logo
Cootamundra-Gundagai demerger ignites hope for other NSW councils

Cootamundra-Gundagai demerger ignites hope for other NSW councils

A decision to split a merged council has offered hope to other New South Wales shires fighting for the same cause.
The Cootamundra and Gundagai councils were forced to merge in 2016 when the state government created 19 new councils from the amalgamation of 44 existing councils.
A decade-long campaign to demerge ensued and on Thursday locals got their wish.
"It was a great day for local democracy," Demerge NSW Alliance coordinator and Save Bombala president Grantley Ingram said.
"The minister has listened to the community of Gundagai and Cootamundra and he's acted on their wishes."
The 2016 decision to amalgamate councils was made by the former Coalition government to improve efficiency and reduce administrative costs.
But Mr Ingram said that was "nonsense", and "roads, rates and rubbish" were common issues faced by merged councils, as well as the loss of council-run aged care facilities and staff turnover.
He said people had wanted out in his town of Bombala, which was forced to merge into the Snowy Monaro Regional Council.
"It's just not working," he said.
Snowy Valleys Council was also among the 19 newly created councils, combining the Tumut Shire and Tumbarumba Shire councils.
Councillor and former Tumut mayor Trina Thomson said both communities had different wants and needs.
"It's like trying to run two separate councils under one umbrella," she said.
"We believe that going forward, a demerger would enable us to have that independent, unique identity."
The sentiment is not shared in the NSW western plains, where Dubbo Regional councillor Matthew Dickerson believes most people have accepted the merger between Dubbo and Wellington shires.
"The eggs have been broken, the omelettes have been made," he said.
"I think that moment has gone and I don't think there is any appetite for a de-amalgamation.
"We're moving on in the world."
During Thursday's announcement, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said there was now a legislative pathway for other merged councils to consider splitting.
"We will not forcibly merge or demerge councils," he said.
"These are decisions for communities, they are not decisions for governments.
"[Governments] need to get their nose out of local government and their nose out of local communities that are more than capable of managing their own affairs.
"The responsibility on effecting the demerger is in the hands of the democratically elected councillors."
Mr Ingram agreed that councils were best to lead the process of demerging, and community consultation was paramount.
"While I think it's a disaster, there may be others that quite like our regional council," he said.
"We need to assess the wishes of the community."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Premier Chris Minns condemns Gareth Ward's court bid to block expulsion
Premier Chris Minns condemns Gareth Ward's court bid to block expulsion

ABC News

time2 days ago

  • ABC News

Premier Chris Minns condemns Gareth Ward's court bid to block expulsion

New South Wales Premier Chris Minns has labelled a late-night legal move by Gareth Ward's lawyers to halt his expulsion from parliament as "unconscionable", after the convicted MP secured injunctive orders in the Supreme Court. "Late last night, orders were granted in the New South Wales Supreme Court, injunctive orders obtained by representatives of Mr Ward, lawyers for Mr Ward, against the Leader of the House Ron Hoenig [and] the Speaker Greg Piper — which will stop or attempt to stop the expulsion motion in the Legislative Assembly," Mr Minns told Nine Radio this morning. The motion was due to be introduced today ahead of a vote in the lower house on Wednesday. If Ward is expelled, his seat in Kiama would be declared vacant, triggering a by-election. The Kiama MP was convicted last month on one count of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of assault with an act of indecency, involving two male victims. He is in custody awaiting sentencing in September and has flagged his intention to appeal. Mr Minns said the government would seek to overturn the court's injunctive order ruling. "The government will seek an urgent hearing in the Supreme Court to have those orders dealt with," he said. "My understanding is the hearing is set down for Friday of this week. "But, we've got a week of parliament to sit, and I think that most people would appreciate it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in jail in Silverwater, convicted of serious sexual offences, who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid. "Our lawyers are assessing [it] and worked through the night to try and navigate this genuinely unprecedented situation." He repeated previous comments that the motion was not designed to punish Ward, but protect the integrity of the Legislative Assembly. Mr Minns, who has repeatedly called for Ward to resign, when asked about the issue again, told the station: "That would be the first and most obvious course." In a statement, Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said the opposition would support Ward's expulsion and work with the government. "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him — immediately resign. Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of New South Wales any further disgrace. Step aside."

Why banning future bridge protests could be risky for NSW Premier Chris Minns
Why banning future bridge protests could be risky for NSW Premier Chris Minns

ABC News

time2 days ago

  • ABC News

Why banning future bridge protests could be risky for NSW Premier Chris Minns

When a judge authorised Sunday's massive pro-Palestinian demonstration on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, the premier may have breathed a partial sigh of relief. Publicly, he says he doesn't regret his vocal opposition to the protest, declaring that it's not "open season" for demonstrations on the bridge. However, having seen the enormous crowds that marched on Sunday, he must have quietly contemplated the alternative scenario. Had the Supreme Court sided with police it's likely that a significant number of protesters would have marched anyway. The premier himself has acknowledged a "huge groundswell" of concern about the suffering of civilians in Gaza, and protest organisers believe many participants would have been undeterred. That could have led to ugly scenes, with the potential for mass arrests or injuries to both protesters and police. And with a crowd that big, police may have still been forced to close the bridge on public safety grounds. That would have undermined their authority — and that of the government. So, the court's authorisation has saved the government that particular headache. However, in doing so, it may have created an even bigger dilemma for Chris Minns. The premier is concerned the court may have set a precedent, making it even more difficult to oppose future protests on the bridge. The road he chooses in response is littered with potholes. While the Palestine Action Group has promised another major protest on August 24, spokesperson Josh Lees says there are no plans to demonstrate on the harbour bridge any time soon. Without another protest application being tested in court, it remains unclear whether Saturday's ruling will pave the way for a future demonstration. However, to remove all doubt, the opposition is calling on the government to consider legislation to stop the bridge being used for a future protest. While the premier says he has no desire to rush legislation, he's not ruling it out either. It's a risky strategy. Legislation would almost certainly face a legal challenge. It could also be ignored by defiant protesters, putting them on a collision course with police, who have a tough enough job as it is. Such a move could also cause major disquiet amongst Labor MPs, some of whom are already angry about existing laws restricting protests. When the premier faces caucus on Tuesday morning, he'll do so knowing several of his colleagues marched on Sunday. Two of his ministers, Penny Sharpe and Jihad Dib joined the protest. MPs Julia Finn, Lynda Voltz, Cameron Murphy, Stephen Lawrence, Bob Nanva and Anthony D'Adam were amongst those marching too. Last year, the premier warned his MPs who spoke out on Gaza to either focus on state issues or "run for federal parliament". He's unlikely to be as dismissive when caucus meets today. Mr Minns sensed the community's horror in the wake of Hamas' terrorist attacks on October 7. But having seen the enormity of Sunday's protest, he says he also understands the depth of concern surrounding the humanitarian situation in Gaza. While he says he's "repeatedly" expressed those concerns, his language on Monday was noticeably stronger. While he said he was "terrified and appalled" by Hamas, he spoke of the "IDF's [Israel Defense Forces] action in bombing hospitals," describing it as a "massive concern as a human being." While Israel has repeatedly argued that Hamas operates beneath hospitals, the images of civilian casualties are difficult to ignore. He also said that stopping aid from entering Gaza had been "disastrous" for civilians there. Israel's government has criticised the weekend's protest. The country's foreign minister, Gideon Sa'ar posted a photo of a demonstrator who appeared to be holding a photo of Iran's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, who has called for Israel's destruction. However, the premier said most protesters went with the "right intentions". Until now, the premier has shown a distinct lack of patience with pro-Palestinian demonstrations, particularly when they create cost and inconvenience. Sunday's scenes suggest that any further attempts to block them could backfire, both in caucus and on the streets.

NSW government under pressure to fulfil toll administration fee promise
NSW government under pressure to fulfil toll administration fee promise

ABC News

time2 days ago

  • ABC News

NSW government under pressure to fulfil toll administration fee promise

Standing before reporters in western Sydney on a drizzly morning in March 2023, then-New South Wales opposition leader Chris Minns delivered an election pledge to motorists grappling with ever-rising toll road costs. "We are going to declare war on the admin toll notices that families in New South Wales receive," he said. The future premier promised that if elected in that month's poll, his government would move to lower administration fees that toll road operators levy on drivers who fail to pay to use their roads. "Fifty million notices are deployed every single year by toll companies and the New South Wales government," he said. "It is, in effect, a toll on top of toll." John Graham, who became roads minster in the new Labor government less than a month later, was even more explicit at the press conference — promising to replicate a Queensland reform that saw multiple toll notices consolidated into a single letter with one administration fee. "We are going to act. We will consolidate these notices. We will save drivers tens of millions of dollars a year," he said. But more than two years later, the NSW government has not delivered on its promise. That is despite even toll road operator Transurban agreeing the administration fee system should be reformed. The issue of administration fees was highlighted last year by the Four Corners investigation Road Gold, which showed how the networks of private roads in Australia's largest cities were worsening the cost-of-living crisis for millions of motorists. The delay in delivering reform is adding to the financial burden on motorists like Luke Cook, who has racked up almost $5,000 in administration fees on top of $2,030 of unpaid tolls — the bulk of it since Mr Minns's election promise. "It's been extremely stressful," Mr Cook said. "When I first started getting the piles of letters and the text messages, I was losing a lot of sleep." Mr Cook accumulated most of his toll debt making regular trips from his home in the Hunter Valley to visit his mother at her Penrith nursing home over the past three years, travelling on the M7, M2 and NorthConnex. He also has unpaid tolls for trips on the Eastern Distributor, Lane Cove Tunnel and Cross City Motorway. Mr Cook says he is happy to pay the outstanding toll bill but cannot afford the administration fees. "The only way I could pay the full amount, with their admin fees as well, is to use the money that my wife and I have saved up to buy my mum an electric wheelchair," he said. Mr Cook acknowledges other motorists might have little sympathy for him, given he used the roads regularly for years without paying. But he says he is now happy to pay the outstanding toll bill, and the reason he could not afford to pay is because he has not worked full time for the past three years due to an injury. "The toll roads are extremely expensive," he said. He has called on the state government to follow through on its election pledge. "Fulfil a promise," he said. "It's really not that difficult to do." The NSW Transport Minister John Graham did not respond directly to questions about why the administration fee promise had been delayed, but in a statement said the change was "on the table as part of toll reform". "We promised to make all toll road operators issue consolidated toll notices and stop gouging motorists with excessive administration fees set at arbitrary levels, and that's exactly what we are doing," he said. Under the current system, motorists who use a toll road in NSW without a valid account, and fail to pay within 14 days, receive a toll bill in the mail that includes a $10 administration fee. If they still have not paid in another 14 days, they receive another toll bill with an additional $20 administration fee. The operator can then hand the unpaid toll and administration fee notice to Revenue NSW to be pursued as a fine, which can lead to motorists having their driver licence or registration suspended if they don't pay. No system is 100 per cent secure, but the Signal app can be used to protect your identity by using end-to-end encryption. Please read the terms and conditions of the app to work out if it is the best method of communication for you. Mr Cook has so far received and paid one fine for his outstanding tolls and is worried about his remaining debt also being converted into fines. He has asked Transurban to put him on a payment plan but is asking them to wipe the administration fee debt. "I'm telling them that I'll quite happily meet them halfway and pay the toll fees just on their own without the administration fees tacked on top," he said. He communicated his request to Transurban in June via the Tolling Customer Ombudsman — a Transurban-funded body that mediates disputes between the operator and its customers. Transurban has since contacted Mr Cook about a payment plan, and it is understood the company can wipe or reduce a driver's administration fees if they agree to sign up for a toll account. "We encourage all motorists to have an active account, which provides visibility of travel and expenses and avoids additional fees," a spokesperson for Transurban said in a statement. Transurban, which operates 11 of Sydney's 13 toll roads, told a NSW parliamentary inquiry in 2021 that it supported a move to consolidated toll notices. "Transurban proposes to consolidate toll notices, so a customer only receives one toll notice for three days of travel across the Sydney network," it said in a submission to the inquiry. "This change will be fairer for customers, reduce the confusion that comes with receiving multiple toll notices and bring NSW into line with the toll notice process in Victoria and Queensland." At the time, Transurban said it was sending about 29 million toll notices each year to motorists in NSW. The company has not responded to a request for an updated figure on the number of toll notices it sends out each year. Transurban insists it does not profit from the administration fees. Shortly after the 2023 election, the NSW government commissioned former ACCC chairman Allan Fels and economist David Cousins to conduct a review of the state's toll road network. Among the recommendations of their final report, delivered in July last year, was that the administration fees be replaced with late fees designed to incentivise drivers to pay their toll bills. Since last year, the NSW government has been locked in negotiations with Transurban about the review's other major recommendations, including the introduction of a central pricing system for Sydney's toll network. Professor Fels says that given that the NSW government and Transurban agree on the need to consolidate toll notices, they should deal with the issue outside of the broader negotiations. "They could solve the administration fee issue outside of the negotiations quite quickly," he said. "They can get on with the consumer reforms. They can be kept separate from the big financial negotiations." The NSW government has made some changes to the toll network since it took office, including a $60 weekly cap on tolls for motorists who register with a rebate scheme.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store