WA government to ban mobile phones from childcare centres after review into industry
The review was ordered by Early Childhood and Education Minister Sabine Winton last month following reports a Melbourne childcare worker had been charged with more than 70 offences, including sexual assault and producing child abuse material
Ms Winton confirmed on Tuesday the state government would move to ban all personal devices in centres across WA, including those that have a camera, like smart watches and iPads, "as fast as [it] can".
"This move is in line with strong responses from states such as South Australia and Victoria, and recognises that these devices can pose a risk to the safety of children," she said.
"I need to work with the union and our sector partners to make sure that there are no unintended consequences."
She said "reasonable adjustments" could be made for workers who have caring responsibilities and might require access to a device.
"We as parents need to know that children are safe in those settings and that is my number one priority through this work I've done," she said.
"I need to not only assure parents right across Western Australia that child safety is the government's number one priority, but it's the number one priority of our sector partners, and that's why I called the snap review."
The review was conducted by the state's Education and Care Regulatory Unit (ECRU), the body which overseas and applies regulations in WA's childcare sector.
This was in addition to The Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority's (ACECQA) review of child safety arrangements under the National Quality Framework.
Authorities made five recommendations following the WA probe.
These include increasing training for early childhood educators, requiring providers to improve their approach to child safety and to urgently progress the Education and Care Services National Law Application Bill 2025 through parliament.
Ms Winton said in addition to supporting all the recommendations "subject to ongoing national and state work", the government will inject $1.1 million to bolster the capacity of ECRU for compliance checks at centres.
"It's a 10 per cent uplift in the total cost that ECRU have right now, and so I'm very confident that this is immediate funding that ECRU can have to step up the important role that they play," she said.
The report however found compliance issues have increased in the past year in WA's early childcare services — up 14 per cent in 2024-25 from the previous financial year, which it suggests is likely a result of growth in the number of services operating.
"There are actually now more services in place than there ever have been … when you get more compliance notifications, it actually means ECRU are doing their job, and I don't apologise for that," Ms Winton said.
United Worker's Union WA branch secretary Carolyn Smith described the ban on mobile phones from the workplace as a "measured and sensible" response.
"Unfortunately we know that personal devices have been involved in some of the really, really awful things we've seen in the last few months in early education," she said.
"Many providers already have that ban.
Ms Smith said the additional funding from the state government was also welcome.
"We absolutely welcome extra money to the regulator," she said.
"We need the regulator out in centres checking that centres are doing the right things and holding them to account."
Opposition spokesperson for Early Childhood Liam Staltari said he welcomed review's findings.
"We will support any measure that makes our centres safer, makes our children safer, gives confidence to parents and gives respect and certainty to the amazing childcare workers and educators who give their all every day," he said.
"We did note with some concern, the review shows that WA lags the national average for the proportion of centres that meet the national quality standard benchmark.
"We'll work in support of any measures that lift that because again, all sides of politics can work together to make our centres safer."
Ms Winton also signed off on — along with all other Australian education ministers — stronger, mandatory child safety measures back in June.
The changes, which come into effect from September, include mandatory 24-hour reporting of any allegations, complaints or incidents of physical or sexual abuse, as well as stronger protections around digital technology use.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Names released of 29 failing childcare centres at risk of losing funding, with more expected to follow
The names of 29 childcare businesses that have failed to meet national quality and safety standards have been made public, with 11 of the centres based in Western Australia. Compliance actions were issued to the centres last week by the federal education department. It's the first time the warnings have been handed down, after federal parliament passed legislation which allows the government to strip funding from centres that don't pass basic checks. The National Quality Standards (NQS) relate to the health, safety and education of children at all childcare centres, family day care facilities, outside school hours care, preschool and kindergarten. The centres issued with warnings failed to meet the standards for at least seven years and were required to tell parents about the compliance action by this week. Some 30 centres have been warned and the ABC has been told that more will be added to the list. While all the names will be released eventually, 29 have been made public so far. They include childcare centres, family day care centres and out of school care, which looks after children in primary school. At this stage, no large for-profit childcare companies are on the list that has been made public. Warnings were issued to five centres in Queensland, among them was the Cairns Regional Family Day Care, Babyco Family Day Care and Moonlight Family Day Care Services. In New South Wales, two family daycare centres, Newton Family Day Care and Little Oz Kids Family Day Care Pty Ltd — Oakhurst, were warned. Four childcare centres had a compliance action issued, while Cooinda Early Learning Centre OOSH, a service which provides care to primary school children after school hours, was asked to improve its standards. Western Australia had the highest number of centres warned. Four centres that care for primary school aged children before and after school have been told to improve their standards. Seven other family and centre-based centres have been given six months to lift standards. Provider Lex Education has received a warning for two of its centres. The NQS ranks each centre on how it manages educational programs, children's health and safety, the setup of play areas, staffing, relationships with children, partnerships with families, governance and leadership. Education Minister Jason Clare says the centres have six months to improve. "These centres need to lift their game or they will face further consequences," he said in a statement. The government can either cut funding to a centre, place conditions on a centre's Child Care Subsidy (CCS) approval, have the approval suspended or cancelled. The CCS approval is essential for a centre to operate. Early Childhood Education Minister, Jess Walsh, said that while the vast majority of educators do the right thing, the compliance notices serve as a warning. "Today's action should signal to all early childhood education and care providers that the National Quality Standards are not optional, and that all services must be up to scratch," she said in a statement.

ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Christine Mulhall among dozens of elective surgery patients caught up in WA hospital crisis
A patient who waited nearly a year for complex elective surgery, only to have it cancelled the day before it was scheduled, says the ordeal has put her under significant emotional and financial stress and eroded her trust in the health system. Christine Mulhall was one of dozens of West Australians who had their planned surgeries cancelled overnight, amid "exceptional" demand on the state's hospitals. Ms Mulhall told the ABC her initial referral to Fiona Stanley Hospital from September last year had been lost, which meant her surgery was rescheduled for February this year. But in the lead up to that appointment, she said she was informed her surgery would likely not happen before the end of 2025. As a category two patient, the procedure is supposed to be undertaken within 90 days of the referral. On Monday, Ms Mulhall said she was offered a last-minute slot to have her operation done today. "It was a bit of a logistical nightmare for me, as it was my first day back at work from annual leave, and I don't have any other leave left," Ms Mulhall told the ABC. "I managed to rearrange everything to do the surgery on Wednesday." Ms Mulhall said she was contacted by a nurse on Tuesday afternoon at around 2pm to confirm her appointment, and to talk through her preparation for the surgery. "Then I actually missed a phone call at about 4.30pm yesterday afternoon and was left with a voice message which said unfortunately my surgery had been cancelled." Adding to the confusion she felt, Ms Mulhall said she received a call from the hospital this morning, asking why she hadn't come in for her surgery. "You can imagine that caused quite a bit of distress for me, and second-guessing," she said. Ms Mulhall said the staff member seemed surprised to learn the procedure had been cancelled. "I said 'I could be there, I hadn't eaten'. She [the staff member] said 'leave it with me'. She called back about 20 minutes later and said, 'I'm so sorry, it's been cancelled,'" she said. She said receiving the voice message had been a devastating blow. "I'd mentally and physically prepared myself to have this surgery. [My tumour] is in the deep lobe of my parotid gland, and the surgeons have said this is as complex as it gets," Ms Mulhall said. "It's [the tumour] is very close to facial nerve so there is potential lifelong complications which could arise from the surgery. It's been a horrible journey, so I was inconsolable yesterday. "I don't think I've fully taken it in. I felt really upset, heartbroken, then I felt a little bit angry and little bit confused as to why. "It puts a financial strain too. I've taken last-minute leave from work, which is unpaid leave." Ms Mulhall said her tumour, which is currently benign, had caused her facial pain and taken a toll on her mental health. "I'm exhausted mentally, emotionally and financially. The stress over the past 350-odd days, however long it's been, it's been a real rollercoaster. Ms Mulhall said she no longer had confidence in the public health system. "I used to have private health insurance for a long time, until I became single, and then I couldn't afford it," she said. "I then had to put that reliance on the public health system, which has not really been good to me unfortunately." WA Health director general Dr Shirley Bowen said she was grateful to Ms Muhall for making way for more urgent surgeries. "Tumours in the parotid gland are complex procedures … they are something that can be deferred a few days," Dr Bowen said. "I can only say I thank her, because she's making way for people who are coming through emergency who urgently need care and urgently need a bed, and without it they may die." It comes after a tumultuous week for the state government defending its funding and management of WA's health system, amid record ambulance ramping and issues with aging hospital infrastructure. The Cook government announced a $50 million health infrastructure maintenance fund on Monday, while the 2025-26 budget included $1.4 billion in additional spending in the health and mental health system. Health Minister Meredith Hammat said the deferrals were unfortunate but necessary. "We are dealing with some unprecedented demand in our hospital system. We have had over 1,000 triple-zero calls this week and we've seen a large number of people presenting at our emergency departments," she said. "Rescheduling non-urgent surgery is something we haven't had to do before this winter, but it is something that the hospital system does to ensure that we've got the capacity to see the most urgent patients." Ms Hammat said older patients were the primary cause of the influx in demand. "We're also seeing large numbers of older people in hospital who are ready to be discharged, but don't have an appropriate place to go to receive the care they need," she said. Dr Bowen said a large number of older people with comorbidities were presenting with winter illnesses.

ABC News
7 hours ago
- ABC News
Readers on the challenges and guilt around caring for an aging parent
Andrew Larcos retired earlier than expected to move in with his aging dad. He says after watching what his dad went through putting his wife, Andrew's mum, into aged care, he hopes to avoid it. "My mother had Alzheimer's, and my father was her main carer at home until it just became too much for him," the 63-year-old from Sydney/Gadigal Country says. "He was completely overcome with feelings of guilt when we had no choice but to place Mum into a residential care home." Andrew says six months after entering into aged care, his mum died. "My father fell into depression. It was a difficult period for the family." Andrew says he's doing "the best he can" to care for his 98-year-old father. "At times it isn't easy, and I desperately hope that I will never have to face the dilemma of trying to place my father into residential care." Andrew wrote to us after reading our story the guilt people often experience for not being able to provide the support they would like to for an aging parent. We've collated several reader responses here. Thank you to everyone who took the time to share with us. I had to give up work over a year ago to care for my 85-year-old mum. I'm an only child. There is no other family as they are either dead or over 80. I rely on my mum's aging friends in their 70s and neighbours for very limited help. It's isolating, lonely and frustrating. Mum and I are only 100 kilometres from the centre of Sydney, but it's another planet as far as help is concerned. I applied to have her assessed by My Aged Care in March. I'm still waiting. I love my mum and we're closer than ever. It's just hard when you can't get through to people that there's no support other than friends who you don't want to impose on, as they have their own health issues. — Ericka Lovell , 65, Southern Highlands, NSW There's always this guilt; do I go see my mum with advanced dementia in the nursing home, or spend time with my grandson who also needs me? — Roxanne Breccia, 65, Sydney/Gadigal Country, NSW I am a carer for my dad. Dad is unwilling to trust anyone but me, meaning there are no support services. I have to be everything, do everything, know everything and fix everything. Walking away would mean him ending up in hospital and much worse off. I'm unable to get support, unable to walk away, and putting my own life on hold. I can't work, I can't look for love, I can't travel. There's no way forward and no way out. And I imagine I'm not the only one who's in a similar situation. — Naomi Thompson, 33, Orange, NSW I looked after my mum at home. It is the most difficult thing that I've ever had to do. It's very hard and draining if you don't get sibling support. Mum had her first stroke on her birthday and had no choice but to go into a nursing home. Every night I went to see Mum to settle her in. She hated it and I felt it. Eight months later, and two more strokes, I couldn't do it anymore. I couldn't see her for a couple of months because I'd just cry. When she passed after her fourth stroke, I missed her. But I was relieved for her. It is still the most difficult decade of my life, and I still miss my mum. Hardest thing I've ever done but slowly feeling proud and honoured. — John Sellwood, 61, Wagga Wagga, NSW I gave up my work as a lawyer two years ago to care for my mother, who has dementia. Although she is in a 'good' nursing home, l go daily because l don't think the level of care is sufficient. I know of several women who, like me, have held senior professional positions and have given up their careers to care for elderly parents. There appears to be considerable support for parental leave both with time off work and paid leave, but absolutely zero support for the many in my situation. As a nation, we are losing the skills and experience of women who give up work to look after elderly parents never to return to the workforce. — Collette Davies, 53, Perth/Boorloo, Western Australia Some comments have been edited for clarity and brevity.