logo
Facebook ranks worst for online harassment, according to a global activist survey

Facebook ranks worst for online harassment, according to a global activist survey

The Verge6 days ago
Activists around the world are calling attention to harassment they've faced on Meta's platforms. More than 90 percent of land and environmental defenders surveyed by Global Witness, a nonprofit organization that also tracks the murders of environmental advocates, reported experiencing some kind of online abuse or harassment connected to their work. Facebook was the most-cited platform, followed by X, WhatsApp, and Instagram.
Global Witness and many of the activists it surveyed are calling on Meta and its peers to do more to address harassment and misinformation on their platforms. Left to fester, they fear that online attacks could fuel real-world risks to activists. Around 75 percent of people surveyed said they believed that online abuse they experienced corresponded to offline harm.
'Those stats really stayed with me. They were so much higher than we expected them to be,' Ava Lee, campaign strategy lead on digital threats at Global Witness, tells The Verge. That's despite expecting a gloomy outcome based on prior anecdotal accounts. 'It has kind of long been known that the experience of climate activists and environmental defenders online is pretty awful,' Lee says.
Left to fester, they fear that online attacks could fuel real-world risks
Global Witness surveyed more than 200 people between November 2024 and March of this year that it was able to reach through the same networks it taps when documenting the killings of land and environmental defenders. It found Meta-owned platforms to be 'the most toxic.' Around 62 percent of participants said they encountered abuse on Facebook, 36 percent on WhatsApp, and 26 percent on Instagram.
That probably reflects how popular Meta's platforms are around the world. Facebook has more than 3 billion active monthly users, more than a third of the global population. But Meta also abandoned its third-party fact-checking program in January, which critics warned could lead to more hate speech and disinformation. Meta moved to a crowdsourced approach to content moderation similar to X, where 37 percent of survey participants reported experiencing abuse.
In May, Meta reported a 'small increase in the prevalence of bullying and harassment content' on Facebook as well as 'a small increase in the prevalence of violent and graphic content' during the first quarter of 2025.
'That's sort of the irony as well, of them moving towards this kind of free speech model, which actually we're seeing that it's silencing certain voices,' says Hannah Sharpe, a senior campaigner at Global Witness.
Fatrisia Ain leads a local collective of women in Sulawesi, Indonesia, where she says palm oil companies have seized farmers' lands and contaminated a river local villagers used to be able to rely on for drinking water. Posts on Facebook have accused her of being a communist, a dangerous allegation in her country, she tells The Verge.
The practice of 'red-tagging' — labeling any dissident voices as communists — has been used to target and criminalize activists in Southeast Asia. In one high-profile case, a prominent environmental activist in Indonesia was jailed under 'anti-communism' laws after opposing a new gold mine.
Ain says she's asked Facebook to take down several posts attacking her, without success. 'They said it's not dangerous, so they can't take it down. It is dangerous. I hope that Meta would understand, in Indonesia, it's dangerous,' Ain says.
Other posts have accused Ain of trying to defraud farmers and of having an affair with a married man, which she sees as attempts to discredit her that could wind up exposing her to more threats in the real world — which has already been hostile to her activism. 'Women who are being the defenders for my own community are more vulnerable than men … more people harass you with so many things,' she says.
Nearly two-thirds of people who responded to the Global Witness survey said that they have feared for their safety, including Ain. She's been physically targeted at protests against palm oil companies accused of failing to pay farmers, she tells The Verge. During a protest outside of a government office, men grabbed her butt and chest, she says. Now, when she leads protests, older women activists surround her to protect her as a security measure.
In the Global Witness survey, nearly a quarter of respondents said they'd been attacked on the basis of their sex. 'There's evidence of the way that women and women of color in particular in politics experience just vast amounts more hate than any other group,' Lee says. 'Again, we're seeing that play out when it comes to defenders … and the threats of sexual violence, and the impact that that is having on the mental health of lots of these defenders and their ability to feel safe.'
'We encourage people to use tools available on our platforms to help protect against bullying and harassment,' Meta spokesperson Tracy Clayton said in an email to The Verge, adding that the company is reviewing Facebook posts that targeted Ain. Meta also pointed to its 'Hidden Words' feature that allows you to filter offensive direct messages and comments on your posts and its 'Limits' feature that hides comments on your posts from users that don't follow you.
Other companies mentioned in the report, including Google, TikTok, and X, did not provide on-the-record responses to inquiries from The Verge. Nor did a palm oil company Ain says has been operating on local farmers' land without paying them, as they're supposed to do under a mandated profit-sharing scheme.
Global Witness says there are concrete steps social media companies can take to address harassment on their platforms. That includes dedicating more resources to their content moderation systems, regularly reviewing these systems, and inviting public input on the process. Activists surveyed also reported that they think algorithms that boost polarizing content and the proliferation of bots on platforms make the problem worse.
'There are a number of choices that platforms could make,' Lee says. 'Resourcing is a choice, and they could be putting more money into really good content moderation and really good trust and safety [initiatives] to improve things.'
Global Witness plans to put out its next report on the killings of land and environmental defenders in September. Its last such report found that at least 196 people were killed in 2023.
Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All by Justine Calma
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Environment
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Meta
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All News
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Policy
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Science
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Tech
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal judges speak out about ongoing threats in rare panel session
Federal judges speak out about ongoing threats in rare panel session

Washington Post

time7 hours ago

  • Washington Post

Federal judges speak out about ongoing threats in rare panel session

One federal judge said he was targeted with a 'swatting' attack that drew authorities to his house under false pretenses after he ruled against the Trump administration. Another judge told of receiving voicemails calling for his death. A third said he received a pizza delivery in the name of a colleague's slain son when he spoke out about anti-judge rhetoric. In rare public remarks, a panel of U.S. district judges on Thursday offered firsthand accounts of the threats and harassment they said they and other jurists have faced since President Donald Trump returned to office and heaped criticism on the nation's court system. Speaking in a forum organized by the nonpartisan judicial advocacy group Speak Up for Justice, the judges said attacks on the judiciary have reached levels they had not seen in decades-long careers in public service. They called for a coordinated response from officials across government to end the intimidation, saying it was eroding the rule of law and jeopardizing the safety of judges and their families. 'It's just been stunning to me how much damage has been done to the reputation of our judiciary because some political actors think that they can gain some advantage by attacking the independence of the judiciary,' said Judge John Coughenour, who was targeted with the swatting attack. The virtual forum was part of an expanding effort by judges, lawyers, and legal experts to push back against what they describe as an increasingly hostile and menacing political climate. It included uncommon candor from the judges, who often limit their public speeches and interviews to issues related to court processes and the administration of law. Chief Judge John McConnell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island said he was hesitant to speak about the barrage of threats that came after he temporarily blocked the Trump administration's broad freeze on federal grants and other spending. He said he felt compelled to raise public awareness because the attacks had grown so severe. McConnell, an appointee of President Barack Obama, described how his chambers received more than 400 vitriolic phone calls in the spring, including one calling for him to be killed and threatening to 'come for him.' Right-wing influencers doxed the judge and his daughter, and billionaire Elon Musk called for his impeachment. The U.S. Marshals Service identified six credible death threats, he said, and assigned him a protective detail for months. 'I've never spoken about what's happened to me personally because I'm not looking for pity, and I'm not looking for sympathy,' McConnell said. 'I want to be able to just do my job again, and I want to be able to uphold the Constitution. And I want the public to speak out once again and support an independent judiciary.' Threats against federal judges have risen for several years and have come from both sides of the political spectrum. Supreme Court justices have received round-the-clock protection since the conservative majority overturned abortion rights in 2022. District judges handling abortion-related cases and judges overseeing Trump's now-dismissed criminal cases have also received enhanced security. A significant spike in threats occurred in the early months of the Trump administration as the White House faced mounting lawsuits challenging its policies on federal spending, workforce cuts, deportations, and reshaping of immigration policy. The U.S. Marshals Service investigated threats against 297 federal judges between Oct. 1 and mid June, according to data shared with The Washington Post by U.S. District Judge Esther Salas of New Jersey. Nearly 200 of those investigations came between the beginning of March and late May — a period in which Trump and his allies repeatedly assailed the judiciary and vilified judges who ruled against the administration. That was more than double the 80 judges threatened in the previous five months, from Oct. 1 through March 1. The marshals investigated threats against an additional 20 judges between late May and June 16, according to the data, which the agency has not released publicly. A White House spokesman, Harrison Fields, said in a statement Thursday: 'Attacks against public officials, including judges, have no place in our society and President Trump knows all too well the impact of callous attacks having faced two assassination attempts.' McConnell was also one of dozens of judges to receive an anonymous, unsolicited pizza delivery in the name of Daniel Anderl, the murdered son of Salas. Anderl was fatally shot in the family's home in July 2020 by a disgruntled lawyer posing as a delivery person. The marshals are reviewing more than 100 such deliveries in at least seven states and the District of Columbia. Salas and other judges view the deliveries as threats meant to intimidate the recipient by showing that the senders know where they live. Salas, a founding member of the advocacy group who also spoke in the panel discussion, said Thursday that state judges in Florida and Colorado have also received pizzas, some in her son's name. U.S. District Judge Robert S. Lasnik of Washington said in Thursday's panel discussion that he, too, had received a pizza delivery in Anderl's name. Lasnik, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, said that he opted this year not to participate in lawsuits involving the Trump administration so that he would be free to comment broadly on threats and intimidation against the judiciary without raising conflicts of interest. In April, he called on the administration and its supporters to cool their incendiary language toward federal judges in an interview with a local NPR station. Soon after, he said, a pizza showed up at his home in Seattle. Two of his adult children in other cities also received deliveries in Anderl's name. 'What's the message to Judge Lasnik? 'We know where you live. We know where your children live, and they could end up dead like Judge Salas's son did,'' Lasnik said. Coughenour, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan, said he was targeted this year after he issued a sharply worded ruling calling Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship unconstitutional. Someone called a fake police report to his home saying he had murdered his wife, he recalled in the panel discussion. Police officers arrived at his house with weapons drawn, he said. Shortly after, he said, someone falsely reported a bomb threat at his house. Coughenour said he can endure the threats and attempts to intimidate because he chose to become a judge. 'But my family didn't,' he said. 'It's unspeakable that people will do these things.'

Uvalde schools adding AI gun detectors three years after Texas shooter killed 19 kids
Uvalde schools adding AI gun detectors three years after Texas shooter killed 19 kids

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Uvalde schools adding AI gun detectors three years after Texas shooter killed 19 kids

The Uvalde, Texas, school district is installing an artificial intelligence-based gun detection system, as the area continues to grapple with the fallout of a 2022 school shooting that left 19 students and two teachers dead. A company called Omnialert plans to offer the district its technology, which automatically monitors security feeds for the presence of an individual with a gun, for free as part of a three-year grant program. 'We felt very strongly–particularly with the tragedy that occurred in Uvalde–that it made sense for us to create a grant program specifically for these types of school districts that have already been impacted by a tragedy,' Omnialert CEO Dave Fraser told KXAN. The executive added that the system, which flags a human to review possible alerts and then notifies first responders for confirmed matches, does not track biometric data. 'It's important that there's absolutely no form of biometrics or facial recognition, nothing that makes a human being, individually or personally, recognizable at all in our system,' he said. 'All it's doing is it's looking for the shape of a human being holding a brandished firearm.' The small-town Texas community continues to scrutinize the tragic shooting, one of the worst school massacres in U.S. history. This spring, the city of Uvalde settled with victims' families for $2 million. A group of Uvalde parents has also sued video game company Activision and Instagram parent company Meta, arguing they helped promote the firearm used in the shooting. Activision has pushed back and sought to dismiss the suit this month, arguing these claims violate the First Amendment and past precedent. Pete Arredondo, the former Uvalde schools police chief, is awaiting trial on charges of child abandonment and endangerment over the chaotic response to the shooting. He has pleaded not guilty. The school district and law enforcement response to the shooting at Robb Elementary, which involved hundreds of police officers and federal Border Patrol personnel, has been roundly criticized. The 18-year-old gunman was first able to enter the school through an unlocked back door. Police arrived on the scene of the school within three minutes of the first shots being fired, but officers ultimately waited over an hour until a heavily armed Border Patrol SWAT team arrived to confront and kill the teen gunman, as he barricaded himself inside a classroom with children and fired multiple shots. Arredondo, the then-chief, initially lacked a radio as the shooting unfolded, and officers reportedly never tried to open a door into the classroom where the gunman was hiding, believing it was locked and instead waited for a key. A 2023 Texas Tribune investigation captured officers just outside the classroom fretting about being shot if they confronted the gunman. 'What's the safest way to do this? I'm not trying to get clapped out,' one officer can be heard saying on radio communications obtained by the publication. 'Me neither,' another responds. Uvalde school police had conducted active shooter training just weeks before the massacre, and had invested heavily in security and training in previous years, but appeared unprepared for an active shooter situation. A 2024 Justice Department review said the response to the shooting showed 'cascading failures of leadership, decision-making, tactics, policy and training' at all levels, while a Homeland Security report that same year said law enforcement did not establish a clear line of command, 'leading to delays, inaction, and potentially further loss of life.' In the wake of the shooting, Texas lawmakers passed a bill this year to improve police training and school security infrastructure. In 2024, state officials announced the creation of a new $34 million behavioral health campus in the area to improve mental health treatment.

"Daunting" and "frightening": Federal judges warn of rise in threats and harassment
"Daunting" and "frightening": Federal judges warn of rise in threats and harassment

CBS News

time9 hours ago

  • CBS News

"Daunting" and "frightening": Federal judges warn of rise in threats and harassment

Washington — A trio of federal judges on Thursday publicly detailed threats and harassment they have endured in recent months after handing down decisions against the Trump administration or speaking out against attacks on the federal judiciary, including receiving pizzas that purported to be sent from the late son of a New Jersey federal judge who was the target of an attack. The appearances marked the first time the judges have spoken out about the threats they've received, and marked the rare occasion of sitting members of the judiciary responding to the attacks leveled against them. During the course of his second term, President Trump, members of his administration and Republicans on Capitol Hill have lambasted judges who have issued rulings against the president's policies. Some GOP lawmakers have filed articles of impeachment against judges, and the Justice Department has lodged judicial misconduct complaints against two jurists who sit on the federal trial court in Washington, D.C. The event was hosted by Speak Up for Justice, an organization that seeks to voice support for the judiciary. U.S. District Judge John McConnell, who is the chief judge of the court in Rhode Island, said he has received six credible death threats. He described one in which a person was searching for McConnell's home address because he wanted "Smith & Wesson to pay me a visit." McConnell also received a voicemail — played during the forum — from a man that said, "Tell that son of a b***h we're going to come for him," and "how dare you try to put charges on Donald J. Trump." The caller continued, telling McConnell "your ass is going to prison" and "I wish somebody would fucking assassinate your ass, someone needs to f**king wipe his ass out." The voicemail was one of more than 400 threatening messages that his court has received, McConnell said. "It's daunting. It was frightening," he said in remarks during the forum. "I've never had anyone threaten to put me in prison, threaten bodily injury, wishing that I was assassinated." The judge, who was appointed to the federal bench by former President Barack Obama, said it "shook my faith in the judicial system and the rule of law." But McConnell said the "most heartbreaking call" he received was from the U.S. Marshals, who provide protection for federal judges, informing him that a pizza had been delivered to his home in the name of Daniel Anderl, the late son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas. Anderl was killed when he answered the door at his family's New Jersey home in 2020 and was shot by a disgruntled gunman who was targeting Salas. CBS News reported in May that about two dozen judges nationwide had received unsolicited pizza deliveries in Anderl's name. Federal prosecutors have labeled the unsolicited pizza deliveries "pizza doxxing" — a spin on "doxxing," in which somebody's address or other personal information is maliciously made public, often as a form of intimidation. A U.S. Marshals Service official told CBS News in May the agency — which handles judicial security — is "looking into all the unsolicited pizza deliveries to federal judges and taking appropriate steps to address the matter." U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik, who presides in Seattle, said that to his knowledge more than 50 judges nationwide have been pizza-doxxed, not including the judges' families and their associates. He said he and his children all received pizza boxes in Anderl's name after he gave press interviews about attacks on the judiciary. "They're looking into it," Lasnik said about the U.S. Marshals' investigation. "But it's very difficult in this day and age to track where these things originate." Lasnik said his colleagues handling cases involving Mr. Trump's second-term agenda have been "bombarded with hate mail and hate emails and threats." "It's so discouraging to a young judge to suddenly not only worry about how do I do this job right, but how do I keep my family safe," he said. Salas spoke about the five-year anniversary of her son's death, which occurred in July 2020, and the increase in violent rhetoric in recent months that has led to more judges speaking out about the threats they have received. "You know, we're seeing things coming out, from the top down, from White House spokespeople calling, you know, us crazy, leftist, unconstitutional judges," Salas said. "And I think that we, in fairness, are nonpartisan, but we have to speak the facts. And the facts are that we have political leaders with large social platforms, political leaders with power, right? Calling us deranged and idiots, that is the kind of inflammatory rhetoric that I think caused the judges that are on here today to come forward." She urged the nation's political leaders to tone down the rhetoric and stop calling judges "corrupt" and "biased." "They are inviting people to do us harm, they are inviting that man to call you because now he feels emboldened to use those words against you, because our leaders are calling us idiots and deranged and monsters," she said. "Don't make it personal. Appeal us to a higher court." U.S. District Judge John Coughenour, also on the bench in Seattle, said he and his wife were "swatted," an illegal scheme in which people make false emergency calls in an attempt to draw police SWAT teams to the homes of public figures. Recounting the incident, the judge, appointed by President Ronald Reagan, said law enforcement received a call that he had murdered his wife and arrived at their house with their weapons drawn. Shortly afterward, the FBI informed him that there was a bomb in his house, Coughenour said. "What kind of people do these things?" he said during the forum. "It's just so disgusting and it's really unspeakable that people will do these things." Coughenour said that through his decades as a federal judge, he repeatedly heard jurists in other countries discuss how admired the U.S. judiciary was. But he said it's "stunning to me how much damage has been done to the reputation of our judiciary, because some political actors think they can gain some advantage by attacking the independence of the judiciary and threatening the rule of law." Coughenour issued a call for lawyers and fellow judges to speak out against the attacks on the judiciary and say "not in this country and not on our watch." The attacks appear to go beyond threats and harassment and also seek to inflict professional punishments on the judges. McConnell said he was the subject of judicial misconduct complaints filed by America First Legal, a conservative organization that was run by Stephen Miller, and two members of Congress. Miller now serves as White House deputy chief of staff. Both McConnell and Coughenour are overseeing cases that challenge policies implemented by the second Trump administration. Coughenour in February issued a preliminary injunction blocking Mr. Trump's plan to end birthright citizenship and McConnell in March blocked the White House's freeze on federal funding. The Justice Department appealed both decisions and legal proceedings are ongoing. Threats to federal judges have steadily risen over the last six years, according to the Marshals. A vulnerability management program run by the federal judiciary that was established after the death of Salas' son provided services to more than 1,700 judges, 114 retired judges and 235 family members, according to the Judicial Conference's annual report released in March. In 2022, after the leak of a draft Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, a California man armed with a gun, knife and various tools was arrested outside Justice Brett Kavanaugh's Maryland home. The man was charged with attempted murder and pleaded not guilty. Salas told CBS News that it's not just federal judges who are targeted — state judges are now being pizza-doxxed, including those in Florida and Colorado. Colorado Chief Justice Monica Marquez has "gotten so many pizzas she's stopped counting," said Salas. Marquez cast a deciding vote in a 4-3 decision by Colorado's Supreme Court in December 2023 to disqualify then-candidate Trump from the Colorado ballot before the 2024 election. The court found that Mr. Trump was ineligible for the presidency under the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment, a decision that was ultimately overturned by the Supreme Court. Marquez spoke about the toll of that vote in November 2024, which she knew could be the most consequential of her career. She described how she was late for the court's conference that day because "I was in my chambers bathroom vomiting from the stress. I knew exactly what was on the line." In Florida, two state judges were targeted with pizzas, some also in the name of Salas' son. A 49-year-old man, Jonathan Mark Miller, has been charged with "fraudulent use of personal information" for the orders that targeted the judges. But Salas said this accountability is rare. "State bad actors have been caught," she said, but the acts of intimidation against federal judges have come from "unknown sources." "That troubles me," Salas said, "because we don't know who is doing this. We don't know whether this is a group of bad actors, a few bad actors. But clearly judges are being targeted, and the message is clear."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store