Alaska small businesses need investment, not abandoned contracts
Traffic in downtown Anchorage on Oct. 10, 2024. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
This week is National Small Business Week, a time to celebrate the entrepreneurs who keep our communities vibrant and full of opportunity. In Anchorage, we're lucky we don't have to look far to see that spirit in action.
Just last week, a room full of small business owners, proud families, and community members gathered in Spenard to celebrate the newest graduates of Anchorage Community Land Trust's Set Up Shop and Indigenous Peoples Set Up Shop programs. These programs help entrepreneurs in underserved communities launch and grow their businesses, creating a ripple effect of community revitalization and generational wealth.
But just as we mark this week meant to honor small businesses, the future of this work is in jeopardy. Recently, the federal government terminated congressionally approved grants that fund these very programs. That means Set Up Shop — a proven path to self-sufficiency for underserved entrepreneurs — may not continue in its current form.
And let's be clear. This isn't about government waste or bloated bureaucracy. It's about breaking a contract.
Imagine hiring a contractor to paint your home. They buy the paint, prep the walls, schedule a crew, and then you cancel the job halfway through and refuse to pay. Most people would agree that's unethical, and certainly indefensible. Yet that's exactly what's happening to nonprofits like ACLT, who were asked to do a job, only to see the funding pulled midstream. The work still needs to be done, but the government has walked away.
We're not just talking about line items in a budget. We're talking about hard- working Alaskans who have done everything right. They've taken business classes, written plans, earned certifications, and opened storefronts, and are now left with fewer tools and less support than they were promised. When we don't invest in our own people, we pay the price in other ways, with lost jobs, empty buildings, and neighborhoods full of untapped potential.
When an entrepreneur opens a new business in Anchorage they hire locally. They spend locally. They transform vacant lots into thriving storefronts. The economic return goes far beyond the individual business owner and it makes our city a better place to live.
Set Up Shop has helped more than 500 entrepreneurs turn ideas into realities, and side hustles into fully fledged businesses. These businesses hire locally, pay taxes, and invest in their neighborhoods. That's not charity. That's economic infrastructure built from the ground up.
We will continue to do this work, with or without the original funding. That's what it means to serve your community. But we could benefit from you being with us. If you believe in the promise of local business and the power of neighborhood-led change, we invite you to consider supporting ACLT and, most importantly, supporting these entrepreneurs. You could visit their businesses, share their stories and help us keep the momentum alive.
Because when we invest in our neighbors, we all win — and that's just good business.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Praise but no firm promises, as Trump administration officials talk Alaska oil and gas
The trans-Alaska pipeline is seen on Sept. 19, 2022, in Fairbanks. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon) Gov. Mike Dunleavy's annual energy conference included visits from three of the Trump administration's top officials, but it didn't include any major developments on the financing of the proposed 800-mile trans-Alaska natural gas pipeline. U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and Lee Zeldin, administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, traveled to the North Slope and to Anchorage this week during a visit that coincided with the fourth annual Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference. Despite the conference's name, oil and gas development took top billing, with all three officials saying that they hope to increase oil and gas production in Alaska under the direction of President Donald Trump. 'President Trump wants to see the flows through (the trans-Alaska Pipeline System) doubled,' Wright said during a speech on the North Slope this week. 'The oil is here. The discoveries are here. If we free Alaska and the people here (from regulation), we're going to more than double the oil flow through the pipeline and build the big, beautiful twin, the natural gas pipeline, from the North Slope.' Despite the week's enthusiasm for the Alaska Liquefied Natural Gas pipeline, better known as AKLNG, it still isn't clear who will pay for it to get built. The natural gas pipeline and associated processing plants are expected to cost $38.7 billion, but that estimate was published in 2020, and it predates inflation-driven and tariff-driven cost increases under the Biden and Trump presidencies. Energy developer Glenfarne, which is pursuing AKLNG on behalf of the state, announced this week that 50 firms had formally expressed interest in AKLNG contracts worth more than $115 billion. Those contracts include possible supply agreements — people interested in selling things to AKLNG for construction — as well as possible investors. An expression of interest isn't a firm commitment, and no investors said this week that they will back the project. Officials from Japan, Korea and other nations — possible customers for Alaska gas — visited the state this week but made no announcements. Taiwan's state-run energy company, CPC, signed a non-binding agreement in March stating that it would buy liquefied natural gas from Alaska and invest in the project. As currently envisioned, AKLNG would be constructed in two phases — the first would be a pipeline from the North Slope to Fairbanks and Southcentral Alaska for domestic, in-Alaska gas customers. The second phase would involve facilities and equipment needed to export gas overseas. Glenfarne is expected to announce a go/no-go final investment decision on the first phase by the end of the year. Speaking to NBC reporters in Prudhoe Bay, Burgum said that the U.S. military could be a key customer for the first phase of the project. 'They're ready to sign on to take an offtake agreement from this pipeline to get gas to our super strategic, important bases across Alaska,' he said on CNBC. Actually signing a customer agreement could make financing easier to come by. 'If you get the commercial offtakers for the gas, financing is pretty straightforward,' Wright told CNBC. Legislation passed by Congress and signed by President Joe Biden allows $30 billion in federally guaranteed loans for the project. This week, Wright told reporters in Anchorage that the U.S. Energy Department could make additional loans available. 'They're going to get details of the project to come together, but I think it's quite likely that you will see loan guarantees provided by the loan program office at the Department of Energy to build the pipeline part of that project,' he said. Under the Biden administration, the DOE's Loan Programs Office grew into a major financier for green-energy projects. The Trump Administration has halted most of that work, and Wright suggested that it could be redirected to the natural gas pipeline. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Behind the cameras: Gavel Alaska broadcasts the business of state government to Alaskans
Tulio Fontanella, a first-year production technician with Gavel, controls the cameras at a Senate Finance Committee meeting on Feb. 13, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon) Hours after a historic second veto of a bill to fund public education, Gov. Mike Dunleavy called a news conference on the governor's floor of the Alaska State Capitol. The shades were drawn, and a handful of reporters lined a long conference room table, as Dunleavy spoke and took questions for over an hour, explaining his criticisms and his veto. In offices throughout the rest of the building, legislators on all sides of the politically contentious debate on how to fund Alaska schools, watched from behind closed doors, as well as school district leaders, news outlets, and Alaskans across the state — live, via the cameras of Gavel Alaska. In the room, Gavel production crew Michael Penn operated a live camera broadcasting Dunleavy, with Tulio Fontanella sitting to the governor's right side, in a baseball cap, microphone in hand. During the May 19 news conference, Gavel Alaska was nearing the end of another legislative session. For nearly 30 years, Gavel has provided a free, public broadcast of the business of the state government to the rest of Alaska. A team of eight, mostly seasonal staff, operates cameras and broadcasts remotely from a ground floor production studio at KTOO Public Media, on Egan Drive along the waterfront of Juneau. 'It's kind of the C-SPAN of Alaska,' said executive producer Will Mader, referring to the nonprofit cable TV network that has streamed the U.S. government in Washington, D.C., since 1979. Above the chambers and committee rooms of the Alaska State Legislature, overlooking lawmakers' debates, governors' speeches, the prayers over floor sessions and the introductions of guests in the galleries, cameras and microphones capture the business of the State Capitol and Gavel broadcasts it live to Alaska. The team has just wrapped up covering another 120 day legislative session, with over 800 hours of live coverage broadcasting from the Capitol. The team of Gavel Alaska are used to dealing with technical problems, but now, they're facing a potential new hurdle of federal cuts. Gavel's crew finished the session at a sensitive time for public broadcasting. President Donald Trump has proposed large-scale cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides a share of funding to KTOO and public media across the country and state. Looking closely at Gavel Alaska gives a sense of the work that goes into giving the public access to state government. While the people in front of the cameras make the news, the people behind them rarely capture public attention. Behind the cameras On a late winter morning, Mader sits in front of a wall of monitors, gearing up for a busy day covering the Alaska State Legislature, which typically runs from January to May. Teams of two staff monitor three or four robotic cameras in each chamber of the House and Senate, the committee rooms, and the hallways. During hearings or floor sessions, they toggle between cameras to focus on who is speaking, add captions with names and titles, feature speakers' presentations and provide information for public comment. Mader said the most newsworthy topics are recorded and streamed on KTOO's statewide public affairs TV channel, KTOO 360TV. It's also transmitted via satellite through the Alaska Rural Communications Service statewide, for those without consistent internet. 'So it's available to anyone out in rural Alaska that can view it, just with an antenna,' he said. Though all hearings are livestreamed online, on some days there can be up to six committee meetings at a time, so Mader said that can be a challenge deciding which three to feature at once. 'We always cover House and Senate floor sessions, and we almost always cover finance (committee) meetings,' he said. 'The budget is always the No. 1 issue in session. So that's one reason for covering finance, as well as that it's the last stop for most legislation before it gets to the floor.' The Gavel broadcast launched in 1996, first with one cameraperson moving a manually operated camera between rooms of the Capitol to cover meetings, 'which isn't ideal, because people are facing all different directions,' Mader said. Eventually, the Legislature started some basic webstreaming with its own cameras. Ultimately the Legislature agreed to an informal partnership with Gavel and KTOO to provide a more quality broadcast. 'They share access to the cameras, and then they get a higher quality video feed from those cameras,' said Mikko Wilson, production manager at KTOO. The Gavel production at the Capitol saw a major technological upgrade in 2020, when grant funding and the purchase of new robotic cameras arrived at the same time as the COVID-19 pandemic. 'We had the quotes for the cameras. And I picked up the phone and said, 'Ship 'em. Send us the cameras, like we need the robots now!' Wilson said, smiling. 'And so that was my COVID project in 2020, pulling about 2 miles of cable and installing the 40-something-odd cameras inside.' At the controls are new seasonal staff, like fresh college graduates learning broadcast production, as well as veteran Alaska journalists, like longtime Juneau photojournalist Michael Penn and former TV broadcaster Bob Laurie. In a small studio off the main production bay, Laurie wrapped up covering a committee meeting and had time to talk. 'I try to really listen closely to what is being said, so that I can make sure I get the right names up, the right explainers, and kind of follow the flow of what is going on in the room. It takes a lot of focus for me,' he said. Laurie first covered the Legislature as a young TV reporter, for a highly contentious session in 1981. 'The leadership in the House, it took them a long time to organize…before they had their 21 votes together,' he said, to form a majority caucus. 'We didn't have the, you know, 121 day sessions, and people were dissatisfied with nothing getting through. Things were held up.' He said he slept on someone's floor while covering the action. 'I was the first full-time television reporter from outside Juneau to cover the Legislature,' he said. 'My competition followed about three days later — three days after I got on the air.' That launched a television reporting career, then work in state government, before Laurie returned to cover the session seasonally with Gavel. 'So this is nice, clean. This is raw. All we're doing is getting the different shots,' he said. 'This is what is actually happening, so people can see their representatives at work.' Some days Laurie is in the studio, and some days he's in the Capitol operating a camera to cover live events, like speeches from the governor or Alaska's U.S. senators. He said it's an opportunity for Alaskans to watch their elected officials in action. 'They can actually sit there and actually watch it and say, 'Oh, that's who I elected,'' he said. 'Whether it's good or bad. Without any editorial comment.' Across the hall, Tulio Fontanella is covering a Senate Finance Committee hearing a report on the state's oil revenues. He grew up in Juneau and just graduated from college with a degree in sports media. He said while there's some comparisons to sports broadcasting, it's much slower. 'There will be times that you'll stay on a wide shot, just because you don't know who's gonna talk next or how quickly they'll be done talking,' he said. 'There's other people who pause a long time before they start speaking, so it's a balancing act, getting that right.' His partner in the booth on captions, Robbie Gabel, who also grew up in Juneau, is also in his first year of broadcast production. 'I like when it's a little more hectic. It's a little slow. So it's fun when they're trying to get stuff in,' he said. 'I like it when it's more hectic and a lot more going on.' The crew is on duty whenever legislators are live, so that means long hours and sometimes weekends, especially when bills are being voted on, and final budget negotiations take place at the end of May. 'It's more complicated than someone would think,' Fontanella added. 'This type of television, you know, is somewhat simplified, but also still more complicated than anyone would guess. Like Will does so much planning for what we do. And Mikko, with all the tech mishaps or whatever needs to be set up — they do a lot of work.' Like C-SPAN, Gavel broadcasts the activities of all three branches of Alaska's government: the Legislature; the executive, such as governor's speeches or news conferences; and the judiciary, including oral arguments before the Alaska Supreme Court. At times, Gavel broadcasts emergency response updates, such as from the U.S. Coast Guard or National Weather Service; it provided updates when one of the strongest storms on record, Typhoon Merbok, hit in 2022, impacting more than 35 communities in Western Alaska. Gavel partners in Juneau and statewide Gavel Alaska is an independent press outlet, but those broadcasts require close coordination with public offices around the state. For broadcasting the Alaska Supreme Court, that's the court clerk's office; for the Legislature, that's daily coordination with the media team of the Legislative Affairs Agency, a nonpartisan support agency based in the Terry Miller Legislative Office on 6th Street behind the Capitol. The agency also provides webstreaming on the state's website of all legislative floor sessions and committee meetings, for the public record, said Tim Powers, the agency's chief technology and operations officer. 'So KTOO is going to do their high production quality for all the popular meetings, and we're still going to create the record for everything that may not be as popular, yeah, and won't have as high demand on television,' he said. The agency also coordinates all call-ins for the public to comment. 'You can testify on every bill in every committee in Alaska when they have public testimony, and that is not the case in other states,' he said. 'In some other states, you have to go to the State House to testify. In some other states, you're not allowed to testify, even if you do go to the State House, because they just don't take it. So it's unique, uniquely Alaskan, and I think it's a benefit to us,' Powers said. Powers said typically they see an estimated 1 million minutes per year of teleconferencing. 'Yeah, it's a lot of people connected,' he said. The Gavel livestream is watched closely by Alaska news outlets and journalists too, like Matt Acuña Buxton, who writes the political newsletter, the Alaska Memo. 'Literally — and I mean literally — I couldn't do my job covering the Alaska Legislature from Anchorage without Gavel Alaska's hard work,' he said. 'It's a lot more than just a camera in a legislative hearing, and Gavel's crews do so much behind the scenes to ensure we can see what's going on in Juneau, whether it be news conferences or the beloved hallway cameras. 'Their work with the broadcast during the day, which has to keep up with packed days of simultaneous hearings as well as the slow days, does a good job of balancing the big-ticket issues while also offering a wide look at things that you didn't know needed to be on your radar.' Federal funding under threat KTOO receives local funding, as well as federal funding, whose future is now uncertain. The partnership with the state to broadcast Gavel Alaska is an informal one. 'We don't receive any state funding for actually making this happen,' said KTOO manager Justin Shoman, 'So we're really relying on these other sources.' Since its start in 1996, the public television broadcast has been partly funded by the City and Borough of Juneau, to provide Alaskans access to the Capitol. Amid a long-running dispute on the location of Alaska's capital, the city's funding of the broadcast continues still today. 'Regardless of where the capital is in Alaska, it's still inaccessible easily to a large number of people,' Mader noted. 'So that's why I think, of all the states, having this service is most crucial in Alaska.' The Gavel Alaska staffing and production costs about $750,000 per year, Shoman said, with $455,000 funded by the city. The remaining roughly $295,000 is funded by a mix of sponsorships, underwriting, community donors and federal grant funding, including funding through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which also supports the general TV operations of KTOO. 'The majority of CPB funding goes to television. That's simply because television is more expensive to produce,' Shoman said. That federal funding is threatened now, as Trump has proposed steep cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Shoman and other supporters of public broadcasting in Alaska are actively advocating, including flying to Washington, D.C., and meeting with Alaska's congressional delegation, urging them to protect the funding. 'For those who are concerned with the future of Gavel Alaska and that level of government, accessibility and transparency — it is reliant, in Alaska, on some federal funding, and it's important that people know that,' Shoman said.

5 days ago
Trump officials are visiting Alaska to discuss a gas pipeline and oil drilling
JUNEAU, Alaska -- The Trump administration is sending three Cabinet members to Alaska this week as it pursues oil drilling in the pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and reinvigorating a natural gas project that's languished for years. The visit by Department of Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin comes after Trump signed an executive order earlier this year aimed at boosting oil and gas drilling, mining and logging in Alaska. It also comes amid tariff talks with Asian countries that are seen as possible leverage for the administration to secure investments in the proposed Alaska liquefied natural gas project. Their itinerary includes a meeting Sunday with resource development groups and U.S. Sens. Dan Sullivan and Lisa Murkowski in Anchorage before heading to Utqiagvik, an Arctic town on the petroleum-rich North Slope where many Alaska Native leaders see oil development as economically vital to the region. The federal officials also plan to visit the Prudhoe Bay oil field Monday — near the coast of the Arctic Ocean and more than 850 miles (1,368 kilometers) north of Anchorage — and speak at Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy's annual energy conference Tuesday in Anchorage. While it's not unusual for U.S. officials to visit Alaska during warmer weather months, Dunleavy's office said the officials' visit is significant. Dunleavy, a Trump ally, said he is thankful for an administration that 'recognizes Alaska's unique value.' Government and industry representatives from a number of Asian countries, including Japan, are expected to participate in a portion of the trip, reflecting pressure from the U.S. to invest in the pipeline — despite skepticism and opposition from environmental groups. In Alaska, some environmentalists criticized the agenda for Dunleavy's conference. Highlighting fossil fuels alongside renewable or alternative energy make 'energy sources of the past look more legitimate at a conference like this," said Andy Moderow, senior policy director with the Alaska Wilderness League. 'I think we should be looking at climate solutions that work for Alaskans, not trying to open up places that industry is taking a pass on, namely the Arctic refuge,' he said. Trump has long taken credit for provisions of a 2017 tax law championed by Alaska's congressional delegation that called for two oil and gas lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge's coastal plain by late 2024. The first one remains the subject of ongoing litigation, with the main bidder a state corporation that saw its seven leases later canceled by then-President Joe Biden's administration. A judge in March ruled Biden's administration overstepped, and the Interior Department, in line with Trump's executive order, is working to reinstate the leases. There weren't any bids in the second sale, held under Biden and blasted by the state as overly restrictive. Debate over drilling in the refuge — home to polar bears, musk ox, birds and other wildlife — has long been a flashpoint. Indigenous Gwich'in leaders consider the coastal plain sacred land, noting its importance to a caribou herd they rely upon. Many North Slope Iñupiat leaders who support drilling in the refuge felt their voices were not heard during the Biden era. During the Trump officials' visit, they also hope to make a case for additional development in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, which Trump has advocated, and for being included in planning decisions. Nagruk Harcharek, president of Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat, an advocacy group whose members include leaders from the region, called the officials' visit 'a step in the right direction.' For years, the state has sought to develop its stores of North Slope natural gas as a way to provide affordable energy to more residents and bolster revenues via exports. But cost concerns, shifts in direction, competition from other projects and questions about economic feasibility have stymied progress. Oil companies have long reinjected gas that occurs with oil deposits on the slope to produce more oil, which remains Alaska's economic lifeblood. The latest gas proposal calls for a roughly 810-mile (1,300-kilometer) pipeline that would carry gas from the North Slope to port and a facility that would process and export liquefied natural gas to Asian countries. In a March speech to Congress, Trump touted his ongoing support of the 'gigantic natural gas pipeline." He said countries like Japan and South Korea 'want to be our partner, with investments of trillions of dollars each.' No firm commitments from countries have been made. The company advancing the project — in partnership with a state corporation — is in a stage of refining cost estimates, previously pegged at around $44 billion for the pipeline and related infrastructure, before final decisions are made on whether to move forward with the project. While Dunleavy has likened Trump's friendly approach to energy development as 'Christmas every day,' Alaska's fortunes remain tightly linked to the volatility of oil prices, which are down sharply from a year ago, squeezing state revenues. State lawmakers across party lines overwhelmingly passed a resolution urging Congress to provide Alaska with 90% of royalty revenues for oil and gas leases in the Arctic refuge, arguing the U.S. government reneged on past promises for such a share. The resolution also asked for that to be extended to the petroleum reserve. Alaska's tax structure allows companies like ConocoPhillips Alaska — which is pursuing a massive oil project known as Willow in the reserve — to write off a portion of their development costs against production taxes they incur elsewhere on the North Slope. While lawmakers widely support Willow, they also have argued a change in federal royalty share would address a hit to state revenues created by production in the reserve.