HIV testing and monitoring down by a fifth after Trump aid cuts
The testing to monitor blood virus levels has fallen by 17 per cent in young people, and by 21 per cent in pregnant women.
The data reported by Reuters also shows that testing in infants has fallen by a fifth and is one of the most concrete signs yet of the effect the aid cuts are having on the country with the highest number infected by HIV.
Aaron Motsoaledi, health minister, admitted the funding cuts had caused problems, but strongly denied suggestions the country's anti-HIV campaign was close to collapse.
He said: 'Under no circumstances will we allow this massive work conducted over more than a decade and a half to collapse and go up in smoke because of what President Trump has done.'
Modelling released in March has already predicted the cuts could trigger soaring rates of global HIV infections and millions of deaths.
There could be between 4.4m to 10.8m additional new HIV infections by the end of this decade in low-and-middle income countries according to the forecasts published in the Lancet journal.
Regular testing of HIV patients is considered vital for managing the long-running outbreak because it tells whether treatment is keeping the virus in check, and whether it is sufficiently suppressed to prevent it spreading to others.
Testing is particularly important in pregnant women who are at risk of passing on the infection during childbirth.
Public health experts warn that with less testing, fewer people who are at risk of transmitting the virus will be identified.
Missing a test can also indicate that a patient has dropped out of the system and may be missing treatment.
Trump froze many foreign aid programmes by executive order in the early days of his administration.
South Africa was doubly hit, as he also targeted aid to the country for allegedly discriminating against white people. He falsely said white land was being seized by the government.
South Africa did not rely on America for its anti-HIV drugs but did rely on the United States President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR) to pay 15,000 health workers.
These workers did HIV testing and counselling in hotspots and checked up on patients who had dropped off their medication.
'These are shocking figures, with profound implications for maternal and child health across the country,' said Francois Venter, executive director of the Ezintsha Research Centre in Johannesburg.
Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Flesh-eating bacteria case in Cape Cod prompts public health alert: What to know
A warning from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health may have some beachgoers exercising a little more caution as they try to escape the August heat. Residents and visitors at Buzzards Bay, a community on the south end of Cape Cod, are on alert after officials identified a person with a rare, flesh-eating bacterial infection in the area. Officials said the bacteria, known as Vibrio, could pose a risk to others in nearby coastal waters. The Vibrio species, which includes Vibrio vulnificus, can cause severe and life-threatening infections. Some can lead to necrotizing fasciitis, which kills off flesh around an open wound. Many people with a Vibrio vulnificus infection can get seriously ill and need intensive care or limb amputation. About 1 in 5 people with this infection die, sometimes within a day or two of becoming ill. But it's not the first time this bug has made its way to the Massachusetts bay: In a news release, the department of health said there have been seven cases of the illness over the last seven years among residents of the commonwealth, including four who were exposed in Massachusetts. The Vibrio bacteria and the infection it causes are usually more common in warmer waters, including in the Gulf Coast states of Louisiana, Texas and Florida, Dr. Larry Madoff told USA TODAY. But it's increasingly being seen northeastern states along the Atlantic coast, he added, such as Massachusetts and New York. "It's associated with warmer waters, and our waters are getting warmer," said Madoff, adding that the area where it's been found, Buzzards Bay, is an area with estuaries, small islands and warmer water on the western area of Cape Cod. The Vibrio bacteria also thrive in salty and brackish waters along the Atlantic coast, said Madoff, medical director for the Massachusetts Department of Public Health's Bureau of Infectious Disease and Laboratory Sciences. Above-average water temperatures are creating the conditions that allow the bacteria to grow, especially in the spring, summer and early autumn. Still, he said, there's no need for most people to worry, as long as they take certain precautions. "I would not discourage people from going to the beach," he said. "The beach is good and people need to cool off." What precautions should people take against flesh-eating bacteria? There are several species of Vibrio bacteria that can cause people to fall seriously ill. So how can people protect themselves? The bacteria is opportunistic, and it can enter the body through open wounds, health officials said. Foods like contaminated shellfish can also carry the bacteria. People with health conditions including liver disease, cancer, diabetes, HIV or who are on immunosuppressants are at highest risk of severe illness from the bacteria following exposure. Some precautions include: What are some symptoms and signs of flesh-eating bacterial illness? According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, common signs of a Vibrio infection include diarrhea, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, fever, chills, dangerously low blood pressure and blistering lesions. Wounds that become infected may be red, swollen or discolored and may have a discharge.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he's looking at reclassifying marijuana at federal level
President Donald Trump said his administration is considering reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug. "We're looking at reclassification and we'll make a determination over the next few weeks," Trump said at news conference August 11. Though 45 states have legalized the use of marijuana for medicinal or recreational use, the federal government still classifies it as a Schedule I drug. Schedule I drugs are defined as highly dangerous, addictive and without medical use. Marijuana has belonged to this class of drugs since the Controlled Substances Act was signed in 1970. If reclassified, marijuana would be treated the same as drugs like Tylenol with codeine and anabolic steroids, which can be prescribed by licensed health care providers and dispensed by licensed pharmacies. Reclassifying marijuana would be the biggest change in marijuana policy the federal government has taken since the drug was first outlawed, but it would not make recreational usage legal under federal law. The move began in 2022, when then-President Joe Biden asked the Department of Health and Human Services and the Drug Enforcement Administration to review how marijuana is scheduled. In 2023, Health and Human Services recommended that marijuana be moved to Schedule III. In 2024, DEA proposed a rule to transfer marijuana to Schedule III. That rule change has been on hold since March 2025. More: Inflation? Not in the cannabis market. Here's why weed is so cheap. Trump said the decision is complicated, weighing the benefits of marijuana use for medical reasons against potential societal impacts. "Some people like it, some people hate it. Some people hate the whole concept of marijuana," he said. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump says he's looking at reclassifying marijuana at federal level
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The celebrity doctor overseeing Medicaid suggested that recipients in the program spend too much time watching TV.
President Donald Trump's favorite celebrity doctor is telling Medicaid recipients to get off their couch. Dr. Mehmet Oz, the Trump-appointed administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, on Thursday suggested that low-income Americans enrolled in the program are bums who spend their hours watching TV. 'An able-bodied person on Medicaid today watches about 6.1 hours of television or just hangs out, leisure time,' he said on CNBC. 'That's a lot of time.'
