
Ben Stokes' cheap tactics aimed at Jadeja isn't new; Sunil Gavaskar, Sachin Tendulkar faced a similar situation against…
Batters are judged and measured by centuries and averages, bowlers by five-wicket hauls and strike-rates. That's the nature of the beast.
Why, only the other day at Old Trafford, an entire country and all those populating the English dressing-room were going gaga after Joe Root became Test cricket's second-highest run-maker behind Sachin Tendulkar as he went past Rahul Dravid, Jacques Kallis and Ricky Ponting, all in the matter of minutes. Along the way, they also celebrated the former skipper's 38th century, which put him level with Kumar Sangakkara and behind only Tendulkar (51), Kallis (45) and Ponting (41) for the most Test hundreds. That's how cricket works.
Also Read: I want Shubman Gill to ask Ben Stokes, 'Why did you…?' Sunil Gavaskar annihilates England for saying 'India were scared'
Ben Stokes and the rest of his bunch didn't take kindly to India opting to bat on in the final hour of the final day's play in the fourth Test on Sunday so that Washington Sundar and Ravindra Jadeja could complete their respective tons. Much of it had to do with their own inability to take more than two wickets in 75 ineffectual overs on a day-five strip, and perhaps their misplaced belief that unilaterally, they could decide when the game could be called off. Their churlishness hasn't endeared them to even their die-hard fans, but their behaviour isn't without precedent.
When Pakistan tried to deny Sunil Gavaskar a century
A major international incident was avoided in Bengaluru in September 1983, all stemming from Pakistan's desire to deny Sunil Gavaskar a 28th Test century. It was the opening game of a turgid three-Test series in which all matches ended in drab draws. The weather had a big part to play in the match meandering into an insipid affair. By the time of the final day, both sides hadn't even completed their first innings, though by then, Javed Miandad had been dismissed for 99, caught in the covers by substitute K Srikkanth off Madan Lal.
Gavaskar and Anshuman Gaekwad comfortably erased the 13-run first-innings deficit and built a handy lead of little consequence when, with 14 of the then 20 mandatory overs bowled in the final over, Pakistan captain Zaheer Abbas took his team off the field without informing umpires Madhav Gothoskar and Swaroop Kishen in conduct uncharacteristic of him. Technically, Pakistan had forfeited the Test, but clearly, the law couldn't be strictly enforced in its letter because of the massive ramifications. Gavaskar was on 87; clearly, he wanted to go on to three-figures, well within his rights. Zaheer and Pakistan's reluctance to let him get there was obvious, and it needed a veiled threat from the officials for manager Intikhab Alam and Zaheer to realise that unless they returned to the field – by this time, nearly a half-hour had elapsed since they had left the ground and incensed the home crowd – India would be declared winners.
As soon as Gavaskar hit the first ball of the final over, from Mudassar Nazar, for four, he and players left the ground for a second time to formalise the draw. That night, the teams flew together to Delhi for a One-Day International. 'Some of his players were critical of his (Zaheer's) action, which they felt was unnecessary and unsporting," Gavaskar has written.
Sachin Tendulkar wasn't spared either
The events in Ahmedabad in November 2009 bear greater resemblance to Old Trafford 2025. Sri Lanka replied to India's 426 with 760 for seven declared on the back of a 351-run partnership between Jayawardenes Mahela (275) and Prasanna (154 n.o.). India had to bat out 135 overs to secure a draw; 79 overs were left on the final morning when Tendulkar walked out at No. 5 to join current head coach Gautam Gambhir.
Gambhir was the fourth batter dismissed for 114 but Tendulkar and VVS Laxman steered India to safety. With the former approaching his 44th century, Sangakkara wanted to take his troops off the field, ala Stokes, until he was reminded by umpires Daryl Harper and Tony Hill that it wasn't his call alone to make, that Tendulkar and Laxman too would have to play ball. Having battled for more than four and a half hours to ensure an honourable draw, there was no way Tendulkar was going to give up a Test ton. Long Sri Lankan faces were indicative of their displeasure at the turn of events that perhaps had more to do with the flatness of the surface, which prevented their bowlers from making an impression. Just three years earlier, Sangakkara and Mahela had put on 624 for the third wicket against South Africa in Colombo. Surely, they weren't stacking up those many runs only because the team required that of them.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Siraj pushes his limit to lead India's fightback
Mumbai: Even in a lengthy series, you can single out moments of inspiration that can prove defining. Mohammed Siraj's unrelenting spell of eight overs before tea on Day 2 at The Oval could prove to be one. The onus is on India as a collective to back up his brilliance. Mohammed Siraj celebrates after taking the wicket of England's Jacob Bethell. (PTI) It was immediately after India had lost the Lord's Test narrowly that Siraj doffed his hat to Ben Stokes for bowling tireless marathon spells. 'If you can learn from someone, there's no shame,' he said. No shame, indeed. Just like his English pace counterpart, the Hyderabad fast bowler strained every sinew and kept running in to keep India in the Test after their batters had folded up for 224 in the first innings. His spell could well prove the spark for an Indian win to level the series 2-all. Fast bowlers have to bowl long spells from time to time. But think of the strain the present-day pacer has to endure in a five-Test series, stuffed in between a great deal of white-ball cricket. After Chris Woakes' freak injury ruled him from further participation at The Oval, Siraj is the only one among the pace pack from either side to play in all the Tests and still in action – 154 overs and counting. When Siraj came on to bowl mid-day, England openers had already played a powerful hand before lunch in 16 overs of mayhem, scoring at over run-a-ball. India's total had begun to look insufficient. While the sun showed up now and then, the pitch still had plenty of juice. India's pacers had to hit their lengths and stay patient. Siraj was among the bowlers who had gone for plenty with the new ball. He needed an early spark and the bowler created it on his own by getting one to nip back in sharply to Ollie Pope (22), trapping him lbw. Siraj stayed patient, not just with his lengths but lines too. He needed to be against Joe Root. There are days when Siraj likes to have a chirp with the batter. Not on Friday. He left it to Prasidh Krishna. All Siraj wanted was to channel his energies on breaking through Root's defence. He had done it before in the series targeting the stumps and on the final ball of the fifth over of his spell, summoned another one of his scrambled seam deliveries that rammed into Root's pads. The lbw decision was reviewed by Root, but DRS confirmed it. England were now four wickets down, but India still had plenty to do. They didn't have a fourth seamer to exploit the green pitch and Shubman Gill had no choice but to stick with Siraj. As if asking Siraj to invoke the spirit of Ishant Sharma's nine-over spell in the Perth Test of 2008, Gill kept throwing the ball to him for one more over. Siraj bowled his 6th, the 7th and then the 8th. While he worked hard, Siraj was able to pin the talented newcomer Jacob Bethell down with a toe crusher following up on a series of wobble seam balls. This time England wouldn't review. It was obvious that the ball would have dismantled Bethell's stumps. Each of Siraj's three wickets were arrowing in on the stumps and went into the scoresheet as leg before dismissals. After starting the day with a spell of 4-0-31-0, Siraj's second spell read 8-1-35-3. He may have bowled more productive spells before, but few where he was the last fast bowler standing in a punishing series played on batter-friendly decks, barring this one. The Oval Test has offered just rewards to the pacers, to try and overcome the pain barrier, bend their backs and make it count. Siraj did with his four-wicket haul, adding Harry Brook in the end. Siraj has taken on the mantle of leading the pace attack in Jasprit Bumrah's absence. Even in Australia where Bumrah was phenomenal, it was Siraj who bowled the most number of overs. Here, with an innings to come, he is already the series' highest wicket taker. So good has Siraj been with his skills and pluck that he would have won an admirer even from the opposing side in Stokes, the injured England skipper watching from the dressing room.


India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
Mohammed Siraj is wearing white headband on Day 2 of 5th Test vs England due to...
Mohammed Siraj wearing white band at Oval on day 2. (PIC - X) New Delhi: Mohammed Siraj was spotted wearing a headband during Day 2 of the fifth Test against England at The Oval, in honour of the late Graham Thorpe. Thorpe was born on this day in 1969 and died on August 4 last year. He was a retired England great who played 100 Tests, making 6,744 runs at 44.66, and played 82 ODIs for 2,380 runs. How did the day start? Interestingly, the day began with all the players of the England team sporting a headband with Thorpe. Even the English commentators – Nasser Hussain and Michael Atherton were sporting the same. The players of the England team also took a photo sporting the headband. But it was in the last session of the day that Mohammed Siraj sported the headband and completed the last wicket of England, getting Harry Brook out for 53 runs. How did bowlers perform without Jasprit Bumrah? Without Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Siraj and Prasidh Krishna tore through and took four wickets apiece. The day began on a sour note for the team led by Shubman Gill as wickets fell at regular intervals, being bowled out for 224 runs. England openers Zak Crawley smashed a half-century, while Ben Duckett made 43 runs in retaliation. Having given a perfect start, the hosts were to get India into trouble, but that did not happen. What happened in the match? England also lost their wickets early, but Brook was the one who remained steady. He attempted to create a partnership with the middle, but there was hardly any support in the middle. However, he continued and because of his half-century, England had a lead of 23 runs. For India, Siraj and Prasidh indicated their intentions. They did not get off to the best of starts, but once they found their rhythm, the England batsmen found it hard to get going. In the meantime, with the four-wicket bag, Siraj has 18 wickets to his credit – the highest by any bowler in the series so far.


Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
AIFF looks inwards to solve crisis, appoints Khalid Jamil as India national football team coach
India have looked to the Netherlands, England, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Uzbekistan and, very briefly and rather disastrously, Spain to lead their national men's football team in the last three decades. Only twice have the powers that be looked within the nation for someone to fill that role in this period – Sukhwinder Singh (2005) and Savio Medeira (2011/12); and Armando Colaco in 2011 on an interim basis. Khalid Jamil has now become the third man, and the fourth if one counts Colaco, to take over that role with the All India Football Federation (AIFF) confirming his appointment on Friday. Colaco was among those who contributed to the decision-making process that ended with Jamil's name being finalised. 'Our Indian coaches know the players, the culture, the strong and weak points of the players. So let's try, give him a chance and wish him all the very best,' Colaco told the Indian Express. Long an advocate for Indian coaches to be given the big roles in the country, Colaco hoped Jamil's appointment would open the doors for others. However, to think that being Indian is the only qualification that was needed for Jamil to take the top job would be a mistake. 'He has gone to different clubs and has proved himself. That is one criterion which forced us to give him a chance,' said Colaco. Born in Kuwait City, Kuwait, Jamil was just entering his teens when his family had to shift to Mumbai during the Gulf War of 1990/91. A midfielder, he went on to spend many a year playing for Mahindra United and Mumbai FC while also making about 40 appearances for the Indian national team. While his utterly astonishing I-League title win with Aizawl FC may be what made him the subject of national headlines, it is in Mumbai that Jamil's coaching roots lie. 'He had a lot of leadership qualities in him, that is what we identified, myself and David Booth, the English coach there,' Henry Menezes, the former goalkeeper who was Mumbai FC's general manager at the time, told the Indian Express. Menezes said Booth wanted Jamil to start coaching the club's under-19 side. Jamil is known for the sheer passion he exudes on the touchline, and the fact that he seems to hardly have anything to say off it. One-word answers are a common feature of his post-match interviews in the Indian Super League (ISL) as NorthEast United and later Jamshedpur FC boss, and Menezes says that this was true of him back then as well. 'When he gets on the ground, he is a different animal. When he is outside the ground, he is the shiest person on earth. He has got two different characters like that, and that is something we picked. When he gets to the ground, he is very aggressive and authoritative,' says Menezes. Jamil went on to take the reins of the senior team at Mumbai FC. It was a team often built on a shoestring budget and filled with unheralded players, but Jamil squeezed results out of them year after year. Survival was the only expectation they had, but Jamil even led them close to top-five finishes on occasion. Incredibly, though, the powers that be at the club, long after the departure of the likes of Menezes, decided that Jamil deserved the sack for these great escapes instead of credit. 'It felt like I was removed from my home,' Jamil had said in 2017. 'It was painful.' The next step in Jamil's career took him to Aizawl, a city that had absolutely nothing in common with Mumbai. Evidently, though, shifting from the seaside to a place nearly 4000 feet above sea level made little difference to him from a footballing perspective. If anything, his stock rose towards the end of that season far more than his distance from the Arabian Sea. 'He will eat, drink and sleep football,' is what Menezes said about Jamil. Jamil had helped Mumbai avoid relegation season after season. Aizawl also had only similar expectations, and he helped them do that in his first season in charge – by winning the I-League altogether. A dogged defence is what defined his football with Mumbai. With Aizawl, he balanced that up with a higher concentration on attack. Aizawl beat Kolkata giants Mohun Bagan and East Bengal to the title in 2017, while Mumbai were relegated. A few months later, Jamil's former club ceased to exist. Then came two rather unimpressive stints with Bagan and East Bengal, followed by a stint as the assistant coach of the ISL club NorthEast United in 2019. Jamil went on to become the first Indian to be a permanent head coach of an ISL club in 2021 when NorthEast promoted him to that role. Jamil is currently the head coach of Jamshedpur FC, and it has yet to be revealed whether he will leave that role to take over as India's head coach, with the AIFF still to complete the hiring process formally. Neither Jamshedpur nor NorthEast are among the big boys of the ISL in terms of budgets, but Jamil has led both teams to semifinal appearances. 'He has a knack for getting the best out of young players, and that is exactly what India needs today,' Jamshedpur FC CEO Mukul Choudhary told this paper. Getting the best out of players often means pulling them out of their comfort zones, which is exactly where a number of those playing for the Indian team in the recent forgettable months seem to be stuck in. What is guaranteed is that under Jamil, the players would know that not working hard is simply not an option. 'He is the kind of person who has that knack of getting things done (his way),' said Choudhary. What remains to be seen now, apart from the details of his contract, is whether Jamil would be afforded the kind of patience that some of his foreign predecessors enjoyed from the AIFF. He has a tough run of matches to start off with – India face the likes of Iran, Tajikistan and Afghanistan in the CAFA Nations Cup later this month. That will be followed by the all-important double-header against Singapore in the AFC Asian Cup qualifiers in October. 'If he has earned this place, it is because of his own work. Nobody else has pushed him up,' said Menezes. 'Now, the federation has to help him. Whenever there is an Indian coach at the top, I understand that there is a little less freedom (for them to work with). That should be kept aside.' Rohit Mundayur is a Copy Editor with the Sports Team at The Indian Express. He works with the online team and is based out of Delhi. ... Read More