Hedge Funds Get Dragged Into Mandate Tensions Between EU and US
(Bloomberg) -- As money managers adapt to a new reality in which their oil policies risk losing them business, hedge funds are finding they're also being dragged into the fray.
ICE Eyes Massive California Tent Facility Amid Space Constraints
How Britain's Most Bike-Friendly New Town Got Built
Washington, DC, Region Braces for 'Devastating' Cuts from Congress
The Dark Prophet of Car-Clogged Cities
Saving the Signature Sound of Washington, DC
Pension funds in northern Europe are currently reviewing US mandates amid concerns over climate risk. In London, meanwhile, lawyers advising hedge funds say their clients are dropping oil exclusions in order to hold on to US clients.
The 'concern is that oil screens may cause redemptions by oil-state investors,' said Lucian Firth, a partner at London-based law firm Simmons & Simmons who advises hedge funds with as much as $20 billion of assets under management. And oil states 'are big investors in hedge funds.'
It's a split-screen moment which has fund managers struggling to strike the right balance. State Street Global Advisors has already lost mandates from pension funds in the UK and Scandinavia after retreating from its climate commitments. And PME is currently reviewing a €5 billion mandate with BlackRock Inc., which the Dutch pension fund says is at risk due to 'BlackRock's diminishing ambitions in responsible and sustainable investing.'
At the same time, the state pension plan in Republican-led Indiana recently replaced BlackRock with State Street, based on an assessment that BlackRock was too focused on an environmental, social and governance agenda. And the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts is targeting financial firms it says are 'boycotting' the oil and gas industry.
Firth says he has hedge fund clients who are worried that an oil screen on just one fund can be enough to lose US clients, 'even if they have other funds which do potentially invest in oil.'
The developments have sent a chill through the wider investment management industry, with many opting to remove clear references from public documents that might place them in one camp or another. But it's a strategy that may backfire, according to Lucie Pinson, executive director of Reclaim Finance, a French nonprofit.
'Financial institutions will need to pick a side,' she said.
Anders Schelde, the chief investment officer at AkademikerPension — a Danish pension fund known for its focus on sustainability — said it's important for the fund that external asset managers are 'aligned to some degree with how we think and how we see the world.' And in the current climate, Schelde said 'the odds of a US manager getting to our portfolio going forward have become lower.' The $20 billion fund just pulled a $480 million mandate from State Street.
State Street has said that as AkademikerPension does more investment management inhouse, it looks forward to continued discussions about future opportunities. BlackRock has said that it's a 'global leader' in sustainable and transition investing, and that it offers climate-focused clients in Europe a choice of products that deliver performance in line with their preferences.
The 'Woke' Factor
As US asset managers risk losing more European contracts, they remain under pressure from a newly emboldened Republican Party that's made fighting climate policies a battle cry. Money managers face lawsuits and bans if they're suspected of embracing environmentally friendly investments vilified by the GOP as 'woke' and financially unsound.
Those political threats have coincided with a selloff in green stocks, which by one measure have lost about two-thirds of their value since the end of the pandemic. In the same period, big oil, big tech and the wider market have all rallied.
To be sure, clean-energy stocks have outperformed both big tech and the wider market so far this year, as they prove more resilient to the global selloff that just sent the S&P 500 Index into a correction.
At the same time, there's an awareness in Europe that pulling large mandates from the biggest US firms is far from risk-free. In Switzerland, lawmakers just voted to keep State Street as the custodian of a 46-billion-franc ($52 billion) pension hoard. The bill had been brought forward by a parliamentary committee in January, due to fears that the Trump administration might suddenly order State Street to freeze funds amid growing tensions between Europe and the US.
In the event, Interior Minister Elisabeth Baume-Schneider said the bill would have 'damaged the reputation of Switzerland as a financial center,' while Kathrin Bertschy of the Green Liberals said annulling State Street's contract would hurt the perception of legal certainty.
US money managers are now navigating a political landscape in which they can be blacklisted from either side of the ESG debate. Late last year, BlackRock, Vanguard Group Inc. and State Street were all sued by a group of states led by Texas for allegedly breaking antitrust law by adopting environmental strategies that hurt the supply of coal. The suit alleges that those investment policies drove up electricity prices.
For hedge funds, such developments have coincided with a clear decline in enthusiasm for ESG strategies. For example, a once-popular fund class under the European Union's Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, known as Article 8, has now fallen out of favor, Firth at Simmons & Simmons said.
While insisting that 'ESG is far from dead,' Firth said hedge funds now find it more convenient to keep segregated accounts for such holdings.
Separately managed accounts (SMAs), which are an 'entirely private' vehicle between an asset allocator and a fund manager, 'are an increasingly common way for hedge fund mangers to deliver strategies to allocators,' he said.
(Adds comment from Firth in sixth paragraph.)
Nvidia Looks Past DeepSeek and Tariffs for AI's Next Chapter
How America Got Hooked on H Mart
How Trump's 'No Tax on Tips' Could Backfire for the Working Class
The Real Reason Trump Is Pushing 'Buy American'
College Presidents on Trump, Tuition and Universities Under Pressure
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Perfect Moment Ltd. Announces Pricing of Public Offering
LONDON, June 27, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Perfect Moment Ltd. (NYSE American: PMNT) ("Perfect Moment" or the "Company"), the high-performance, luxury skiwear and lifestyle brand that fuses technical excellence with fashion-led designs, today announced the pricing of its underwritten public offering of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock. Each share of common stock is being sold at a public offering price of $0.30 per share for gross proceeds of $3,000,000, before deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses. In addition, the Company has granted the underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,500,000 shares of common stock at the public offering price less discounts and commissions, to cover over-allotments. The offering is expected to close on June 30, 2025, subject to satisfaction of customary closing conditions. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering primarily for repayment of debt, working capital and general corporate purposes. ThinkEquity is acting as sole book-running manager for the offering. The securities will be offered and sold pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-285612), including a base prospectus, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on March 6, 2025 and declared effective on March 12, 2025. The offering will be made only by means of a written prospectus. A prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus describing the terms of the offering will be filed with the SEC on its website at Copies of the prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus relating to the offering may also be obtained, when available, from the offices of ThinkEquity, 17 State Street, 41st Floor, New York, New York 10004. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such an offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction. About Perfect Moment Ltd. Founded in Chamonix, France, Perfect Moment is a luxury outerwear and activewear brand that merges alpine heritage with fashion-forward performance. Known for its technical excellence, bold design, and versatile pieces that transition seamlessly from slopes to city, the brand is worn by athletes, tastemakers, and celebrities worldwide. Perfect Moment is traded on the NYSE American under the ticker symbol PMNT. Learn more at Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained in this press release are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release may be identified by the use of words such as "anticipate," "believe," "contemplate," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "seek," "may," "might," "plan," "potential," "predict," "project," "target," "aim," "should," "will," "would," or the negative of these words or other similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based on our current expectations and are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Further, certain forward-looking statements are based on assumptions as to future events that may not prove to be accurate. Our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements, include those risks and uncertainties described more fully in the sections titled "Risk Factors" in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, and in the prospectus supplement for the offering, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any forward-looking statements contained in this press release are made as of this date and are based on information currently available to us. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. View source version on Contacts Company Contact Julie Robinson, Brand DirectorPerfect MomentTel +44 7595178702press@ Investor Contact CMA Investor RelationsTel (949) 432-7554PMNT@ Sign in to access your portfolio
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Hitting snags, Trump pushes Senate to pass his big tax bill before July 4
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's first order of business after returning from an overseas trip: shore up support for a tax bill he's been pushing to have on his desk by July 4. Trump's administration said it still expected Congress to meet the ambitious timeline, even as the bill ran into hurdles in the Senate that could delay its potential passage. 'We hope so,' the president told reporters, as he left an East Room event. The president's arrival in Washington after attending a NATO Summit in Europe capped a two-week period in which Trump's focus was on foreign affairs. But with tensions in the Middle East abating and his tax bill teetering, Trump turned his attention back to the legislation he's nicknamed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' The legislation would increase the child tax credit, create investment accounts for kids, increase the estate tax exemption, boost border security and allow residents of high-tax states to write off more of their income. It would also add restrictions to Medicaid and food stamps. Trump sought to rally support for the legislation at an event with workers his administration said would benefit from measures such as no taxes on tips or overtime. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a daily briefing that meetings and direct conversations with senators about the bill had been taking place behind the scenes. 'I saw some senators rolling out of the Oval Office the other day, and the president remains on the phones talking to his friends in the Senate when necessary,' she said. 'And when they call, he picks up the phone.' She declined to say which senators Trump was trying to convince. But the president spoke this week with Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, a key Republican holdout on the bill. Johnson said they met at the White House on June 23, which was a day before Trump left for Europe. Trump previously hosted members of the Senate Finance Committee at the White House and has met multiple times over the last month with Senate Majority Leader John Thune. Senators Mike Lee of Utah and Bernie Moreno of Ohio attended his event at the White House. Tax bill latest: GOP senators negotiate Trump budget bill in hopes of improving its polling Vice President JD Vance has also urged his former Senate colleagues to vote yes on the bill. He attended Senate Republicans' weekly luncheon last week and met with Johnson at the Capitol on June 10, a person familiar with the conversation said. The White House says it is optimistic it can get Johnson to a yes. He is one of several senators who have said they are worried the legislation, which extends tax cuts and expands breaks Trump signed into law in 2017, will add trillions to the federal deficit. Other lawmakers in the president's party say that cuts to Medicaid in the bill run too deep. Trump can only afford to lose three senators and still be able to pass the bill. Trump chides GOP 'grandstanders' The president directed Republican lawmakers to stay in town, and skip a planned recess heading into the July 4 holiday if they must, in order to get the bill to his desk on his preferred timeline. 'To my friends in the Senate, lock yourself in a room if you must, don't go home, and GET THE DEAL DONE THIS WEEK. Work with the House so they can pick it up, and pass it, IMMEDIATELY. NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT'S DONE,' he said on social media. At his afternoon event on June 26, the president spoke out at 'grandstanders' who were derailing his agenda, without chiding any specific Republican lawmaker by name. "I shouldn't say this, but we don't want to have grandstanders where one or two people raise their hand, 'we'll vote no.' And they do it to grandstand,' he said. 'Not good people. They know who I'm talking about. We don't need grandstanders.' The event was largely focused on everyday Americans the White House brought on stage to put a human face on the proposed policies. One of them was Maliki Krieski, a DoorDash driver from Ripon, Wisconsin, who works for the food delivery service to supplement her income and provide care for her son, a Type 1 diabetic. The 46-year old gift shop owner said she had previously shared her story with White House staff. 'No tax on tips is huge,' Krieski told USA TODAY after the event. 'Being able to put that money back into our pockets and be able to help our families be able to really grow the economy is extremely important.' Tax bill hits another roadblock Lawmakers are relying on a complicated budgeting mechanism to push the bill through without triggering a Democratic filibuster. Senators had to revise a House-passed version of the bill on June 26 after the chamber's parliamentarian, Elizabeth McDonough, ruled that provisions of the bill that were critical to winning over conservative hardliners in the House would have to come out. Among the provisions that were ruled out of bounds were several pertaining to Medicaid, a federal healthcare program for low-income and disabled individuals. Another roadblock: Trump, Senate GOP face big setback on tax bill's Medicaid overhaul Republicans in the lower chamber then said they would oppose the bill if areas of the bill were adjusted. 'I love President Trump and I really want to vote to pass his agenda in the Big Beautiful Bill when it comes back to the House from the Senate, but between the far left Senate Parliamentarian stripping out many of our good provisions and the special interest lobbyists sneaking in dirty poison pills like 10 year state moratoriums on AI, I'm currently a NO,' Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia said in a post on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that his chamber would work around the clock to meet Trump's deadline. 'It doesn't make it easier, but you know me, hope springs eternal,' Johnson said.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Federal judge weighs whether Alabama's anti-DEI law threatens First Amendment
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) — Professors and students at the University of Alabama testified on Thursday that a new an anti-diversity, equity and inclusion law has jeopardized funding and changed curriculum, as a federal judge weighs whether the legislation is constitutional before the new school year begins. The new state law, SB129, followed a slew of proposals from Republican lawmakers across the country taking aim at DEI programs on college campuses. Universities across the country have shuttered or rebranded student affinity groups and DEI offices. The law prohibits public schools and universities from using state funds for any curriculum that endorses or compels assent to viewpoints about eight 'divisive concepts' related to race, religion, gender identity and religion. Instructors are also prohibited from encouraging a person feel guilt because of those identities. Schools are still allowed to facilitate 'objective' discussions on those topics, according to the law. Dana Patton, a political science professor at the University of Alabama, was one of six professors and students who sued the school and Republican Gov. Kay Ivey in January, arguing that the law violates the First Amendment by placing viewpoint-based restrictions on educators' speech. The lawsuit also argued that the law unconstitutionally targets Black students because it emphasizes concepts related to race and limits programs that benefit Black students. Shortly after the law took effect in October, Patton said that school officials told her that five students had made complaints suggesting that the interdisciplinary honors program she administered had potential conflicts with the new legislation. The program focuses on social justice and community service. University officials said a 'powerful person' in the state Capitol was behind the five student complaints, Patton testified. The complaints alleged the program 'promoted socialism' and focused on 'systematic racism" and 'producing engaged global citizens as opposed to patriotic Americans,' according to evidence presented at the hearing. The complaints also said students 'feel unsafe' because 'the leadership of the program has a clear view of the world from a divisive perspective." 'I was completely shocked, stunned," Patton said. After weeks of meetings where Patton exhaustively laid out the content of her courses to administrators, she said she was introduced to Alabama Republican Rep. Danny Garrett at a school football game. Garret told her that 'we need compromise here' because the legislators involved in the complaints are 'tenacious' and 'not going to let this go.' He then sent her links to work he had done with Black Democratic state legislators after the death of George Floyd to address racial tension. Patton said the conversation 'very much felt like a threat' because Garrett is the chair of the Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee, which is one of two legislative committees that oversees the university's funding. The tenured professor said she has since removed some course material from her syllabus and is no longer posting slides of her lectures online, out of fear that her lessons might be misinterpreted. Garrett declined to comment on the pending litigation. University lawyer says law hasn't caused harm Jay Ezelle, the defense attorney for the University of Alabama Board of Trustees, said the school had an obligation to investigate if students complain about being tested on an opinion, not on a performance. 'If that's violated, the university has to investigate, correct?' Ezelle asked during cross-examination. He added that the law had not created any measurable harm against the plaintiffs, because no faculty had been terminated or formally disciplined, and school administrators had sourced private funding for some affinity groups, who still have access to campus facilities. Professors said they had to remove class assignments Other professors testified that they felt compelled to pull class assignments or stop offering classes altogether based on Patton's experience, as well as formal instruction from the university about the 'risks' of testing students on divisive concepts. Rising senior Sydney Testman said she lost her scholarship because it was tied to her job at the Social Justice Advocacy Council, which was terminated after the anti-DEI legislation went into effect. 'No one wants to say it's disproportionately affecting Black people,' she said. 'The vibes are kind of 'everyone fend for yourselves.'' Federal U.S. Chief Judge R. David Proctor said the case will largely hinge on whether classroom speech is protected under the First Amendment and whether the state has a right to influence curriculum. Proctor will also consider if the six students and professors who brought the lawsuit against the University of Alabama have been harmed by the new law. ___
