
DOGE Vowed to Make Government More ‘Efficient' — but It's Doing the opposite
Allison Robbert/For The Washington Post
President Donald Trump returns to the White House from a trip to his golf course in Bedminster, New Jersey, on May 25.
Somewhere in the world last month, a State Department employee began the routine process of hiring a vendor for an upcoming embassy event – but quickly ran into a problem.
The vendor was refusing to sign paperwork certifying that it did not promote diversity, equity and inclusion, or 'DEI,' a new requirement under President Donald Trump's executive order eradicating DEI from the government. The State employee – who spoke on the condition that neither he nor the location of his embassy be named, for fear of retaliation – sighed.
Then he got busy: The work-around, he knew, would take time. First, he got his ambassador's signed approval to hire the vendor anyway. Next, he filled out an Office 365 form justifying the expense in 250 words before selecting which 'pillar' of necessary spending it fell under, choosing from options including 'Safer, Stronger, More Prosperous.' After submitting that to higher-ups and getting their sign-off, he filled out yet another form – this one destined for political appointees back in Washington.
A week later, the vendor was secured. Under any previous administration, it would have taken one day, the employee said.
Similar layers of new red tape are plaguing federal staffers throughout the government under the second Trump administration, stymieing work and delaying simple transactions, according to interviews with more than three dozen federal workers across 19 agencies and records obtained by The Washington Post. Many of the new hurdles, federal workers said, stem from changes imposed by the U.S. DOGE Service, Elon Musk's cost-cutting team, which burst into government promising to eradicate waste, fraud and abuse and trim staff and spending.
The team's overarching goal was in its name: DOGE stands for Department of Government Efficiency, although it is not part of the Cabinet. But as Musk departed government on Friday, many federal workers said DOGE has in many ways had the opposite effect.
DOGE's intense scrutiny of federal spending is forcing employees to spend hours justifying even the most basic purchases. New rules mandating review and approval by political appointees are leaving thousands of contracts and projects on ice for months. Large-scale firings spearheaded by DOGE have cut support offices – especially IT shops – that assisted federal workers with issues ranging from glitching computers to broken desk chairs. And the piecemeal reassignment of staff is causing significant lags in work in some agencies, notably Social Security, as inexperienced workers adjust to new roles.
Meanwhile, most everyone, across every agency, is dealing with fallout from new policies or executive orders – even as colleagues continue to resign or retire, increasing the workload for those who remain.
'Leadership is overcome with meetings and questions from people on how this will all work. The Human Resource teams have conflicting information, and confusion reigns,' said one Defense Department employee who, like others interviewed for this article, spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing his job. Every day, he said, it feels like 'each person still standing is battling a dozen fires.'
Many presidents try to reshape the sprawling federal bureaucracy to achieve their specific policy goals, said George Krause, a University of Georgia professor who studies public administration. Such efforts span Democratic and Republican administrations back to Richard M. Nixon, whose political appointees were known for clashing with career federal executives, Krause said.
But the DOGE-driven efforts appear to be backfiring in ways that other initiatives did not.
'What Musk showed is that you cannot do this without a plan, and if you do it without a plan that respects some of the functions of government that everybody wants, then what's going to happen is you'll end up making the government less efficient, and not more efficient,' said Elaine Kamarck, director of the Center for Effective Public Management at the Brookings Institution and a former Clinton administration official.
White House spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement that, through DOGE, 'President Trump is curbing government waste and reforming a system that has long burdened American taxpayers.' He added: 'Anyone resistant to these critical reforms has had ample opportunity to step aside, but the work of DOGE will press forward unobstructed.'
The State Department on Saturday shared an emailed statement from a 'senior official' it declined to name: 'The State Department will never apologize for putting processes in place to ensure taxpayer dollars are used correctly. It's what the American people expect and deserve.' But on Friday, almost exactly 24 hours after a Post reporter asked about the requirement that international vendors certify they do not promote DEI, State had issued guidance rescinding that mandate for staff overseas, according to a directive obtained by The Post.
'Holding up everything'
At NASA, employees recently wrote several detailed paragraphs, across multiple rounds of emails, to win approval to buy simple fastening bolts, according to a staffer and records obtained by The Post.
Within the General Services Administration, the government's real estate arm, more than 1,500 project requests – included fully executed leases and notices saying construction can begin – backed up in an internal tracker awaiting political appointees' attention, records show. Some items waited for months, and almost 200 are still on hold, while about 300 were never approved, an employee said.
And at the Food and Drug Administration, once-routine tests on food – monitoring for accuracy in labeling, coloring and exposure to heavy metals – were delayed significantly, a former employee said. That's because the agency began requiring department-level approval for expenses at every step: Purchasing samples to test. Paying to ship samples between labs. Buying lab supplies.
This hands-on approach reflects the Trump administration's drive to rein in what officials see as decades of unsupervised, wasteful federal spending. Speaking in the Oval Office in early February, Trump said, without providing evidence, that there are 'billions and billions of dollars in waste, fraud and abuse … That's one of the reasons I got elected.'
Citing the example of the Treasury Department, Musk claimed the government is missing 'basic controls that should be in place that are in place in any company,' such as categorizing payments by code and providing justifications for each expense. (Systems to do both already existed across agencies.)
And so shortly after Trump's inauguration, DOGE imposed a $1 federal credit card freeze and limited purchasing power to only a handful of people in many departments, decisions that have incapacitated parts of agencies as varied as the National Park Service and the Pentagon. Soon, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Commerce Department required that political appointees green-light many funds before disbursement. In April, DOGE wrested control of a federal grants website used to dole out billions each year.
Many federal employees said they supported closer inspections of how the government spends money. But in practice, they said, the Trump administration's chokehold is tangling up basic, everyday tasks.
The results seem to run counter to the goal of efficiency.
At air traffic control towers at two dozen West Coast airports, officials are unable to easily pay to have the windows washed and shades cleaned, said a Federal Aviation Administration employee. A DOGE-ordered overhaul of the payments system means FAA staffers must write statements justifying all expenditures, the employee said – not just for window-washing, but also elevator maintenance and even pens and pencils, the employee said. Purchase orders that used to take 15 or 20 minutes to fill out now consume 1 or 2 hours for each tower.
'These are things that people don't think about, but clean windows are crucial for controllers,' the employee said. Because he is so often busy with purchase justifications, he has fallen behind on landscaping, fire alarm safety and pest control, all of which are 'staples in the air traffic towers,' he said.
The added reviews extend beyond financial issues to questions of policy and political speech, including press releases.
At some parts of the National Institutes of Health, per an employee there, every grant must now be fed through an AI tool to screen for references to concepts deemed unpalatable by the Trump administration, such as 'DEI, transgender, China, or vaccine hesitancy,' the employee said. Further delaying grants is another new requirement: NIH staff must check to ensure the recipient isn't on the list of colleges and universities that have drawn Trump's wrath, including Columbia, Harvard, Northwestern, Brown and Cornell.
At the State Department, employees are spending hours combing through official documents to remove the words 'diverse,' equitable' and 'inclusive,' said a staffer there, months after Trump issued his executive order ending diversity efforts.
NASA, the NIH, GSA, the FDA and the FAA did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
'Nobody is working at top efficiency'
The administration's ongoing shake-ups of the workforce, from buyout offers to firings to sweeping reorganizations, are also undermining efficiency.
At the Social Security Administration, for example, Trump officials and DOGE pushed thousands of central-office workers to take lower-level positions answering phones in field offices, threatening to fire whoever did not make the jump, according to emails reviewed by The Post and interviews with a half dozen agency employees.
Chaos has ensued across field offices in the weeks since the reassignments took effect, staffers said. Claims processing has bogged down as regular field office staff – already overburdened because of widespread resignations and retirements – are pulled off their normal duties to train incoming administrators and analysts.
But the backlog means the trainings are being shortened and rushed through, employees said, so inexperienced, reassigned staffers start work unprepared. That leads to more mistakes, more requests for help and more backed-up claims – and more time wasted all around.
To sum it up, 'you now have half the staff with very little knowledge of how to do the work,' one relocated staffer said. 'And the other half of staff overwhelmed with work and unable to really train or mentor these new folks.'
Asked about the reassignments, Social Security provided an emailed statement from an unnamed official, whom it declined to identify. The statement said DOGE's work at Social Security had charted a new, better course for the agency.
'The voluntary reassignment of approximately 2,000 employees to direct service positions has not caused disruptions at the agency,' the statement read. 'As these employees complete their training and become fully proficient in their new positions, they will further accelerate the progress the agency is making.'
DOGE reorganized other agencies by dismissing gobs of technical staffers, or incentivizing them to resign, and centralizing IT services. Although it sounded good in theory, said one Interior Department staffer, in practice, it meant he lost his in-office IT contact. He used to pop around the corner to ask for assistance – now, help tickets take up to three days.
In other places, staff dismissals or departures are tripping up operations, as employees struggle to keep up with a sharply increased workload.
One office in the Transportation Department lost nearly 15 percent of its staff, who were fired as probationary employees, then rehired, then promptly took advantage of the administration's second-round deferred resignation offer to leave for good, said a worker there.
'Now, all those jobs and responsibilities [have fallen on] everyone left,' the worker said. 'There's a learning curve, no knowledge transfer, and in some cases no access to do the job for a while. Lots of productivity lost.'
Within one FDA office, a reduction in force removed everyone who worked in administrative support, a former staffer said: The people who coordinated travel, ran purchasing and processed personnel paperwork. Remaining staff were given general email addresses to contact, the staffer said, 'but no names.'
Asked for comment, a range of agencies asserted that Trump was improving efficiency, not hurting it.
'President Trump's decisive actions have allowed us to eliminate bureaucratic waste,' said an Interior department spokesperson.
'We are replacing outdated, sluggish systems with streamlined, mission-driven operations,' said an HHS spokesperson, 'following years of unchecked spending, bureaucratic bloat, and ideologically driven initiatives that strayed from serving the American people.'
But other employees say that strict imposition of Trump's return-to-office rule and requirements that federal workers must be in their seats from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. sharp are frustrating staffers, who say their productivity and drive have dropped.
Within a research arm of the Defense Department, staff no longer take work home or travel to conferences on weekends, noted one employee.
At FEMA, people have to take a day off or work a half-day to make medical appointments, rather than working remotely and missing fewer hours, said a staffer there.
One Department of Homeland Security staffer noted that after her hours were changed to 9-5, it briefly prevented her from attending an 8 a.m. meeting – until higher-ups realized the problem and changed it. (DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin wrote in a statement that 'meetings being moved is a small price to pay for federal employees to finally be back in their taxpayer funded offices to do their work for the American people.')
Atop everything else, frayed, fatigued federal workers have little capacity left to do their jobs well, or at all, they said.
'People are so demoralized, anxious and sleep deprived,' said a NASA employee. 'Nobody is working at top efficiency.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Japan Times
35 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Los Angeles residents reject Trump's claims of protest destruction
Just blocks from where a handful of die-hard protesters faced police in Los Angeles on Wednesday, residents were enjoying lunch in the sun and shrugging off claims by U.S. President Donald Trump that their city was burning. Six days after unrest began — prompting Trump to send soldiers into the streets, over the furious protests of local officials — life in the City of Angels was going on largely as normal. "Everything is hunky dory right here at Ground Zero," said Lynn Sturgis, a retired teacher protesting outside the federal complex that has been at the heart of the demonstrations in Downtown Los Angeles. "Our city is not at all on fire, it's not burning down, as our terrible leader is trying to tell you." The demonstrations began Friday as immigration authorities carried out raids on undocumented migrants in the sprawling metropolis. They have continued each day since — mostly peacefully, but tarnished by several spectacular incidents of violence, including torched cars and sporadic clashes with law enforcement. Trump has insisted that if he had not taken the extraordinary step of sending troops into Los Angeles over the weekend, "it would be burning to the ground right now." 'Manufactured' "Not at all ... this is very calm," said protester Ellen Carpenter, a retired federal worker who was demonstrating alongside Sturgis. "I lived in Washington, D.C., for a long time, so I was part of very large protests there, you know, millions and millions of people. This is a little wimpy by comparison." "This whole thing has been manufactured by the current administration," Sturgis said. Trump's promises to crack down on illegal immigration helped propel him back into the White House. He seized the opportunity presented by the Los Angeles rallies to order the California National Guard to deploy along with hundreds of Marines — a move state governor Gavin Newsom called "dictatorial." Tracey, a Los Angeles real estate agent who declined to give her last name, said the deployment was a "mistake." "I don't feel safe" with the military presence in the city, she said, even as she admitted that the protests had at times been "scary." Retired actor Thomas welcomed the troops, however. Not taking chances "As soon as it gets dark, thugs come out and cause trouble," the 69-year-old said downtown. It is the National Guard that has calmed things down, he argued — "bringing in more force. That's all they understand ... You have to step in and put your foot down." Restaurants in the streets surrounding the protest area were packed at lunchtime Wednesday. Workers cleaned graffiti sprayed by protesters on federal buildings as curious passers-by stopped to watch and snap photos. But there were some signs of apprehension as a handful of businesses were boarding up, worried that protests planned for the weekend could spiral into more violence. Trump will hold a military parade in Washington for his birthday on Saturday that coincides with planned protests in more cities across the country. "There's lots of expensive glass behind these boards that we're worried about, so we're not going to take any chances," said Chis Gonzalez, who was overseeing the boarding up of one downtown business. "Saturday, you know, seems like it's going to be a big protest. We're just anticipating the worst ... Not saying the protests are bad, but it's definitely scary when you have a business to protect."


Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
The U.S. Granted These Journalists Asylum. Then It Fired Them.
Aristide Economopoulos/For The Washington Post Leonid Martynyuk is a Russian journalist who was working for Voice of America but was recently fired in the Trump administration's cuts at the government-funded news operation. Martynyuk came to the United States in 2014 and was later granted asylum. When Leonid Martynyuk got off the train from Sochi to Krasnodar in southern Russia in the summer of 2014, a strange man bumped into him. The man started yelling, refusing to leave, egging on a fight. He claimed Martynyuk pushed him – not the other way around. Martynyuk's soon-to-be-wife, Ekaterina, motioned to police officers, pleading to intervene and defuse the hostile situation. But when the police arrived, they were only interested in interrogating Martynyuk – not the other man, who was released without questioning. 'This was when I was sure that the entire thing was an orchestrated set up to have me arrested,' Martynyuk later wrote in his application for political asylum in the United States. Martynyuk spent 10 days in prison on charges of hooliganism. His real offense, he maintains, was criticizing Russian President Vladimir Putin. His crime was journalism. Martynyuk, then in his mid-30s, spent years writing critical reports about Putin alongside his mentor, the well-known political opposition leader Boris Nemtsov, who previously served as deputy prime minister under Boris Yeltsin in the late 1990s. In one report, Nemtsov and Martynyuk detailed Putin's extensive wealth and opulence; in another, they detailed extensive corruption around the 2014 Olympics in Sochi. Martynyuk also ran a popular YouTube channel. When he was released from prison, Martynyuk's lawyer suggested that he and Ekaterina relocate to the United States for a short time, so the pair left for the New York area in October 2014. Four months later, two gunmen assassinated Nemtsov while he was walking home from dinner along a Moscow bridge. 'After that, I decided it would be dangerous to return,' Martynyuk recently told The Washington Post. He applied for political asylum, which the U.S. government granted two years later. But now Martynyuk, who became a full citizen in 2024, is once again feeling the ire of a powerful government – this time, it's the United States. On May 30, Martynyuk was one of more than 500 Voice of America staffers terminated by the U.S. Agency for Global Media, the agency that oversees the government-funded news service. Kari Lake, senior adviser to the USAGM, which oversees Voice of America and funds nonprofit news outlets with similar goals, says the agency represents government waste. The contractors fired could soon be joined by hundreds of full-time staffers, who are expected to be fired. After Putin came to power in 1999, he gradually clamped down on independent media in the country. Martynyuk read, listened to and watched Voice of America's work as a young man in the early 2000s, and he learned English through a program at the time titled Special English. His history with the network goes back much further: His grandfather was a colonel in the Soviet Army, stationed in Lviv in the 1970s. At night, he would listen to VOA on the radio – in secret. Martynyuk applied to work for VOA's fact-checking team, Polygraph. At the time of his firing, Polygraph employed one editor and three reporters, all of whom either received or had applied for political asylum. Stacy Caplow, a Brooklyn Law School professor, who – along with students in her clinic – helped Martynyuk apply for asylum, told The Post that he was the quintessential asylum seeker. 'This was the kind of case where if they didn't grant asylum, there would be something wrong with the system,' she said. 'It's clear-cut. Asylum is designed for people like him.' For foreign-born journalists who have found refuge not just in the U.S. but at Voice of America, losing their jobs feels like an existential threat – one that could stop them from working every day to speak truth to power, for the first time in their careers. Nik Yarst, a video producer on the fact-checking team, also lost his job on May 30. Yarst was a Sochi-based correspondent for the Public Television of Russia, also known as OTR, and reported extensively on corruption in Russia during the Olympics. He and a cameraman were driving to an interview with a Russian official when he was stopped by Russian police, who found narcotics in his car. Yarst, who later tested negative for a drug test, said the police slid the drugs into his car to arrest him. He served a year on house arrest, while his legal battle continued, and faced a 10-year prison sentence if convicted. 'After the Olympic Games were done, I decided to escape from the Russia,' Yarst told The Post. 'I asked for the political asylum here in the United States because I truly believed here the independent media exists. Here is freedom of speech. And I have to escape from Russia because I was facing prison or death.' Rachel Denber, deputy director of the Europe and Central Asia division at Human Rights Watch, said Russia was a different country back then – 'still quite authoritarian,' but there were still independent journalists, news organizations and human rights organizations. 'This was a time you could still operate in Russia, but Krasnodar region was one of the toughest to operate and had a very, very harsh governor who really went after journalists,' said Denber, who has known Yarst for many years and documented his story. 'Nik, sadly, was no exception.' Yarst worked on an investigative story involving the kidnapping of a 6-year-old girl who had received a large inheritance, including land in the zone designated for construction of the Sochi Olympics. 'Her mother was murdered – before that, she had been threatened – and the girl was taken to Abkhazia,' Yarst told The Post. 'Her grandmother fought in court, trying to restore justice. We were helping her. That case was a boiling point.' The story, which involved allegations of corruption and improper land seizure by the government, made him a target. In the U.S., Yarst – now based in Miami – first flew to New York and stayed at a hostel for a month, choosing to start his life over in a new country. Human rights organizations heard about his case and contacted him, connecting him with a lawyer and to resources from the Committee to Protect Journalists and other organizations. He received asylum in 2017, and he found employment at Voice of America. 'VOA was the one service who could hire people like me,' he said. He feels not betrayed but disappointed by the government. President Donald Trump, 'during his campaign, he talked a lot about the swamp, about corrupt people,' Yarst said. 'But these are not corrupt people who are out on the street.' When Fatima Tlis arrived in America, she resettled in Erie, Pennsylvania, through the work of the International Institute of Erie, now the Erie field office of the nonprofit U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants. It helped her learn English, get a Social Security card and establish credit. She couldn't get a car, so she and her two children would ride bicycles through the rural roads of northeast Pennsylvania to Walmart for groceries, which they loaded into backpacks. 'Of course, in Pennsylvania, nobody cares that you're some kind of a famous journalist,' she told The Post. When she found out her fellowship application to Harvard University's Carr-Ryan Center for Human Rights had been accepted, she broke down sobbing. Before that, in Russia, Tlis reported for both independent Russian media and the U.S.-based Associated Press, particularly about issues in the Caucasus. She said Russian security forces harassed her, detained her, tortured her and once put her in a hidden room in a police station that she called a 'cage.' It was 12 feet long, but only four feet wide, and had a door with thick iron bars, through which she could see a portrait of Putin on the wall. After that, a former classmate who worked for the Russian security forces, stopped her on the street one day and warned her that her name was on a list and urged her to flee the country. 'What list?' Tlis replied. 'You remember your friend Anna Politkovskaya?' she recalls him asking. 'She was on the same list – and those lists never expire.' Politkovskaya, a journalist and human rights activist critical of Putin, was assassinated in 2006. Tlis joined Voice of America in 2010 after two years of fellowships at Harvard, including the prestigious Nieman Fellowship. At the time of Trump's executive order in March dismantling the USAGM, she was the supervisory editor in charge of Polygraph and the team's only full-time employee. The others worked full time but were designated as personal services contractors, who are easier to hire and fire. As of now, she still has a job. Lake sent her plans for a reduction in force at the USAGM to Congress on June 3, a move that would eliminate all but 80 staffers at the agency and fewer than 20 at Voice of America. About 1,300 people worked at VOA before the March executive order. Tlis said that – beyond Polygraph – she personally knows of more than a dozen asylum holders or seekers at Voice of America. Lake did not respond to a request for comment about the asylum holders that have or could be fired. 'The people who were working on my team, journalists who, because of their job, endured the impossible just to be able to support the truth in their countries,' Tlis said. 'Still, after all of that they remained true to their profession, to their mission, and wanted to continue fighting lies and falsehoods and unmasking disinformation. Those people are getting fired right now.'


Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump White House Opens Door to Historic Military Deployment on U.S. Soil
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post National Guardsmen stand outside the Metropolitan Detention Center ahead of protests against immigration raids on Wednesday in Los Angeles. President Donald Trump is prepared to send National Guard troops into more U.S. cities if protests against immigration raids expand beyond Los Angeles, administration officials said Wednesday, potentially opening the door to the most extensive use of military force on American soil in modern history. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in testimony to Congress that the Pentagon has the capability to surge National Guard troops to more cities 'if there are other riots in places where law enforcement officers are threatened.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt warned protesters beyond Los Angeles that more 'lawlessness' will only increase Trump's resolve. 'Let this be an unequivocal message to left-wing radicals in other parts of the country who are thinking about copycatting the violence in an effort to stop this administration's mass deportation efforts,' Leavitt said. 'You will not succeed.' The White House's message coincides with a rise in bellicose language from Trump, who in recent days has threatened the use of force not only against immigration activists but also against any protesters who attempt to disrupt the military parade scheduled in Washington on Saturday to celebrate the Army's 250th anniversary. The parade, which Trump has wanted for years and will feature tanks, helicopters and Army parachutists, is shaping up to be a symbolic culmination of a dramatic week in which the president not only prepared for a historic deployment of armed forces against domestic adversaries but openly embraced shows of military force. In a speech at Fort Bragg in North Carolina on Tuesday, the president reveled in the nation's military power as fort leaders showcased several tactical demonstrations. 'Time and again, our enemies have learned that if you dare to threaten the American people, an American soldier will chase you down, crush you and cast you into oblivion,' Trump said. In threatening the use of force against protesters, Trump notably did not distinguish between those committing acts of violence and those peacefully protesting against his policies. Leavitt, during the White House briefing on Wednesday, answered a question on the subject by saying that 'of course' the president supports the right to peacefully protest and declared the inquiry a 'stupid question.' The administration's escalating rhetoric has invited comparison to language used by autocrats in foreign countries, where leaders more frequently deploy their military forces within their own borders. White House officials maintain that the president is showing strength and dominance – and standing up for 'law and order' as Democrats go soft on violent agitators. Trump and his advisers have highlighted footage of looting and cars being set ablaze to justify taking action over local officials' objections. 'President Trump is fulfilling the promise he made to the American people to deport illegal aliens and protect federal law enforcement from violent riots,' said White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson. 'This kind of thing doesn't happen in democracies, and it's becoming a routine part of our politics,' said Steven Levitsky, a professor of government at Harvard University, who has long warned that Trump poses a threat to American democracy. (Federal campaign finance records show that a person named Steven Levitsky who works at Harvard has made small campaign donations to Democratic candidates.) Trump has given himself more flexibility this term to escalate military intervention and to upend democratic norms with fewer constraints. In his first term, military leaders prevented Trump from deploying troops within the United States. This time, he has surrounded himself with loyalists – though he still could face obstacles in the courts. California has sued to block the administration from deploying troops within its borders. Protests over the administration's immigration policies are expanding to more cities, including Philadelphia, Chicago and San Francisco. More are scheduled this weekend as part of a national 'No Kings Day,' with activists scheduling events in opposition to Trump's attempts to test his executive power and, protesters say, defy the courts. Americans are divided in their view on the protesters in Los Angeles and Trump's decision to send the National Guard to respond, according to a new poll from The Washington Post and George Mason University's Schar School. Republicans overwhelmingly favor Trump's National Guard decision, and most Democrats oppose it, according to the survey. Independents skew toward opposing the action, while a majority of Californians also oppose it. Amid protests in Chicago, Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the Democratic whip, said it would be 'a serious decision' for Trump to deploy troops across the country. Durbin said he has not spoken with Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) about the possibility of Trump doing so in their state. Durbin said Trump is treating the deployment of National Guard troops 'as this routine decision.' 'It is not routine, using our military force to enforce criminal laws in our country,' he said. This week, Trump warned that any protests against immigration raids in other cities will be 'met with equal or greater force' than that used in Los Angeles. He said those troops would remain in the city 'until there's no danger,' providing only a subjective timeline for their deployment. Trump and California leaders have sparred over whether the troops were ever a necessary response to the protests, which have been confined to several blocks and have included sporadic episodes of violence. He said he 'would certainly' invoke the Insurrection Act, which can be used by presidents to expand the role of the military in responding to domestic incidents, if he viewed it as necessary. The fact that he is even considering it is an ominous sign, several scholars said. 'In a democratic society, citizens don't have to think twice or think three times about peaceful expressions of opposition – that's what life is like in a free society,' Levitsky said. 'In an authoritarian regime, citizens have to think twice about speaking out, because there is risk of government retribution. Maybe you'll be arrested, maybe you'll be investigated, maybe you'll have an IRS audit, maybe you'll have a lawsuit.' The showdown over the military intervention has intensified since Saturday, when Trump deployed the National Guard to California without the permission of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), who believed sending troops would escalate the protests. Newsom warned in a speech Tuesday that the deployment marked the onset of a much broader effort by Trump to threaten democracy. 'California may be first, but it clearly will not end here. Other states are next,' Newsom said. 'Democracy is next. Democracy is under assault before our eyes. This moment we have feared has arrived.' Also Tuesday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) announced he was deploying his state's National Guard ahead of planned protests. An Abbott adviser said the decision did not result from Trump's rhetoric. The governor has previously deployed Guard troops ahead of protests, such as during George Floyd demonstrations in 2020. 'This is not a frivolous thing. This is not a political thing,' said Dave Carney, a longtime political adviser to Abbott. 'If this was happening four years ago or eight years ago, he would have done the exact same thing. This is instinctively protecting people.' Carney said he suspects Republican governors will call up National Guard members only if they have 'good intelligence of what's being planned.' In other Republican-run states with recent clashes with ICE – either through protests or Democratic-leaning cities pushing back on enforcement – governors have resisted announcing proactive deployments, despite GOP officials vowing to punish violent agitators. In Atlanta, where authorities used tear gas and made arrests Tuesday as anti-ICE protesters threw fireworks at police, state officials believe local and state law enforcement have been able to manage the demonstrations, according to a person with knowledge of the situation there who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak freely about plans. Likewise in Nashville, where Department of Homeland Security officials have clashed with the mayor of the heavily Democratic city, large protests have not materialized, and the Republican governor has not announced any military deployment.