Kerala HC dismisses petition filed by teacher charged under POCSO Act
The petitioner who was an Arabic teacher at a school in Malappuram and was placed under suspension following the registration of the FIR over a year ago, approached the court, seeking that a departmental inquiry report and the consequential proceedings following the incident be set aside. Among other reasons, he said that he had been acquitted in the criminal trial, after the survivor and her mother 'turned hostile'.
'Benefit of doubt'
Referring to the ancient education system in India where teachers were known as 'rishis', and the 'rishi ashram' was a veritable 'gurukul' where students were loved and cared for as members of the guru's family, the Bench of Justice D.K. Singh said the petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case on the benefit of doubt. Even if a person is acquitted in a criminal trial, the same would not necessarily lead to discharge in a domestic inquiry. Being her teacher, the petitioner had a fiduciary relationship with the survivor. The crime is grossly unbecoming of a schooteacher.
The petitioner teacher was accused of sexually assaulting the student since January 2023 while she was reading standing near the petitioner in the classroom. The Wandoor police filed an FIR in 2024, under provisions of the POCSO Act and the IPC after being alerted by the headmaster. The child had told her mother about the assault and she informed the headmaster.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Attempted abduction of minorgirl: Women protest in Kapkot
Bageshwar: Enraged by an alleged incident of attempted kidnapping, sexual harassment and molestation of a minor girl, several women gheraoed a thana in Kapkot on Saturday, raising slogans against police and calling for swift arrest of both the accused. Locals said the incident took place on Friday night when the girl stepped out of her home. A 55-year-old man, a distant relative, assisted by an unidentified man, allegedly tried to forcibly take her away. They fled after she raised the alarm. She said the man had earlier subjected her to "inappropriate behaviour and intimidation". DSP Manish Sharma said, "The accused has been taken into custody and is being interrogated. Efforts are on to identify the unknown youth. The girl has undergone a medical examination. The culprits will not be spared." Station officer (SO) Khushwant Singh added, "A case has been registered against the accused under BNS sections 74 (assault or use of criminal force against a woman with the intent to outrage her modesty), 75 (sexual harassment), 137 (2) (kidnapping), among others. Sections under the Pocso Act were added. The girl was sent for medical tests and the matter has been also referred to the child protection unit." The women protesters issued an ultimatum, threatening widespread demonstrations if the unidentified accused was not arrested by Sunday evening.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Kerala high court sets aside order barring juvenile from driving until age 25
1 2 3 Kochi: The Kerala high court has set aside the portion of an order issued by the judicial first-class magistrate court, Kozhikode, which directed that a juvenile who had illegally operated a motor vehicle shall not be eligible for a driving licence until he attains the age of 25. Justice P V Kunhikrishnan issued the order on a petition filed by a 22-year-old man from Kozhikode, challenging the direction issued by the magistrate court. The prosecution's case was that, in 2020, the magistrate court had convicted the petitioner's father and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs 26,200 under sections 269 and 336 of the IPC, and section 5 of the Kerala Epidemic Diseases Ordinance (KEDO), 2021, along with imprisonment till the rising of the court, for an offence related to the petitioner, then a juvenile, illegally operating a motor vehicle during the pandemic. The magistrate court also ordered that the juvenile shall not be granted a driving licence until he reached 25 years of age, a direction that was challenged before the HC. While considering the matter, the bench noted that the petitioner was not a party to the case adjudicated by the magistrate court, as the proceedings against him, being a juvenile at the time, had been forwarded to the juvenile court as per the final report. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription? Techno Mag Learn More Undo The high court observed that the magistrate court had erred in issuing such a direction, as it was not competent to impose a punishment on a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act. Accordingly, the court set aside the portion of the magistrate's order that barred the petitioner from obtaining a driving licence until the age of 25. Kochi: The Kerala high court has set aside the portion of an order issued by the judicial first-class magistrate court, Kozhikode, which directed that a juvenile who had illegally operated a motor vehicle shall not be eligible for a driving licence until he attains the age of 25. Justice P V Kunhikrishnan issued the order on a petition filed by a 22-year-old man from Kozhikode, challenging the direction issued by the magistrate court. The prosecution's case was that, in 2020, the magistrate court had convicted the petitioner's father and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs 26,200 under sections 269 and 336 of the IPC, and section 5 of the Kerala Epidemic Diseases Ordinance (KEDO), 2021, along with imprisonment till the rising of the court, for an offence related to the petitioner, then a juvenile, illegally operating a motor vehicle during the pandemic. The magistrate court also ordered that the juvenile shall not be granted a driving licence until he reached 25 years of age, a direction that was challenged before the HC. While considering the matter, the bench noted that the petitioner was not a party to the case adjudicated by the magistrate court, as the proceedings against him, being a juvenile at the time, had been forwarded to the juvenile court as per the final report. The high court observed that the magistrate court had erred in issuing such a direction, as it was not competent to impose a punishment on a juvenile under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act. Accordingly, the court set aside the portion of the magistrate's order that barred the petitioner from obtaining a driving licence until the age of 25.
India Today
7 hours ago
- India Today
Bail is rule, but not in child abuse cases: Man denied bail for sodomising minor
The Bombay High Court, while holding that 'bail is indeed the rule and jail is the exception,' stated that this general principle must be balanced against the special circumstances of each case, particularly when dealing with offences against children. The court therefore refused to grant bail to a 25-year-old student accused of sodomising a minor at Aksa beach, Mumbai last bench of Justice Amit Borkar observed that while every accused person has a fundamental right to liberty, this right is not absolute and must be balanced against the larger interests of justice, public order, and the protection of victims, especially when the victims are minors.'The POCSO Act represents the legislative intent to provide stringent protection to children from sexual offences. Courts, as guardians of justice, have a solemn duty to ensure that this legislative objective is not defeated by a liberal approach to bail in such serious cases," he stated. The Court further observed that 'the trauma suffered by child victims in sexual assault cases is immense and long-lasting.""The criminal justice system must be sensitive to their plight and ensure that they are not subjected to further victimization through intimidation or influence by the accused persons," he added.A 17-year-old boy from suburban Mumbai regularly went fishing with his friend and was doing so on July 31, 2024. After catching fish, both friends were sitting on the beach when, around 6:30 pm, a man approached them and asked them to come near the bushes, claiming something had happened there. The boys were hesitant, but when the man persisted, the victim went to take a they reached the bushes, the accused held him, forcibly removed his clothes, and committed unnatural carnal intercourse with him against his will and without his the victim began to cry then the accused revealed his identity as Mayur Wankhede and callously told the victim that he was free to inform anyone about what had transpired. The victim and his friend then went to register an FIR and the accused was arrested. After investigation, a charge sheet was also going through the evidence, the bench observed, 'there exists sufficient prima facie evidence to suggest the involvement of the applicant in the alleged offence. The medical examination report constitutes crucial evidence in the present case. The report clearly indicates signs of recent forceful penetration and states that sexual violence cannot be ruled out.'advertisementThe bench further ruled, 'This Court is mindful of the fact that the present case involves allegations under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Pocso Act), which is a special legislation enacted to provide protection to children from sexual offences. The Pocso Act has been enacted with the noble objective of safeguarding the interests of children and ensuring their protection from sexual exploitation and abuse.''The nature of the alleged offence is such that it not only causes physical harm to the victim but also inflicts severe psychological trauma that may have long-lasting effects on the minor victim. Courts have consistently held that while considering bail in cases involving sexual offences against minors, the traumatic effect on the victim and the possibility of the accused influencing or intimidating the victim or witnesses must be given due consideration," the bench court noted that the victim is a minor and there exists a reasonable apprehension that if released on bail, the applicant may attempt to influence the victim or other witnesses."The victim, being a minor, is particularly vulnerable to intimidation or pressure, which could seriously compromise the fair trial of the case. The investigation has been completed and the charge-sheet has been filed, but the trial is yet to commence. During this crucial period, it is essential to ensure that the victim and witnesses are protected from any potential influence or harassment by the accused," the bench observed.- Ends advertisement
