Greene threatens criminal referrals at House DOGE hearing
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), chair of the House Oversight Subcommittee on the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), threatened to make criminal referrals during a hearing on foreign aid on Wednesday.
'This committee, based on this hearing and witness testimonies, will consider recommending investigations and criminal referrals,' Greene said, at the start of her questioning.
The remark followed opening statements from several witnesses, including one who accused USAID of supporting terrorists, lacking proper oversight and engaging in 'potentially criminal' activity.
'This committee should take action to ensure that the Department of Justice acts on it and does everything [in] Congress's power to not just investigate but refer criminal actions to the proper authorities,' said witness Gregg Roman, executive director of the Middle East Forum, during his opening statement.
Greene did not specify who the committee would look into for investigations or referrals. The congresswoman, however, spent much of her remarks at the hearing expressing concern over the way foreign aid was being spent and accusing USAID of being run by Democrats.
'The Democrat-run USAID should not get to use our federal government, our US taxpayer dollars, as their party piggy bank to push their radical agenda in countries that we have no business giving money to,' Greene said in her opening remarks.
'Maybe we should consider investigating whether USAID funding has made it back to Democrat campaigns. Has it affected elections?' she later added.
Greene, during the hearing, suggested President Biden used USAID to protect his son, Hunter Biden, by calling for the removal of a prosecutor general of Ukraine, Viktor Shokin, while serving in the Obama administration.
Greene repeated a frequent GOP talking point that Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion of a USAID grant if Shokin was not fired, claiming the then-vice president did so because the prosecutor was investigating Ukrainian energy company Burisma, on whose board Hunter Biden served.
'Is USAID supposed to be used as leverage by a president to protect his son?' Greene asked witness Max Primorac, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation.
'No, we call that corruption,' Primorac responded.
While Biden did threaten to withhold U.S. aid if Shokin was not fired, by that point Shokin was no longer investigating Burisma, and the international community was in agreement over a push to oust the prosecutor over corruption charges.
During Greene's closing remarks, she again floated the prospect of criminal referrals.
'What we have heard today is that USAID has been used as a tool by Democrats to brainwash the world with globalist propaganda to force regime changes around the world,' Greene said.
'But if USAID funded terrorism that resulted in the death of Americans,' Greene continued, 'then this committee will be making criminal referrals.'
Democrats have denounced the USAID cuts, claiming they would roll back progress globally.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
Biden physician to testify
President Donald Trump already had Republicans scrambling to get their 'big, beautiful bill' to his desk by next week. Now he's got Congress grappling with something even bigger: the aftermath of his airstrikes on Iran. The issue could come to a head with a vote as soon as this week. Sen. Tim Kaine's (D-Va.) resolution requiring congressional approval for military action in Iran ripens Friday but is expected to be on the floor sooner with the megabill set to eat up the back half of the week. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is pushing to move up the vote. He's urging his party to support the measure, but Democrats expect to lose the vote of Sen. John Fetterman (Pa.). On the GOP side, keep an eye on Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), who said Sunday on X 'Congress alone' has the power to authorize war. Lawmakers in both chambers are set to receive briefings Tuesday on the situation in Iran; they were on the books before the strikes. In the House, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna's (D-Calif.) war powers resolution, which would block U.S. involvement in Iran, will not ripen until next week. But House GOP leadership is considering getting ahead of that: Speaker Mike Johnson could move this week to kill the effort with language getting rid of the privileged nature of the resolution, according to a person granted anonymity to relay the private discussions. Trump and GOP leaders are moving to unify the rank-and-file behind Trump's decision to strike, even as Trump openly muses about pursuing regime change in Iran. Take note of Trump's renewed attacks on Massie — a person familiar with the conversations who was granted anonymity to discuss them tells POLITICO it's part of an effort to keep members in line. Adding to the chaos for Republicans is Trump's Sunday evening musing about pursuing 'regime change' in Iran if its current leaders can't 'MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.' 'This is not America First folks,' Massie said in response to Trump's Truth Social post. House Democrats are less unified. Most are questioning the constitutionality of the strike, but the party is split on where to go from there. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) has brought up impeachment. Others, like Rep. Steny Hoyer (Md.), were more supportive of the strike. That could be a problem for Democrats trying to strengthen their opposition. The top Democrats on Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Armed Services are drafting their own resolution in response to the strikes, according to a person granted anonymity to discuss the plan. There are likely a handful of pro-Israel Democrats who will vote against any war powers resolution. Even if the bill makes it to a House floor vote there likely won't be enough Republicans. What else we're watching: — Megabill's big week: Republicans will hold a closed-door meeting Monday night after votes for leadership to update members on the GOP megabill and its outstanding issues. Full bill text could land Monday, though it may also slip. While the 'big, beautiful bill' could hit the floor as soon as Wednesday, Thursday is looking more likely. — First Dem oversight vote: House Democrats' steering committee will vote this evening on who should be the party's leader on the Oversight Committee, followed by a full caucus vote Tuesday. California Rep. Robert Garcia, 47, is seen as the favorite in a field split along generational lines. He's running against Reps. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, 44; Kweisi Mfume of Maryland, 76; and Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, 70. — Slashes to GAO funding: House Republican appropriators are proposing to cut funding for the Government Accountability Office by nearly half. It's the latest in a series of flash points between the GOP and the watchdog agency, which has been involved in clashes this year over DOGE, regulatory rollbacks and Trump's incursions into the power of the purse. Meredith Lee Hill, Jordain Carney, Nicholas Wu and Katherine Tully-McManus contributed to this report.
Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump's "big, beautiful bill:" What's in, what's out
Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough dealt big-time blows to GOP priorities this weekend when she ruled that chunks of President Trump's "big, beautiful bill" violate the chamber's rules. Why it matters: The so-called "Byrd bath" rulings further complicate Majority Leader John Thune's path to passing the mega tax and spending cut package by the White House's July 4 deadline. What's out: A provision to pass food aid costs on to states by forcing them to share expenses for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. Proposed restrictions on the ability of federal courts to issue nationwide injunctions and temporary restraining orders. A GOP proposal to hollow out funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and a plan to slash pay for staff at the Federal Reserve. An effort to repeal an EPA rule limiting air pollution emissions of passenger vehicles. A provision allowing project developers to bypass judicial environmental reviews if they pay a fee. A modified version of the REINS Act, which would increase congressional power over major regulations. It was a top priority for Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Republican leadership. Language to expand state and local officers' ability to carry out immigration enforcement and limits on grant funding for " sanctuary cities." What's in: A Republican proposal to place a what's now being branded a "temporary pause" on state laws regulating AI. But the measure has some GOP opponents, including Sens. Josh Hawley (Mo.) and Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.), who could still seek to strike it. Hawley's bill that provides compensation to victims of radiation — a long-time priority of his. What to watch: The AI provision is just one example of the intra-party disputes that will need to get settled for Thune to lock down the support he needs. Another provision creating a framework for the sale of federal lands has gotten pushback from some GOP senators and from hunting groups. Lee, who oversaw that part of the bill, has indicated he plans to make changes. Then there are the two biggest, looming fights: How deeply to cut into Medicaid spending and how high to set the cap on state and local tax, or SALT, deductions. Reconciliation bill provisions must be ruled budget-related for the passage threshold to be 51 instead of 60 votes.
Axios
29 minutes ago
- Axios
Sen. Lisa Murkowski wants to slow down on Trump's "big, beautiful bill"
Sen. Lisa Murkowski thinks the Senate is rushing on President Trump's budget bill, and is asking why her colleagues are "afraid" of conference negotiations. Why it matters: The Alaska Republican is publishing a memoir this week, intended to tell of her historic write-in ballot win in 2010, but going on through her vote to convict Trump of impeachment. She finds herself once again at the center — of attention and political parties. "I don't want us to be able to say we met the date, but our policies are less than we would want," Murkowski told Axios in an interview late last week. "It's an arbitrary date," she said on the self-imposed July 4 deadline the White House and Hill leadership are gunning to meet for the "one big, beautiful bill." "Why are we afraid of a conference? Oh my gosh," she added. Leadership has been wary of the the lengthy formal process of reconciling differences between House and Senate bills. Zoom out: The reconciliation process will allow the Senate to pass the package along party lines. Murkowski thinks it is a problematic move, warning that all the same debates will be had again when power shifts, "with an effort by the other side to flip what we are putting in place." She is working to ensure changes to Medicaid do not overly hurt Alaska communities because of their outdated reporting systems, but also touted "some really great things" in the bill. Some of her key allies for bipartisanship have now left the chamber. "There are new allies cropping up," Murkowski said, "But yes, it is getting harder." The big picture: Murkowski has long been a thorn in GOP leadership's side. She is serious about putting Alaska first, and takes pride in practical wins for her state — and bucking her party when necessary. The style has put her in the line of fire. It has also kept her in her Senate seat despite the Tea Party in 2010 and now MAGA threats. Murkowski describes a direct link between the two big GOP movements of her career. "The so-called MAGA movement, this personality cult that has ripped us apart, was born, with another name, during the first two years after President Obama was elected," Murkowski writes in Far From Home. "The virulent spread of angry populism transformed American politics." What she's saying: Murkowski's reluctance to enter politics and her frequent loneliness in D.C. — and in her party—are evident. "I will be honest, sometimes, it is exhausting," Murkowski told Axios about her political role. She finds it "tiring" to be swarmed by reporters just because most of her colleagues' votes are more predictable than hers. "I would be less than honest with you, if I say, 'Oh yeah, every day, I wake up with great excitement and much energy to go on and conquer the world,'" she said.
