It's not just Democrats. Socialist Mamdani's plans should worry Republicans nationwide
Asked about the New York City Democratic mayoral candidate this week, the Massachusetts senator urged her fellow Democrats to embrace Mamdani's socialist plans as the "Democratic message."
Imagine that: a clear (albeit extreme) answer to a direct question rather than contrived talking points. Other Democrats are offering mealy-mouthed canned responses to questions about Mamdani, including my opponent in the New Hampshire Senate race, U.S. Representative Chris Pappas, D-N.H., who won't take a position on Mamdani's candidacy, and is calling me "pathetic" for raising the issue.
The outcome of this fall's mayoral race in New York City has implications poised to resonate far beyond the five boroughs. Not only would the epicenter of capitalism falling into the hands of an avowed socialist send a dangerous message to our innovators and the world, but it will shape the future of the Democratic Party struggling to find its footing. Less than a year after getting their electoral clocks cleaned by President Donald Trump, the party's national standing has plummeted to a 35-year low.
Republican candidates need to do more than sit back and watch the Democrats implode. We must loudly and clearly explain to voters what socialism means. Remind them it's been decades since the fall of the Soviet Union, but a group of extreme and uniformed politicians are trying to bring back some of its core tenets. Mamdani has called for the abolition of private property and discussed "the end goal of seizing the means of production." These should be relics of a failed economic playbook that belongs in the history books, not modern political debates.
Capitalism is the greatest force for good this world has ever seen. It has lifted people up from poverty and provided opportunities for those at the bottom. And I am one of them. I went from being a kid on welfare to the halls of Congress and then to serving as President Donald Trump's ambassador to New Zealand and Samoa decades later.
That upward mobility doesn't exist in Mamdani's socialist worldview. He frames his arguments around free handouts and government-run grocery stores. In his mind, it's better to spread mediocrity widely than strive for excellence through hard work. It's free for everyone until it doesn't exist for anyone.
Believe it or not, it won't be long before presidential candidates are kicking the tires on campaigns for 2028, especially in my home state of New Hampshire, the site of the First in the Nation presidential primary (at least on the Republican side, the Democrats decided to move it back in line to boost former President Joe Biden's electoral prospects).
Should he win this November, Mamdani is poised to become one of his party's biggest stars. His fellow socialist, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, D-N.Y., is ascendant. Juan Williams, a well-respected Democratic voice even boldly predicted this week: "Say hello in 2028 to President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez."
The copycat phenomenon is well underway. In Minnesota, a socialist challenger to the incumbent Democrat mayor has been dubbed the "Mamdani of Minneapolis."
The recent trend lines are concerning. A 2021 Gallup poll found that just half of young Americans had a positive view of capitalism, while a separate survey showed that 62% of younger voters held a "favorable view" of "socialism." The Occupy Wall Street movement that was born in many of America's major cities a decade and a half ago has graduated to an open embrace of socialism.
With President Trump atop the ticket, the GOP made steady gains last year among younger and working-class voters. With every Democrat on record opposing tax cuts in the "One Big Beautiful Bill," not to mention provisions like "No Tax On Tips," we have a compelling story to tell about our vision for the future.
If we don't, it's more than just politics at stake. It's the future of our country. Democrats' economic vision is the one outlined by Sen. Warren and Mamdani: more government programs funded by higher taxes. Unlike those two politicians, most aren't willing to admit it, but given the chance, their policies would be ruinous.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
‘What gives you the right?': Tapper pushes back on Abbott over calls to remove Dem lawmaker
CNN's Jake Tapper presses GOP Texas Gov. Greg Abbott over why he took the unusual step of calling for Democratic leader state Rep. Gene Wu to be removed from office amid the ongoing redistricting fight.
Politico
a few seconds ago
- Politico
What Kamala Harris can learn from John Kerry
HISTORY LESSON — A failed Democratic presidential nominee who's thinking about running again. A party that isn't thrilled about the prospect of a repeat bid. It sounds a lot like the situation currently facing Kamala Harris, but it's actually the dilemma that confronted Democrat John Kerry after his 2004 presidential defeat. And for Harris, what came next for Kerry could prove instructive as she weighs her options ahead of 2028. Back then, Democrats were reeling after George W. Bush's election to a second term. Many in the party expected the race was theirs for the taking; in the end, Bush won both a majority of the popular vote and the Electoral College. Kerry, however, kept the door open to a second White House bid long after Bush's victory. It wasn't until Jan. 2007 that Kerry announced he would not make a second run. While his experience offers a roadmap for Harris, it's also a cautionary tale about the hurdles facing failed candidates. For much of the two years before the 2006 midterms, Kerry actively campaigned across the country like a potential presidential candidate. He gave a formal speech on patriotism at Grinnell College, the elite liberal arts institution in Iowa, and was the guest of honor at the New Hampshire Democratic Party's Jefferson-Jackson dinner in 2006. And all throughout, he stumped for candidates in swing races across the country in places from rural Iowa to south Florida. Yet what doomed Kerry was the first time he put his foot in his mouth. Speaking to students on the eve of the midterms, Kerry said, 'Well, you know, if you make the most of it, and you study hard, and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, you — you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq.' Critics immediately seized on the remark as an insult to the troops, and candidates in both parties called on him to apologize. His aides insisted that it was a botched joke about George W. Bush and that he meant to say 'you get us stuck in Iraq.' It didn't matter. Coming only days before the midterms, Democrats panicked as Republicans raced to condemn the former presidential nominee. Kerry was abruptly dropped from an event in Iowa where he was scheduled to appear with Bruce Braley, a Democrat running in a swing district and canceled other campaign trips as well. It was a fresh reminder of Kerry and his various blunders on the 2004 campaign trail, but also a sign of how little room for error he had within his own party after losing to Bush. Harris is in a far stronger position than Kerry ever was. The former vice president consistently leads Democratic polls in advance of the 2028 primary — Kerry, on the other hand, lagged behind Hillary Clinton in public polls. And Harris isn't held entirely culpable for the party's 2024 defeat — an abbreviated campaign marked by Joe Biden's abrupt, mid-campaign decision to bow out — the same way that Kerry was held responsible for blowing a lead against Bush. However, Harris has been far less visible so far than Kerry at a similar point. Part of that is simply a function of the fact that Harris is no longer in public life — she announced recently she would not run for California governor in 2026 — while Kerry remained in the Senate. But the Massachusetts Democrat also kept a far more active schedule than Harris did after his loss — within five weeks of his general election loss, Kerry had already returned to both Iowa and New Hampshire to thank supporters who had backed him in his primary campaign. All of that could change with Harris' coming book tour. The book, titled '107 Days,' is set to release Sept. 23. Even if she isn't campaigning with state Senate candidates in the suburbs of Webster City, Iowa, Harris is still likely to get more than sufficient eyeballs on the late night talk show circuit. The return to the spotlight risks opening up all the old wounds. It's hard to dodge questions about past decisions when promoting a book that is intended to be a chronicle of her 107-day presidential campaign. Hillary Clinton utilized a simple yet very effective putdown of Kerry after his 2006 gaffe. 'No one wants to have the 2004 election replayed,' she said, prompting bad memories among Democrats about the devastating loss two years earlier. For Harris, that will be the first challenge if she wants to mount a presidential bid — erasing fears that her nomination would look like a re-run. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at bjacobs@ or on X (formerly known as Twitter) at @Bencjacobs. What'd I Miss? — Trump places DC police under federal control, deploys National Guard: President Donald Trump said today he would place the Washington, D.C., police department under federal control and deploy the National Guard, an escalation of federal power in his campaign to tighten control over the nation's deep-blue capital city. 'This is liberation day in D.C. and we're going to take our capital back,' Trump said. Although crime in Washington hit a 30-year low last year, Trump on Monday said he was declaring a public safety emergency in the District. The president in recent days has seized on violence against a Trump administration staffer to cast the city as dangerous, pledging earlier today that 'Crime, Savagery, Filth, and Scum will DISAPPEAR.' — House Republicans back Trump on DC crime push: House Republicans moved quickly today to follow President Donald Trump's lead as he took unprecedented action to target Washington's locally elected government — further heightening the GOP's scrutiny of the capital city and its Democratic elected leaders. Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said he would haul Mayor Muriel Bowser, Council Chair Phil Mendelson and Attorney General Brian Schwalb to Capitol Hill next month for a hearing. The public grilling is likely to come as Trump's takeover of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department approaches a 30-day expiration date, requiring congressional action to continue. — Trump: Russia and Ukraine peace requires 'land swapping': President Donald Trump said Russia and Ukraine will engage in 'land swapping' that will be 'good' and 'bad' for both countries, a key part of his push to end the years-long war. The president's comments on today follow insistence from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that his country would not trade land for peace, and underscore Trump's focus on making a deal with Putin. President Donald Trump said Russia and Ukraine will engage in 'land swapping' that will be 'good' and 'bad' for both countries, a key part of his push to end the years-long war. — Trump defends deal to sell Nvidia export control license: President Donald Trump defended a deal he struck with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to waive national security concerns blocking the sale of certain semiconductor chips to China in exchange for the company giving the U.S. government 15 percent of the revenue. 'I said, 'I want 20 percent if I'm going to approve this for you,' Trump told reporters Monday during a White House press conference. 'For the country, for our country. I don't want it myself ... And he said, 'Would you make it 15?' So we negotiate a little deal.' Trump appeared to brush off concerns that he was weakening national security by approving the sale. He said the H20 chip manufactured by Nvidia is 'obsolete,' even though there is still a market for it in China and other places. — Judge denies DOJ bid to unseal grand jury material in Ghislaine Maxwell case: A federal judge today denied the Justice Department's effort to unseal grand jury material in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, calling the 'entire premise' of the government's move 'demonstrably false.' U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer, in a 31-page decision, chided the Justice Department for its bid to make the material public because, he said, the public would learn virtually nothing new from the documents and 'would come away feeling disappointed and misled.' AROUND THE WORLD LAST MINUTE SUMMIT — U.S. President Donald Trump will join European leaders including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for an emergency virtual summit on Wednesday. The call, organized by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, comes ahead of Friday's summit in Alaska between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on the war in Ukraine. The virtual summit will focus on pressure options against Russia, questions about Ukrainian territories seized by Russia, security guarantees for Kyiv and the sequencing of potential peace talks, a German government spokesperson told POLITICO. JOURNALISTS KILLED IN GAZA — Israel killed five journalists during an airstrike in Gaza, news outlet Al Jazeera reported. Anas al-Sharif, a prominent Al Jazeera reporter, was killed in a tent alongside four colleagues and two bystanders, the Qatari-owned network said. He shared a video of Israel's 'relentless bombardment' of Gaza shortly before he died. The Israel Defense Forces confirmed the strike, claiming that al-Sharif, who is Palestinian, headed a Hamas terrorist cell and led 'advanced rocket attacks' against Israel. Al Jazeera has repeatedly denied allegations about al-Sharif's links to Hamas, and the United Nations special rapporteur for freedom of expression, Irene Khan, said last month that the claims were unsubstantiated. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP THE ATOMIC BOWL — Less than five months after the U.S. bombed Nagasaki in 1945, the U.S. military returned to stage a New Year's Day football game. In an attempt to normalize the U.S. occupation of Japan, some 1,500 people gathered at a debris-riddled middle school to watch professional football players-turned-servicemen play. The long-forgotten game in a city where most of bombings' victims were non-combatants was emblematic of the American military and public's takeaways from the second nuclear bombing, argues Greg Mitchell. He reports on the game and its legacy for Mother Jones. Parting Image Jacqueline Munis contributed to this newsletter. Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.
New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani's $2,300 rent scandal exposes who this ‘socialist' is really looking after first —himself
Who are government-mandated rent-stabilized apartments for? Apparently well-compensated bureaucrats. Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani is only paying $2,300 for his stabilized place in Astoria, despite making $142,000 a year as an assemblyman, plus stipends, in addition to however much his artist wife is also raking in. It's part of a long-term pattern of Mamdani scheming programs meant for less-fortunate people for his own benefit. First he's claiming to be an African American to get into college, now he's grifting on rent-stabilization that lower income people should be benefiting from. Advertisement Mamdani's rent had been pointed out for around a week before Andrew Cuomo caught on and challenged him in a Friday tweet about the matter, which attracted a staggering 33 million views on X. 5 Zohran Mamdani is under fire for only paying $2,300 a month for his rent-stabilized apartment. Getty Images 'You are actually very rich, [yet] you and your wife pay $2,300 a month, as you have bragged, for a nice apartment in Astoria,' the former governor wrote. 'I am calling on you to move out immediately and give your affordable housing back to an unhoused family who needs it.' Advertisement Cuomo inaccurately first claimed that Mamdani's home is rent-controlled (a statement he's since corrected). The one-bedroom apartment is actually rent-stabilized, as are almost half of rentals in New York City. But Cuomo is not wrong to question why Mamdani — who claims to be a champion of the lesser-fortunate — has never sought to correct why someone like him can benefit from a system that should be for low-income, housing-insecure New Yorkers first. Rent-stabilized apartments are subject to only modest annual increases in rent, as determined by the Rent Guidelines Board, and virtually guaranteed rights to lease renewal. And there are generally no income restrictions for moving into one — it's mostly a matter of luck. 5 Andrew Cuomo called for Zohran Mamdani to move out of his rent-stabilized home. @andrewcuomo/X Advertisement But shouldn't a socialist assemblyman be concerned with making sure low-income New Yorkers who need those protections most are prioritized in getting them? Apparently not so much. Mamdani has bragged about only paying $2,300 a month for rent in debates and interviews alike. He has made housing the primary pillar of his campaign, calling on New York City to freeze the rent for apartments under the provision of the government and to build 200,000 affordable housing units in the next 10 years. The question is: Who gets to benefit from these policies? Will well-off New Yorkers like Mamdani, who are unfairly occupying rent-stabilized homes, benefit from indefinite freezes? Advertisement 5 Cuomo is proposing legislation called Zohran's Law which would block wealthy tenants from accessing affordable housing. SARAH YENESEL/EPA/Shutterstock Former governor Cuomo told The Post Sunday that he's proposing new legislation, calling it Zohran's Law, which would block wealthy New Yorkers like Mamdani from accessing rent-stabilized housing. 'We're not supposed to be providing rent-stabilized apartments to the children of millionaires,' he said. Mamdani's father is a major Columbia professor, his mother an internationally renowned movie director. Cuomo is right, but he shouldn't stop there. Mamdani — who has previously called for the 'abolition of private property' — should be made to explain exactly who will benefit from his expanded affordable housing scheme. He did, after all, tell the New York Editorial Board that he's 'deeply skeptical of means testing' when asked by an interviewer whether we should 'have any way of ensuring that people who are better off who live in rent-stabilized housing don't get those benefits.' Seems like Mamdani has a very personal interest in batting down proposals for means testing. 5 Zohran Mamdani's wife, Rama Duwaji, leaving their apartment in Astoria recently. Brigitte Stelzer Advertisement 5 Mamdani was featured on The Post's cover calling on him to give up his rent-stabilized place. This scandal fits into a larger pattern in the candidate's past. It's not unlike when Mamdani, who grew up in Uganda but is of Indian descent, decided to check the 'African American' box on his application to Columbia University. Mamdani had no problem potentially benefiting from racial affirmative action — a system set up to uplift the descendants of American slaves — in the admissions process, despite quite evidently not being Black or African American. Advertisement Similarly, he seems to have no issue getting all the perks of rent-stabilization — a system set up to receive cash-strapped New Yorkers — despite being the well-compensated son of successful parents. Mamdani has a long history of identifying special-interest programs meant for others worse off than him, and then scheming them for his own benefit. Is this really the sort of leader that New Yorkers trust to roll out and dole out vast new entitlement programs?
