Appomattox elections board seeks to close precincts that serve Black voters
A Virginia polling place during the 2020 election. (Photo by Parker Michels-Boyce for the Virginia Mercury)
A proposal to close and consolidate two voting precincts in Appomattox County has sparked concerns about voter access and racial equity, as the changes would disproportionately impact Black and minority voters.
The county's Board of Elections made the request at the Jan. 21, 2025, Board of Supervisors meeting, targeting precinct 201 in the Chap community and 502 in Agee — the two with the highest percentages of Black and racial minority voters among the county's nine precincts.
According to census block data compiled by the NAACP Virginia State Conference, 36.7% of Chap precinct voters and 24.4% of Agee precinct voters are Black. Racial minority voters overall make up 40.27% and 27.82% of the respective precincts.
Appomattox County, home to just over 16,000 residents and situated between Lynchburg to the west and Farmville to the east, is a Republican stronghold. In the 2021 gubernatorial race, GOP nominee Glenn Youngkin dominated with 80% over Democrat Terry McAuliffe, who received 19%. In the 2024 presidential election, former President Donald Trump carried the county by a wide margin, winning 75% of the vote to Joe Biden's 24%.
If approved, the closures would force many voters in these precincts to travel significantly farther to cast their ballots — up to 30 additional minutes by car or over four hours on foot in some cases. The lack of public transportation in the county exacerbates the impact, especially for elderly voters or those without access to a vehicle.
The Virginia NAACP condemned the proposed closures, calling them a direct threat to voting rights.
'Voting is a fundamental right and the foundation of our democracy,' said Virginia NAACP President Rev. Cozy Bailey.
'All citizens of Appomattox County are entitled to have an equal opportunity to participate in the electoral process regardless of their race or ethnicity. Throughout our history, various tactics have been employed to limit access to the ballot, including precinct closures, voter ID laws, and other measures that disproportionately affect marginalized communities.'
Bailey added that the proposal, if enacted, would 'perpetuate these historical patterns and result in barriers to participation for Black voters in Appomattox County.'
According to a Feb. 18 letter from the Virginia NAACP to the Board of Supervisors, and obtained by The Mercury, the proposed closures would place significant burdens on affected voters. The Chap precinct's voters would be reassigned to Spout Spring, requiring an 11.7-mile trip — about a 17-minute drive or a 4.25-hour walk. Agee voters would be reassigned to Oakville, a distance of 5.8 miles, or an 8-minute drive and a two-hour walk.
'These already-long distances are calculated from the existing to proposed polling sites,' the NAACP's letter states, 'so in many instances, voters will be required to travel even greater distances.'
The Mercury reached out to the local elections board and the Board of Supervisors for comment. While no members of the Board of Supervisors responded by the time of publication, General Registrar Patricia Morton provided an email statement referencing the findings of the local Precinct Review Committee, which cited cost savings as the primary motivation for the proposed precinct closures.
According to the committee, closing the two precincts would save the county $1,527 in fiscal year 2025 and $5,374 in fiscal year 2026. Long-term savings are projected at $24,600 for replacing outdated tabulators and ballot markers, along with $2,554 for purchasing electronic poll books.
Morton also noted that after meeting to discuss the matter Tuesday afternoon, election officials plan to revisit certain aspects of the proposal before finalizing changes.
'We will talk with the Board of Supervisors again in two weeks, and recommend they move forward merging Agee and Oakville, but pause and review another, more central location for Falling River district (Chap and Spout Spring merger),' Morton said in an email.
However, elections are the cornerstone of democracy, providing the primary means for most citizens to participate, says David Richards, a political science professor at the University of Lynchburg. While elections are costly to run, requiring staff and modern equipment, accessibility should not be compromised.
'Anytime barriers are introduced to voting, the number of participants decreases,' Richards said, emphasizing that factors like lack of transportation should not prevent people from casting their ballots. The financial realities counties face must be balanced with the need to ensure as many people as possible can legally vote.
Richards added that while structural issues, such as the disrepair of the Agee precinct building, may justify some changes, the fact that the two targeted precincts have the highest minority populations raises questions of voter suppression.
'I will not assume motive, but we should look at the facts as they are,' Richards said, questioning why closer precincts like Stonewall and Spout Spring were not considered for consolidation instead. Ultimately, he argued, demographic data must play a role in these decisions and should not be overlooked by the Board of Supervisors.
And voting rights advocates argue that budget concerns should not take precedence over voter access.
'We should work to make voting easier and more accessible, not create new obstacles to the ballot box,' Bailey said. The Virginia NAACP urged the Board of Supervisors to explore alternatives that would maintain voting access without creating undue burdens for Black and minority voters.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Ciattarelli and Sherrill Face Off in NJ Governor's Race: What Polls Say
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New Jersey voters hit the polls on Tuesday and cast their ballots in the state's primary races ahead of this year's gubernatorial election. Jack Ciattarelli, a former New Jersey state representative and one-time critic turned supporter of President Donald Trump, won the Republican Party's nomination for governor. On the Democratic side, U.S. Representative Mikie Sherrill snagged the party's nomination. With primaries in the rearview mirror, New Jersey's gubernatorial race kicks into high gear, with Sherrill pulling out all the stops to keep the governor's seat in Democrats' hands and Ciattarelli leveraging Trump's backing to flip it red. Newsweek reached out to Ciattarelli and Sherrill's campaigns for comment via LinkedIn and email, respectively, on Tuesday. Why It Matters New Jersey is among only two states holding gubernatorial elections this year, alongside Virginia, meaning November's election in the Garden State will be one of the first and earliest tests of Trump's agenda. With New Jersey's incumbent Democratic governor, Phil Murphy, being term-limited, both parties see the contest as a crucial bellwether, especially after a competitive 2021 governor's election in which Ciattarelli lost to Murphy by a narrow margin. Supporters await New Jersey Republican gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli at his watch party on November 2, 2021, in Bridgewater, New Jersey. (Photo by) Supporters await New Jersey Republican gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli at his watch party on November 2, 2021, in Bridgewater, New Jersey. (Photo by) What To Know According to the Associated Press, Ciattarelli clinched the GOP nomination for governor at 8:17 p.m. ET Tuesday and Sherrill was projected to win the Democratic nomination at 8:39 p.m. New Jersey has voted for a Democrat in every presidential election since 1988. Although Trump lost the state in November, he significantly narrowed the gap between the two parties, losing to then-Vice President and Democratic nominee Kamala Harris by less than 6 percentage points. As Newsweek reported this month, it was the best showing by a GOP presidential nominee in two decades. By comparison, Joe Biden won New Jersey by 16 percentage points in the 2020 election. Ciattarelli, who won Trump's endorsement in May, also got some good news in a recent poll published shortly before Tuesday's primaries. According to SurveyUSA, Ciattarelli and Sherrill are viewed favorably by a near-equal percentage of New Jersey voters. The SurveyUSA poll found that 40 percent of Garden State voters have a favorable view of Ciattarelli, while 41 percent view Sherrill favorably. But there's a larger gap between the two candidates when it comes to their unfavorables, with 29 percent of voters having an unfavorable view of Sherrill, compared to 36 percent who have an unfavorable opinion of Ciattarelli. What People Are Saying The Democratic National Committee, in an emailed statement to Newsweek from Chair Ken Martin: "Congratulations to New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial nominee Rep. Mikie Sherrill and to New Jersey Democrats up and down the ballot who are stepping up to fight for families across the Garden State. "The DNC is all hands on deck to ensure the Governor's office and Assembly remain blue in November. We will do everything in our power to unite the party and defeat Republican extremists like Jack Ciattarelli who want to rubber stamp Donald Trump's cost-hiking agenda and sell out working-class Americans. In 2025, Democrats have overwhelmingly won and overperformed in special and off-year elections. Concluding, Martin said, "We'll continue that trend in New Jersey by organizing in every corner of the state, investing strategically, and working with our allies on the ground to elect more Democrats who will stand up to the Trump disaster and deliver for working families." Sherrill's campaign said in a statement, in part: "Let's be clear about the two visions in this race: I am ready to stand up to an extreme Washington that doesn't have New Jersey's best interests at heart. Jack has already surrendered to them. It's our duty to meet the moment and live up to our state's motto of liberty and prosperity, because a Trump yes man like Jack Ciattarelli in Trenton will threaten it all." She added: "While Jack is for Trump, I am for New Jersey. A New Jersey where housing is affordable so our kids can afford to live here, middle-class families can buy a home, and our seniors can afford to stay. A New Jersey where we finally take control of our energy future, and slash the cost of utilities. A New Jersey where a woman's right to an abortion is non-negotiable, and we respect the rule of law, due process, and the Constitution." Trump wrote on Truth Social over the weekend: "The Great State of New Jersey has a very important Primary coming up on Tuesday. Get Out and Vote for Jack Ciattarelli, who has my Complete and Total Endorsement! His Opponents are going around saying they have my Endorsement, which is not true, I don't even know who they are! We can't play games when it comes to Elections, and New Jersey is a very important State that we must WIN. The whole World is watching. Vote for Jack Ciattarelli to, MAKE NEW JERSEY GREAT AGAIN!" What Happens Next The general election in New Jersey's governor's race is on November 4. In addition to Sherrill and Ciattarelli, five third-party or independent candidates are also running for the seat.


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his ‘big, beautiful' bill
'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. Advertisement At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. Advertisement 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families,' he said. 'It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Advertisement Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Advertisement Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.' Associated Press writer Michelle L. Price contributed to this report.

Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Mikie Sherrill, Jack Ciattarelli Win the Democratic and Republican Primaries for Governor of New Jersey
WASHINGTON—U.S. Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.) and former State Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli (R-Somerville) won the Democratic and Republican primary contests in the New Jersey gubernatorial election on June 10 and will advance to the general election. Ciattarelli easily beat out his Republican opponents, leading with 66.3 percent of the vote with 28 percent counted. The Associated Press called the race for him at 8:17 p.m. ET. Sherrill's race took slightly longer to call, being declared the winner at 8:39 p.m.