Most Americans get these retirement questions wrong. Can you do any better?
Most Americans intend to retire eventually, but few have the knowledge to address the major challenges that often trouble retirees, according to a new survey from the TIAA Institute and the Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center.
The study, which surveyed more than 3,300 Americans, found that the average U.S. adult couldn't answer a majority of retirement-related questions. Survey respondents were asked six questions in total, ranging in topic from long-term care needs to lifetime income.On average, respondents answered just 2.2 questions correctly, or 37% of the questions. Fifteen percent of adults surveyed couldn't answer a single question correctly.
READ MORE: For Gen Z, retirement feels out of reach. Can advisors bring it closer?
Interested in seeing the survey for yourself? Take the quiz below to see how you stack up against the average American.
Financial advisors say that lack of knowledge can create problems for Americans looking to retire. But it also presents an opportunity for planners in the wealth management industry.
"What I think a planner should do is really focus on education and making sure the client understands things," said Charles "Chuck" Failla, the founder of Sovereign Financial Group in Stamford, Connecticut. "My job is not to say 'Here is the absolute right thing to do,' because it's rarely that clear. But instead, it's to say, 'Here's option A and B, or maybe C, and here's the pros and cons of each one of those.' And if I do my job correctly, then the client, even without decades of financial experience like I have, should be able to make the decision. … And that only comes with education."
READ MORE: Ask an Advisor: Is my Social Security strategy outdated?
Educating a client on the different options available to them is a crucial part of the job for Failla, but he said that he also doesn't expect clients to become experts themselves.
"I could become an expert on drywall, but I have no interest in that, so I hire people. Like, that's not what I want to learn," Failla said. "It's all learnable stuff. But you have to understand, if someone's coming to your office, by definition, they're not … as financially literate as you are."
Even for people who would prefer to pay someone to handle their financial planning, Failla said that educating a client on the "why" behind certain decisions and behaviors is crucial to ensuring they stick to the plan.
"What type of discipline will that client have if they don't understand why they're doing it, right?" he said. "Education kind of helps them do the right thing, which is, stay the course."
In the survey, roughly three-quarters of respondents couldn't correctly answer questions about long-term care costs and Medicare coverage. Those numbers aren't promising, but they might be improving among older Americans.
"I think we're seeing a much higher acceptance level of people understanding that they're going to need care. And like anything, it's driven by experience," said Byrke Sestok, a financial advisor at MONECO Advisors in Fairfield, Connecticut. "More and more people that are in their 40s, 50s, 60s, have now been in the position of having to care for an elderly person in their family … and now they're going, 'Well, I know that happened with Mom and Dad, so it's definitely going to happen to me, right?' So, the denial I find is leaving as our generations get older because people are living it."
Still, clients can understand the importance of preparing for something like long-term care needs, but that doesn't mean they're equipped with the information to actually do it. That's where advisors come in, Failla said.
"I give them the options, and this is an A, B or C option. So, pay for it yourself, pay for it with insurance or let the state pay for it on Medicaid," he said. "And there's, of course, pros and cons to each one of those, right? And we walk them through that to the point they can make their own decision."
READ MORE: The 10 cities where retirees receive the highest income
Navigating those options can become complicated, especially for clients who aren't in an ideal financial situation, Sestok said.
"If you are not in, like, the total green zone, and you're in that yellow zone where you're probably going to have long-term care costs, but you're probably not going to be able to foot the whole bill, then I think there's a real and honest conversation about, 'How do we implement long-term care insurance within your financial situation?'" he said. "It's always better to have some insurance than zero."
Clients can certainly benefit by learning more about the options available to them when it comes to something like long-term care, but few people are equipped to effectively make those related financial decisions on their own, Sestok said.
"Retirement in general and long-term care specifically, I don't think it's a topic that people should try to assess themselves, unless they really have taken the time to learn a lot about the topic," he said. "They should consult a professional."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
8 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
House GOP Megabill Would Add $2.4 Trillion to Debt Through 2034: CBO
A sweeping GOP bill to enact President Donald Trump's agenda that passed the House last month would add more than $2.4 trillion to the national debt by 2034, according to The legislation, called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, would make the 2017 tax cuts permanent, raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion, and include provisions related to securing the border and unleashing American energy. It includes no taxes on tips or overtime and would tax university endowments at certain thresholds. It is now pending before the Senate. The bill would add an estimated $1.75 trillion through 2029, according to the CBO. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) dismissed the CBO estimate.

Miami Herald
31 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Zelenskyy dismisses Russian demands, proposes direct Putin talks
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that Russia's maximalist demands mean there's no point in continuing with lower-level talks aimed at brokering an end to the war. Calling Russia's conditions for peace an "ultimatum," Zelenskyy said that he remains willing to meet directly with President Vladimir Putin. But low level talks such as those that took place in Istanbul on Monday make no sense unless they lead to a meeting of the two leaders, he said. "To continue diplomatic meetings in Istanbul at a level that does not resolve anything further is, in my opinion, meaningless," Zelenskyy told reporters in Kyiv on Wednesday. Zelenskyy is upping the pressure on Putin after a pair of audacious attacks against Russian targets in recent days that represented an embarrassing setback for the Kremlin. U.S. special envoy for Ukraine Keith Kellogg said yesterday that additional sanctions on Russian are "ready to drop," based on his conversation with Republican Senator Lindsey Graham. Another prisoner exchange with Russia involving around 500 people is possible over the coming weekend, according to Zelenskyy, who said that Russia was motivated by a desire to avoid further western sanctions. Prisoner exchanges "are going on and should go on, but the Russians are not ready for a ceasefire; at least the delegation level is not ready to resolve this and they believe that this is a matter for the leaders, they told us so themselves," he said. Zelenskyy proposed a ceasefire until a leaders' meeting in a place "of Russia's choice," citing Istanbul, the Vatican, or Switzerland. "If we see that we can continue the dialogue and are ready to take steps towards de-escalation, we will continue the ceasefire with American monitoring and American guarantees of mediation," he said. However, he said a meeting with Putin would also be possible "tomorrow" without such a ceasefire agreement in place. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.


Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Finds His Approval Rating Sinking Once More
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating on the economy is sinking, according to new polling. Pollster G. Elliott Morris' tracker shows that on the issue of the economy, Trump's approval rating is underwater by 15.75 points. That is down from -14.94 points on Monday. When Morris' tracker first launched in January, Trump's approval rating on the economy was well above water, at +8.24 points. On the issue of inflation, Trump's approval rating stands at -22.24 points. That is down from +1.99 points in January. Why It Matters While this downturn hasn't returned to the all-time low of -16.28 percent net approval recorded on May 8, the trend comes despite Trump's recent move to scale back the tariffs that saw his approval ratings plummet in April amid economic anxiety. That the numbers are falling again suggests voters remain unconvinced by the administration's course correction—and that concerns over rising prices, trade instability, and mixed signals from the White House continue to overshadow any efforts to reset the economic narrative. What To Know While Morris' tracker shows that Trump's approval rating on the economy is trending downward, pollster Nate Silver's tracker tells a different story. Silver's tracker shows that in the past few days, Trump has been trending upward on the economy, with his approval currently standing at -10 points, up from -11.3 points on June 1. However, similar to Morris' tracker, Silver's tracker shows that Trump's net approval rating on the economy has trended downwards dramatically since January, when it stood at +6 points. The same trend occurs for Trump's net approval rating on inflation, which has trended upward in the past few days, from 19.7 on May 1 to 17.1 as of June 3, but has dropped from -6 points in January. Individual polls show that Americans remain sharply divided over Trump's handling of the economy during his second term. While some surveys indicate modest approval, others reveal significant dissatisfaction—highlighting the ongoing polarization of public opinion on one of the administration's most critical issues. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on May 30, 2025. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the rain after arriving on Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, on May 30, 2025. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP According to polling conducted between May 21 and June 2, 2025, economic job approval ratings for Trump range from a low of 37 percent to a high of 47 percent, with disapproval rates consistently higher in most surveys. The latest poll by AtlasIntel (May 21-27) shows Trump with just 42 percent approval on the economy and 54 percent disapproval, resulting in a net -12 percent rating. Similarly, RMG Research (May 28-29) recorded 44 percent approval and 55 percent disapproval, also yielding a net -11 percent score. Other pollsters, like YouGov and John Zogby Strategies, reported a slightly narrower gap. Zogby's poll from May 28-29 showed a 46-50 percent split, or a net -4 percent, indicating a more divided sentiment among likely voters. Only Morning Consult recorded a relatively neutral economic approval rating for the president, with 47 percent approving and 47 percent disapproving in its most recent surveys conducted between May 30 and June 2. This suggests a degree of economic support stability, though not a clear advantage. At the bottom end, the American Research Group poll (May 17-20) gave Trump just 37 percent approval compared to 60 percent disapproval, marking a net -23 percent—the steepest negative margin in the group. Meanwhile, polls show that Trump continues to face strong headwinds on the issue of inflation, with net approval ratings on the topic deeply negative—despite attempts by his administration to scale back tariffs, having paused the majority of them. Across national surveys conducted between May 1 and June 2, 2025, Trump's approval rating on inflation remains persistently low, ranging from just 31 percent to 44 percent. Disapproval consistently outpaces approval by double digits, with net ratings ranging from -7 percent (Harris/Harvard CAPS) to -32 percent (Verasight and Marquette Law School). In the most recent YouGov poll (May 30-June 2), just 39 percent approved of Trump's handling of inflation, while 54 percent disapproved—netting a -15 percent margin. The latest data from Verasight and Marquette University underscore the depth of discontent: only 31 percent and 34 percent of respondents, respectively, approved of Trump's inflation policies, while roughly two-thirds disapproved. That puts Trump's net approval at -32 percent in both surveys, among the worst marks recorded in this cycle. It comes after the pace of inflation slowed in April, the month that Trump introduced his tariffs, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) said last month. The annual inflation rate was 2.3 percent in April, down from an annual rate of 2.4 percent March. Meanwhile, consumer confidence saw a surprising increase in May. The Conference Board reported a rise to 98, much higher than both the expected 87.1 and April's 86 reading. It was the biggest one-month jump in more than a year. Nonetheless, polls still show that voters don't trust Trump on the economy. In the latest Fox News poll from April, 72 percent said they were "very" or "extremely" worried about the economy entering a recession this year. What Happens Next Trump's approval rating could fluctuate in the coming weeks, depending on the evolving tariff situation and concerns about a recession.