401(k) savings rate: Are Americans with 401(k) accounts saving enough for retirement? Fidelity's latest report has this to say
Americans are getting closer to retirement readiness
A decade of progress
Better employer matches help
ADVERTISEMENT
Auto-enrollment is making a difference
Gen Z steps up
ADVERTISEMENT
FAQs
ADVERTISEMENT
After years of slow progress, Americans may finally be getting close to saving enough for retirement, or at least those with access to a 401(k) plan are, as per a report.Fidelity Investment's latest retirement savings report revealed that in the first quarter of 2025, the average total 401(k) savings rate on its plans reached 14.3%, reported USA Today. That's an all-time high and just a step away from the long-recommended 15% benchmark many financial advisers suggest for a secure retirement, as per the report.Ten years ago, the picture looked different, as in early 2015, employees were saving just 8.1% of their pre-tax income, while employers added 4.4%, for a total savings rate of 12.5%, according to USA Today. By comparison, today's employees are contributing 9.5%, with employers pitching in 4.8%, as per the report.Vice President of Thought Leadership at Fidelity, Mike Shamrell said, 'It's basically the rate that we recommend that will allow you to live the same lifestyle in retirement that you did before you retired,' quoted USA Today.One reason for the increase is that employers are more generous with their matching contributions. As competition for talent grows, many companies now offer to match up to 5% of employee salaries, as per USA Today.A senior director of investing at Betterment, Mindy Yu said, 'That's basically free money for saving for retirement , and that is something that employees value,' as quoted in the report.Auto-enrollment policies are also having an impact as since the beginning of 2025, most new 401(k) plans are required to automatically enroll workers unless they opt out, as per USA Today. This simple change has encouraged more participation and is steadily improving savings habits, according to the report.More than one-third of Fidelity's plans now auto-enroll workers at contribution rates of 5% or more, reported USA Today. Many plans also include auto-escalation features, which increase contributions gradually every year, and nearly three-quarters of Fidelity's plans now include this feature, reported USA Today.A head of thought leadership at Alight Solutions, Rob Austin said, 'Unless a new hire takes action, they're going to be saving for the plan,' adding, 'That's much different than how 401(k)s first started, and you had to enroll on your own,' as quoted in the report.Fidelity's data shows that Gen Z workers, though they are in the early phase of their careers, are saving at a promising rate of 11.2%, as per USA Today. That's close behind Millennials at 13.5% and Generation X at 15.4%, according to the report.Austin said, 'I think most of the newer, younger cohorts are in this environment where they learn that they need to be saving a lot,' quoted USA Today.Financial advisers typically recommend saving at least 15% of your salary, including employer match for a secure retirement.Auto-enrollment automatically signs you up for a 401(k) when you start a job. It's helped more people start saving without needing to opt in.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Immigration's Impact on the US Hotel Industry: A Growing Crisis, ET HospitalityWorld
A U.S. crackdown on foreign-born workers could spell trouble for the hotel and hospitality industry, which has lobbied for years to expand the pathways for immigration to the United States to help fill over 1 million job vacancies. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Thursday he would issue an immigration order soon, following a social media post in which he cited labour issues in the farm and hotel industries stemming from his immigration crackdown. But on Friday, the Washington Post reported that no such policy changes were under way, according to three people with knowledge of the administration's immigration policies. Advt Advt In 2024, travel supported the jobs of 15 million U.S. workers and directly employed 8 million, with approximately one-third of those workers immigrants, according to the U.S. Travel Association and American Hotel and Lodging Association . There are about 1 million job openings in and resorts have struggled to find enough Americans willing to work hospitality jobs, including seasonal or temporary jobs at ski resorts and amusement parks. The leisure and hospitality industries have quit rates higher than all other industries. The accommodation and food services subsector has experienced a quit rate consistently around or above 4 percent since July 2022, according to the U.S. Chamber of 71 percent of the hotels that had job openings were unable to fill them despite active searches, according to a 2024 survey conducted by AHLA and Hireology, an employee management platform.U.S. Travel and AHLA have lobbied Congress for broader pathways for legal immigration in an effort to close these industry's priority was to push for expanding the H-2B visa program , which was capped at 66,000 visas a year, to bring more seasonal workers to the United March 2024, then-President Joe Biden signed the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, which authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to increase the number of H-2B temporary nonagricultural workers if the agency determines there are not enough American workers "willing, qualified, and able to perform temporary nonagricultural labor."DHS and the Department of Labor in December published a joint temporary final rule increasing the limit on H-2B non-immigrant visas for fiscal year industry also supported legislation that looked to make it easier for temporary workers to return to the U.S. and allow people seeking asylum to work as soon as 30 days after applying for executives, including those from Marriott and Hilton, have talked about the need for practical immigration solutions for years."One of the most important issues in our industry for time and eternity has been workforce ... and the need for comprehensive immigration reform ," Hilton Worldwide CEO Chris Nassetta said at the Americas Lodging Investment Summit in January, according to a report by Travel union Unite HERE, which represents thousands of workers in U.S. hotels, casinos, and airports, a majority of whom are immigrants, said the union will continue to fight "the increasingly arbitrary rules" about who can and cannot live and travel to the United Culinary Workers Union, which represents hospitality workers in Las Vegas, rallied against escalating Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Nevada and pushed back against claims the Trump administration was only responding to people breaking the law.(Reporting by Doyinsola Oladipo in New York; additional reporting by Aishwarya Jain in Bengaluru; editing by Rod Nickel) Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. All about ETHospitalityWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETHospitalityWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles.
New Indian Express
6 hours ago
- New Indian Express
AI literacy: What it is, what it isn't, who needs it, why it's hard to define
MUNICH/ WEST LAFAYETTE: It is the policy of the United States to promote AI literacy and proficiency among Americans, reads an executive order President Donald Trump issued on April 23, 2025. The executive order, titled Advancing Artificial Intelligence Education for American Youth, signals that advancing AI literacy is now an official national priority. This raises a series of important questions: What exactly is AI literacy, who needs it, and how do you go about building it thoughtfully and responsibly? The implications of AI literacy, or lack thereof, are far-reaching. They extend beyond national ambitions to remain a global leader in this technological revolution -- or even prepare an -- AI-skilled workforce, as the executive order states. Without basic literacy, citizens and consumers are not well equipped to understand the algorithmic platforms and decisions that affect so many domains of their lives: government services, privacy, lending, health care, news recommendations and more. And the lack of AI literacy risks ceding important aspects of society's future to a handful of multinational companies. How, then, can institutions help people understand and use or resist AI as individuals, workers, parents, innovators, job seekers, students, employers and citizens? We are a policy scientist and two educational researchers who study AI literacy, and we explore these issues in our research. What AI literacy is and isn't At its foundation, AI literacy includes a mix of knowledge, skills and attitudes that are technical, social and ethical in nature. According to one prominent definition, AI literacy refers to a set of competencies that enables individuals to critically evaluate AI technologies; communicate and collaborate effectively with AI; and use AI as a tool online, at home, and in the workplace. AI literacy is not simply programming or the mechanics of neural networks, and it is certainly not just prompt engineering that is, the act of carefully writing prompts for chatbots. Vibe coding, or using AI to write software code, might be fun and important, but restricting the definition of literacy to the newest trend or the latest need of employers won't cover the bases in the long term. And while a single master definition may not be needed, or even desirable, too much variation makes it tricky to decide on organizational, educational or policy strategies. Who needs AI literacy? Everyone, including the employees and students using it, and the citizens grappling with its growing impacts. Every sector and sphere of society is now involved with AI, even if this isn't always easy for people to see. Exactly how much literacy everyone needs and how to get there is a much tougher question. Are a few quick HR training sessions enough, or do we need to embed AI across K-12 curricula and deliver university micro-credentials and hands-on workshops? There is much that researchers don't know, which leads to the need to measure AI literacy and the effectiveness of different training approaches. Measuring AI literacy While there is a growing and bipartisan consensus that AI literacy matters, there's much less consensus on how to actually understand people's AI literacy levels. Researchers have focused on different aspects, such as technical or ethical skills, or on different populations for example, business managers and students or even on subdomains like generative AI. A recent review study identified more than a dozen questionnaires designed to measure AI literacy, the vast majority of which rely on self-reported responses to questions and statements such as -- I feel confident about using AI. There's also a lack of testing to see whether these questionnaires work well for people from different cultural backgrounds. Moreover, the rise of generative AI has exposed gaps and challenges: Is it possible to create a stable way to measure AI literacy when AI is itself so dynamic? In our research collaboration, we've tried to help address some of these problems. In particular, we've focused on creating objective knowledge assessments, such as multiple-choice surveys tested with thorough statistical analyses to ensure that they accurately measure AI literacy. We've so far tested a multiple-choice survey in the U.S., U.K. and Germany and found that it works consistently and fairly across these three countries. There's a lot more work to do to create reliable and feasible testing approaches. But going forward, just asking people to self-report their AI literacy probably isn't enough to understand where different groups of people are and what supports they need. Approaches to building AI literacy Governments, universities and industry are trying to advance AI literacy. Finland launched the Elements of AI series in 2018 with the hope of educating its general public on AI. Estonia's AI Leap initiative partners with Anthropic and OpenAI to provide access to AI tools for tens of thousands of students and thousands of teachers.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
AI literacy: What it is, what it isn't, who needs it, why it's hard to define
It is "the policy of the United States to promote AI literacy and proficiency among Americans," reads an executive order President Donald Trump issued on April 23, 2025. The executive order, titled Advancing Artificial Intelligence Education for American Youth, signals that advancing AI literacy is now an official national priority. This raises a series of important questions: What exactly is AI literacy, who needs it, and how do you go about building it thoughtfully and responsibly? The implications of AI literacy, or lack thereof, are far-reaching. They extend beyond national ambitions to remain "a global leader in this technological revolution" or even prepare an "AI-skilled workforce," as the executive order states. Without basic literacy, citizens and consumers are not well equipped to understand the algorithmic platforms and decisions that affect so many domains of their lives: government services, privacy, lending, health care, news recommendations and more. And the lack of AI literacy risks ceding important aspects of society's future to a handful of multinational companies. Live Events How, then, can institutions help people understand and use - or resist - AI as individuals, workers, parents, innovators, job seekers, students, employers and citizens? We are a policy scientist and two educational researchers who study AI literacy, and we explore these issues in our research. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories What AI literacy is and isn't At its foundation, AI literacy includes a mix of knowledge, skills and attitudes that are technical, social and ethical in nature. According to one prominent definition, AI literacy refers to "a set of competencies that enables individuals to critically evaluate AI technologies; communicate and collaborate effectively with AI; and use AI as a tool online, at home, and in the workplace." AI literacy is not simply programming or the mechanics of neural networks, and it is certainly not just prompt engineering - that is, the act of carefully writing prompts for chatbots. Vibe coding, or using AI to write software code, might be fun and important, but restricting the definition of literacy to the newest trend or the latest need of employers won't cover the bases in the long term. And while a single master definition may not be needed, or even desirable, too much variation makes it tricky to decide on organizational, educational or policy strategies. Who needs AI literacy? Everyone, including the employees and students using it, and the citizens grappling with its growing impacts. Every sector and sphere of society is now involved with AI, even if this isn't always easy for people to see. Exactly how much literacy everyone needs and how to get there is a much tougher question. Are a few quick HR training sessions enough, or do we need to embed AI across K-12 curricula and deliver university micro credentials and hands-on workshops? There is much that researchers don't know, which leads to the need to measure AI literacy and the effectiveness of different training approaches. Measuring AI literacy While there is a growing and bipartisan consensus that AI literacy matters, there's much less consensus on how to actually understand people's AI literacy levels. Researchers have focused on different aspects, such as technical or ethical skills, or on different populations - for example, business managers and students - or even on subdomains like generative AI. A recent review study identified more than a dozen questionnaires designed to measure AI literacy, the vast majority of which rely on self-reported responses to questions and statements such as "I feel confident about using AI." There's also a lack of testing to see whether these questionnaires work well for people from different cultural backgrounds. Moreover, the rise of generative AI has exposed gaps and challenges: Is it possible to create a stable way to measure AI literacy when AI is itself so dynamic? In our research collaboration, we've tried to help address some of these problems. In particular, we've focused on creating objective knowledge assessments, such as multiple-choice surveys tested with thorough statistical analyses to ensure that they accurately measure AI literacy. We've so far tested a multiple-choice survey in the U.S. , U.K. and Germany and found that it works consistently and fairly across these three countries. There's a lot more work to do to create reliable and feasible testing approaches. But going forward, just asking people to self-report their AI literacy probably isn't enough to understand where different groups of people are and what supports they need. Approaches to building AI literacy Governments, universities and industry are trying to advance AI literacy. Finland launched the Elements of AI series in 2018 with the hope of educating its general public on AI. Estonia's AI Leap initiative partners with Anthropic and OpenAI to provide access to AI tools for tens of thousands of students and thousands of teachers. And China is now requiring at least eight hours of AI education annually as early as elementary school, which goes a step beyond the new US executive order. On the university level, Purdue University and the University of Pennsylvania have launched new master's in AI programmes, targeting future AI leaders. Despite these efforts, these initiatives face an unclear and evolving understanding of AI literacy. They also face challenges to measuring effectiveness and minimal knowledge on what teaching approaches actually work. And there are long-standing issues with respect to equity − for example, reaching schools, communities, segments of the population and businesses that are stretched or under-resourced. Next moves on AI literacy Based on our research, experience as educators and collaboration with policymakers and technology companies, we think a few steps might be prudent. Building AI literacy starts with recognizing it's not just about tech: People also need to grasp the social and ethical sides of the technology. To see whether we're getting there, we researchers and educators should use clear, reliable tests that track progress for different age groups and communities. Universities and companies can try out new teaching ideas first, then share what works through an independent hub. Educators, meanwhile, need proper training and resources, not just additional curricula, to bring AI into the classroom. And because opportunity isn't spread evenly, partnerships that reach under-resourced schools and neighbourhoods are essential so everyone can benefit. Critically, achieving widespread AI literacy may be even harder than building digital and media literacy, so getting there will require serious investment - not cuts - to education and research. There is widespread consensus that AI literacy is important, whether to boost AI trust and adoption or to empower citizens to challenge AI or shape its future. As with AI itself, we believe it's important to approach AI literacy carefully, avoiding hype or an overly technical focus. The right approach can prepare students to become "active and responsible participants in the workforce of the future" and empower Americans to "thrive in an increasingly digital society," as the AI literacy executive order calls for.
