Steady but uneven: Women slowly climb the corporate ladder in South Africa's boardrooms
This is according to the 2024 Spencer Stuart South Africa Board Index which tracks the composition of boards in the country's 50 largest JSE-listed companies.
The report reveals that women now account for 37% of all directors and 40% of non-executive directors (NEDs) which is a significant improvement compared to previous decades.
The report also showed persistent gaps especially in executive leadership and long-term retention.
'Sixty percent of boards now include at least one woman in a top executive position either as chairperson, CEO, CFO or another executive director. This signals that women are not only entering the boardroom but increasingly occupying key decision-making roles,' the report said.
The index showed that despite these gains progress remains inconsistent. Just 43% of newly appointed NEDs are women and 22% of them have no prior board experience which is a sign of what the report calls a 'persistent pipeline problem'.
The report also provides insights into age and tenure differences. The average board member is just under 60 years old but female NEDs are notably younger than their male counterparts, averaging 57.9 years versus 62.3.
New directors are younger still, at 55.7 years. However the average tenure for women on boards is only 4.6 years compared to 7.5 years for men, raising questions about retention and long-term influence.
In addition to gender, the Spencer Stuart Index tracks other dimensions of diversity including race, age and nationality. It found that 32% of board members are historically disadvantaged South Africans (HDSAs).
Among these, HDSA women average 55.4 years in age and 4.9 years of tenure, slightly above the average for female directors.
Still, the report cautions that women remain underrepresented at the highest rungs of corporate leadership.
Globally, the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI), which tracks thousands of companies, reports that just 6.5% of CEOs and 9.1% of board chairs are women.
The MSCI ACWI said the number of female CEOs worldwide has doubled since 2019, and 18.8% of CFO roles are now held by women. However, pay disparities persist as in 2022, male CEOs earned an average of $6.5m compared to $6.3m for their female counterparts.
The communications sector showed the starkest gap with men outearning women by nearly $10m, while in industrials, women out-earned men by $4.4m on average.
South Africa's progress, though slow, is notable as a Stellenbosch University study highlights that in 2008, only 14.3% of JSE-listed company directors were women.
By 2017, that figure had risen to 20.7%. Yet, it still lags far behind the demographic reality as women make up 51.2% of the population and 45% of the economically active population.
Internationally, some countries have taken bolder measures. Norway enacted one of the world's first and strictest gender quota laws in 2003, mandating 40% female board representation. It became compulsory in 2006, with penalties for noncompliance.
The result was fewer listed companies. with many delisting to avoid the law, but the move led to better qualified women in leadership and a reduced gender pay gap.
Spain's 2007 Gender Equality Act took a softer approach. It set a 60/40 gender balance target but without strict enforcement. Instead, it used incentives such as preferential access to government contracts for compliant companies, encouraging voluntary change.
Despite global shifts, gender parity is still a long way off. The MSCI projects that women will make up 40% of board members globally by 2033. Full gender parity (50:50) isn't expected until 2040.
TimesLIVE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
PK Investments defends its voluntary offer for MAS amid governance concerns
MAS owned Moldova Mall in Romania underwent a redevelopment and reopened in April 2025. MAS' shareholder PKI Investment has made an offer to acquire at least 10% of the shares in MAS it does not already own. Mas shareholder PK Investments has defended its voluntary bid to buy MAS shares. Image: Supplied The corporate travails at JSE-listed East European property group MAS took another twist on Monday when shareholder PK Investments (PKI) insisted its 'voluntary offer' is fair, and the concerns raised by the MAS independent board were not material. PKI's offer follows its earlier attempt to get MAS to sell all its assets, but this was thwarted at a shareholders' meeting. It also follows concerns expressed by nine minority South African institutional shareholders about aspects of governance in the MAS board. These shareholders, which together own 15% of MAS, include Meago, Sesfikile Capital, Ninety One, Catalyst, Eskom Pension Fund, and Stanlib. South African REIT Hyprop also earlier withdrew a bid for MAS, because MAS's board and PKI allegedly failed to provide information. PKI has offered cash of €1.40 per MAS share (R29.22) or a preference share option or a combination of both. MAS's shares were trading 0.96% lower at R23.77 on Monday. On the MAS board's view that there was a 'perceived lack of regulator 'proactive' intervention' in the PKI bid, PKI's directors said their offer 'is fully compliant from a legal perspective.' And while the bid documents were submitted to the JSE for approval, it was the 'JSE's own view that it did not have jurisdiction to review or comment on the documentation,' PKI said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'This was not a view unilaterally adopted by PKI. We believe the PKI Voluntary Bid is generous by any reasonable measure, as evidenced by the premiums to MAS pricing levels recognised in the MAS announcement…' The MAS board had also said that neither it nor shareholders were 'engaged meaningfully by PKI prior to the launching of the bid, and that shareholders were not given enough time to make a complex decision.' PKI said, however the "bid is a voluntary offer…and does not constitute a scheme of arrangement or similar transaction. Accordingly, there was no express need to engage the MAS independent board prior to the launch thereof, as is the case with any such offer to MAS shareholders.' Additionally, said PKI, the material terms of the bid were publicly available since May 16, 2025. PKI and PSG Capital had also engaged 'extensively with numerous MAS shareholders' regarding the bid, PKI said. 'As regards MAS' statement that the timeline does not comply with the JSE corporate actions timetable or Maltese Capital Markets Rules, it should be noted that these rules are not applicable to the PKI voluntary bid,' PKI directors said. The MAS board had also questioned the absence of any requirement for the exempt parties to make a mandatory offer if, pursuant to the PKI bid, certain control thresholds were exceeded. 'MAS shareholders would already have had the opportunity to tender their shares into a full voluntary offer on attractive terms. This is precisely the outcome the mandatory bid regime in the MAS Articles is designed to achieve.' The MAS board also highlighted the absence of a third-party guarantee for the cash consideration. PKI said the settlement process, handled by MAS' own transfer secretaries, ensured that cash and shares were exchanged simultaneously. 'We further confirm that PKI has already deposited the maximum cash amount with its bankers in South Africa.' On the MAS board concern about the rand/euro exchange rate risk for South African shareholders, PKI said foreign exchange exposure was inherent in any cross-border investment and 'MAS' own share price already embeds EUR exposure through its portfolio.' On concerns that the free float reduction could mar the liquidity of MAS shares, PKI said many companies with lower free floats maintain healthy liquidity, while a stable, aligned controlling shareholder could bring strategic benefits and a more predictable capital allocation. BUSINESS REPORT


Mail & Guardian
3 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Infrastructure, governance failures limit growth of agriculture and development in rural areas
The rural economy depends on resource-based industries such as agriculture, mining, fishing, tourism and forestry. Photo: File On 6 August, I had an opportunity to deliver the Among other things, I emphasised that the rural economy should not be forgotten in South Africa's economic growth agenda, where there tends to be a strong urban bias in policy discussions. The rural areas are still a significant segment of society and the economy, though 68% of the population now lives in urban areas. Apart from the rural areas' reliance on remittances and social transfer payments, the one outstanding characteristic of the rural economy is its dependence on a few key industries, all of which are typically resource-based, such as agriculture, mining, fishing, tourism and forestry. With rising unemployment and low economic activity, policymakers are searching for areas of growth and job creation. For many rural areas, agriculture and tourism are the only industries that still have the potential to generate livelihoods and employment. But, for these industries to perform better, we must address the various infrastructure and governance constraints that have limited the development and growth of agriculture to its potential levels. Indeed, the sector has more than doubled since 1994, but it is not yet at capacity. We have detailed many growth-constraining issues in our latest joint work with Professor Johann Kirsten, These include: Market failures (high transaction costs, remote location); Government failures (inefficiencies, poor service delivery and corruption); Community failures (poor local institutions, vested interests of traditional leaders); and Poor land governance (lack of secure tenure). These constraints cause many rural communities to be caught in a poverty trap from which they cannot escape. What's worse, rural areas have less access to public services and infrastructure than urban areas due, partly, to the higher per-unit cost of infrastructure investment and service delivery in rural areas. This extends to 'soft' infrastructure such as healthcare centres as well as 'hard' infrastructure such as road networks, rail, silos, irrigation systems, water and electricity. This leads to low agricultural productivity and poor linkages to markets for farmers. What should be done differently to address these problems so that economic activity and employment can take off in rural areas? To an extent, these problems are well understood and were highlighted in The lack of implementation of agricultural government policy and infrastructure-related constraints comes down to the following reasons: Weak coordination and misalignment of functions and priorities between different government departments and different spheres of government. A misallocation of the budget by the national and provincial governments; and Poor coordination between the government and the private sector has led to a misalignment of transformation programmes, incentives and in some cases, vision. I won't delve into further details, especially as my book, This is a challenge that the government and the private sector should address, and refocusing on the Wandile Sihlobo is the chief economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa. You can watch the lecture . I speak at 1:10:10 minutes.


Mail & Guardian
7 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Dion George gives go ahead for new 4 000MW nuclear plant
Green groups warn of risks, including soaring upfront costs, the history of construction delays and budget overruns Forestry, Fisheries and Environment Minister The minister's decision, announced on Friday, came after he resolved under section 43(6) of the National Environmental Management Act (Nema), to dismiss the appeals from various environmental organisations, and confirm the environmental authorisation to Eskom for the planned 4 000 megawatt power station in Duynefontein. The proposed project is adjacent to the existing George said that he had carefully reviewed the environmental impact assessment report, as well as the 'In the end, my decision was made in respect of the principles of [the Act] … and with full appreciation of the environmental, social and economic considerations involved,' the minister said. The original decision to grant the environmental authorisation was made in October 2017. Various appellants challenged the decision, submitting appeals that ranged from comprehensive and detailed submissions to shorter, individual objections. George's decision does not automatically grant Eskom permission to begin with the construction or operation of the nuclear power station. The state-owned power utility is still required to obtain several additional statutory authorisations before proceeding in accordance with section 24(7) of Nema. 'As per section 24(7) of [the Act], the granting of an environmental authorisation does not exempt an applicant from complying with any other applicable legal requirements or obtaining permits from other competent authorities,' noted George. These authorisations include a nuclear installation licence from the National Nuclear Regulator; approval from the National Energy Regulator of South Africa; water use licences from the department of water and sanitation; as well as other relevant approvals such as those from the minister of mineral and petroleum resources. George emphasised that the protection and preservation of the country's environment is non-negotiable. He said his department supports the country's transition to a cleaner, more sustainable energy future 'where inclusive growth, job creation and poverty reduction are central'. Earthlife Africa is considering George's decision, as well as its next steps, said Lekalakala, the director of the non-profit environmental organisation. 'Our concerns include the length of time taken to conduct the environmental impact assessment and to make the appeal decision,' she said. 'We are also deeply concerned about the In addition, there has been no assessment of the socio-economic impacts of a major beyond-design-basis nuclear incident, nor of the generation of long-lived high-level McDaid, the strategic lead of the Green Connection, another non-profit, agreed. 'In recent months, we've seen a 'We are in the middle of a climate crisis, and we should be using our abundant natural resources, such as solar and wind, which can be built quickly and deliver affordable power to homes. Nuclear is expensive, and, like other large projects, is plagued by long delays.' Nuclear power also carries significant risks, requiring costly additional regulation, 'and there is always the possibility of an accident'. 'Even after 40 years of operation, South Africa still has no proper plan for managing toxic nuclear waste — a huge problem that is often ignored in discussions about this dangerous technology … Right now, in the absence of an inclusive, people-centred energy plan, it appears that vested interests are driving individual projects without public consensus.'