Kate Forbes not banned from Summerhall building, venue says
The Deputy First Minister is a devout Christian and a member of the socially conservative Free Church of Scotland, and she was criticised during her SNP leadership battle for her stance on gay marriage, abortion and trans rights.
In an email to artists on the day of the event, Summerhall said Herald Unspun was programmed before the line-up of interviewees was confirmed.
It described the booking as an 'oversight' and said it 'should have considered the likelihood of her being booked to attend, and the understandable upset it would cause'.
The venue said it will be writing 'robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that prevent this from happening again'.
It said Herald Unspun was not curated by Summerhall and at this stage would not comment on future curated events and the possibility of Ms Forbes appearing.
However in a statement on Friday it said Ms Forbes is not banned from the building.
It said: 'The Fringe event passed without incident.
'Forbes is not banned from the Summerhall building which encompasses a cafe, pub, arts venues, galleries and independent traders' offices and studios.'
It said speakers including First Minister John Swinney, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar and Ms Forbes 'all entered and exited the building the same way for the events over each day'.
It added: 'The events, the Herald Unspun events, were a paid hire and programmed by The Herald newspaper.'
Ms Forbes has said she 'fervently' believes in freedom of speech.
She said: 'Any effort to cancel people, especially politicians, undermines democracy.
'Many people attended the Herald event and it is important that we could freely discuss and debate matters in a respectful manner.
'I respect and acknowledge the fact that, in a liberal democracy, there are people who will agree with me and others who will disagree with me.
'That is all the more reason to create events where the audience and journalists can question politicians openly, as the Herald did.'
In an email sent to artists on August 7 and addressed to 'Dear companies', Summerhall said: 'At this point, our main concern is that cancelling the event could pose significant additional risk to the safety and wellbeing of LGBTQ+ artists, staff and audiences by attracting those who share Kate Forbes's views outside of these walls to Summerhall, and as such the interview will take place as scheduled, with all proceeds from the event donated to a local LGBTQ+ charity, the amount and the recipient will be published as soon as possible.
'While the event is happening, staff will be on hand to help anyone who may wish to make use of a designated relaxed space.
'We do not believe LGBTQ+ rights, nor their existence, is up for debate. We recognise that the LGBTQ+ community make up a significant proportion of our artists, audiences and staff, and we have work to do to repair the damage from this oversight.
'At this stage, we can guarantee that we will be writing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that prevent this from happening again.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Ministers have a duty to protect freedom of speech and end this insanity
The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht is a collection of essays edited by Susan Dalgety and Lucy Hunter Blackburn. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As is often the case during the Edinburgh Fringe, the material was weak and the delivery unconvincing. While authoritarian bullies rampaged across Scotland's cultural landscape last week, the response from senior politicians was predictably - depressingly - poor. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In saner times, an apology from a publicly-funded venue for allowing the Deputy First Minister to enter the premises would have provoked justifiable outrage from the very top of Government. Likewise, the decision to ban a book from an exhibition at the National Library of Scotland would, surely, have seen the personal intervention of the First Minister. Instead, last week we witnessed yet more of the lack of leadership which has allowed trans activists to wreak havoc across the public sector. First, and I cringe for those involved as I type these words, we learned that management at the Summerhall venue in Edinburgh set up a 'safe space' for staff and performers while Deputy FM Kate Forbes was in the building. The presence of Forbes, a devout Christian who previously revealed that, had she been an elected member at the time the law was changed, she would have voted against gay marriage, was dangerous. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes (Picture: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire) Management at the venue later apologised for letting her in. 'Summerhall Arts' primary concern,' said a spokesperson, 'is the safety and wellbeing of the artists and performers we work with, and going forward we will be developing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that would prevent this oversight in our bookings process happening again.' This is insanity. Kate Forbes is a democratically elected politician whose faith-born opposition to gay marriage, while controversial, is perfectly legal. Her presence in Summerhall created no danger for anyone, LGBTQ+ or otherwise, and those claiming otherwise should be embarrassed. The only danger, here, is in Summerhall management's attack on free speech. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Another enthusiast for undermining this fundamental freedom is National Librarian, Amina Shah. It emerged last week that the excellent book 'The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht' had been withdrawn by Shah from an exhibition highlighting the importance of libraries and the ways in which they can 'empower individuals and the communities they belong to'. The editors of the book, a collection of essays by women involved in the ultimately successful campaign to defeat the SNP's plan to allow anyone to self-identify into the legally-recognised sex of their choosing, discovered through a freedom of information request that it had received more public nominations for inclusion that any other. They learned that the book had, initially, been selected for inclusion in the 'Dear Library' exhibition but that, after protests from members of staff, Shah - with the backing of the board, chaired by Sir Drummond Bone - withdrew it. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Shah's actions are indefensible and stand fully in contradiction to the responsibilities that come with the position she is unfit to hold. I suspect the National Librarian's decision is one that will whisper in her ear for years to come. Faced with threats of disruption from staff if 'The Women Who Wouldn't Wheest' had been included in the exhibition, Shah should have turned to the National Library's disciplinary code. Rather than capitulating to authoritarian bullies, she should have reminded them that gross misconduct is a real thing with real consequences. As these twin scandals unfolded, finance secretary Shona Robison spoke of the need for 'tolerance'. In her reaction to the Summerhall scandal, Robison revealed at least some of the reason that we find ourselves where we do. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'I don't think,' said Robison, 'it sends out the right signal over freedom of speech.' Any weaker and the pulse would be undetectable. Something that sends out entirely the wrong signal over freedom of speech is members of the Government sitting back while others deny the free speech of others. When culture secretary Angus Robertson eventually spoke up, he served a weak cocktail of bromides. While he was a 'strong supporter' of free speech, there would always be 'tensions' between that right and views that some people might find 'unpopular or unjustifiable'. It would not, he added, 'be easy all of the time to please everybody'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On Robertson waffled: he was a strong supporter of freedom of speech and expression; there was an important distance between government and cultural organisations; there were issues of 'public concern' and 'public debate'. Over the two decades that I've known former journalist Robertson, I've always considered him - in common with most in our trade - a fundamentalist on freedom of speech. His unwillingness to take a stronger stance, here, does not chime with the values I've long understood him to hold. Robertson spoke about the important distance between government and cultural organisations and it is, of course, correct that ministers should have no say in the decision making of bodies such as Creative Scotland but that does not mean he should not intervene when things are going catastrophically wrong. Robertson is entitled to demand the presence in his ministerial office of Summerhall chief executive Sam Gough. The culture secretary is perfectly within his rights to point out to Gough that Summerhall - a venue recently propped up with more than £600,000 of public money - must operate within the law and that failure to do so will mean the tap's turned off. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The National Library of Scotland is funded by the Scottish Government and answerable to the Scottish Parliament. Robertson has the right - the duty - to act here, too. Amina Shah, cowed by activists, removed a book from an exhibition that includes, satire fans, George Orwell's '1984'. She's a censor and Angus Robertson should sack her and remove Sir Drummond Bone from the library's board. Freedom of speech is under attack as never before in living memory. The culture secretary's presence on the frontline of this battle would be very much appreciated.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
'I went to Nicola Sturgeon's book event - it felt like an Oasis gig'
But there were no placards, no chants, no confrontation at all — only a steady stream of fans filing in with the same easy enthusiasm you might see at an Oasis gig. Oasis fans at Murrayfield, Edinburgh last week. (Image: Gordon Terris/ The Herald) Inside, the room hummed with anticipation. Three young women in front of me chatted about how impressive Ms Sturgeon had been as First Minister, their tone almost reverent. For them, it seemed, this was not just politics — it was admiration of a celebrity-like figure. It was a scene reminiscent of the concert-style events of her peak years as the SNP poster woman, when she could fill event spaces across Scotland like the Hydro with supporters eager for selfies and soft applause lines. In the past week, her return to the centre stage of the public eye has been far from smooth. Last week, her book was published earlier than planned, drawing swift criticism over her handling of the probe into Alex Salmond — particularly her claim that he leaked details of the investigation against him. She also said she would be happy to debate her gender reforms with JK Rowling, which raised the eyebrows of some of the legislation's most prominent critics given her unwillingness to engage in debate during the policy's development. READ MORE: Sturgeon takes swipe at Boris Johnson in book launch event Nicola Sturgeon: 'Summerhall wrong to cancel Kate Forbes' Sturgeon: Some gender reform critics are driven by prejudice But if there was an appetite for scrutiny, it didn't get fed at this event. Questions centred round her experience as a woman in politics and her ability to persevere in spite of any criticism. Resilience was the word of the night. Ms Sturgeon has spent much of the past week in the embrace of a friendly London media circuit — strolling along cliff tops with Julie Etchingham, taking part in searching-but-gentle interviews. The tone: reflective, personal, softly probing. And what was left for the Scottish press pack, journalists who have covered her policy record in forensic detail? They were allocated less than 14 minutes of her time. This is not just a snub; it is a deliberate media strategy. Ms Sturgeon is leaning into spaces where she can control the tempo, the topics, and, crucially, the reception. This asymmetry speaks volumes: she appears most at home when the questions are soft and the audience supportive. In many ways, these 'gently does it' interviews allow you to discover more about a Nicola Sturgeon who seems more at ease with herself and friendly. Huge round of applause as Nicola Sturgeon is welcomed onto the stage. Slightly later, someone shouts: 'You look great' NS responds: 'Thank you, mum.' — Hannah Brown (@HannahMargBrown) August 14, 2025 For example, she made a lot of funny quips during her time at the Union with host Sam Baker, a UK journalist whose current work focuses on "giving a voice to midlife women". 'Can I give you an exclusive here tonight?" Ms Sturgeon says with a smile, "Me and Dougie Ross were not boozer buddies.' For that, she was met with laughs and a round of applause. Ms Sturgeon was also comfortable throwing in the occasional swear word for comic effect to a receptive audience. 'There's lot about Salmond that p***es me off,' she says at one point and she made the joke on several occasions that her younger self would tell her to 'f off' if she ever gave her advice. Again, the crowd roared with laughter. As someone who has felt the wrath of a Nicola Sturgeon hard glare during doorstep interviews in Holyrood, I had clearly entered another world. It was as if I'd stumbled into a parallel universe where the former First Minister opened the door, made you a cup of tea, and settled in for a long, friendly chat. But the welcome here wasn't for me — nor for any other Scottish political journalist. It was her homecoming for fans. Former first minister Nicola Sturgeon at the launch of her memoir 'Frankly', at Edinburgh International Book Festival. (Image: PA) Her hostility towards the media is not unfounded. There have been headlines and stories written about Nicola Sturgeon I have shuddered at - sexist and sexual language permeating certain copy that should lead our industry to hang our heads in shame. The (UK) Daily Mail's infamous 2017 'Never mind Brexit, who won Legs-it?' front page reduced her meeting with Theresa May to a commentary on both women's legs. The Sun once ran a photoshopped image of her head on Miley Cyrus swinging naked on a wrecking ball. Since publishing her memoir, Nicola Sturgeon has been subject to commentary in the Scottish press which can portray her as nothing short of a Disney villain. Then there's the tirade of abuse on social media. Ms Sturgeon has already opened up about rape taunts and abuse she received for sharing her detailed and poignant account of her own miscarriage in her memoir. Anyone with a sliver of humanity should completely condemn abhorrent abuse like this. In that context, it is understandable that she prefers friendly rooms. But there is a danger in allowing self-protection to harden into permanent avoidance of scrutiny. 'I don't really enjoy reading political memoirs', Ms Sturgeon told the Glasgow audience. I agree with her. They are often one-sided and can erase a huge amount of history the author may not be proud of. But I'm not a sitting MSP and former first minister who has just published one. She has written Frankly — and is now touring it in settings where her version of history will go largely unchallenged. Ms Sturgeon told the Glasgow audience: 'I didn't want to write a memoir that was what most are, which is dry and quite detailed and also just recounting things that happened with the person writing it saying: 'wasn't I great and didn't I get everything right and everything else was wrong?'" But her version has its omissions. Decisions that drew serious criticism during her premiership — on education, drug deaths, ferries, the handling of internal party disputes— are reframed or smoothed over or just not referred to at all. It's not unusual for a memoir, but Nicola Sturgeon is a former First Minister whose political legacy is still contested and she is still a political representative of Glasgow Southside which she described as "the best place in the world". Of course there will be scrutiny of this memoir - as there should be. For a functioning democracy, it is vital. It is only too easy to diss the Scottish media who have followed your political decisions very closely all because you claim they are hostile towards you. Choosing to embrace only soft-ball interviews risks shielding her from legitimate challenges about her record. Another question now is whether this is the start of a sustained return to public life, or merely a victory lap before a new chapter elsewhere. In her self-published review, JK Rowling hints that Sturgeon's memoir could serve as a "CV distinguisher" which could earn her a "cushy sinecure with UN Women". Copies of 'Frankly' By Nicola Sturgeon Goes On Sale at Waterstones Piccadilly (Image:) We know Ms Sturgeon may move away from Scotland for a few years because she has suggested this at several of her book events now. Could this be a move to London? Only time will tell. She's also said she wants to explore writing fiction. Her biggest critics would argue she already has. What is clear though is that her memoir closes no doors, but Thursday's event in Glasgow suggests she's not ready to give up the stage just yet. For the people in the Union (the building we were in, that is), this was an evening of nostalgia, validation, and familiarity. For Nicola Sturgeon, it may have been a reminder that, for all the political storms of recent years, she can still very easily fill a room. The event ended, much like it did during her glory days, with her taking a selfie with the crowd.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests'
Moira McFarlane, an Edinburgh-based activist, said her home had been visited after midnight by three plain-clothes officers – despite the fact that she has never been arrested or charged with anything. 'I'm a 58-year-old yoga teacher. I'm really not a criminal,' she said. 'When they come in knocking on your door at midnight, it's a police state. It's crazy.' Another Palestine activist, Andrew Thomson, said he had been lifted from an Edinburgh street, kept in a police station for eight hours, and charged with terror offences two days after allegedly wearing a t-shirt outside Bute House. READ MORE: Scottish screenwriter Paul Laverty dons 'Palestine Action' top at Fringe The t-shirt read 'Genocide in Palestine time to take action'. Other activists have also been charged for wearing clothes with the same or similar slogans as they were alleged to be in support of Palestine Action, a protest group which the Labour Government has proscribed as a terror organisation. The proscription has been condemned by Volker Türk, the UN's human rights chief, who said it puts the UK 'at odds' with international law and 'limits the rights of many people involved with and supportive of Palestine Action who have not themselves engaged in any underlying criminal activity but rather exercised their rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association'. Earlier in August, the Scottish Human Rights Commission (SHRC) warned Police Scotland that its policing of pro-Palestine protesters risked breaching human rights. Police Scotland's Chief Constable Jo Farrell (Image: PA) Professor Angela O'Hagan, the commission's chair, said in a letter to the Chief Constable, Lord Advocate, and Justice Secretary that rights to free expression and freedom of assembly were guaranteed under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), adding: 'In general, only incitement to violence, the justification of terrorist acts, or the encouragement of violence towards specific people can be restricted. The expression of a political or moral viewpoint is protected.' Police Scotland insisted their actions are "appropriate", but Thomson said that Türk and O'Hagan's warnings are 'exactly what's happened'. 'The key thing is this is excessive and this is draconian policing,' he went on. 'They're conflating political and moral expression with terrorism, and they're doing it deliberately. 'The smear will bring about fear. And in my own understanding, this is what Keir Starmer's Britain is all about. Starmer's Britain requires fear. But for me, for many, many others, and the good people in Scotland, it's Palestine that commands courage.' READ MORE: Leaked document 'leaves Government's Palestine Action case in tatters' Thomson said he was arrested in the Cowgate area on Monday, July 21, after allegations that a t-shirt he had worn on July 19 had expressed support for a terrorist organisation. He then received 'bail checks', where Police Scotland officers turned up on his doorstep, four times in four days. 'I was really alarmed by the fact that the reason for the visits had zero plausibility,' he said, disputing that reaffirming his bail conditions could have been the force's true reason for the visits. 'It is about harassment. It's an intrusion into private family life. Who has signed the order for them to make those four visits? 'I guess what's happening to me just now would be one tactic that Police Scotland undertook to try and subdue protests against the genocide. That seems plausible to me, and definitely there's zero plausibility about reminding of your [bail] condition.' READ MORE: Arms firms lobbied for Palestine Action 'terrorists' label, files show Hours after the Sunday National spoke to Thomson, he received a letter from the Crown Office advising that his court date had been cancelled and bail conditions lifted, just days after SHRC chair O'Hagan's intervention. Both Thomson and McFarlane alleged that Police Scotland had infringed on their human rights. It comes after a third pro-Palestine activist, the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign's Mick Napier, 78, sent a legal letter to Police Scotland alleging intimidation after his address was visited by officers seven times in seven days. Mark Harrower, a senior criminal defence lawyer and former president of the Edinburgh Bar Association, suggested that claims of reminding of bail conditions were not credible and the 'only possible explanation for these repeated visits is to intimidate'. 'Not only is this a huge waste of police resources, it makes Scotland look like it is turning into a police state,' Harrower wrote. 'It is nothing short of harassment. I request that your officers stop harassing my client.' The National has also reported on the case of Kimberley Davidson, in the Scottish Borders, who also faced daily visits from police officers claiming to be there to remind her of bail conditions. A Police Scotland spokesperson said: "We carry out appropriate checks as required in line with conditions imposed by the courts." A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government supports individuals' rights to freedom of expression. 'We live in a society where people have the democratic right to campaign and express views in a peaceful and lawful manner.'
