Harvard's Monday court date will be important for international students. Here's why
The federal court hearing in Boston is in response to several attempts by the Trump administration to prevent Harvard from enrolling international students or allowing them to enter the country to study. The university began its second lawsuit against the federal government last month.
Since the battle between the two, international students and U.S. students have been considering transferring to other universities.
About 27% of Harvard's undergraduate and graduate students are international, according to 2024 to 2025 data.
There are two temporary restraining orders from May and June that U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs granted.
A preliminary injunction would effectively replace the two — which have expiration dates — to allow for the court case to continue until Burroughs makes a final determination on the legality of the case, according to Jonathan Grode, managing partner at immigration law firm Green and Spiegel.
Read more: Why the fight over foreign students at Harvard has some US students leaving, too
When Harvard asked for a preliminary injunction in May, Burroughs told the university and the Department of Homeland Security to agree on common terms over a preliminary injunction.
In Thursday evening court filings, both Harvard and the Trump administration said they were unable to do so.
Harvard international students have been wrongly detained at Boston Logan Airport and denied visas, according to Maureen Martin, Harvard's Director of Immigration Services, who wrote in a Friday court filing.
The Trump administration, in a lengthy 44-page brief, stated its opposition to a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction in the case.
'That Harvard has now become the subject of an immigration related enforcement action is neither discriminatory nor retaliatory. It reflects considered enforcement discretion directed to address well-founded national-security concerns, which courts cannot question,' the federal government wrote.
If Judge Burroughs sides with the federal government, past restraining orders will be null, putting international students at Harvard in a difficult situation, according to Grode.
The hearing comes after the U.S. State Department ordered embassies around the world to resume processing Harvard University student visas last week.
However, the university has been battling against the Trump administration since April.
It began when the Department of Homeland Security said it was revoking a key certification that allows Harvard University's international students to study there.
The institution was offered an ultimatum by the Trump administration to lose the certification or give up information about its foreign student population.
Quickly after, Judge Burroughs granted a temporary restraining order.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio later stated that the U.S. would begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students and increase vetting of social media accounts of student visa applicants.
Following the revocation attempt, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation that barred Harvard's international students from entering the country. He also directed Rubio to consider stopping the processing of Harvard student visas. Another temporary restraining order was granted in response.
Harvard has a separate lawsuit in reaction to the federal government freezing or cutting nearly $3 billion in federal funding, citing antisemitism at Harvard.
The administration has claimed the university failed to protect Jewish students, particularly in the wake of the war in Gaza.
'In the Trump Administration, discrimination will not be tolerated on campus. Federal funds must support institutions that protect all students,' the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services wrote in May as it cut $60 million in grants to Harvard.
As Trump cuts funding, these Harvard scholars consider leaving US — and academia
Harvard researcher released from custody after months in detention
Ex-Harvard professor fired after refusing COVID shot named to CDC vaccine panel
U.S. House committee demands Harvard send them hiring policies for review
Williams College stops accepting federal grants, opposing new policy
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Goldman Flags Falling Survey Responses as Key Driver of Big Data Revisions
Goldman Sachs says a key reason behind the unusually large revisions to recent U.S. economic data could be falling survey response rates. Analysts led by Jan Hatzius examined more than 30 indicators over the past decade and found measures like JOLTS job openings, retail sales, and nonfarm payroll growth have seen bigger revisions partly due to fewer responses. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with AMD. The debate intensified after the July jobs report delivered one of the largest two-month payroll revisions in decades outside the pandemic, prompting former President Donald Trump to fire Bureau of Labor Statistics chief Erika McEntarfer. Trump accused her of rigging numbers before last year's election a claim she denied. Goldman noted other forces at play, including pandemic-related seasonal distortions that skewed initial prints for jobless claims and manufacturing surveys. Trump's replacement pick suggested halting the monthly jobs report, though the White House confirmed it would continue. Markets shrugged off the data drama, with Wall Street hitting record highs Tuesday on softer July inflation and Fed rate cut hopes. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump rewrites Sylvester Stallone's ‘Rocky' history at Kennedy Center event
President Donald Trump rewrote the script on how Sylvester Stallone came to play 'Rocky' when he told a Kennedy Center crowd on Wednesday that film executives insisted the aspiring actor play the title character in the 1976 film. For nearly 50 years, its been known that Stallone campaigned to play Rocky Balboa as producers did everything in their power to convince him to surrender the script he wrote to an established star. But that wasn't the story Trump told when he named Stallone among this year's Kennedy Center Honors recipients. 'He wouldn't do it,' Trump said Wednesday. 'And it turned out that when [executives] saw him, they said, 'You know, you'd be actually pretty good for this role.' He had never done this before —think — anything like it.' Stallone's personal underdog tale famously parallels Balboa's story as an unknown fighter who gets an unlikely shot at the heavyweight championship and greatly overachieves. The 79-year-old Hell's Kitchen native studied drama at the University of Miami and appeared in 'The Lords of Flatbush' with Henry Winkler, as well as several small film roles, before doing 'Rocky' in 1976. Still, he was a longshot for the leading man role that went on to make him famous. Stallone said in a 1977 BBC interview that he badgered producers to cast him as Balboa, even after they offered him $265,000 'to stay away' from the cameras. But his gut told him that if he sold the 'Rocky' script and didn't appear in the movie, he'd regret it. 'I knew that after the money was gone I would become very bitter for having sold out because my one love was to at least fail on my own terms,' he said. 'I wanted to see if I could act.' Stallone said filmmakers pitched the script to James Caan, Burt Reynolds, Robert Redford and Gene Hackman before the scrappy newcomer convinced producers he'd work a lot harder and for a lot cheaper than those stars if given the chance. He eventually struck a deal that allowed him to play Balboa, but gave executives several options to change the lead character if they didn't like what they were seeing. The role worked out so well that Stallone reprised it in five more films. In Trump's version of events, Stallone had sway over who played Balboa, but didn't want it to be him. 'He didn't want to play [the role],' Trump said. 'He did it as a writer, but he ended up playing it because he couldn't find anybody else that fit the role.'
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Violent crime doesn't worry me. Trump is just mad he has to see homeless people.
In my daily life, the types of crime I'm concerned about are scams, fraud, cybercrime and hate crimes. We live in a pretty safe town. We are a beach community of about 100,000 people. Does that mean I would let my 15-year-old walk home at night by themselves? No. Would I not lock my doors and my vehicle? No. It is just common sense. Despite President Donald Trump saying his actions were meant to "rescue our nation's capital from crime," I don't think violent crime in Washington, DC, is as big of an issue as he's making it. As for Trump specifically, I don't think a convicted felon should be president. What type of crime concerns you? Share your thoughts here. | Opinion Forum Another view: Trump's order on homelessness is more humane than failed liberal policies | Opinion I don't live in Washington, so I can't say how residents feel about their safety. I would imagine that it's got more crime than my community simply for the size of it and the fact that so many people come and go, but I honestly don't think it's bedlam and mayhem in the streets. Trump is just mad because he sees homeless people on his way to the golf course. If he truly cared about homelessness and bedlam in the streets, he would be funding housing and programs to help with addiction and mental health – not bringing in the National Guard and relocating unhoused people. I'm not worried about violent crime in America. You just have to know your surroundings and use common sense. — Martha Payne, Ventura, California This piece was submitted as part of USA TODAY's Forum, a new space for conversation. See what we're talking about at and share your perspective at forum@ Do you want to take part in our next Forum? Join the conversation by emailing forum@ can also follow us on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and sign up for our Opinion newsletter to stay updated on future Forum posts. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: DC bedlam? The real problem is Trump, a convicted felon | Opinion