount of traffic' going out of the city and stores that were closed. More from Deadline Iranian National TV Headquarters Hit By Israeli Airstrike During Live Broadcast Donald Trump Says Tucker Carlson Apologized Amid MAGA Split On U.S. Involvement In Iran Strikes Donald Trump Appears To Praise David Ellison Amid Pending Skydance-Paramount Merger Approval, Settlement Talks In '60 Minutes' Lawsuit He said that they drove through Iran, 'the mood there is fairly calm. Not a lot of panic.' In a digital video, Pleitgen, traveling with his producer, also described driving through a 'substantial part' of Iran to get to Tehran, where it 'appears to be almost business as usual.' The network said that Pleitgen is the first Western journalist to enter the country since the conflict with Israel started. President Donald Trump said earlier Wednesday that he had not yet decided on whether the U.S. would take part in further efforts to dismantle Iran's nuclear arsenal. Pleitgen is CNN senior international correspondent and anchor. Networks have been mobilizing crews and coverage in the region since the Israeli airstrikes started on Thursday. Much of the reporting from the Middle East on broadcast and cable networks has been from Israel, as journalists have been reporting on Iran's retaliatory strikes and the damage in Tel Aviv and elsewhere. CNN has been providing images from Tehran from Iran's Mehr News Agency. The Committee to Protect Journalists said that the conflict with Israel has already increased media censorship among Iranian journalists, in a country where the government already controls broadcasting. CNN earlier in the day featured Christiane Amanpour's interview with Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi, who told her, 'If the Americans decide to get involved militarily, we have no choice but to retaliate, wherever we find the targets necessary to be acted upon.' Best of Deadline 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series 'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'The Buccaneers' Season 2 Soundtrack: From Griff To Sabrina Carpenter
