ECI discusses issues related to Special Intensive Revision in Bihar with 11 political parties
The SIR aims to verify the eligibility of voters and ensure accurate electoral rolls ahead of the assembly elections expected to be held later this year.
Representatives of 11 political parties met with the Election Commission, including Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar along with other Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu Vivek Joshi at Nirvachan Sadan.
'Representatives of various political parties(PPs) met Election Commission comprising CEC Sh Gyanesh Kumar along with ECs Dr Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Dr Vivek Joshi at ECI, New Delhi, today to discuss the issues related to Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar,' the Commission posted on X.
https://x.com/ECISVEEP/status/1940422471834116506
The Election Commission is currently conducting the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar, ahead of the Assembly elections which are expected to held later this year. The opposition parties has raised alarm over the exercise, claiming that it will be used to disenfranchise voters.
The ECI stated that the SIR is being conducted in accordance with Article 326 of the Constitution and the Representation of the People Act 1950, to identify ineligible voters and ensure no eligible voter is left out.
'Commission stated that SIR is being conducted in accordance with provisions of Article 326, RP Act 1950 & instructions issued on 24.06.2025 Party representatives raised concerns related to SIR. Each concern which was raised by any member of PP was fully addressed by Commission,' the post added.
Opposition parties, including the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), expressed concerns that the SIR might be used to disenfranchise voters, particularly the poor and marginalized.
According to the EC, certain members had a prior appointment with the poll panel and some had come unannounced, however the Commission allowed two representatives from every party for a meeting.
'Some of the participants were given an appointment and others were allowed to join in without any prior appointment as Commission decided to meet two representatives from every party so as to listen to all views,' read the ECI's post.
The ECI assured that the SIR would be conducted transparently and fairly, with measures in place to assist vulnerable groups, such as senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and the economically vulnerable.
A group of 18 leaders from 11 political parties met with the Election Commissioners regarding the upcoming Bihar elections. The exercise has faced heavy criticism from the opposition.
The SIR involves house-to-house verification, online submission of forms, and assistance from Booth Level Officers (BLOs) and volunteers
Earlier today, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav claimed the SIR exercise is being used to help the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) win the upcoming Bihar polls by denying poor people their right to vote.
The RJD leader also claimed that the Narendra Modi-led Centre will impose President's rule in the state to consolidate power.
'Two days after the (SIR) notification itself, we have asked the Election Commission that our mahagathbandan, the alliance, wants to meet with you, a delegation wants to meet with you.
The RJD leader also claimed that voting rights being allegedly taken away is just the first step, with the BJP coming for people's pensions and rations later on.
'It looks like the Election Commission has become Modi's, BJP's Commission, and BJP, Nitish Kumar is silent on this. They are losing the elections by votes so EC is helping them from the back. When they lose, first they cut votes of poor, then pension, after that ration. Modi ji will eat all that up. Voting is a right in a Constitutional democracy, and that too you are taking that way,' he added.
The Bihar assembly elections are scheduled to take place at the end of this year, with the SIR exercise notified on June 24. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Punjab and Haryana HC to hear Akali leader Bikram Singh Majithia's plea challenging ‘illegal arrest, remand' in vigilance case tomorrow
The Punjab and Haryana High Court Thursday fixed July 4 for hearing a petition filed by Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader and former Punjab minister Bikram Singh Majithia, challenging his recent arrest and subsequent police remand in a vigilance case. The matter came up before Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya, who adjourned the hearing by a day to allow Majithia's counsel to place on record the latest remand orders issued in the case. Majithia moved the high court seeking relief against what he terms his 'illegal arrest and remand' following an FIR registered by the Punjab Vigilance Bureau on June 25 under Sections 13(1)(b) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In his petition, Majithia has alleged that the FIR is a product of 'political witch-hunting and vendetta' aimed at maligning him, adding that he has been a vocal critic and political opponent of the ruling regime. The petition claims that Majithia was picked up from his Amritsar residence around 9 am on June 25 and kept in custody for over two hours before his formal arrest at 11.20 am, in violation of his constitutional and statutory rights. Citing video evidence and the remand order issued the next day, the plea contends that this delay amounts to illegal detention and a breach of Article 22(2) of the Constitution and Section 187 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (formerly Section 167 CrPC). The petition also challenges the remand order passed by the Judicial Magistrate on June 26, calling it 'manifestly perverse and non-speaking.' It alleges that the Magistrate failed to comply with mandatory requirements laid out in the Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, particularly Volume III, Chapter 11-B, which mandate judicial satisfaction, scrutiny of the case diary, and clear reasons for granting police custody. Majithia's lawyers argue that there is no indication in the order that the Magistrate applied his mind or considered a previous Supreme Court order dated March 4, 2025. In that order, the apex court had denied the Punjab government's request for custodial interrogation and had instead directed Majithia to cooperate with the Special Investigation Team, which, according to the petition, he fully complied with. Despite this, the state sought a fresh remand by allegedly concealing facts and misrepresenting urgency before the magistrate. The petition argues that the remand was intended to extract a confession in violation of Article 20(3) of the Constitution. Calling the arrest and remand a 'gross violation' of Articles 14, 20, and 21 of the Constitution, the petition raises broader legal questions around the alleged misuse of criminal procedure, abuse of remand powers, and the right to liberty and fair investigation. Majithia is seeking quashing of the remand order and appropriate directions to prevent what he terms further abuse of process. The petition has been filed through advocates Sartej Singh Narula, Damanbir Singh Sobti, Arshdeep Singh Cheema, Arshdeep Singh Kler, and Sultan Singh Sangha.
Hans India
42 minutes ago
- Hans India
Distrust of Indian voters, EC: NDA blasts Rahul Gandhi over Bihar voter roll revision row
Patna: After a delegation of opposition parties lodged a strong protest against the Election Commission's decision to carry out a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections, the NDA launched a scathing counterattack, accusing Congress MP Rahul Gandhi of undermining constitutional authorities and showing distrust towards Indian voters. The Opposition, represented by an 18-member INDIA bloc delegation comprising 11 parties, including Congress, RJD, CPI, CPI(M-L), and Samajwadi Party, met with ECI officials at Nirvachan Sadan on Wednesday. They alleged that the EC's move was both sudden and ill-timed, potentially impacting marginalised groups and compromising the fairness of the polls. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, intensifying the opposition's stance, also demanded the publication of consolidated, machine-readable digital electoral rolls and CCTV footage from polling booths in Maharashtra, citing transparency concerns. Reacting to this, Bihar Minister Nitin Nabin accused Rahul Gandhi of questioning the integrity of both Indian voters and the Election Commission. "Rahul Gandhi is trying to deceive the people of this country. He doesn't trust Indian voters; instead, he trusts those who come from Bangladesh and other places. If he truly had faith in the people of India, he wouldn't cast doubt on them," Nabin told IANS. Bihar Minister Santosh Kumar Singh also slammed Gandhi for "not trusting a constitutional body" and misrepresenting the voter list revision process. "The voter list revision work is underway. As per the Indian Constitution, a person can vote only in one constituency. If someone is dead or has a duplicate entry, their name is removed -- this is the EC's responsibility," Singh told IANS. "If Rahul Gandhi doesn't understand this, he should join PM Modi's class and learn. He keeps raising baseless concerns instead of trusting the EC and the Constitution," Singh added. BJP national spokesperson Shahnawaz Hussain accused Gandhi of disrupting the EC's work. "The voter list is being revised. Why does Rahul Gandhi have a problem with it? Wherever Congress wins, the EC is fine. But if they lose, the EC becomes corrupt in their eyes," he told IANS. "Rahul Gandhi should stop blaming others for his party's failures. He wants the EC to hand him a certificate of being the most likeable leader, but such validation comes from the people, not institutions. His part-time politics won't be enough to challenge PM Modi or the BJP," Hussain added. JD(U) senior leader K.C. Tyagi also weighed in and, speaking to IANS, he said, "Rahul Gandhi has already accepted defeat. That's why he is making such accusations. The EC has always tried to ensure accuracy in the electoral process." The opposition leaders, however, have also questioned the timing of the announcement, pointing out that no mention of a Special Intensive Revision had been made in the EC's public communications over the past six months. The delegation alleged that for the first time, the EC was asking voters to furnish multiple documents, a move that could lead to the exclusion of poor, marginalised, and rural populations from the voter rolls. The leaders urged the Commission to defer the revision exercise and ensure that electoral reforms, if necessary, are conducted in a manner that does not affect voter rights or compromise democratic integrity.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Word secular was not…': Swami Avimukteshwaranand amid row over RSS leader's Constitution remark
Shankaracharya Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati Maharaj on Thursday made a significant statement regarding the word 'secular' in the Indian Constitution. Shankaracharya Avimukteshwarananda adresses a press conference, in Varanasi.(PTI file) The Shankaracharya said the word was not originally a part of the Indian Constitution but was added later. According to him, the term does not align with the fundamental nature of the Constitution, which is why it often becomes a topic of discussion. 'The word secular was not there in the Constitution originally, it was added later. That is why it does not align with the nature of the Indian Constitution, and this issue is repeatedly raised," Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati told news agency ANI. According to him, 'dharma' means to think about right and wrong and to adopt the right and to reject the wrong. "To become secular means that we have nothing to do with right or wrong. This cannot happen in anyone's life. So this word is also not right," the Shankaracharya said. The statement comes in the wake of a much-discussed comment by Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh second-in-command Dattatreya Hosabale advocating that the words "secular" and "socialist" in the Preamble of the Constitution be reviewed. He said the words were added during the Emergency and were not part of the original text drafted by BR Ambedkar. Congress leaders have slammed the Bharatiya Janata Party and the RSS over Dattatreya's comment while Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar and Union minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan have spoken in support of his demand. CPI MP P Sandosh Kumar wrote to RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, questioning if the organisation 'truly accepts the Indian Constitution'. In a letter addressed to the RSS Sarsanghchalak Bhagwat, the CPI MP said it is time the RSS stop inflaming these debates for the sake of polarisation. He also said the terms were not 'arbitrary insertions' but 'foundational ideals'. The Communist Party of India leader said in a diverse country like India, secularism ensures unity in diversity, while socialism promises justice and dignity to each of our citizens.
