UN experts call for GHF to be dismantled
The UN rights office said Israeli forces had killed more than 1,000 Palestinians trying to get food aid in Gaza since the GHF started operations.
GENEVA - United Nations special rapporteurs called on Aug 5 for the Israel- and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to be immediately dismantled, saying aid was being 'exploited for covert military and geopolitical agendas'.
An exceptionally-large group of the UN-mandated experts voiced grave concerns over the GHF's operations.
The private organisation
began distributing food in Gaza Strip in May as Israel began easing a more than two-month aid blockade on the Palestinian territory that had exacerbated existing shortages.
'The GHF... is an utterly disturbing example of how humanitarian relief can be exploited for covert military and geopolitical agendas in serious breach of international law,' the experts said in a joint statement.
'The entanglement of Israeli intelligence, US contractors and ambiguous non-governmental entities underlines the urgent need for robust international oversight and action under UN auspices.
'Calling it 'humanitarian' adds on to Israel's humanitarian camouflage and is an insult to the humanitarian enterprise and standards.'
On July 22, the UN rights office said Israeli forces had killed more than 1,000 Palestinians trying to get food aid in Gaza since the GHF started operations – nearly three-quarters of them in the vicinity of GHF sites.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels
Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news
Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan
Asia Philippines, India shore up ties amid China tensions, US tariff risks
Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim
Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street
Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan
Singapore Beauty industry consumers hit by 464% rise in prepayment losses in first half of 2025
'Without clear accountability, the very idea of humanitarian relief may ultimately become a casualty of modern hybrid warfare,' the special rapporteurs said.
'The credibility and effectiveness of humanitarian assistance must be restored by dismantling the GHF, holding it and its executives accountable, and allowing experienced and humanitarian actors from the UN and civil society alike to take back the reins of managing and distributing lifesaving aid.'
The joint statement was signed by Ms Francesca Albanese, the UN's special rapporteur on the rights situation in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967.
Israel accuses her of having an 'obsessive, hate-driven agenda to delegitimise the state of Israel'.
The statement was also signed by 18 other special rapporteurs, plus other UN experts and members of UN working groups – a notably large number for such statements.
Special rapporteurs are independent experts mandated by the UN Human Rights Council to report their findings. They do not, therefore, speak for the United Nations itself.
More than two million people live in the Gaza Strip.
GHF says it has distributed more than 1.76 million boxes of foodstuffs to date.
'We continue to improve our operations,' GHF executive director John Acree said on Aug 4.
'We urge the international humanitarian community to join us – we have the scale and capacity to deliver more aid to the people of Gaza.' AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
12 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Stanford student newspaper sues Trump administration for alleged free speech violations
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: The Hoover Tower rises above Stanford University in this aerial photo in Stanford, California, U.S. on January 13, 2017. Picture taken January 13, 2017. REUTERS/Noah Berger/File Photo Stanford University's student newspaper sued the Trump Administration on Wednesday, arguing it has violated the free-speech rights of foreign students by threatening to deport them for writing stories that it considers "anti-American or anti-Israel." The Stanford Daily and two unidentified students said in the lawsuit, filed in federal court in California against Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, that foreign students at the Palo Alto, California, school have refused to write about the conflict in the Middle East for fear they could be arrested, detained and deported. "This pall of fear is incompatible with American liberty," the lawsuit said. "Our First Amendment stands as a bulwark against the government infringing the inalienable human right to think and speak for yourself." Spokespeople for the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. "In the United States of America, no one should fear a midnight knock on the door for voicing the wrong opinion,' Stanford Daily attorney Conor Fitzpatrick said in a statement. A spokesperson for Stanford University said the newspaper is an independent organization and that the school is not part of the lawsuit. The Trump administration has attempted to deport students who have expressed pro-Palestinian views, calling them antisemitic and extremist sympathizers whose presence in the country was adverse to U.S. foreign policy. Protesters say that the government wrongly conflates their criticism of Israeli actions in Gaza and advocacy for Palestinian rights with antisemitism and extremism. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds World Trump eyes 100% chips tariff, but 0% for US investors like Apple World White House says Trump open to meeting Russia's Putin and Ukraine's Zelensky Singapore MRT track issue causes 5-hour delay; Jeffrey Siow says 'we can and will do better' Singapore ST Explains: What is a track point fault and why does it cause lengthy train disruptions? Singapore ST and Uniqlo launch design contest for Singapore stories T-shirt collection Asia Malaysia plans barrierless toll system modelled after Singapore's ERP Singapore S'pore and Indonesia have discussed jointly developing military training facilities: Chan Chun Sing Judges have ordered the release of some students who the administration arrested and detained without being charged with a crime. The Stanford Daily said in its lawsuit that the administration has caused its foreign writers to self-censor to avoid being targeted. It argued that the administration's threats prevent them from "engaging in protected expression like attending protests, using certain slogans, and publicly voicing their true views about American foreign policy, Israel, and Palestine." The newspaper asked the court to rule that the U.S. Constitution prevents the government from deporting non-citizens for engaging in free speech. REUTERS
Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- Straits Times
UCLA says Trump administration froze $750 million of its federal funding
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The US government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's administration has frozen $584 million (S$750 million) in federal funding for the University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA said on Aug 6 after the government reprimanded the university over pro-Palestinian protests. The Trump administration has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza. The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests. Large demonstrations took place at UCLA in 2024 . Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's military assault in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. 'Currently, a total of approximately US$584 million in extramural award funding is suspended and at risk,' UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk said in an update on the university website. The Los Angeles Times reported UCLA leaders were preparing to negotiate with the government over the freeze. The White House had no immediate response to a request for comment. Last week, the university agreed to pay over US$6 million to settle a lawsuit by some students and a professor who alleged antisemitism. It was also sued earlier this year over a 2024 attack on pro-Palestinian protesters at the height of the US campus protest movement. The government has in recent weeks settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over US$220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay US$50 million. Both institutions accepted certain government demands. Talks to settle with Harvard University are ongoing. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds World Trump eyes 100% chips tariff, but 0% for US investors like Apple World White House says Trump open to meeting Russia's Putin and Ukraine's Zelensky Singapore MRT track issue causes 5-hour delay; Jeffrey Siow says 'we can and will do better' Singapore ST Explains: What is a track point fault and why does it cause lengthy train disruptions? Singapore ST and Uniqlo launch design contest for Singapore stories T-shirt collection Asia Malaysia plans barrierless toll system modelled after Singapore's ERP Singapore S'pore and Indonesia have discussed jointly developing military training facilities: Chan Chun Sing Rights advocates have raised concerns about academic freedom and free speech. The government has also attempted to deport foreign student protesters but faced judicial roadblocks. Stanford University's student-run newspaper sued the Trump administration on Aug 6 , saying student writers were censoring themselves and turning down assignments related to Gaza to avoid being targeted for deportation. REUTERS
Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- Straits Times
What's a ‘secondary tariff' like the one Trump imposed on India?
On top of an existing 25 per cent levy on goods from India, US President Trump added an additional 25 per cent tariff to penalise India for buying oil from Russia. WASHINGTON – In his second term as US president, Donald Trump has used tariffs as a blanket solution to pursue a wide range of goals: increasing domestic manufacturing and foreign market access, boosting federal revenue, and even punishing the government of Brazil for prosecuting his political ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro. Now he's deployed a tool he calls a 'secondary tariff' in an effort to get countries to distance themselves from US adversaries. On Aug 6, Mr Trump announced that such a tariff on imports from India would take effect in 21 days. On top of an existing 25 per cent levy on goods from India, he added an additional 25 per cent tariff to penalise India for buying oil from Russia. What is Trump's concept of 'secondary tariffs'? The idea behind 'secondary tariffs' is to use a weapon against one country to penalise or try to influence a different country. The concept is similar to the one behind so-called secondary sanctions. How are 'secondary tariffs' and secondary sanctions different? The US uses secondary sanctions to multiply the effect of its primary sanctions on countries or entities. Secondary sanctions target commercial activity involving a party under primary sanctions but occurring outside US legal jurisdiction. They are meant to force companies, banks and individuals to make a tough choice: continue doing business with the sanctioned entity or with the US, but not both. Unlike primary sanctions, which can be enforced by fines and the seizure of US-held assets, secondary sanctions rely on the centrality of the US financial system to the world economy and the widespread use of the dollar as the global reserve currency to work. A company or individual who violates a secondary sanction could be hit by US export controls or be placed on the Treasury Department's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List, which would prevent Americans from doing business with it. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds World Trump eyes 100% chips tariff, but 0% for US investors like Apple World White House says Trump open to meeting Russia's Putin and Ukraine's Zelensky Singapore MRT track issue causes 5-hour delay; Jeffrey Siow says 'we can and will do better' Singapore ST Explains: What is a track point fault and why does it cause lengthy train disruptions? Singapore ST and Uniqlo launch design contest for Singapore stories T-shirt collection Asia Malaysia plans barrierless toll system modelled after Singapore's ERP Singapore S'pore and Indonesia have discussed jointly developing military training facilities: Chan Chun Sing The 'secondary tariff' Mr Trump announced on imports from India isn't aimed at magnifying the impact of a primary tariff, as the name might suggest. US tariffs on energy from Russia are irrelevant given that such imports were banned in 2022 after the country's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Instead, the extra 25 per cent tariff on imports from India appears to be aimed at compelling its government to adopt a similar ban, with the larger goal of pushing Russia to stop its war. In March, Mr Trump created a mechanism for imposing tariffs on imports from countries that buy oil from Venezuela, whose regime, he said, poses a threat to US national security. How can the US know who other countries buy oil from? Ships on the water have identifying transponders that allow third parties to track their location in real time via satellite. That enables analysts in and out of government to, for example, follow oil tankers loading in Russia and unloading in India. Bloomberg
