logo
Nicola Sturgeon tells all about famous names in British politics

Nicola Sturgeon tells all about famous names in British politics

STV News11 hours ago
Nicola Sturgeon has told all about her experiences with some of the most famous names in British politics in her new memoir, Frankly.
Sturgeon was Scotland's longest-serving first minister, having spent more than eight years in the role until she stepped down in 2023.
She crossed paths with five UK Prime Ministers during her time in office, led the SNP to victory in eight elections, and led the country through the global Covid-19 pandemic.
She has been an MSP since the formation of Scottish Parliament in 1999, but in March she announced she would step back from frontline politics at the 2026 election.
In her new memoir, Frankly, which was released on Thursday, Sturgeon tells all about the famous people she's interacted with over the years.
Here's what she had to say.
Sturgeon spoke very highly about the late Queen Elizabeth II, despite calling herself a republican 'at heart and by instinct'.
She said the Queen was an 'extraordinary and incredible' woman who 'loved a bit of gossip', and 'always wanted to hear the stories behind the political headlines'.
'I imagine that every leader who interacted privately with the Queen came to believe that their relationship with her was special. That was one of her qualities,' Sturgeon wrote.
Sturgeon met with the Queen biannually, and said she was 'always relaxed and chatty'.
'Conversation would range far and wide. She was incredibly well informed about everything, from the very local to the truly global. Chatting to her was like being given a private window onto all the big events and key personalities of twentieth century history. It was remarkable.'
During a meeting at Balmoral Castle, Sturgeon said the Queen also immediately asked for gossip about the Alex Salmond sex allegations weeks after the misconduct claims emerged.
'She wasn't being trivial in any way, but it was clear that she wanted to know more of what was going on,' Sturgeon said.
She added: 'There was a mystique around her that no other member of the royal family comes close to having.'
Sturgeon said almost all of her interactions with members of the Royal Family had been positive, except for one.
Sturgeon said she 'had cause to feel slightly aggrieved' towards Prince William back in 2021.
The former first minister said she attended a private meeting with Prince William in 2021, which she described as 'cordial', but emphasised that the pair did not discuss Scottish independence or politics.
Sturgeon discovered a few days later that the Prince later held an unpublicised meeting with Gordon Brown.
She said the nature of the meeting, in the wake of the former prime minister setting up an 'anti-independence think tank' had 'inevitably raised questions'.
She called the explanation from Prince William's office 'disingenuous'.
The Prince explained that he had wanted to talk to politicians from across the political spectrum, but Sturgeon said it 'wasn't right' to suggest his discussion with her had provided any balance since they had not discussed politics at all.
Sturgeon spoke highly of the famous 007 actor in her memoir, and recounted meeting him amid her bid for SNP leadership in 2014.
The former first minister said Sir Sean, who was a long time supporter of the SNP and Scottish independence, 'had charisma in spades'.
'He was physically imposing and even at 74 as he was then, he was strikingly attractive,' Sturgeon said.
'The famous voice with its highly distinctive timbre sounded exactly the same in person as it did on the screen.'
In a strange twist, Sir Sean offered Sturgeon tips on sounding more 'authoritative' while speaking.
'Suddenly there I was under the instruction of 007 himself pacing up and down the library of the new club with a folded piece of paper between my teeth, repeating sentences chosen, it seemed for their particular combination of syllables consonants and vowels,' she wrote.
'My lesson in voice projection from Sir Sean Connery and the laughter we shared in the process is an experience I won't forget,' she wrote.
She later recalled answering a call from an unknown number after her first outing at First Minister's Questions.
'I immediately thought I was being pranked by someone doing a Sean Connery impression. I wasn't. It was the man himself, still in Edinburgh, saying that he had just watched me on TV and thought the tone and depth of my voice had been perfect. I took that as a win,' she wrote.
The Harry Potter author has repeatedly criticised Sturgeon for the SNP government's controversial gender recognition reforms, and Sturgeon wrote that one of Rowling's stunts 'wounded [her] deeply'.
In 2022, Rowling shared a photograph of herself wearing a T-shirt calling Sturgeon a 'destroyer of women's rights'.
Sturgeon said it was 'entirely legitimate' for people to argue against the gender reform proposals, but said the tactics deployed by some 'suggested that there was another agenda at work'.
'There are many examples I could cite, but the one that attracted the most attention, not surprisingly, was JK Rowling's donning of a T-shirt bearing the slogan: 'Sturgeon, destroyer of women's rights',' she wrote.
'I obviously don't know what her intentions were, but it seems blindingly obvious that a stunt like that was never going to elevate the debate or illuminate the issues at the heart of it.'
'It certainly marked the point at which rational debate became impossible and any hope of finding common ground disappeared.'
She added: 'There are few issues I care more about than protecting and advancing women's rights, so to hear myself described as a destroyer of them wounds me deeply.'
Sturgeon said David Cameron was 'by some margin the Prime Minister [she] found easiest to deal with'.
The former first minister said he 'always appeared to bear the burdens of office quite lightly', but that her relationship with him was 'cordial and constructive'.
'David Cameron was the first of five prime ministers I interacted with during my time in office,' Sturgeon wrote.
'In terms of background and political outlook, he and I had little in common.
'However, by some margin, he was the prime minister I found easiest to deal with. He had an effortless charm, burnished at Eton no doubt, and despite our differences, I liked him.
She added: 'Indeed, given some of the characters who came after, I would later feel quite nostalgic about my interactions with Cameron.'
Sturgeon said it was 'impossible' to build any genuine rapport with Theresa May.
Sturgeon recalled an 'awkward' meeting with the former prime minister where she made a point of admiring the stylish shoes May was wearing.
'Instead of the few moments of ice breaking chat about shoes I had hoped for, a look of horror crossed her face,' Sturgeon wrote.
'For what seemed like an eternity, she said absolutely nothing, staring down at the folder on her lap as if looking for the appropriate 'line to take'.'
Sturgeon said the ordeal was 'so awkward' that she vowed never to repeat the exercise.
The former first minister said she met May on several other occasions and had 'countless' phone calls, but said the 'these conversations were for [May], no more than a tick box exercise'.
'It was all so frustrating. I felt that instinctively we should have been able to forge a closer relationship,' Sturgeon said.
Sturgeon said May lost her sympathy when she went 'too far' in trying to appease the 'treacherous charlatans in her own ranks'.
Sturgeon called former prime minister Boris Johnson 'an embarrassment' in her book.
She recalled meeting Johnson, who was still the mayor of London, for the first time when he asked her what would it take to 'buy you lot in the SNP off? Would full fiscal autonomy shut you up?''
'I replied that on the right terms, full fiscal autonomy would certainly be welcome, a step in the right direction, but that it wouldn't 'buy us off' because we believed in independence,' Sturgeon wrote.
'I could sense him struggling to process this strange notion of politicians who actually believed in something!'
In the midst of the Covid-19 global pandemic, Sturgeon said Johnson was an 'embarrassment' that seemed 'disengaged and disinterested'.
Sturgeon said the former prime minister 'parachuted in for an hour or so in the middle of the second week and was not seen again'.
'It was an abdication of responsibility,' she wrote.
'Whenever he did grace us with his presence, I would be taken aback all over again by how unserious he was.'
Sturgeon did not have much time to interact with Rishi Sunak as prime minister, but said she was 'shocked' by how out of touch he was.
'The main opportunity I had to get to know him was at a private dinner he and I had in Inverness in January 2023,' Sturgeon wrote.
'I was shocked by how removed he seemed from the concerns and preoccupations of ordinary people on issues like the cost of living crisis.'
Sturgeon had little say about Liz Truss' 'short and ill-fated premiership'.
The only interaction she had with Truss was during King Charles' accession ceremony.
'Our communication amounted to barely more than a hello, but it was enough to convince me that building rapport between us would have been an uphill task. Thankfully it was never required,' Sturgeon said.
Sturgeon said Reform UK Leader Nigel Farage was 'odious' and 'very insecure'.
Ahead of a televised election debate in 2015, Sturgeon said Farage told someone 'quite loudly' about how much alcohol he had consumed.
'I have met him in the flesh only a handful of times and while I found him ever bit as obvious in person as he appeared on TV, it also seemed to me that underneath the bombast is a brittle, fragile ego,' she wrote.
'He seems very insecure, especially around women.'
Sturgeon said she never warmed to former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn despite meeting him a few times.
'He exuded the same aura of aloofness and sneering superiority that I have detected in many men on the far left over the years, particularly around women,' she wrote.
Nicola Sturgeon said a ten-minute phone call with Donald Trump 'must rank amongst the most absurd' moments of her entire time as first minister.
She said the phone call, which took place between Trump's election in 2016 and his inauguration in January 2017, was one of two interactions she had with the US President
'The ten minutes or so that followed must rank amongst the most absurd of my entire time in office,' Sturgeon wrote.
The US President invited her to the White House and railed against Scotland's 'obsession' with wind power, the former first minister said.
Sturgeon described Donald Trump's defeated political rival, Hillary Clinton, as 'someone [she] had looked up to for a long time'.
Sturgeon added she was 'sorry' Clinton wasn't elected as the first female US president.
'When the US finally does elect its first female president – which at the time of writing feels further away than ever – she will owe an enormous debt of gratitude to Hillary Clinton. I am just sorry it couldn't have been her,' Sturgeon wrote.
Sturgeon's former friend and mentor turned political rival, Alex Salmond, features heavily in her memoir, and there's a whole chapter dedicated to their complex relationship.
Sturgeon insisted she was not the one who had leaked the outcome of the Scottish government investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct against Salmond to the press.
She claimed Salmond, or someone close to him, may have leaked the details himself.
Sturgeon also accused Salmond of attempting to 'cast himself as the victim' and being 'prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all'.
She added that Salmond would rather have seen the SNP 'destroyed' than have it succeed without him.
'I was clearly public enemy number one. For a while, I told myself that the bonds between us would be stronger than his thirst for revenge,' she wrote.
'Eventually, though, I had to face the fact that he was determined to destroy me.
'I was now engaged in mortal political combat with someone I knew to be both ruthless and highly effective.
'It was a difficult reality to reconcile myself to. So too was losing him as a friend. I went through what I can only describe as a grieving process.
'For a time after we stopped speaking, I would have conversations with him in my head about politics and the issues of the day.
'I had occasional, but always vivid, dreams in which we were still on good terms. I would wake up from these feeling utterly bereft.'
Sturgeon also claims in her book that Salmond had admitted to her that the 'substance' of one of the sexual harassment complaints had been true.
The former Alba Party leader was acquitted of all charges relating to the allegations at court in 2020, while a judicial review found the Scottish Government's own investigation of him was tainted with apparent bias.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I should've ordered Covid shame Catherine Calderwood to quit on spot after flouting lockdown laws, says Nicola Sturgeon
I should've ordered Covid shame Catherine Calderwood to quit on spot after flouting lockdown laws, says Nicola Sturgeon

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

I should've ordered Covid shame Catherine Calderwood to quit on spot after flouting lockdown laws, says Nicola Sturgeon

The pair gradually became pals following the scandal in 2021 TONE DEAF I should've ordered Covid shame Catherine Calderwood to quit on spot after flouting lockdown laws, says Nicola Sturgeon Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) NICOLA Sturgeon admits she was wrong not to order her Chief Medical Officer to quit on the spot after she flouted Covid lockdown laws with trips to her seaside holiday home. The ex-First Minister also said Dr Catherine Calderwood deserves 'credit' for resigning 24 hours after the scandal broke — despite her initially insisting privately that she would try to 'ride it out'. 3 Catherine Calderwood broke lockdown rules by travelling to her holiday home in Earlsferry, Fife 3 Nicola Sturgeon at the launch of her new memoir, Frankly But amid an explosion of anger across the country, Ms Sturgeon changed her mind after realising her credibility would be 'fatally undermined' if she allowed the top medic to stay in place. Dr Calderwood, from Edinburgh, was exposed by The Scottish Sun on Sunday for two 88-mile round trips to her second home in Earlsferry, Fife, at the height of the pandemic. The scandal saw her axed from telly ads telling people to stay in their own house to avoid spreading Covid and forced to resign from her £120,000-a-year government role amid hypocrisy claims. In Ms Sturgeon's book, Frankly, released on Thursday, she writes: 'With hindsight, I should have told her immediately that resignation was necessary and inevitable.' The Scottish Government at first brushed off the revelation when contacted by The Scottish Sun on Sunday on the evening of Saturday, April 4, 2021. But the next afternoon the then First Minister was bombarded with questions at a bruising TV press conference. She stood by the CMO, despite her undermining lockdown orders she had fronted for those with second homes not to travel to them to reduce the risk of spreading the disease. In her memoir, Ms Sturgeon argues that she thought losing Dr Calderwood would have 'severely disrupted' attempts to tackle the Covid crisis. She wrote: 'Losing an experienced Chief Medical Officer at this juncture was in no one's best interests. However, as I quickly came to realise, to a country in which emotions were raw and running high, it must have seemed the worst kind of politician response — detached and tone deaf.' We also revealed last year how Dr Calderwood WhatsApped fellow UK CMOs over the trips backlash saying she would 'ride it out'. Timestamps on the text suggested she sent it at around the time of the TV briefing where she stood beside the First Minister. Nicola Sturgeon backs apologetic CMO Catherine Calderwood after she was caught flouting lockdown rules Her resignation, after talks with Ms Sturgeon, was announced just before 10pm that night. The ex-SNP leader admitted in her book she was 'stunned and, initially, disbelieving' after our bombshell exclusive went live online on the Saturday night. Hoping for a rational explanation', she wrote: 'I called Catherine immediately to get her side of the story. She was shaken and apologetic, but there was no getting round the fact the essence of The Sun's claim was accurate. She had gone with her family over that weekend to her second home. 'It later transpired she had gone there the previous weekend too. 'She had interacted with no one other than her family unit. 'No one had been at any risk as a result of her actions. 'But there was no doubt she had broken the rules.' She defended the CMO at a press conference where she was 'pummelled' by journalists. But Ms Sturgeon said she slowly came to the realisation that Dr Calderwood had to go. She wrote: 'As I mulled it all over on my journey home later that evening, I knew in my gut that I was in the wrong place. I also knew if I stayed in that place, it wasn't just Catherine's credibility that would be shot. My own would be fatally undermined too. By the time I got home, I knew Catherine had to resign. 'When I spoke to her, she had reached the same conclusion. She could have dug her heels in, as I had no actual power to sack her. 'She accepted responsibility and did the right thing, in a way other senior figures caught breaking the rules didn't. This is to her credit. 'After the Covid restrictions lifted, we would catch up occasionally for coffee or a drink, and gradually became pals.'

‘I should be living independently – but I can't afford it'
‘I should be living independently – but I can't afford it'

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

‘I should be living independently – but I can't afford it'

The full-time worker's inability to buy or rent her own place is ­highlighted as it was claimed that planning permission for build to rent and student accommodation ­outstrips affordable housing by over 20 to one in the city. Liz Davidson is just one of the many people affected by Glasgow's housing emergency. She has lived in Partick since she was five years old but says there is no way she could ­afford the new housing currently being built in the area. 'There are two developments ­going on near where I live, neither of which is at all affordable to me,' she said. READ MORE: Scottish Government minister joins march in support of Palestine 'I work a full-time job and they would want about 75% of my ­wages for a one-bedroom flat. Because of this, I've had to make the hard ­decision to stay living with my gran in her flat, which is a social home. 'At 37, I should be living independently and starting a family but I can't afford to. That's not my shame, it's Glasgow City Council's. They seem to think they're above the rules when it comes to building affordable housing.' The National Planning Framework 4's requirement is that all developments include 25% affordable homes or provide 'commuted sums' to help pay for infrastructure. However purpose built student ­accommodation is exempt from the rule, making it more attractive to ­investors. Campaign group Living Rent claim developments of purpose built ­student accommodation (PBSA) and build to rent in Glasgow outstrip ­affordable housing by 23 to one. They say only 447 units of affordable housing (mid-market rent and ­social housing) were approved between February 1 2023, and March 1 2025, while 53.7% of all applications granted planning permission are for PBSA developments in Glasgow. The majority of build-to-rent and PBSA developments are in the city centre, without any affordable ­housing units. The figures show that the ­council could be doing much more to ­alleviate the housing crisis, Living Rent claims. Only two developments by private corporations had an ­affordable ­housing contribution, one of 15% and the other of 13%, the Living Rent study says. In addition, the researchers could find no evidence of Glasgow City Council agreeing commuted sums for build-to-rent or private developments that failed to provide the 25% affordable housing component. The council declared a housing emergency in November 2023 ­citing an 'overwhelming increase' in ­homelessness. READ MORE: I went to the 'first legal wedding' at the Edinburgh Fringe – here's what it was like As of September 2024, there were more than 7000 people living in ­temporary accommodation, of which 3100 are children. This is costing the city £36 million a year for B&B spend, a 40% increase over the last three years. Glasgow has also seen a 22% ­increase in homelessness applications in the year from September 2023 to 4241. This is not helped by the rise in private rental prices. Since 2010, rent has increased 81.8% for a two ­bedroom property, over 30% above inflation (50%). Bianca Lopez, a Living Rent's spokesperson, said Glasgow was quickly becoming a city that ­prioritised the interests of developers over the wellbeing of its residents. 'Glaswegians don't need more student accommodation or expensive build-to-rent,' she said. 'We need ­social and affordable housing. 'Across Glasgow, people are ­being forced out of their communities, pushed into poverty and, in some ­cases, made homeless by the shortage of affordable places to live. 'Our report exposes the hypocrisy of Glasgow City Council and their failures to take action on ­affordable housing, despite announcing a ­housing emergency. 'It's unbelievable that the ­council has chosen to prioritise private ­developers' profits over the homes that Glasgow so badly needs.' Lopez said the council needed to prioritise affordable homes in its planning system and shift the balance away from unaffordable tenures such as PBSA and build to rent. 'It needs to implement the 25% ­requirement in NPF4 across the board. Only then will it be able to deliver the social and affordable housing that Glasgow deserves,' she said. What is the council saying? A Glasgow City Council spokesperson said: 'We do not recognise these figures. Around a half of all homes built in Glasgow every year are affordable/social, and comparing student rooms to new homes with a number of bedrooms is not comparing like for like. In Glasgow, there is a very high proportion of social homes built compared with the figures for any other Scottish or UK local authority.' The spokesperson added that ­planning applications did not lead to a development. 'If a housing association puts in a planning application for a development of social/affordable homes, then it will have support for funding and will in all likelihood be built out,' he said. 'This is not always the case for PBSA or build to rent.' However Living Rent said this was ignoring the 'fundamental point' of their research. 'The council is trying to pull the wool over our eyes by citing past data and ignoring the fundamental point of what our research says: their ­planning approvals are favouring ­unaffordable housing which will push up rents and push us out of the city centre,' said a spokesperson. 'Unless action is taken now, ­Glaswegians who have lived here their whole lives will be forced out by high rents and a lack of social housing. Glasgow needs social and affordable housing developments to be prioritised not PBSA and build-to-rent developments. 'If the developments that have received planning approval go ahead or developments seeking approval are granted permission, Glasgow and particularly the city centre would become increasingly gentrified. 'Our city centre will be a playground for the rich, all the while enabling foreign investment funds huge returns.' With regards to comparing student accommodation with other housing developments, Living Rent said it would be wrong to count a student development as one unit when it contained hundreds of beds. 'Many social housing developments did not specify the number of beds, so the 'unit' metric is imperfect but the closest way to compare what is being approved,' said the spokesperson. 'Even if we assume that a social home is on average 2.5 beds, approved purpose-built student accommodation and build-to-rent developments still vastly outstrip social and affordable housing by eight to one.'

Pro-Palestine protesters chant ‘RAF shame on you' at air base demonstration
Pro-Palestine protesters chant ‘RAF shame on you' at air base demonstration

Rhyl Journal

time3 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Pro-Palestine protesters chant ‘RAF shame on you' at air base demonstration

Hundreds of demonstrators gathered along the barbed wire fence of RAF High Wycombe on Saturday afternoon at the protest organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Protesters held banners that said 'end British military collaboration with Israel' and '61,000+ killed, 600 RAF spy flights'. There were chants of 'RAF you work for us, Israel is not your boss', 'RAF shame, shame – killing children in your name' and 'RAF blood on your hands'. A large Palestine flag was erected in front of a replica Second World War Hurricane fighter plane outside the entrance to the air base, with organisers bussing in protesters from High Wycombe railway station. The demonstrators assembled outside the air base held a large red banner as they chanted 'we are the red line, UK for Palestine', with protesters banging pots and drumming throughout the protest. Thames Valley Police said no arrests were made at the protest. Speaking at the demonstration, Adnan Hmidan, chairman of the Palestinian Forum in Britain, said: 'The RAF is not just a bystander, it is a partner in collective punishment. 'It is a partner in ethnic cleansing and the most important thing is it is a partner in the genocide against the people in Gaza. 'Every war plane that reaches Israel with British parts or British support makes this country complicit in the killing of children.' Addressing the crowds, activist Andrew Feinstein said: 'For the last 22 months, there are more RAF spy planes flying over Gaza than there have been Israeli Air Force spy planes. 'That information then gets relayed to the IDF to inform what they call their targeting decisions, but we know that their targeting is totally indiscriminate. 'So, the people who sit in these buildings are the ones guiding the IDF around Gaza. That is active participation in a genocide. 'The people sitting in these buildings should sit for the rest of their lives in The Hague in prison for their participation in genocide.' The Palestine Solidarity Campaign said: 'On 16th August, as part of our summer of action for Gaza, we will be surrounding RAF High Wycombe, drawing on the legacy of protest at air bases like Greenham Common, and showing the strength of the public demand for an arms embargo.' A spokesperson for Thames Valley Police said: 'We are aware of a protest being planned to take place in High Wycombe today. 'We will work with the organisers, partners and the public to facilitate peaceful protest, balancing the rights of all and to keep our communities safe.' RAF High Wycombe in Buckinghamshire houses Headquarters Air Command and was originally designed to house RAF Bomber Command in the late 1930s. The station is also the headquarters of the European Air Group and the UK Space Command. Last weekend in central London, 15,000 people demonstrated peacefully in support of the Palestinian cause with only one arrest, the Metropolitan Police said, adding that 522 were arrested 'for an illegal show of support for Palestine Action on the same day'. The Metropolitan Police said on Friday that a further 60 people will be prosecuted for 'showing support for the proscribed terrorist group Palestine Action'. The force said this follows the arrest of more than 700 people since the group was banned on July 5, including 522 in central London last Saturday. More prosecutions are expected in the coming weeks and arrangements have been put in place 'that will enable us to investigate and prosecute significant numbers each week if necessary', the Met said. Last week, the Met confirmed the first three charges in England and Wales for offences against section 13 of the Terrorism Act relating to Palestine Action. Palestine Action was proscribed by the UK Government in July, with the ban meaning that membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store