Denver may revamp its public financing laws
Major changes could be on the horizon for Denver's taxpayer-funded campaign finance system.
Why it matters: A retool of the Fair Elections Fund could impact who runs for office and how millions in public money will be used by future mayoral, city council, city auditor and clerk and recorder candidates.
Context: Denver City Council's proposed changes to the program include:
Banning anonymous donations;
Listing ways donations can't be spent, including on alcohol or marijuana;
Simplifying and clarifying the election code to make it easier for potential candidates to understand how they can run for office.
The changes also call for clarifying rules about mandatory debates to ensure fairness, and strengthening and clarifying the investigatory duties for staff responsible for overseeing campaign finance complaints.
Driving the news: Denver City Councilmembers Amanda Sawyer and Darrell Watson introduced the bill with the proposed tweaks during a committee meeting Tuesday.
Sawyer said the changes would "strengthen" the city's campaign finance program.
Context: The Fair Elections Fund, which provides qualifying candidates with a 9-to-1 public match for donations of up to $50, was crafted to level the playing field for people seeking municipal office.
The program provided $7.7 million during the 2023 election cycle, according to a report from the Clerk and Recorder's office, which oversees the fund. Not all candidates used it during that cycle.
Between the lines: Denver City Clerk and Recorder Paul López supports the bill, per a letter sent to the city council.
The intrigue: While a candidate survey in last year's clerks and recorder report suggested the program influenced their decision to run for office, at least $1.7 million was given to people who had no chance of winning their respective races, an Axios Denver analysis found.
What's next: The full Denver City Council is scheduled to host a required public hearing on the proposal on Feb. 18.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lemonade Inc (LMND) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Revenue Growth Amidst Challenges
Revenue: Increased 27% year-on-year to $151 million in Q1 2025. In Force Premium (IFP): Grew 27% to just above $1 billion. Customer Count: Increased by 21% to 2.5 million. Premium per Customer: Increased 4% to $396. Annual Retention Rate (ADR): Decreased to 84% from 86% in the prior quarter. Gross Earned Premium: Increased 24% to $234 million. Gross Loss Ratio: 78% for Q1, compared to 79% in Q1 2024. Adjusted Gross Profit: Improved 25% year-on-year. Net Loss: $62 million, or a loss of $0.86 per share. Adjusted EBITDA Loss: $47 million in Q1. Total Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments: Approximately $996 million. Growth Spend: $38 million in Q1, nearly double the prior year quarter. Technology Development Expense: Increased 5% to $22 million. General and Administrative (G&A) Expense: Increased 20% to $36 million. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with LMND. Release Date: May 06, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Lemonade Inc (NYSE:LMND) reported a 27% year-on-year growth in Q1 2025, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of accelerating top-line growth. The company achieved a 25% year-on-year improvement in adjusted gross profit, despite the impact of California wildfires. Lemonade Car's quarter-over-quarter in-force premium (IFP) growth outpaced the rest of the business for the first time, signaling strong momentum. The company is on track to achieve EBITDA breakeven by the end of 2026, with expectations of generating positive adjusted free cash flow in 2025. Lemonade Inc (NYSE:LMND) has successfully leveraged AI to maintain or reduce fixed costs while significantly increasing its book size, demonstrating strong operational efficiency. The California wildfires had a notable impact on Q1 results, contributing 16 percentage points to the gross loss ratio. Annual dollar retention (ADR) decreased to 84%, down from 86% in the prior quarter, partly due to efforts to improve profitability in the home insurance book. The gross loss ratio for Q1 was 78%, slightly higher than the previous year's 79%, indicating ongoing challenges in managing claims costs. Operating expenses, excluding loss and loss adjustment expense, increased by 29% year-on-year, driven by growth spend and the impact of the FAIR plan assessment. Net loss for Q1 was $62 million, or $0.86 per share, compared to a net loss of $47 million or $0.67 per share in the prior year, reflecting ongoing financial challenges. Q: Can you elaborate on the timeline for reaching EBITDA profitability and what levers will drive this? A: Daniel Schreiber, CEO, explained that Lemonade aims to achieve adjusted EBITDA breakeven by the end of 2026, with 2027 being the first full year of positive adjusted EBITDA. The company expects gross profit to grow faster than fixed costs, driven by AI efficiencies, bringing them closer to profitability. Q: What impact did the California wildfires have on gross profit, and how are tariffs affecting your full-year guidance? A: Tim Bixby, CFO, noted that the California wildfires had a $44 million gross impact, aligning with prior estimates. The tariff impact is expected to be modest, with single-digit percentage effects on claims. Lemonade is comfortable with its full-year guidance, assuming a modest headwind from tariffs. Q: How is Lemonade's Car business performing, and what are the plans for geographic expansion? A: Daniel Schreiber, CEO, highlighted that Lemonade Car is growing faster than the rest of the business, with a focus on refining the product before expanding geographically. The company is currently available to 40% of the U.S. market and plans to expand further once the product is optimized. Q: How is AI impacting Lemonade's competitive position in the insurance industry? A: Daniel Schreiber, CEO, emphasized that Lemonade's AI capabilities allow for better data utilization and risk assessment compared to traditional insurers. The company's digital infrastructure enables it to connect data points effectively, providing a competitive advantage in pricing and customer acquisition. Q: What percentage of new car sales are cross-sales from existing Lemonade customers? A: Tim Bixby, CFO, stated that about half of new car sales are cross-sales from existing customers, up from a third previously. This trend is expected to continue, leveraging Lemonade's existing customer base for more efficient growth. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
State lawmakers considering policy changes after LA wildfires
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Nearly six months after a firestorm ravaged communities across Los Angeles, California lawmakers are crafting legislation to try to protect the state insurance program for high-risk homes from financial collapse. A bill, AB 226, sponsored by Assemblymembers Lisa Calderon, D-Whittier, and David A. Alvarez, D-San Diego, would make the state's insurer of last resort, the FAIR Plan, eligible for loans and bonds from the state-backed California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank to avoid running out of money after a disaster. Alvarez proposed the measure last year but it failed to pass. Despite receiving unanimous support in the Assembly, the bill never reached the Senate floor for a vote before the end of the 2024 legislative session. If the measure had passed last year and been signed into law by the governor, the FAIR Plan would have had more flexibility to weather the massive number of claims filed after the January firestorms, Alvarez said. Instead, the FAIR plan was forced to imposed an extra $1 billion in total assessments on insurers that provide homeowners policies in California. To recoup those expenses, insurance companies are expected to hike rates on homeowners through monthly surcharges. "Had they had this option available to them ... they would not be having to hit consumers with price increases on the private market now," Alvarez said. AB 226 is one of many wildfire-related bills still winding their way through the slow legislative process. If passed into law, the measures would protect homeowners from price gouging after disasters, streamline the process for filing claims for lost property and offer financial protections for disaster victims. Lawmakers and Gov. Gavin Newsom in January approved $2.5 billion in wildfire aid after the Palisades and Eaton fires killed more than two dozen people and became the second and third most destructive fires in state history. Legislative leaders at the time signaled for a swift, bipartisan approach to the disaster. "Tens of thousands of our neighbors, our families and friends, they need help. This means that we need to be able to move with urgency, put aside our differences, and be laser-focused on delivering the financial resources, delivering the boots on the ground that are needed and the policy relief that is needed to get neighborhoods cleaned up and communities rebuilt," Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire, D-Healdsburg, said after it passed. California's last-ditch home insurer, the FAIR Plan, is meant as a backup for properties deemed high-risk and uninsurable by private companies. A Times analysis found that within the Eaton and Palisades fire zones, the number of homes on the plan nearly doubled between 2020 and 2024 and the plan has become one of the state's largest insurers. Amid lawsuits alleging collusion between private insurers and the FAIR Plan and policyholders raising concerns about delays in payments and smoke damage investigations, lawmakers and insurance advocates have repeatedly called for better safety nets - like the one proposed in AB 226 - to keep the insurer solvent in emergencies and viable as a long-term solution to the state's home insurance problem. This year, Alvarez was joined on the bill by Calderon, chair of the Assembly's insurance committee. It passed through the Assembly at the beginning of March but has not yet seen its first Senate committee. Alvarez celebrated the bill's swift passage through the Assembly and hopes the Senate will work to do the same, "God forbid, if it has to be used because of a devastating fire this summer," he said. Other major wildfire bills being considered by lawmakers include: •AB 493, which would require lenders to pay policyholders interest on disaster insurance payouts that are held in escrow. The measure, authored by Assemblymember John Harabedian, D-Pasadena, would close a loophole in existing law, which already requires interest payments on other escrowed funds. •AB 597, also introduced by Harabedian, which would keep public insurance adjusters from gouging homeowners, especially after a natural disaster or state of emergency. •SB 495, which would prevent insurers from requiring an itemized list of personal property losses from policyholders during a state of emergency, and would require insurers to provide extensions where reconstruction is delayed. The bill, introduced by state Sen. Benjamin Allen - who represents the Pacific Palisades and Santa Monica areas - passed a Senate floor vote on Tuesday and is headed to the Assembly. Most of the pending legislation won't directly support survivors of the Palisades and Eaton fires but are still important to the rebuilding process, said Maryam Zar, president emeritus of the Pacific Palisades Community Council and founder of the Palisades Recovery Coalition. The new laws would help prevent and prepare for future fires, she said, and are a show of goodwill to the communities that are suffering still. Some other fire relief measures focus on easing the permit process for rebuilding, while others extend provisions set by Newsom during the state of emergency - easing tenancy rights for people staying in temporary housing for longer than 30 days, shortening the permit approval timeline and securing mortgage forbearance for destroyed properties for up to a year after the disaster. Others look to address staffing issues for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as fire season turns into a year-round threat. "Wildfire survivors continue to face housing insecurity, financial strain, and emotional trauma long after the immediate danger has passed," Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath said in a statement. "These State bills represent a commitment to meeting people where they are - actively in recovery, rebuilding their lives, and in need of our long-term support." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Los Angeles Times
3 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
State lawmakers considering policy changes after L.A. wildfires
SACRAMENTO — Nearly six months after a firestorm ravaged communities across Los Angeles, California lawmakers are crafting legislation to try to protect the state insurance program for high-risk homes from financial collapse. A bill, AB 226, sponsored by Assemblymembers Lisa Calderon (D-Whittier) and David A. Alvarez (D-San Diego), would make the state's insurer of last resort, the FAIR Plan, eligible for loans and bonds from the state-backed California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank to avoid running out of money after a disaster. Alvarez proposed the measure last year but it failed to pass. Despite receiving unanimous support in the Assembly, the bill never reached the Senate floor for a vote before the end of the 2024 legislative session. If the measure had passed last year and been signed into law by the governor, the FAIR Plan would have had more flexibility to weather the massive number of claims filed after the January firestorms, Alvarez said. Instead, the FAIR plan was forced to imposed an extra $1 billion in total assessments on insurers that provide homeowners policies in California. To recoup those expenses, insurance companies are expected to hike rates on homeowners through monthly surcharges. 'Had they had this option available to them ... they would not be having to hit consumers with price increases on the private market now,' Alvarez said. AB 226 is one of many wildfire-related bills still winding their way through the slow legislative process. If passed into law, the measures would protect homeowners from price gouging after disasters, streamline the process for filing claims for lost property and offer financial protections for disaster victims. Lawmakers and Gov. Gavin Newsom in January approved $2.5 billion in wildfire aid after the Palisades and Eaton fires killed more than two dozen people and became the second and third most destructive fires in state history. Legislative leaders at the time signaled for a swift, bipartisan approach to the disaster. 'Tens of thousands of our neighbors, our families and friends, they need help. This means that we need to be able to move with urgency, put aside our differences, and be laser-focused on delivering the financial resources, delivering the boots on the ground that are needed and the policy relief that is needed to get neighborhoods cleaned up and communities rebuilt,' Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire (D-Healdsburg) said after it passed. California's last-ditch home insurer, the FAIR Plan, is meant as a backup for properties deemed high-risk and uninsurable by private companies. A Times analysis found that within the Eaton and Palisades fire zones, the number of homes on the plan nearly doubled between 2020 and 2024 and the plan has become one of the state's largest insurers. Amid lawsuits alleging collusion between private insurers and the FAIR Plan and policyholders raising concerns about delays in payments and smoke damage investigations, lawmakers and insurance advocates have repeatedly called for better safety nets — like the one proposed in AB 226 — to keep the insurer solvent in emergencies and viable as a long-term solution to the state's home insurance problem. This year, Alvarez was joined on the bill by Calderon, chair of the Assembly's insurance committee. It passed through the Assembly at the beginning of March but has not yet seen its first Senate committee. Alvarez celebrated the bill's swift passage through the Assembly and hopes the Senate will work to do the same, 'God forbid, if it has to be used because of a devastating fire this summer,' he said. Other major wildfire bills being considered by lawmakers include: Most of the pending legislation won't directly support survivors of the Palisades and Eaton fires but are still important to the rebuilding process, said Maryam Zar, president emeritus of the Pacific Palisades Community Council and founder of the Palisades Recovery Coalition. The new laws would help prevent and prepare for future fires, she said, and are a show of goodwill to the communities that are suffering still. Some other fire relief measures focus on easing the permit process for rebuilding, while others extend provisions set by Newsom during the state of emergency — easing tenancy rights for people staying in temporary housing for longer than 30 days, shortening the permit approval timeline and securing mortgage forbearance for destroyed properties for up to a year after the disaster. Others look to address staffing issues for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as fire season turns into a year-round threat. 'Wildfire survivors continue to face housing insecurity, financial strain, and emotional trauma long after the immediate danger has passed,' Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath said in a statement. 'These State bills represent a commitment to meeting people where they are — actively in recovery, rebuilding their lives, and in need of our long-term support.'
