Which US States Have the Highest Risk of Dementia?
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Your risk of developing dementia may be more closely tied to your ZIP code than you think, according to a large-scale study of U.S. military veterans aged 65 and older.
Analyzing health data from over 1.2 million veterans who received care through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) between 1999 and 2021, researchers found that where someone lives can significantly influence their chances of developing dementia—even after accounting for age, race, heart disease, diabetes, and whether they lived in rural or urban areas.
The study revealed stark regional differences. Veterans living in the Southeast faced the highest risk, with dementia rates 25 percent higher than those living in the Mid-Atlantic, the region with the lowest rates.
Other high-risk areas included the Northwest and Rocky Mountains, where dementia risk was 23 percent higher than in the Mid-Atlantic. The South, Southwest and South Atlantic also showed elevated rates.
The researchers measured how many new cases of dementia were diagnosed each year per 1,000 people. In the Southeast, that number was 14 cases per 1,000 person-years, while in the Mid-Atlantic it dropped to just 11.2. Even after adjusting for factors like demographics, rurality and cardiovascular conditions, the regional patterns remained consistent.
"The study underscores the need to understand regional differences in dementia and the importance of region-specific prevention and intervention efforts," said senior author Dr. Kristine Yaffe, also of the San Francisco VA Health Care System, in a statement.
What Might Be Driving the Regional Differences?
Researchers explored why dementia rates varied so widely across regions, and several key factors may help explain the gap.
Although health, age, and environment clearly play a role, the data showed that geographic location remained a strong predictor even after accounting for those variables, suggesting there's more going on beneath the surface.
Potential Factors Influencing Dementia Risk:
Education: Lower educational attainment was more common in regions with higher dementia rates.
Health Conditions: Chronic illnesses such as stroke, high blood pressure, diabetes and obesity were more prevalent in higher-risk areas like the Southeast.
Lifestyle and Environment: Smoking and other regional lifestyle patterns may contribute.
Access and Quality of Health Care: While the VHA generally offers more equal care across regions, differences in resources and specialty care at individual VA centers may affect how—and whether—dementia is diagnosed.
Diagnosis Practices: Studies using Medicare data suggest that how often and how well dementia is diagnosed can vary, not just because of patient health but also due to how local health systems operate.
Hidden Variables: Some important influences—such as quality of early-life education or early signs of cognitive decline not captured in health records—may not show up in administrative data but could still drive long-term risk.
A stock image of a doctor visiting a senior man to check his health.
A stock image of a doctor visiting a senior man to check his health.
Photodjo/iStock / Getty Images Plus
All-in-all, the study makes one thing clear: location matters. While individual lifestyle choices and genetics remain important, where you live could shape your brain health more than previously understood.
These findings underscore the need for more localized research and targeted interventions, especially in regions facing higher dementia burdens.
Understanding why dementia hits harder in some areas than others is essential—not only for treating the disease but also for preventing it in the first place.
Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about dementia? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.
Reference
Dintica, C. S., Bahorik, A. L., Xia, F., Boscardin, J., & Yaffe, K. (2025). Regional differences in dementia incidence among US veterans. JAMA Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1536
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
44 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Mom Launches Raw Milk Lawsuit After Losing Unborn Son
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Florida mother has filed a lawsuit against a dairy farm, alleging that raw milk sold at a market caused severe illness in her toddler and led to the loss of her 20-week pregnancy. The complaint, filed August 13 in Seminole County Circuit Court, names Keely Farms Dairy, LLC, and Nature's Natural Foods, LLC, which operates Wild Hare Natural Market, as defendants. Plaintiff Rachel Maddox is suing both individually and on behalf of her minor child, who has required repeated hospitalization since consuming the milk. An attorney representing Maddox told Newsweek that the labeling did not warn consumers about the "extreme dangers" of the products. Keely Farms Dairy, based in New Smyrna Beach, declined to comment beyond a published statement. Wild Hare Natural Market, in Longwood, has not issued a response. Why It Matters Raw milk is a national flashpoint. The CDC and FDA warn it can carry pathogens and stress pasteurization as a key safeguard. Supporters cite taste and possible health benefits. Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo in an August 12 post on X wrote that Floridians "have the freedom to make informed health choices" but should "know the risks." U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has voiced support for expanding dairy's role in dietary guidelines and has expressed openness to raw milk's benefits, though interstate sales remain prohibited. Florida law prohibits the sale of raw milk for human consumption, but the product remains available in retail outlets under "animal feed" labeling. With the state health department linking more than 20 illnesses to the dairy's products, the lawsuit raises questions about whether current laws and labeling practices adequately protect families from the risks of unpasteurized milk. Keely Farms Dairy Raw Milk showing labeling that states: 'Feed for Calves - Not for Human Consumption' Keely Farms Dairy Raw Milk showing labeling that states: 'Feed for Calves - Not for Human Consumption' Ron Simon & Associates | Food Poisoning Lawyers What To Know Plaintiff's Allegations According to the complaint, Maddox purchased raw milk in June from Wild Hare Natural Market. The milk was labeled "for consumption by animals," which Maddox said she was told was a technical requirement for selling "farm milk." On June 8, 2025, her toddler developed diarrhea, vomiting, fever, abdominal pain, and dehydration. He was hospitalized from June 9 to June 12, underwent surgery for intussusception—a condition in which part of the intestine slides into another—and tested positive for E. coli and Campylobacter. His treatment is ongoing. Maddox herself tested positive for Campylobacter after caring for her child, telling WKMG News 6: "I became very ill, and I mean the sickest I've ever been in my life. I came really close to dying and our (unborn) son did die. The doctors told me that I was lucky to be alive." By June 18, she miscarried and was diagnosed with sepsis. She was hospitalized repeatedly in subsequent weeks. Her attorneys argue that labeling on Keely Farms products did not adequately warn consumers. "The labeling on Keely Farms' raw milk products is wholly insufficient to warn a buyer of the extreme dangers of consuming these products," Ron Simon, a food safety attorney representing the plaintiffs, told Newsweek in an August 19 email. Simon added that the labels fail to disclose the products are unpasteurized, do not explain why they are marketed as "Feed for calves – not for human consumption," and were displayed alongside groceries intended for people. "Any reasonable consumer would naturally assume that the Keely Farms products—like the others in the freezer— were safe to consume," he said. Health Department Findings The Florida Department of Health (FDOH) has linked at least 21 illnesses since January 2025 to raw milk from Keely Farms Dairy. Six cases involved children under 10, seven required hospitalization, and two developed severe complications. In an advisory, FDOH said sanitation practices at the dairy were "of concern" and urged Floridians to be aware of the risks of consuming raw dairy. The commissioner of agriculture also encouraged residents to choose pasteurized products. Products marketed by Keely Farms Dairy, including Raw Milk, Greek Yogurt and Raw Kefir, all labeled 'Feed for Calves - Not for Human Consumption" Products marketed by Keely Farms Dairy, including Raw Milk, Greek Yogurt and Raw Kefir, all labeled 'Feed for Calves - Not for Human Consumption" Ron Simon & Associates | Food Poisoning Lawyers Legal Framework Florida law bans the retail sale of raw milk for human consumption. Section 502.091 of the Florida Statutes permits only pasteurized milk and certain aged cheeses to be sold for drinking. Raw milk products may be sold if labeled for animal feed. Keely Farms acknowledges this requirement on its website: "As required by the Federal Pasteurized Milk Ordinance and Florida Statute 502.091, which forbid the sale of unpasteurized milk products for human consumption, our products are labeled: 'Not for Human Consumption' and sold as 'Feed for Calves.'" The complaint argues that such labeling was inadequate, saying: "Any reasonable consumer would naturally assume that the Keely Farms products—like the others in the freezer—were safe to consume." What People Are Saying Ron Simon, attorney for Rachel Maddox said in an email to Newsweek, August 18, 2025: "My client is seeking compensation for her medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering for her illness, her son's illness, and the loss of her unborn child. But most importantly, she filed this lawsuit so that we could determine exactly HOW the products became so contaminated, in order to fix the problems so that this never happens to anyone else again." Alexia Kulwiec, executive director of Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, in a statement on August 15: "The Florida Department of Health's actions are unusual, confusing, and frankly troubling. "Here at FTCLDF, we have experience with many local departments of health. If the Department had evidence that Keely Farms Dairy sold contaminated raw milk for livestock feed, it would be taking serious action against the farm." What Happens Next The lawsuit seeks damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering, including claims related to the loss of Maddox's pregnancy. Attorneys emphasize that the case also aims to clarify how the contamination occurred. No trial date has been set, and further proceedings will depend on the court's scheduling. The Florida Department of Health has stated it will continue working with Keely Farms Dairy to improve sanitation practices while maintaining its advisory that Floridians should be aware of the risks of consuming raw dairy products.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Dog Manages to Show Dad She's Happy He's Home Without Losing Spot on Couch
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A golden retriever was delighted to see her dad had come home, but she really didn't want to get off the couch to show him that. Dev Erlich, an attorney based in New Jersey, adores her dog Skylar. "I've wanted a golden retriever ever since I was a little girl, so getting Skylar was a dream come true," she told Newsweek. Making that dream a reality was far from straightforward, though. It started with the search to find a responsible breeder. "There is a big issue where too many dogs end up in shelters. A contributing factor to that is backyard breeders who use poor breeding practices and bring dogs into this world with health and temperament issues that can be avoided had they bred responsibly," Erlich said. "Many of those dogs end up in shelters, being rehomed or causing unnecessary stress and heartache to their families," she added. Erlich spent countless hours learning how to find a responsible breeder and ultimately drove eight hours to pick up the dog she would come to know as Skylar. To this day, she considers that careful process the "best decision I ever made." "Skylar is that perfect golden retriever everyone dreams of," Erlich said. "She loves to train, play ball, swim, hike, chew a bone and, of course, cuddle—honestly, she's always really down to do just about anything." But, while Skylar is happy to do "just about anything," she is also conscious of prioritizing her own needs when it comes to all things self-care. Skylar's sleep is a good example of that. Research published in the journal Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews found that dogs require anywhere between 7.7 and 16 hours of sleep a day, depending on size and breed. Erlich said she isn't sure how much Skylar sleeps, but she knows that, come 8:30 p.m. most nights, her golden retriever "doesn't want to get up." "After a certain time of night, she gets extra lazy and doesn't want to move," Erlich said. "The girl needs her beauty sleep." That left Skylar facing something of a dilemma when her dad came home from work. It was a dilemma Erlich captured on camera, with the resulting footage shared to her TikTok @ Skylar loves her dad, though she doesn't necessarily show it in the way some more excitable dogs might. "Thankfully, Skylar doesn't get separation anxiety, so I wouldn't say she actively misses her dad when he's not home," Erlich said. "But, if I say his name, she definitely perks up and looks for him, especially when she knows he's due to come home soon." That day was a little different, though. Dad had come home late from work and, try as she might, Skylar couldn't muster the energy to go and greet him as he came through the front door. In her defense, Skylar had a great spot on the couch and looked supremely comfortable. She did find a way of letting him know she cared, though, by excitedly wagging her tail as he came into the room. Skylar's response did the trick, raising a laugh and smile between mom and dad while letting them know she had no plans to move. "It was a funny moment," Erlich said. "I just hope it makes people smile and see Skylar's sweet personality." Mission accomplished on both fronts.
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Top Scientist Issues Stark mRNA Vaccine Warning to U.S.
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Rick Bright, the former director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) has warned that Department of Health and Human Services' decision to cut funding for mRNA vaccine development could threaten American national security. "BARDA wasn't the only government agency making early investments in mRNA research," Bright wrote in an opinion piece for The New York Times. "The Department of Defense and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency had already recognized mRNA's potential for swift action against emerging biological threats, including those that might be weaponized." It comes after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the termination of 22 mRNA development investments and the reallocation of roughly $500 million at the beginning of this month. Why it Matters Bright said the mRNA platform had been central to the fast response to COVID-19 and that abandoning the technology would undermine the nation's ability to respond quickly to future biological threats. Multiple scientists and doctors have spoken out against this decision, including infectious diseases expert Dr. Thomas A. Russo, who told Newsweek that mRNA vaccines "will be critical when the next, inevitable infectious diseases crisis rears its ugly head." What To Know On August 5, the HHS confirmed it would cancel $500 million in mRNA vaccine development contracts, impacting research teams and proposals—including those from Emory University, Tiba Biotech, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur and others. The projects reportedly targeted respiratory viruses including seasonal influenza, COVID-19, RSV and H5N1 and included work by major industry and academic teams. Secretary Kennedy argued that the data showed mRNA vaccines had not met expectations for preventing upper respiratory infections and that HHS would shift funding toward other vaccine platforms. But Bright praised mRNA technology, saying that the "unprecedented speed" with which a COVID-19 vaccine was developed in 2020 "was possible only because years earlier, the United States had invested" in it. "This decision undercuts one of the most significant medical advances in decades, technology that could protect millions more people from the threats ahead," Bright said. "I know the stakes because I was BARDA's director when the United States made the decision to invest heavily in mRNA," he said. "That investment did not begin with Covid-19. It began in 2016, when we faced the Zika virus outbreak." "We needed a way to design a vaccine in days, not years, to protect pregnant women and their babies from devastating birth defects. Older vaccine approaches were too slow," Bright continued. "The solution was mRNA: a flexible, rapid-response technology that could be reprogrammed for any virus once its genetic sequence was known. That early investment laid the groundwork for the lightning-fast Covid-19 response four years later." Kennedy said in a post on X the time: "We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted. BARDA is terminating 22 mRNA vaccine development investments because the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu," Kennedy said in a post on X. "We're shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate." Newsweek has contacted the HHS, via online inquiry form, for a response to Bright's comments. File photo of an employee of the Bavarian Red Cross (BRK) preparing the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine against the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 for vaccination in a vaccination center, taken in Bavaria, Germany, in January 2021. File photo of an employee of the Bavarian Red Cross (BRK) preparing the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine against the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 for vaccination in a vaccination center, taken in Bavaria, Germany, in January 2021. AP What People Are Saying Former BARDA director Rick Bright said in his NYT op-ed: "Like every technology, mRNA has limitations. Vaccines meant to protect against respiratory infections, whether developed through mRNA or older technologies, are generally better at averting severe disease than preventing infection. It is a scientific challenge we can address with next-generation vaccines. The answer to limitations is improvement, not abandonment. "Political narratives about mRNA have fueled confusion, which leads to mistrust, yet the scientific evidence consistently shows that this technology is safe and effective and holds enormous potential for future vaccines and treatments." Children's Health Defense, an anti-vax nonprofit founded by Kennedy Jr. which focuses on childhood health epidemics, said in a post on X: "CHD applauds this most recent announcement to defund 22 mRNA vaccine projects under BARDA. While we believe that the mRNA shots on the market are unsafe and should be off the market, this is a welcome step in the right direction. The pandemic preparedness industry as it exists today is a threat to human welfare." What Happens Next HHS said it would shift funding toward other vaccine platforms but did not provide detailed timelines or specify which programs would receive redirected support. Scientific organizations, industry groups and public-health leaders said they would assess the impact and consider next steps, while some public-health advocates announced initiatives to defend vaccine science and provide public information.
