logo
Residents outraged after unbelievable objects are found dumped on local beach: 'Almost at a loss for words'

Residents outraged after unbelievable objects are found dumped on local beach: 'Almost at a loss for words'

Yahoo11-06-2025
British website Echo reported that a bathtub and toilet were dumped on Thurstaston Beach near Liverpool, England.
A councilor said she is "almost lost for words."
The objects were dumped near the slipway for a sailing club that is part of a natural area designated for public recreation in Britain.
The article noted that the beach sits on the edge of an estuary that is an important site for birds and other wildlife. Photos of additional debris in the area have surfaced. Locals are understandably upset.
Discarding items in natural areas is not only disrespectful, but it can have exponential ramifications. Objects dumped in preserves and other protected areas — or even areas simply not designated for dumping — can disrupt the local ecosystem. Many discarded items can leach chemicals into the surrounding environment and can immediately affect local wildlife. When they get into the local water supply, they can cause health concerns for humans as well.
Objects left in natural areas can also be dangerous to animals. They may ingest something harmful or become entangled.
It may be difficult to understand why someone would dump objects in an area that is designated a safe space for wildlife or recreation for locals and visitors.
It is not difficult to understand that we can take simple steps to be responsible for our waste and perhaps find an alternate use. Reusing or repurposing items we no longer need or want can benefit others and the environment. Donating items to a local charity or secondhand store is another way to give unwanted items new life.
It is also important to understand your recycling options. While not everything can be recycled, knowing what you can recycle and how you can recycle is an important part of protecting the environment from planet-warming pollution caused, in part, by waste.
If reusing, repurposing, or recycling is not appropriate, the item should be taken to an appropriate landfill — not dumped just anywhere.
Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty?
Definitely
Only in some areas
No way
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Councilor Liz Grey, chair of the Environment, Climate Emergency and Transport Committee, expressed sadness and disappointment about the violation and wondered about what kinds of harmful items may have been taken out by the tide before they could be removed.
Locals agreed, and one was reported in the article as asking: "What kind of lowlife maggot does this?"
Grey said: "I am almost lost for words at the degree of wanton, environmental vandalism on display here."
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prince William and Kate Middleton's big move forces two families out of their homes
Prince William and Kate Middleton's big move forces two families out of their homes

Fox News

time2 days ago

  • Fox News

Prince William and Kate Middleton's big move forces two families out of their homes

Prince William and Kate Middleton's upcoming move has forced two families living nearby to vacate their homes. The Prince and Princess of Wales, along with their three children, are gearing up to relocate to Forest Lodge, nestled in Windsor Great Park. Two families living near the eight-bedroom property were asked to vacate ahead of the royal family's move, Fox News Digital has learned. Fox News Digital reached out to Kensington Palace for comment. "Close neighbors have been surprised to be ordered to leave their properties so that no prying eyes can see the Prince and Princess with their children," royal expert Ian Pelham Turner claimed to Fox News Digital. It's understood that there have been no eviction notices, and the tenants have since moved to similar or better housing within the 4,800-acre Great Park. Everyone remains in Crown Estate properties. A "well-connected source" told the U.K.'s Daily Mail that the families "were not expecting it." "They were told to move out," the insider claimed to the outlet. "I guess they were given somewhere else, but they were told they had to move. They were not expecting it." "Those houses are very close to the Lodge, so they're not going to want any Tom, Dick, or Harry living in those houses if there are going to be royals there." Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital that the families were asked to relocate due to "security reasons." He stressed that the residents are still allowed to stay on "Crown Estate Land." "They were reportedly in close proximity to the Lodge," Fitzwilliams explained. "The Prince and Princess of Wales need shelter from the enormous pressures of royal life with a media circus watching everything they do." The tenants lived in cottages that were previously converted from stables on the property and rented out by the Crown Estate. The Daily Mail reported that new shrubs have recently been planted and a metal fence with black mesh privacy screens has also been placed around the front of the home in anticipation of the royal family's arrival. A Kensington Palace spokesperson previously confirmed to People magazine that the Wales family will move in later this year. It is understood that William and Kate are paying for the renovations themselves. William, who is heir to the British throne, receives around $30 million a year from the Duchy of Cornwall Estate. "Some royal skeptics are saying that it is not grand enough for a future king," said Turner. "William and Kate may already be setting the precedent for the future monarch living a much humbler existence." WATCH: KATE MIDDLETON, PRINCE WILLIAM 'PLANNING THEIR LEGACY' AMID 'ENDGAME' The royal family previously moved to Adelaide Cottage in 2022. At the time, the couple's three children – Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis – started attending the nearby co-ed prep school Lambrook. Forest Lodge is not far from their current four-bedroom home. Royal insiders told the Daily Mail that William and Kate are hoping for a "fresh start" at the new property. In January of this year, Kate, 43, announced that her cancer was in remission. William's father, King Charles III, was diagnosed with an undisclosed form of cancer in February 2024. "For Kate, there is a tennis court for the game she loves," said Turner. "She can also have relaxing walks in nearby woodlands, which she has stated helps her on her journey after cancer treatment." It is believed that the Wales family will likely remain in their new home even after William ascends to the throne.

Feargal Sharkey accuses environment watchdog of illegally draining River Lea
Feargal Sharkey accuses environment watchdog of illegally draining River Lea

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Feargal Sharkey accuses environment watchdog of illegally draining River Lea

Singer and environmentalist Feargal Sharkey has accused the Environment Agency of illegally draining a section of the River Lea, which hosts the oldest fishing club in England and a rare population of brown trout. The former Undertones frontman, who chairs the Amwell Magna Fishery (AMF), has written to the regulator to threaten legal action if it does not stop abstracting water from a section of the river in Hertfordshire. The AMF has used this stretch of the River Lea, known as the River Lee between Ware and Stanstead Abotts, for fishing since 1841. It claims the Environment Agency began reducing the flow of the Lee on June 3, apparently without statutory authority. Their letter says the action is devastating aquatic life in the area, including the River Lea's only population of breeding brown trout which need a certain level of oxygen to survive. The club adds that it will commence a judicial review if the Environment Agency does not comply with its demand to cease abstraction. Lawyers representing AMF say it is not clear why water is being abstracted from the Lee, which falls within or is near to areas protected for conservation and scientific interest. But it comes as England battles with water shortages and droughts this summer, which has prompted water companies to ask regulators for permission to abstract water from rivers to help shore up supply. Sharkey called the Environment Agency's abstraction of the Lee as 'environmental vandalism unmatched in recent history'. 'What is most extraordinary in all of this is that very government agency established to protect, conserve and ensure our river's futures is now engaged in decimating the oldest populations of breeding brown trout in the River Lee. 'At a time when the regulation of our waterways is under such intense scrutiny you would assume that the Environment Agency would be desperate to do the right thing. Well, that time has come. 'It is now time to make sure that our rivers can and do have a bright, prosperous future.' AMF, based in Stanstead Abbotts, says that about 156 million litres of water per day were originally flowing through the Lee, but this has now been cut to 66 million. As a holder of fishing rights in the area, the club also argues that it is entitled to the natural flow of water into and through the fishery. The letter also notes the fishery has carried out 'significant conservation work' alongside the Environment Agency to restore brown trout to the area following the impact of weirs, sluices and flood defences. Ricardo Gama, a partner at law firm Leigh Day representing AMF, said: 'Our client is perplexed by the Environment Agency's inexplicable decision to alter the flow of the River Lea. 'In our client's view, not only has this had a devastating impact on a stretch of the river, which is an internationally designated habitat, it has put at risk a brown trout conservation project that the agency itself was running with our client. 'We have now sent a judicial review pre-action letter requesting that the agency urgently restores flow to our client's stretch of the river.' The Environment Agency (EA) has been contacted for comment.

Dog Who Endured Trauma and Tragedy Faces Biggest Test Yet: 'Never Give Up'
Dog Who Endured Trauma and Tragedy Faces Biggest Test Yet: 'Never Give Up'

Newsweek

time4 days ago

  • Newsweek

Dog Who Endured Trauma and Tragedy Faces Biggest Test Yet: 'Never Give Up'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Dog lovers are rallying around a brave rescue Dachshund after her owner shared her heartbreaking story on social media. In a post shared on Reddit, u/frasnet introduced the online pet community to his senior rescue dog, Slinky, alongside three simple words: "never give up." It's an apt statement to include, given everything Slinky has been through. Frasnet, a British national living abroad who requested his real name be omitted from this story, told Newsweek he adopted Slinky in 2022. Their vet estimates Slinky to be around 7 years old when they brought her home. From the moment he laid eyes on her, it was clear Slinky had endured a difficult life. Even so, Frasnet was shocked and saddened at just how difficult it had been. "She was surrendered from illegal breeders with severe gum disease and gave birth to a stillborn puppy," he said. "She had all but 5 teeth removed and suffered nerve damage that affected her tongue and possibly her vocal cords as she doesn't bark normally." Slinky had to undergo reconstructive surgery to plug a hole in her gums that had left her nasal cavity exposed and uncomfortable. Frasnet and his wife already had two dogs, Belle and Zeina, but there was something about Slinky, when they first came across her online adoption profile, that made them determined to adopt. "We both just knew we could help her," he said. "Nobody wanted her. We saw her, listened to her backstory and immediately made arrangements to adopt her." Slinky the rescue dachshund lying on the grass. Slinky the rescue dachshund lying on the grass. Reddit/u/Frasnet Slinky could so easily have fallen between the cracks and ended up being consigned to a future stuck waiting in the shelter for a family that never comes. A 2021 study published in the journal Animals saw researchers attempt to narrow the most commonly seen characteristics of a long-term, shelter dog—a dog living in a shelter for 12 months or more. The results concluded that long-term shelter dogs were more often older in age, male, of large size, and considered a "dangerous breed." Slinky may not have fit all of those criteria, but her age undoubtedly counted against her. Frasnet and his wife preferred to focus their mental energies on making this dog, who had suffered so much, smile again. "It took about 18 months of nurturing to bring her out of her shell; she looked defeated," Frasnet said. "My wife cuddled her constantly, we started to take her on walks and she really started to get a personality." It seemed like Slinky was getting the happy ending she so richly deserved. But everything changed. "In January 2025 she started stumbling and we took her immediately for a checkup," Frasnet said. "Nothing showed on her blood tests or X-ray." It seemed like Slinky was on the mend from whatever illness she had been struck down by, but then a month ago, they noticed she was rapidly losing weight. Further X-rays, blood tests and two biopsies followed before it was confirmed she had cancer. Frasnet didn't waste any time getting Slinky the treatment she needed. "We decided she was losing weight so quickly we didn't have time to investigate and booked her in for surgery," he said. Slinky has had her tumor removed. Slinky has had her tumor removed. Reddit/u/Frasnet Though the operation was essential, Frasnet feared Slinky might not make it. "I made casts of her paws because she was so thin I didn't think she could handle the surgery," he said. But Slinky had already overcome so much and appeared determined to do that again. "She would have died in days without it, but [it] looks like she is pulling through," Frasnet said of the surgery. "She really is a fighter and is not ready to give up." Those words, "never give up," appeared as part of the Reddit post about Slinky's situation. The post has gotten a huge response with over 2,500 upvotes and a slew of comments offering support and encouragement during her cancer journey. "I'm cheering for you, Slinky. You go girl, stay strong," one user wrote. "Sending much love and wishes for healing," a second Redditor said. "May the feisty Doxie spirit carry you through recovery," a third person commented. Though Slinky is recovering well from the surgery, Frasnet is taking things one day at a time. "The mass has been sent for analysis to see what future treatment plan she needs. A lot is unknown right now with the key factor on her immediate healing, which is happening," he said. Right now, the outpouring of support has been much appreciated. Frasnet hopes Slinky's story serves as an important reminder about certain kinds of rescue dogs. "Old, disabled, ill-health animals need love too, especially when humans did this to her, breeding the next insta-pup, the mums just discarded," he said. "It really breaks our hearts how humans can be so horrible to animals that show such love."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store