logo
Omagh bomb families call for special advocate for closed hearings at inquiry

Omagh bomb families call for special advocate for closed hearings at inquiry

Omagh Bombing Inquiry chairman Lord Turnbull is hearing arguments around applications during dedicated hearings this week.
Counsel to the inquiry Paul Greaney KC said the inquiry, which is probing whether the 1998 dissident republican bomb attack could have been prevented, will hear some sensitive security evidence in closed hearings.
The atrocity in the Co Tyrone town on August 15 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman pregnant with twins.
Speaking during hearings in Belfast on Monday, Mr Greaney said the inquiry's legal team recognises that survivors and the bereaved have spent 25 years seeking the truth, and may be 'suspicious or even cynical of the UK state's willingness to engage in a way that is straightforward and wholehearted with this inquiry'.
'We acknowledge too, that the idea of evidence being heard in circumstances in which the families and survivors will be excluded is one that they will find difficult to accept, to say the least, and accordingly, we regard it as entirely understandable that some, although not all, have suggested special advocates should be appointed to represent their interests in any closed hearings, and have made applications for that to occur,' he said.
Outlining the arguments that will be made, Mr Greaney said some contend special advocates cannot legally be appointed in a statutory public inquiry, while others have said if such a power does exist it should not be exercised.
He said others have said special advocates can legally be appointed in an inquiry, and should be in this case to ensure the interests of the bereaved and survivors are protected, meanwhile others are neutral, and one group has said they are content to leave the matters to the inquiry's legal team.
Mr Greaney also revealed that both the Advocate General of Northern Ireland Lord Hermer KC and Secretary of State Hilary Benn's position is that there is no power to appoint a special advocate in a statutory public inquiry.
It was also noted that special advocates were not appointed in the inquiry into the death of former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko or in the Manchester Arena Inquiry.
Hugh Southey KC, acting for some of the bereaved families and survivors, emphasised the importance of a process from which everyone walks away feeling confident in the outcome.
He said those which he represents have been calling for the appointment of a special advocate since the early days of the inquiry.
'They obviously have a degree of scepticism about the state's position in relation to this inquiry,' he said.
'There has been considerable delay in getting to this stage and also there is a history, they would argue, of the state not necessarily of being fully open, essentially about what's happened in the past, and because of that they are of the opinion that it is particularly important that any closed procedure involves the state being fully tested, and it's important also that they have confidence in the outcome of any closed procedure.'
He added that special advocates played a key rule in a judicial review which was taken by Michael Gallagher, whose son Aiden was killed in the bomb, previously of the government's decision not to call a public inquiry.
'That is part of the reason why, from their point of view, it is important that special advocates continue to be involved in the process,' he said.
The hearing continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump was on his best behaviour in his meeting with Zelensky
Donald Trump was on his best behaviour in his meeting with Zelensky

Spectator

time2 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Donald Trump was on his best behaviour in his meeting with Zelensky

It was back to black for Volodymyr Zelensky. After the Trump White House asked whether he was going to wear a suit for his Oval Office meeting, the Ukrainian president showed up in a dark military-style jacket, pleasing his hosts to no end. Even Brian Glenn, boyfriend of Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and reporter for Real America's Voice, who had dissed Zelensky in February, commended him on his habiliments, declaring 'you look fabulous in that suit.' Zelensky was pleased. So was Trump. In fact, Trump was on his best behaviour. After ranting earlier in the morning that he didn't need all the experts to tell him what to think and that Ukraine should essentially prostrate itself before Russia, he avoided any verbal fisticuffs with Zelensky or talk about exiting Nato. Instead, Trump breathed optimism about where the negotiations, which he hopes will secure him a coveted Nobel Peace Prize, were headed. 'I think it's going to be when, not if,' Trump said about a trilateral meeting between him, Putin and Zelensky. He may not have rolled out a red carpet for Zelensky when he arrived in Washington, as he did for Putin in Alaska, but he treated him with unwonted respect. According to Trump, 'I have a feeling you and president Putin are going to work something out. Ultimately, this is a decision that can only be made by president Zelensky and by the people of Ukraine working also together in agreement with president Putin. And I just think that very good things are going to come of it.' If the meeting with European leaders that took place later in the afternoon was anything to go by, Trump's eupeptic push for a peace deal is not meeting with overt resistance. Quite the contrary. Zelensky indicated that territorial concessions would be discussed should he meet Putin. It was clever of Zelensky to put the onus back on Putin rather than rejecting out-of-hand the prospect of land swaps. 'If we played this well, we could end this, and we have to end it,' Nato Secretary-General Mark Rutte said. Indeed, he called Trump's offer of security guarantees for Ukraine a 'breakthrough.' What those guarantees would look like remains unclear. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, who appears to have established a good working relationship with Trump, indicated that it was imperative to provide 'Article 5-like guarantees' to Ukraine. What this will amount to is an open question – Germany announced today that it was already overstretched with its stationing of a Bundeswehr brigade in Lithuania and that it is unlikely to put any boots on the ground in Ukraine. But the biggest obstacle to a peace deal, of course, is whether Putin even wants one. 'President Putin wants to find an answer, too,' Trump said. Does he? So far, as he launches fresh fusillades of missiles and drones at Ukraine, the Russian tyrant appears to believe that he has more to benefit from continuing rather than halting the war that he, and he alone, launched in February 2022. For all the bonhomie that existed between him and Trump in Alaska, it may be replaced by a more adversarial relationship in coming weeks should Putin maintain his obduracy about reaching an actual deal.

Donald Trump says Volodymyr Zelenskyy 'can end war with Russia if he wants to' - ahead of crucial White House meeting
Donald Trump says Volodymyr Zelenskyy 'can end war with Russia if he wants to' - ahead of crucial White House meeting

Sky News

time5 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Donald Trump says Volodymyr Zelenskyy 'can end war with Russia if he wants to' - ahead of crucial White House meeting

Volodymyr Zelenskyy could "end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to", Donald Trump has said - ahead of crucial White House talks on the future of Ukraine. Mr Trump made the comment in a series of social media posts throwing forward to his meeting with the Ukrainian president, who will be supported by Sir Keir Starmer and other European leaders. The allies are travelling to Washington DC with the aim of protecting Ukraine from having to concede key regions to Russia in exchange for peace, following the US president's high-profile meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. They will also be keen to avoid a repeat of Mr Zelenskyy 's last heated visit to the White House in February, which ended with the Ukrainian leader leaving early and later resulted in US aid to Ukraine being temporarily halted. 2:09 "President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," Mr Trump shared on his own network, Truth Social, on Sunday. "Remember how it started," he added, before highlighting the annexation of Crimea. Describing today as a "big day" at the White House, he added: "Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!!." Sir Keir and six other political heavyweights will present a united front alongside Mr Zelenskyy, who is expecting to face calls to surrender full control of Donetsk and Luhansk - two mineral-rich regions where large areas are currently occupied by Russian troops. In September 2022, Moscow announced it was officially annexing them, alongside the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, in a move rejected and condemned as illegal by the West. Mr Putin would reportedly give up other territories held by his troops in exchange and agree to a "NATO-like" security guarantee preventing Ukraine from further incursion. At today's Oval Office encounter, Mr Zelenskyy will be joined by France's Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Alexander Stubb, president of Finland, as well as head of NATO Mark Rutte and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, and Sir Keir. They are set to arrive at midday (5pm UK time). Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy will hold a bilateral meeting first, before a multilateral meeting with the rest of the European leaders. In a message on X following the US president's comments, the Ukrainian leader expressed gratitude for the invitation and said everyone involved shares "a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably". However, he said peace "must be lasting", and added: "Ukrainians are fighting for their land, for their independence. Now, our soldiers have successes in Donetsk and Sumy regions. "I am confident that we will defend Ukraine, effectively guarantee security, and that our people will always be grateful to President Trump, everyone in America, and every partner and ally for their support and invaluable assistance. "Russia must end this war, which it itself started. And I hope that our joint strength with America, with our European friends, will force Russia into a real peace." What is the 'NATO-like' security guarantee? Following the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska, the two leaders said they had agreed on some points but did not elaborate further. Speaking to CNN on Sunday, US special envoy Steve Witkoff said: "We were able to win the following concession: that the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO." Article 5 is a core principle of the 32-member collective, which states that an armed attack against one or more of its members shall be considered an attack against all. It has only been invoked once, by the US, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks in 2001. Russia has repeatedly insisted that Ukraine cannot be allowed to join NATO and has dismissed the idea that NATO member forces could be peacekeepers under some sort of ceasefire deal. Mr Witkoff, who has held previous discussions with Mr Putin on ending the war, said Friday's summit was the first time he had heard the Russian leader agree to the suggestion of NATO-like protection - and called it "game-changing". In a post on X, Russian envoy Mikhail Ulyanov said Russia agrees a future peace agreement "should provide reliable security assurances or guarantees for Ukraine". But Moscow should also get efficient security guarantees, he added. "What the West has to offer? Apparently they haven't yet started to think about it. It is a mistake, which needs to be corrected." He also said efforts now should focus on the "main goal - the need to elaborate quickly an efficient long-term peace accord, not a questionable ceasefire which diverts attention". 7:27 No talk of ceasefire after summit Despite prior threats of severe sanctions for Russia should a ceasefire not be agreed during the talks in Alaska, there was no mention of this from Mr Trump afterwards. Instead, he said he wanted to focus on a long-term deal for peace. Mr Putin has long refused to agree to a ceasefire as a precondition for talks to end the war, prompting fears that Russia could continue gaining ground in Ukraine as negotiations take place. At a news conference on Sunday, Ms von der Leyen said the aim was to "stop the killing", and suggested a ceasefire and a peace deal would have that same impact. Mr Trump has previously said today's meeting with Mr Zelenskyy could potentially pave the way for a three-way meeting with Mr Putin.

One subtle gesture from Zelensky could have massive significance for Ukraine
One subtle gesture from Zelensky could have massive significance for Ukraine

Daily Mirror

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

One subtle gesture from Zelensky could have massive significance for Ukraine

Volodymyr Zelensky went on the charm offensive with Donald Trump and "mirrored" the US leader in order to get a more positive outcome for Ukraine, according to a body language expert Volodymyr Zelensky made one major change that could have enormous significance for the future of Ukraine, a body language expert has told The Mirror. ‌ The Ukrainian leader was keen to avoid another disastrous meeting at the White House after the awkward clash earlier in the year. It was clear Zelensky was on the charm offensive, and even appeared to "mirror" his US counterpart. ‌ Body language expert Darren Stanton told The Mirror that Zelensky was keen to appear engaged with Trump. He added: "Zelensky, rather than sitting back in the chair with his arms folded, as he was back in February, he's now engaged. ‌ "He's sat on the edge of the seat and matching and mirroring Trump's posture, which means he's actively listening and taking part....I think overall it's been a very positive thing and Trump hasn't belittled Zelensky in any way." Trump's response to Zelensky will be a relief to his European allies who were no doubt anxious that there would be a repeat of his previous visit to the Washington DC. The US President is hoping to bring an end to the bloodshed between Russia and Ukraine. Trump has appeared more willing to support Ukraine in finding a path towards ending the conflict, although his motivations for doing this remain unclear. The US President appears keen to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for ending conflicts around the world. But the price for peace could be steep with Russian President Vladimir Putin naming his price for peace. Putin said he would be willing to end the conflict if he is allowed to hold occupied territory in Ukraine and for Kyiv to officially recognise them as Russian territory. Zelensky has ruled out officially recognising occupied and annexed territory as officially being Russian, proving a major sticking point for any future negotiations. European leaders have called for Ukraine to be included in any future talks with Putin. There are concerns that Putin will use any period of peace to rearm and pursue more of Ukraine or NATO members in a future war. Ukraine has requested security guarantees but it is unclear whether Trump would agree to provide protection.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store