logo
Some Colorado cities challenge bill reducing harsh penalties in municipal court

Some Colorado cities challenge bill reducing harsh penalties in municipal court

CBS News18-04-2025

Colorado's municipal courts primarily prosecute minor offenses, and punishment for those crimes can vary from city to city. That could soon change. While many welcome the consistency, some cities say it would be a big mistake.
House Bill 1147, Fairness & Transparency in Municipal Court, aims to standardize sentencing and enhance due process in municipal courts across Colorado. In recent years, Aurora
has gotten tougher on crime
-- from shoplifting to car theft.
"We were the number one state for motor vehicle theft. That was the first, big issue that we tackled when we passed that first mandatory minimum for that," said Pete Schulte, Aurora City Attorney. "We're still lower on motor vehicle theft today than the rest of the state, and a lot of our council members believe it's because of our mandatory minimum penalties."
Some city leaders in Aurora fear crime would spike if HB1147 becomes law.
Aurora also has mandatory minimum three days in jail on the first offense for retail theft and 90 days in jail on second offense. By contrast, under state law, shoplifting under $300 carries a maximum of 10 days in jail.
HB1147 would force Aurora and other cities to reduce its penalties to the state criminal code.
Schulte says the bill undercuts Aurora's ability to respond to its own challenges.
"The things that are happening in Aurora are probably a lot different than what's happening in Grand Junction, Steamboat, Vail, Rifle," Schulte said. "Some cities may not have the issues that Aurora has, which is why we like our home rule authority to be able to do these sort of things and take action on our own."
Supporters of the bill say consistent punishment would eliminate what they say are disparities in municipal court.
Terrance Carroll, former Speaker of the House and President of the Sam Cary Bar Association - Colorado's Black lawyers association - voiced strong support.
He emphasized the disproportionate burden current municipal court systems place on vulnerable populations.
"You normally get folks who are the poorest of the poor... who don't necessarily have the same resources to bond out or to make bail," said Carroll. The bill also has support from several organizations including the ACLU and Colorado Freedom Fund.
He says cities shouldn't be labs experimenting with criminal justice.
"It makes no sense that for a state offense, you won't do jail time. But for a low-level municipal offense, you could find yourself in jail for extended periods," said Carroll. "We strongly support it because we think there will be true due process and ensure that there's consistency and constitutional rights throughout the state."
He says solutions are bigger than punishment and justice needs compassion.
"Sometimes you have to look at the circumstances," he said, offering a hypothetical of a struggling mother who resorts to shoplifting. "It's still wrong to do a crime, but... Justice has to be compassionate. Sometimes justice has to be empathetic."
Schulte says Aurora's penalties show compassion to the victims.
"This is standing up for small businesses, standing up for our citizens," Schulte. "Our city is taking a stand on some of these offenses that we believe the state isn't taking seriously."
The bill has passed both chambers and now sits on Gov. Jared Polis's desk. But with mounting pressure from municipalities claiming the bill infringes on local authority, there's speculation that a veto could be on the table.
If it is signed into law, the city of Aurora says it will legal action.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections

WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Democrats Have Selected Their First Major Candidate Of Trump's Second Term
Democrats Have Selected Their First Major Candidate Of Trump's Second Term

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats Have Selected Their First Major Candidate Of Trump's Second Term

Rep. Mikie Sherrill won the Democratic primary for governor of New Jersey on Tuesday night, making the former Naval helicopter pilot and federal prosecutor the first statewide Democratic nominee of President Donald Trump's second term in office. Sherrill, a mainstream Democrat who was first elected to the House in 2018, triumphed in a crowded primary, defeating avowed centrist Rep. Josh Gottheimer, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, New Jersey Education Association President Sean Spiller and former state Senate President Steve Sweeney. All six major candidates had substantial financial backing, with almost $88 million spent on television ads between the Democratic and Republican primaries. Sherrill was not the top spender in the race, with only about $12 million in ad support, but she stood out for being the only woman in the field and for convincing voters she was equipped to stand up to Trump. Her closing ads emphasized she had the 'courage to fight' and the 'strength to win.' Though New Jersey is traditionally a solidly blue state, Democrats are not taking the race for granted. Trump made significant gains with the state's working class and Latino voters in the 2024 election, and New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) only narrowly won reelection in 2021. Murphy's GOP opponent that year, former state legislator Jack Ciattarelli, is also expected to be Sherill's opponent in this year's race.

NC Senators spar over rewrite of bill intended to prevent the sexual exploitation of women, minors
NC Senators spar over rewrite of bill intended to prevent the sexual exploitation of women, minors

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NC Senators spar over rewrite of bill intended to prevent the sexual exploitation of women, minors

Senator Sydney Batch (seated far left) questions the proposed committee substitute for HB 805. (Screengrab of NCGA videostream) House Bill 805 started as a bipartisan bill to fight human trafficking and provide women with an avenue to remove nonconsensual content and images from the internet. House members on both sides of the aisle felt so strongly about the issue, they passed the bill 113-0 last month. But when the bill ('Prevent the Sexual Exploitation of Women and Minors Act') moved to the upper chamber, Senator Buck Newton (R- Greene, Wayne, Wilson) saw an opportunity to rework the legislation. Newton's proposed committee substitute for HB 805, spells out there are only two sexes – male and female – and that gender identity shall not be treated as legally equivalent to biological sex. 'This section ensures that our state follows federal policy and aligns with President Trump's executive order,' Newton told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday. 'This ensures our state maintains eligibility for any and all federal funding.' Newton's proposal would ban the use of state funds for transgender surgeries for any prisoner incarcerated in the state prison system. The final section of Newton's PCS would require that when a person changes their sex on a birth certificate, the State Registrar must attach the new certificate to the original certificate of birth on file, preserving both copies. The state would also forward a copy of the new certificate to the register of deeds in the county of birth where both would be kept on file. 'What problem are we really trying to solve in terms of efficiency or cost savings?' asked Senator Sophia Chitlik (D-Durham). 'Well, there seems to be a great deal of confusion among our society about the fluidity of sex,' replied Newton. 'And it is time that we clarify, once and for all, what most people recognize would be obvious, which is that there are only two sexes.' 'I actually don't understand why this chamber is so obsessed with genitalia, but here we are,' said Sen. Sydney Batch (D-Wake) noting the new PCS does not allow for a definition that's based in science. Batch said the original House bill intended to safeguard women and children from exploitation by the pornography industry was a 'fantastic bill' and that Newton's proposal should be a standalone bill judged on its own merits. Senator Mujtaba Mohammed (D-Mecklenburg) questioned why the bill which once enjoyed unanimous support seeks to bar gender affirming care in the prison system. 'We reached out to our state agencies, and they confirmed that they've never authorized sexual procedures, there's never been gender affirming care, there's never been any authorized gender affirming surgeries,' Mohammed said. 'As a Republican, supporting limited government, why are we coming up with unnecessary laws?' Newton acknowledged while such medical surgeries had not happened yet using North Carolina funds, he believes taxpayers would appreciate that state funds will not be spent in this manner. 'We draw the line now, before anybody attempts to do such a thing.' Sen. Lisa Grafstein (D-Wake) said Newton's proposal reminded her of the hurricane Helene recovery bill – a clean bill that passed the House only to be muddied and politicized when it moved to the Senate. 'The idea that we're going to put into law that you cannot be transgendered, or that you cannot be all the things that you are railing against is a fool's errand,' said Grafstein. Reighlah Collins, Policy Counsel for the ACLU of North Carolina, said the PCS enforces rigid definitions of sex and gender, while forcibly outing people who change their sex on their birth certificate. 'These attempts are part of a larger strategy to push transgender people out of public life,' said Collins. Sen. Batch said she'd like to see the Judiciary Committee vote on the original House bill, setting aside Newton's additions. Rep. Laura Budd (D-Mecklenburg), a primary sponsor of the bill in the House, appealed to the Senate Judiciary Committee to remember the original intent of the bipartisan legislation. 'If you are the victim of human trafficking and there are images or videos of you online there is no remedy in the state of North Carolina to have those images or videos removed from the internet, which means that you're stuck,' said Budd. Budd said House Bill 805 was a long time coming and is an important tool to help women who've been taken advantage of to have these images removed and the videos taken down. Budd requested that Newton remove his proposal and find another avenue to advance his PCS. 'When we take this bill and we layer it with those things [in the PCS] we're not doing good for people with Carolina. We are imposing onto the bill things that are going to make it become the political football,' said Budd. Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee adjourned Tuesday before voting on the matter. The bill is back on the agenda for Wednesday afternoon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store