logo
Volunteer firefighters fear renewable energy projects will put bushfire-prone town at 'risk'

Volunteer firefighters fear renewable energy projects will put bushfire-prone town at 'risk'

The town of Dederang, nestled in Victoria's Kiewa Valley, has felt the impact of several bushfires through the decades.
It's why most of the town's population — about 200 residents — are fighting proposals to build two Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) on private land.
"It's one of the highest, most bushfire-prone areas in the state. If they lose control, it will go and then it'll be chaos," said local resident Paul Ingram.
Late last year, Mint Renewables and Trina Solar submitted planning applications to the Victorian state government to build a BESS in Dederang.
The systems are designed to support wind and solar renewable energy by storing excess electricity and releasing it when demand is high.
Dederang is full of CFA volunteers; most are farmers, and they fear the fire risk that lithium-ion batteries could pose for the town.
Doug Connors, a CFA volunteer in Dederang for 50 years, says the town wouldn't be able to fight a battery fire if one erupted.
"As a brigade, we're equipped and trained to fight grass and scrub fires," he told 7.30.
Teresa Hicks is a third-generation dairy farmer with three young children.
She and her fiancé Darren Sagrera are CFA volunteers and her father Jack Hicks is a former CFA group captain at the Dederang brigade.
She says her family wouldn't feel comfortable fighting a battery fire because it would be too toxic.
"No one's going to get on the fire truck anyway, because it's too dangerous," she said.
"We're not the only ones being affected. Wherever a bushfire gets into is going to be affected. Bushfires will run for hundreds, if not thousands of kilometres. We've seen it. So that's the risk."
Dr Matthew Priestley is a battery and energy expert from the University of New South Wales. He says lithium-ion batteries need to be safely managed to avoid overheating.
"What we find is lithium-ion batteries do have a tendency to overheat, and that's why we have a safety mechanism in them, which is called the battery management system," he said.
"The job of the battery management system is to monitor the health of the lithium-ion battery system."
The CFA confirmed to 7.30 that it has consulted Mint Renewables, Trina Solar and the community about the two projects proposed for Dederang.
In a statement, the CFA said: "Fire safety at large-scale renewable energy facilities is a focus for CFA and is one of the key considerations for communities where a facility is proposed."
"The role of CFA is to advocate that developments proposed in CFA areas are located, designed, constructed and operated as safely as possible."
Dr Priestley says the chance of a fire breaking out at a large-scale battery plant is low.
"They are rare and they're generally due to a fault somewhere in the device," Dr Priestley told 7.30.
"When one does fail, often they move into a very dangerous state called thermal runaway.
Trina Solar's Country Manager John Zhong says he understands that the community has concerns.
However in response to the backlash against the proposals, Mr Zhong compared the rejection of the batteries to kids who refuse to go to school.
"My kid doesn't like to go to prep, but then I have to tell them 'hey, going to prep is … part of your journey to actually learn and study and to become an adult'," he said.
When challenged on referring to the community as 'kids' and whether Trina Solar ignored the community's concerns, Mr Zhong said the company did "receive their submissions" and did "take their comments into account".
Mr Zhong also said the company conducted extensive "fire safety hazard analysis" of the area where their proposed battery will be built.
"The bushfire risk has been carefully assessed," he told 7.30.
He admitted the company had sought guidance from a CFA consultant based in Melbourne, not in Dederang.
"We engaged this consultant from Melbourne, and it's engaged by our planning consultant NGH as a sub-consultant. So we, our team, have been there during the community consultation process."
Mint Renewables declined 7.30's request for an interview.
Instead, they provided a statement that said: "We know that the community has genuinely held concerns."
"Our project will only proceed if we are granted a permit by the Minister of Planning that requires us to follow the CFA guidelines".
In March, the community had a win when the Alpine Shire Council agreed to write to the Victorian government opposing one of the batteries.
"Five councillors voted in favour of opposing it, and so we won that. And that was just amazing … I was crying," Dederang resident Sharon McEvoy said.
For the past 18 months, Ms McEvoy has been spearheading the campaign against the two battery projects.
"The first one is basically at our front door, 450 metres downhill," she told 7.30.
"The other one is uphill from that proposal, a couple of hundred metres, and that would be about 600 metres from our house."
She's helped send hundreds of letters to the state government and created petitions against both proposals.
"We have got over 800 submissions, objections that people have written in personally in some way, shape or form, to the development programs department voicing their objections to it," she said.
"For the second proposal, we've got over 700 written in. We presented a petition to the parliament with 1,300 signatures saying, 'please don't build it here'."
7.30 requested interviews with both the Victorian Planning Minister Sonya Kilkenny and the Victorian Energy Minister Lily D'Ambrosio; both declined.
Instead, a Victorian government spokesperson said: "To continue to keep bills down and keep the lights on, we've streamlined planning approvals for renewable energy projects."
"All members of the community can make submissions which will form part of any planning decision-making."
It's expected a decision on Mint Renewables and Trina Solar's projects will be made later this year.
The Alpine Shire Council is expected to vote on whether it will formally object or endorse the Trina Solar battery project at a council meeting on Tuesday.
Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV
Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fans suffer long queues and tech glitches trying to buy Ashes tickets
Fans suffer long queues and tech glitches trying to buy Ashes tickets

News.com.au

time7 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Fans suffer long queues and tech glitches trying to buy Ashes tickets

Cricket diehards faced long queues of more than 200,000 fans and frustrating last-minute glitches as they attempted to secure tickets to the much-anticipated Ashes summer Tests series. Demand for the Australia versus England Tests was unprecedented with 160,000 tickets moving in the biggest ever pre-sale for Cricket Australia. But for every lucky fan who sailed through the queues, there were many others who spent more than an hour praying to advance beyond the 'virtual lounge' and onto the purchasing page. And many of those got oh-so-close only to be unceremoniously booted off the page by a tech glitch and forced to rejoin the queue. Seasoned cricket ticket buyers said the 2025/26 summer season's pre-sale was the first time they had gone through the process of registering for a code and then heading to the virtual queue to buy tickets to the Ashes tests or one-day and T20 series against South Africa and India. There were almost 20 events on sale at staggered times by state, opening with tickets to the Canberra and Hobart T20 games first to kick off at 10am, followed by Queensland matches at 11am, South Australia and Northern Territory games at 1pm, Victorian fixtures including the Boxing Day Test at the MCG from 2pm and the New Year's Test at the SCG from 3pm. But many fans were confused by the ever-expanding virtual lounge as each pre-sale went live and despaired they would make it through the 200,000 people in front of them to the purchase page where there was a limit of nine tickets per transaction. One fan who was desperate to buy tickets to the SCG test logged on via Cricket Australia at 2.30pm to land behind more than 170,000 people and 90 minutes later, still had over 30,000 hopefuls in front of him. 'Ashes Cricket ticket queue – what a joke – so much for giving preference to those who go every year!!' wrote one frustrated fan who was virtually staring down 179991 people ahead of him. Another despondent fan compared the process to the hell of buying Oasis tickets. 'Well, I've got to say @cricketaus have done a great job devising a ticket buying system for the Ashes that was even more frustrating than getting Oasis tickets. Worst thing is I don't know if my purchase has gone through successfully at all …' And it wasn't just the Australians having a touch time of navigating the torture that is buying tickets in the digital era. 'Got to the front for Ashes tickets, selected my day then couldn't select how many tickets I wanted. Booted out. Back of the Queue. Nice one. Glad I woke up early,' commented Jamie Hodder on X. But surely the greatest pain to be inflicted on sports or concert fans trying to part with their cash in exchange for those precious tickets is getting through only to be booted out thanks to a tech glitch. 'Awful ashes ticket experience so far. Got into queue of 20000+ waited 50 minutes to get access and timed out in about 5 mins with very limited ticket availability. Now in a new queue of 200000+ #shite,' wrote Andy Hadley. Yet there were others who sailed through the process to claim ticket victory, like Jamie McT. 'I know folk complain about process for #Ashes tickets. But Ticketek and Cricket Australia, it all worked fine – logged on at 13:45 for 14:00 start of MCG presale. Had approx 25,000 ahead of me but by 14:25 got Day 1 Boxing Day tickets.'

$400,000 salary job proves the AI revolution is well and truly underway
$400,000 salary job proves the AI revolution is well and truly underway

News.com.au

time18 hours ago

  • News.com.au

$400,000 salary job proves the AI revolution is well and truly underway

A new artificial intelligence-focused job has caught the eye of one of Australia's most successful entrepreneurs, who believes it is the 'perfect example' of how AI is actually creating new opportunities for those willing to adapt. Simon Beard, founder of streetwear juggernaut Culture Kings – a business he sold in 2021 for a staggering $600 million – has highlighted a new job being advertised by Meta. The job is for a Content Engineer in California and comes with a salary range of $189,000 (A$293,000) to $258,000 (A$400,000). According to the ad, the role has a focus on generative AI, with the team supporting 'products through quality control, prompt engineering, fine tuning and creative execution'. According to Mr Beard, this is an example of an AI-related job that anyone can teach themselves how to do. He said being able to come up with an idea and structure for an AI prompt that actually produces the content they want and one that services a purpose is an 'incredibly valuable' skill. 'You don't need a course. You don't need someone to hold your hand. All the tools are there. Just like you taught yourself how to use Instagram, you just have to play with it and figure it out,' he said in a recent TikTok video. 'AI is going to create so many jobs for people that are willing to go put in the work and learn and teach themselves.' Mr Beard pointed out that jobs such as this one being offered by Meta 'didn't even exist three years ago'. 'Meta's new role of content engineer isn't about complicated coding or skill sets – it's about understanding how to prompt AI tools to generate content that connects, converts, and cuts through the noise,' he said. Mr Beard isn't alone in his assessment that AI will ultimately introduce a slew of new jobs to the market. However, this doesn't mean that fears around job losses as a result of the technology are unfounded. In January, a World Economic Forum (WEF) survey found that 41 per cent of employers intend to reduce their workforce because of AI automation by 2030. 'Advances in AI and renewable energy are reshaping the (labour) market – driving an increase in demand for many technology or specialist roles while driving a decline for others, such as graphic designers,' the WEF said in a statement at the time. 'The presence of both graphic designers and legal secretaries just outside the top 10 fastest-declining job roles, a first-time prediction not seen in previous editions of the Future of Jobs Report, may illustrate GenAI's increasing capacity to perform knowledge work.' At the same time, the report also found that close to 70 per cent of companies plan to hire new workers with skills to design AI tools and enhancements, and 62 per cent plan to hire more employees with skills to work alongside the technology. Kylie Walker, chief executive of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, previously told there are plenty of potential benefits of AI, but not without guardrails. 'Greater adoption of AI could see Australia's economy increase by $200 billion annually, but it is critical that robust measures are rapidly implemented to safeguard these areas and position Australia at the forefront of AI development,' Ms Walker said. 'Investing further in local AI innovations will simultaneously create new AI industries and jobs here in Australia and reduce our reliance on internationally developed and maintained systems.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store