Texas GOP seeks to ‘domesticate' rogue Dems for breaking quorum through nationwide civil arrest warrants
In the latest escalation of the redistricting debate taking national politics by storm, Paxton and Burrows are seeking to "domesticate" civil arrest warrants in Illinois and California for the Texas Democrats who fled the Lone Star State to block a Republican-led redistricting plan that could protect Republicans' slim U.S. House majority.
"We are pursuing every legal remedy at our disposal to hold these rogue legislators accountable," Paxton said in a statement. "Texas deserves representatives who do their jobs instead of running away at the behest of their billionaire handlers. If there's one thing Texans can't stand more than losers, it's cowards."
Burrows emphasized that "all options are on the table" to ensure House members return home to Texas to "fulfill their constitutional obligations."
"The State has no choice but to pursue additional legal remedies to compel their return from other states. Our full focus is on stopping this dereliction of duty and restoring quorum in the Texas House as soon as possible so we may return our time, attention and resources where they most matter—on the critical issues of the special session call," the Republican House Speaker said.
Burrows issued arrest warrants on Aug. 4 for the Democrats who fled Texas, under Article III, Section 10 of the Texas Constitution and Rule 5, Section 8, of the Rules of the Texas House of Representatives.
According to the attorney general's office, it allows for "[a]ll absentees for whom no sufficient excuse is made may, by order of a majority of those present, be sent for and arrested, wherever they may be found."
More than a week later, as Democrats have yet to return, Paxton and Burrows are seeking to implement their warrants in Illinois and California, through the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
While the Texas Republicans argue that other states are obligated to adhere to official acts by the state of Texas, both Govs. J.B. Pritzker of Illinois and Gavin Newsom of California have come out in support of the rogue Texas Democrats, as their home states float their own redistricting plans to balance the scales if Texas Republicans are successful.
The Democrats will not be detained and escorted back to Texas unless a state court in Illinois and California accepts Texas' civil arrest warrants.
Once lawmakers leave the state, they are beyond the legal jurisdiction of Texas authorities who can compel their return, according to GovFacts, a nonpartisan educational resource that explains U.S. government legalities.
However, if they were to return to Texas, the Texas Constitution would allow legislative leaders to "physically compel the attendance" of missing members through civil arrest warrants, allowing law enforcement to find the missing Democrats and return them to the Capitol.
Paxton has also filed a lawsuit with the Texas Supreme Court, requesting that 13 House Democrats' seats are declared vacant because they fled the state to avoid the Trump-backed redistricting vote.
The conservative attorney general also filed a lawsuit against former U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke, D-Texas, for allegedly conspiring to aid and abet Democrats' effort to break the quorum.
According to the Courthouse News Service, Republican Tarrant County Judge Megan Fay issued a temporary restraining order against O'Rourke and his Super PAC, Powered by People, hours after the suit was filed "to stop using funds to pay for Democrats' travel expenses and conduct fundraising to pay for such expenses in the future."
When reached for comment, a Pritzker spokesperson pointed to his past comments, addressing the threat of nationwide civil arrests, in which he said Illinois law enforcement will protect "everybody" in Illinois.
And a Newsom spokesperson flagged his X posts, trolling the Texas Republicans and urging them to "come and take" democracy.
O'Rourke did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lisa Kudrow's Impersonation Of A Far-Right MAGA Spokesperson Is Going Viral Because People Say It's Like "Literally Every Republican"
A resurfaced clip of Lisa Kudrow doing a satirical impersonation of a far-right Republican spokesperson failing to debunk claims against the party is going viral thanks to a new tweet insisting she "nailed" the character. The impersonation comes from Kudrow's role in the Netflix mockumentary Death to 2020. And though the film released in that same year, people online can't help but feel striking similarities between Kudrow's character and the Trump administration today. To start, in the video, Kudrow, aka "Un-Official Spokesperson" Jeanetta Grace Susan, tells cameramen, "The whole impeachment thing was baseless, OK? So, the Democrats claim that Trump pressured Ukraine into digging up dirt on the Biden family. And their only real evidence of that is a transcript of him doing it." Related: Someone offscreen asks Jeanetta what was said on the transcript, to which the character replies, "What transcript?" She's then pressed about the transcript she just mentioned, but Jeanetta doubles down by insisting, "Check your tape, I said no such thing." "You said the only real evidence is a transcript of Trump pressurizing Ukraine," the person off-camera responds. To which Jeanetta says, "There's no such place as Ukraine." Later, she's asked, "In March, the president said the pandemic would simply get out of the way, didn't he?" Jeanetta responds, "OK, see, this is what the media does. You lie, fabricate, fantasize. The president never said that." She's then played a clip of the president saying exactly that. "OK, I know this doesn't fit with your agenda," Jeanetta snaps back. "But this never happened." Related: By the end of the video, which has been viewed nearly one million times since it was shared on X, Kudrow claims she has "never supported Trump." The questioner behind the camera reminds Jeanetta that she was, in fact, a part of Trump's campaign. Cleverly, Jeanetta, aka Kudrow, shoots back, "Who's Trump?" Related: In light of recent flip-flopping on the 'Epstein files' — you know, when Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed to have a "client list" of Jeffrey Epstein's on her desk, ready for review, only for the Department of Justice to release a memo stating there is no evidence of a client list — internet users latched on to the clip. The original tweeter said the clip reminded them of "literally every Republican." Others thought the clip reminded them of a very specific Republican: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Mostly, people thought the similarities between the satire and real life were "hysterical and depressing at the same time." Related: On person wrote, "Oh my God! This is my experience of trying to reason with a MAGA, fact-check with a MAGA, and even trying to do some critical thinking with a MAGA. I have given up. I don't know what is up in their heads, but it is not brains or the gift of reason. I am beginning to believe that they are not just stupid and ignorant, but they just do not take in any information that is going to challenge their current mindset." "We literally listen to this everyday. MAGA believe and stake their lives on memes, but call any reporting or data into question and often see document records as a compelling reason to believe the opposite of what they indicate," another agreed. Overall, life felt better when this was all just a parody. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
American Press
8 minutes ago
- American Press
Trump's takeover of Washington law enforcement begins as National Guard troops arrive
The new picture of law enforcement in the nation's capital began taking shape Tuesday as some of the 800 National Guard members deployed by the Trump administration began arriving as police and federal officials took the first steps in a partnership to reduce crime in what President Donald Trump called a lawless city. The influx came the morning after the Republican president announced he would be activating the guard members and taking over the District's police department, something the law allows him to do temporarily. He cited a crime emergency — but referred to the same crime that city officials stress is already falling noticeably. Mayor Muriel Bowser pledged to work alongside the federal officials Trump has tasked with overseeing the city's law enforcement, while insisting the police chief remained in charge of the department and its officers. 'How we got here or what we think about the circumstances — right now we have more police, and we want to make sure we use them,' she told reporters. The tone was a shift from the day before, when Bowser said Trump's plan to take over the Metropolitan Police Department and call in the National Guard was not a productive step and argued his perceived state of emergency simply doesn't match the declining crime numbers. Still, the law gives the federal government more sway over the capital city than in U.S. states, and Bowser said her administration's ability to push back is limited. Attorney General Pam Bondi posted on social media that the meeting was productive. The law allows Trump to take over the D.C. police for up to 30 days, though White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested it could last longer as authorities later 'reevaluate and reassess.' Extending federal control past that time would require Congressional approval, something likely tough to achieve in the face of Democratic resistance. About 850 federal law enforcement officers were deployed in Washington on Monday and arrested 23 people overnight, Leavitt said. The charges, she said, included gun and drug crimes, drunk driving, subway fare evasion and homicide. The U.S. Park Police has also removed 70 homeless encampments. People who were living in them can leave, go to a homeless shelter or go into drug addiction treatment, Leavitt said. Those who refuse could face fines or jail time. The city and Trump have had a bumpy relationship While Trump invokes his plan by saying that 'we're going to take our capital back,' Bowser and the MPD maintain that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low after a sharp rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024 and are down again this year. More than half of those arrested, however, are juveniles, and the extent of those punishments is a point of contention for the Trump administration. Bowser, a Democrat, spent much of Trump's first term in office openly sparring with the Republican president. She fended off his initial plans for a military parade through the streets and stood in public opposition when he called in a multi-agency flood of federal law enforcement to confront anti-police brutality protesters in summer 2020. She later had the words 'Black Lives Matter' painted in giant yellow letters on the street about a block from the White House. In Trump's second term, backed by Republican control of both houses of Congress, Bowser has walked a public tightrope for months, emphasizing common ground with the Trump administration on issues such as the successful effort to bring the NFL's Washington Commanders back to the District of Columbia. She watched with open concern for the city streets as Trump finally got his military parade this summer. Her decision to dismantle Black Lives Matter Plaza earlier this year served as a neat metaphor for just how much the power dynamics between the two executives had evolved. Now that fraught relationship enters uncharted territory as Trump has followed through on months of what many D.C. officials had quietly hoped were empty threats. The new standoff has cast Bowser in a sympathetic light, even among her longtime critics. 'It's a power play and we're an easy target,' said Clinique Chapman, CEO of the D.C. Justice Lab. A frequent critic of Bowser, whom she accuses of 'over policing our youth' with the recent expansions of Washington's youth curfew, Chapman said Trump's latest move 'is not about creating a safer D.C. It's just about power.' Where the power actually lies Bowser contends that all the power resides with Trump and that local officials can do little other than comply and make the best of it. As long as Washington remains a federal enclave with limited autonomy under the 1973 Home Rule Act, she said, it will remain vulnerable to such takeovers. Trump is the first president to use the law's Section 740 to take over Washington's police for up to 30 days during times of emergencies. For Trump, the effort to take over public safety in D.C. reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. The District of Columbia's status as a congressionally established federal district gives him a unique opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime. Trump's declaration of a state of emergency fits the general pattern of his second term in office. He has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs, enabling him to essentially rule via executive order. In many cases, he has moved forward while the courts sorted them out. Bowser's claims about successfully driving down violent crime rates received backing earlier this year from an unlikely source. Ed Martin, Trump's original choice for U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, issued a press release in April hailing a 25% drop in violent crime rates from the previous year. His recently confirmed replacement candidate, former judge and former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, brushed aside the data to argue that violent crime remains a significant issue for victims. 'These were vibrant human beings cut down because of illegal guns,' she said.
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Group opposed to partisan gerrymandering signals openness to Dem countermeasures
A nonpartisan watchdog group, which previously told The Hill it was against blue states doing mid-decade redistricting in response to a battle playing out in Texas, is now signaling some openness to the tactic. The watchdog group said in a statement on Tuesday that it would not 'endorse partisan gerrymandering even when its motive is to offset more extreme gerrymandering by a different party,' but it also added that 'a blanket condemnation in this moment would amount to a call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian efforts to undermine fair representation and people-powered democracy.' The group said it was establishing standards by which it could be assessing states' maps, including proportionality, public participation, racial equity and federal reform, among other aspects. 'We will not sit idly by while political leaders manipulate voting maps to entrench their power and subvert our democracy,' Common Cause president and CEO Virginia Kase Solomón said in a statement. 'But neither will we call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian tactics that undermine fair representation.' 'We have established a fairness criteria that we will use to evaluate all countermeasures so we can respond to the most urgent threats to fair representation while holding all actors to the same principled standard: people—not parties—first,' she added. The announcement represents a shift for the group. Dan Vicuna, director of voting and fair representation at Common Cause, told The Hill last month of blue states engaging in redrawing their maps in the middle of the decade: 'This is dead wrong from a democracy perspective.' 'I think it's very problematic for Democrats from a political strategic perspective,' he added at the time. Common Cause noted Tuesday that they were still key supporters of independent redistricting commissions and reminded readers of their history in battling for fairer representation. 'We took Common Cause v. Rucho to the Supreme Court, which refused to curb partisan gerrymandering. We helped craft the Freedom to Vote Act to ban partisan gerrymandering, but Congress did not pass it,' the group said. 'We have championed independent redistricting commissions nationwide, yet neither party has embraced them fully. We are here because the courts, Congress, and political leaders failed to act.' 2024 Election Coverage Yet, Common Cause's signaling openness to allowing states to conduct mid-decade redistricting in response to Texas underscores how the larger redistricting battle has created fissures in democracy-focused and civil rights groups who have long opposed some of the same tactics Democrats are using to blunt Texas' potential gains with their proposed House map. Common Cause California was intimately involved in the creation of California's independent commission, though California Democrats are now trying to work around the commission to pass maps mid-decade. The watchdog's remarks strike a similar tone to Democrats who have argued that not responding to Texas Republicans' efforts to redraw their maps would be unilateral disarmament and that they need to fight fire with fire.
