What Does The Future Look Like For Local Government?
Council Chair Craig Pauling said although recent media commentary relating to 'scrapping regional government' was unhelpful, a conversation was needed and should involve all levels of government, and iwi partners.
'Significant local government and resource management reform has been on Government agendas for some time. As a Council we agree that the current structure and funding for local government needs work.'
'Instead of waiting for the Government to make changes, we've proactively been doing work at our Council to understand how the reforms might impact Canterbury, and what we can do to ensure good outcomes for our natural resources, our communities as well as our economy.'
Chair Pauling said the workshop gave Councillors an opportunity to discuss representation, local voice, and what services and regulatory functions could be best delivered at a national, regional or local level.
'We didn't land on a specific structure, or proposed future-state today. Today's workshop gave us the opportunity to discuss the whole ecosystem of local government decision making, and to test some ideas with each other.'
Deputy Chair Dr Deon Swiggs said the workshop built on the momentum from the May Council meeting, where Councillors reached shared positions on key issues for the region.
'Canterbury's scale, diverse landscapes, and active economies present both opportunities and responsibilities. We're a region shaped by a unique environment and strong local industries, and require tailored approaches to our place.'
'The work we're doing now reflects our commitment to shaping the future, not waiting for it. By thinking ahead, Canterbury Regional Council is well placed to contribute constructively to national conversations and ensure the needs of our people, environment, and economy are reflected in whatever reforms come next,' said Deputy Swiggs.
Following the workshop, Chair Pauling said he was pleased with the good-spirited and open-minded discussion had by Councillors about different options for Canterbury.
'Although we have more work to do, it was clear that there are some different ways to do this and some promising options for the future.'
'This is an important conversation to have openly across the region, and we plan to share our thinking with our partners, the community, TAs and the Government.'
The workshop was streamed live on the Canterbury Regional Council YouTube channel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
9 hours ago
- Newsroom
NZ can't afford to be careless with its AI strategy
Opinion: The Government's new strategy for AI was announced last week to a justifiably flat reception. As far as national-level policy goes, the document is severely lacking. One of the main culprits is prominently displayed at the end of Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Shane Reti's foreword: 'This document was written with the assistance of AI.' For those with some experience of AI, this language is generally recognised to be a precursor to fairly unexceptional outputs. The minister's commitment to walking the talk on AI, as he says, could have been seen as admirable if the resulting output was not so clumsy, and did not carry so many of the hallmarks of AI-generated content. To be blunt, the document is poorly written, badly structured, and under-researched. It cites eight documents in total, half of which are produced by industry – an amount of research suitable for a first year university student. It makes no effort to integrate arguments or sources critical of AI, nor does it provide any balanced assessment. This same carelessness is exhibited in the web version of the document which has scarcely been edited, and includes a number of errors like 'gnerative AI' as opposed to generative AI. It also contains very little actual strategy or targets. It reads more like a dossier from Meta, Open AI or Anthropic and is filled with just as much industry language. In short, it is entirely unsuitable to be the defining strategic document to guide New Zealand's engagement with what it accurately defines as 'one of the most significant technological opportunities of our time'. Especially not in a global climate where there is an ever-growing appreciation for the potential harms of AI, as seen in the growing number of class actions in the United States, or resources like the AI Incident Database. AI harm and job displacement are very real and important problems. Yet, in the Strategy for AI they are described as dystopian scenarios being used by the media to compound uncertainty. The problem is not necessarily that AI was used to assist the production of the document, it is the extent to which it was used, and how. AI has a number of useful applications such as spellchecking, assisting with structure, and providing counter-points which can help further flesh out your writing. However, it is inappropriate to use generative AI to produce national-level policy. What is particularly alarming is that anyone with a ChatGPT licence and about a minute of spare time could very easily produce a document similar in content, tone and structure to the government's strategy. Thankfully bad policy can be improved, and hopefully this will be eventually. But, by far the most damning aspect of the strategy is the underlying notion that generative AI should have a key role in developing policy in New Zealand. There is an unappealing hubris in thinking that New Zealand's public servants, many of whom are phenomenally skilled, deeply caring, and out of work, could be replaced or meaningfully augmented by such a ham-handed and poorly thought out application of generative AI. Unfortunately, it is likely that the strategy's fast and efficient rollout will be seen by the Government as a success regardless of the quality of the output. This will no doubt embolden it to continue to use generative AI as an aid in the production of policy in future. This is a real cause for concern, as it could be used to justify even more cuts to the public service and further undermine the function of our democracy. Use of generative AI in the development of policy also raises fundamental questions as to what our public service is and should be. It would seem imprudent to employ our public servants on the basis of their care, knowledge, expertise and diligence and then require them to delegate their work to generative AI. A public service defined solely by the pace at which they can deliver, as opposed to the quality of that delivery, is at best antithetical to the goals of good government.
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
ACT rally to focus on supermarkets, free speech, economy
FOR SUNDAY AM ACT is holding their annual rally on Sunday in Auckland. Shown: ACT leader David Seymour at last year's rally in Auckland. Photo: RNZ / MARIKA KHABAZI The ACT Party is hosting its annual "Free & Equal" rally in Auckland, as it takes stock of the first half of its term in government and unveils a policy to help competition in the supermarket sector. ACT leader David Seymour said the Sunday event was a chance to look back at what had been achieved, as well as forward towards "what New Zealand needs from us and from the government over the next 15 months". But speaking to RNZ, he rejected the notion it marked the start of the election campaign, saying the best campaigning is simply doing "our job in government". The rally will feature policy updates from ACT ministers and MPs, as well as a keynote speech from Seymour, currently deputy prime minister, and an international guest speaker that is causing concern for a group in Pōneke. ACT MP Cameron Luxton will MC the event, and ACT ministers due to speak are Brooke van Velden, Nicole McKee, Karen Chhour, Andrew Hoggard and Simon Court. Updates will include outlining progress on crime, economic reform, and reducing regulatory burdens, as well as on the government's policy programme. This will be an opportunity for the party to outline to its supporters the progress made while in government, and look ahead to the second half of the political term. The party will also outline its policy to tackle the lack of competition in the supermarket sector, which will likely look at cutting red tape to help overseas players get a foothold. Seymour said the coalition was elected to tackle the cost of living, crime and co-governance, and added that the country now faces a "challenge with health." But he said in each of those areas the government could point to "significant progress", while acknowledging there were still "substantial challenges" - particularly around the cost of living. "Our challenge is to see economic growth occur so that salaries grow in a real way, keeping up with the increase in prices they've faced." Asked whether - like NZ First - the halfway point was an opportunity to turn into campaign mode, Seymour said no, because it was "important that we do our job in government." "That's the best campaigning that you can do," he said. Seymour acknowledged there would be a different set of issues in 2026 than what was present in 2023, and if that wasn't the case, "it means that we haven't done a very good job of addressing the tasks they gave us". "So we do need to start thinking about the next election, but it's not here yet." In terms of what ACT supporters had been indicating the key issues were, Seymour said there had been "six years of long trouble" starting with the terror attacks in 2019, the Covid-19 pandemic, then inflation and high interest rates, recession and unemployment. "Now we face, probably the most uncertain geopolitical situation in several generations. "What we need is some hope to stop scapegoating, to start problem solving, really rally together as the pioneering nation that we can be so that we can address some of those long term problems around productivity, healthcare, cost of living, and really just having a sense that now we're getting somewhere." Last year, the rally was sold out and broadcaster Paul Henry's keynote speech had more than 200,000 views online. ACT described its annual gathering as an opportunity to connect with supporters, outline the party's policy direction, and foster open debate on the country's future. The latest RNZ Reid research poll, taken after the release of the Budget in May, had ACT down 2.8 points to 6.8 percent . More recently, the Taxpayers' Union-Curia Poll, published on Thursday, showed ACT on 9.1 percent , unchanged from their last poll in June. There will also be an "international guest keynote" from Dr James Lindsay, an American author, mathematician, and "prominent advocate for free speech". "Dr. Lindsay is one of the world's leading lights in challenging ideological extremes," Seymour said. "His insights on defending free expression and liberal values are especially relevant in New Zealand today." The Pōneke Anti-fascist Coalition has raised concerns about the ACT party hosting Lindsay, claiming he peddled harmful conspiracies and held radical views. The group was founded in 2022 following the occupation at Parliament. Since then they've organised various rallies and community events to show opposition to "far right ideas". A member of the group, Anne Campbell, said she was concerned the party had invited Lindsay to "rark up their base" and pointed to an article on the Southern Poverty Law Centre website outlining claims by Lindsay. The SPLC was established in 1971 to carry on work from the civil rights movement in the United States of America. Its website states it works in partnership with communities to "dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people". The SPLC article highlighted statements by Lindsay, including reference to the pride flag as "the flag of a hostile enemy": Screenshots show a tweet under Lindsay's handle @ConceptualJames. Lol what? It also highlighted a post on social media by Lindsay from 2023, saying "Drag Queen Story Hour is an initiation rite into the cult of Queer Gnosticism". Drag Queen Story Hour is an initiation rite into the cult of Queer Gnosticism. The tweet linked to a podcast on Lindsay's website stating "Queer Theory is the doctrine of a cult". The synopsis for the podcast told listeners to join Lindsay to "understand our danger." "This discussion will not only lay Queer Theory bare for the social-spiritual cult belief system that it is, but it will also make sense of the destructive phenomena like sexual graphic novels in our school libraries, Drag Queen Story Hour, and the relentless push for queer and trans everything into all aspects of our culture. Join him to understand our danger." Campbell said it was "really troubling" to bring these ideas into New Zealand and further "stoke that kind of hatred". She acknowledged Lindsay may not directly be "doing damage to minorities himself" but said it was "poisoning the well of political discourse and turning it further right". Seymour told RNZ he admired Lindsay's book Cynical Theories and met him while he was in New Zealand earlier in the year. "We got together, and we hit it off, and I think he's a very thoughtful and decent person." The Free Speech Union hosted Lindsay for a speaking tour earlier this year , where he also appeared on TVNZ's Q+A . In response to the concerns of the Pōneke Antifascist Coalition Seymour said he did not agree with the description of the pride flag as an enemy flag. "I march in the Pride Parade most years myself, so I wouldn't say that I agree with this. I wasn't aware that James Lindsay had said that. "If he has, it doesn't really bother me, because I've got lots of friends I disagree with, and I think it's healthy. "If I agreed with everything that everybody I associated with had ever said, we'd have a very boring place or maybe no friends." In regards to the claims about Drag Queen Story Time, Seymour said parents could decide for themselves who read stories to their children. "I don't really know why anyone else would think it was their business." The concerns were coming from a "pretty obscure extreme left so-called Anti-Fascist group," Seymour said. "They're entitled to their view, but I'm certainly not going to let them define what I think," he said. "People are a little tired of cancel culture and ideological purity tests." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
16 hours ago
- NZ Herald
David Seymour criticises UN official over indigenous rights letter
Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour has told a United Nations official their views on the Government's indigenous rights agenda are wrong and 'an affront to New Zealand's sovereignty'. Last month, the Government received a letter from Geneva-based Albert K. Barume, the United Nations' Special Rapporteur on the rights of
