Group threatens N.S. with legal action over ‘grossly disproportionate' woods ban
The Canadian Constitutional Foundation, which supports legal challenges across the country generally relating to Charter rights, is behind the legal threat, which claims Nova Scotia has overstepped.
The group said it supports a provincial burn ban, but Houston's prohibition on hiking, camping, fishing and picnicking in the woods is a step too far.
'We're creating a culture where we value safety above any other value, including our fundamental freedoms, our freedom to move around our communities,' Christine Van Geyn, the CCF's litigation director, told Global News.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'And when you put safety, when you describe everything as a safety issue, it means everything can be controlled.'
Story continues below advertisement
The CCF has formally written to Houston's government, urging it to rescind the travel restriction or face legal action. A petition in support of removing the ban gained more than 2,000 signatures in just 24 hours.
'I've heard from a few people about their ability to actually access work,' Van Geyn said.
'So some people will take a route where they don't have access to transit, and they might not have a vehicle. So they take their bikes through a forested trail to get to work.'
At the same time, Nova Scotia's tip line to report people breaking the rules has been overwhelmed with calls. The fine for those caught in the woods is $25,000.
That fine, the CCF said, is 'grossly disproportionate.'
In a statement, Nova Scotia's Department of Natural Resources defended its prevention measures and said they were allowed under the Forests Act.
'We are making decisions that are in the best interest of Nova Scotians. Our province is the second most densely populated in the country,' the statement read. 'That means wildfire is a greater risk to our people and our communities.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
7 minutes ago
- Global News
RCMP establishes ‘drone corridor' to boost Canada-U.S. border security
The RCMP is introducing a drone corridor along part of the Canada-U.S. border in an effort to boost security. Drones are to patrol the border in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba in what the RCMP says is a trial. The force says the corridor has been established with help from Transport Canada and drone patrols will target illegal activity including smuggling and drug trafficking. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy It says the corridor extends from the ground to 500 feet in the air and one nautical mile north of the border, or just under two kilometres. The corridor does not restrict flight activity, but local pilots, agricultural operators and recreational aviation users are asked to be careful and notify Mounties before entering the area. The RCMP has increased its presence at the border with drones, helicopters and more as part of Ottawa's $1.3-billion pledge to boost security in an attempt to stave off tariffs from U.S. President Donald Trump.
Vancouver Sun
7 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
B.C. group loses bid to overturn Canada's federal voting system
OTTAWA — A panel of three Ontario Court of Appeal judges unanimously affirmed the constitutionality of Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system in a ruling released on Monday. The system, laid out in the Canada Elections Act, sees the candidate who receives the most votes in a given riding or electoral district become the member of Parliament. Fair Voting B.C. and the Springtide Collective for Democratic Society argued in court that the first-past-the-post system violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of effective representation. The groups also said the system leads to the under-representation of women and other groups in Parliament, breaching the Charter's equality rights provision. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In a proportional representation system, the number of representatives a political party elects reflects the percentage of the total vote the party receives. In November 2023, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed the challenge from Fair Voting B.C. and Springtide. It said that while a proportional representation system would be a fair alternative to the current system, it's not required by the Constitution. In its decision, the province's Court of Appeal also rejected the groups' key arguments. 'The electoral system is not in conflict with either the right to vote or the right to equality. It does not violate the Charter,' Justice Grant Huscroft said in written reasons delivered on behalf of another judge on the panel. 'The appellants' arguments that the electoral system violates the Charter are, in essence, a repackaging of failed political arguments as constitutional rights violations.' The expert evidence 'put forward in support' of those arguments, Huscroft wrote, is 'replete with highly contestable policy arguments about which reasonable disagreement abounds, not only in the academic community but among the public at large.' 'This evidence demonstrates the shortcomings of constitutional litigation in addressing public policy disagreements,' he added. The short answer to the argument that the electoral system violates the Charter is that Canadian citizens are free to vote for anyone they choose, and for any reason they choose, Huscroft added. 'There is no constitutional requirement that their individual choices aggregate in a way that achieves some ideal of representational diversity,' he wrote. 'Neither the political party affiliation nor the personal characteristics of the candidates who win election are relevant to the constitutionality of the electoral system.' During the 2015 election campaign, then-Liberal leader Justin Trudeau promised it would be the last federal election held under the first-past-the-post system. Once in office, however, Trudeau's government abandoned his pledge to replace the system. Fair Voting B.C. and Springtide argued that under the current system, small political parties do not enjoy the success they deserve, creating a disadvantage for people who vote for them. 'I do not doubt that small political parties fare poorly in Canada,' Huscroft wrote. 'They receive relatively few votes and invariably win few or no seats.' The failure of a political party cannot open the door to a claim for constitutional redress, he said. 'In short, the right to vote is a right to vote pursuant to the electoral system in operation — whatever that system is, and regardless of the electoral outcomes that may obtain,' he wrote. The appellants also argued the first-past-the-post system contributes to the under-representation of women and minorities in Parliament. Huscroft said no matter what sort of electoral system is in place, over- or underrepresentation of particular demographic groups might occur to a greater or lesser extent from time to time. He added that arguments based on degree of representation lose sight of the fundamental fact of the matter: that people are entitled to vote the way they want. 'This is the very essence of the freedom that lies at the heart of the right to vote,' he wrote.
Global News
37 minutes ago
- Global News
Carney backs Ukraine role in peace talks in calls with Zelenskyy, Starmer
Prime Minister Mark Carney spoke with the leaders of Ukraine and Britain on Monday amid a flurry of international diplomatic efforts to shore up support for Ukraine ahead of negotiations between the U.S. and Russia aimed toward a peace deal. Carney's conversations came as U.S. President Donald Trump previewed his approach to Friday's planned summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and suggested Kyiv and Moscow will both have to cede land to end the three-and-a-half-year war in Ukraine. A readout from the Prime Minister's Office of Carney's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy — who has yet to be invited to the upcoming talks — said the two leaders 'agreed on the categorical imperatives of ending Russia's barbaric war' to achieve a lasting peace. 'The two leaders underscored that decisions on the future of Ukraine must be made by Ukrainians, that international borders cannot be changed by force, that diplomatic engagement must be reinforced by continued pressure on Russia to end its aggression, and the need for robust and credible security to enable Ukraine to defend its territorial integrity and sovereignty,' the readout said. Story continues below advertisement It added Carney and Zelenskyy 'welcomed the leadership of President Trump and the United States in working toward securing peace in Ukraine,' but also noted Carney endorsed a joint statement by European leaders on Saturday that emphasized Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity must be protected. 'Prime Minister Carney affirmed Canada's steadfast support for Ukraine,' the readout said, pointing to billions of dollars in newly-committed military aid and last week's move to lower the price cap on Russian oil alongside European partners. 2:09 Zelenskyy rejects territorial concessions as Trump and Putin plan Alaska summit Carney and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also spoke on Monday and welcomed diplomatic efforts toward peace 'and agreed that this must be built with Ukraine — not imposed upon it,' according to a readout from Downing Street. The PMO has yet to provide its own readout of the call with Starmer. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Ukraine's European allies have been pushing for Ukraine's involvement in U.S. talks with Russia over fears that a negotiated deal could otherwise favour Moscow. Story continues below advertisement European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Monday that 'transatlantic unity, support to Ukraine and pressure on Russia' were needed to end the war and 'prevent future Russian aggression in Europe.' Trump told reporters on Monday that his upcoming talks with Putin will be 'really a feel-out meeting,' adding he would know 'probably in the first two minutes' whether progress was possible toward ending the war. Trump also said 'there'll be some land swapping going on' that will be 'for the good of Ukraine,' but also acknowledged there will be 'some bad stuff for both' sides. 'It's good and there's bad, but it's very complex because you have lines that are very uneven and there'll be some swapping,' he said. 'Russia's occupied a big portion of Ukraine. They've occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine.' 2:38 Zelenskyy rejects negotiations that exclude Kyiv as Trump-Putin meeting set for Alaska Putin is expected to be unwavering in his demands to keep all the territory his forces now occupy and to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, with the long-term aim of returning it to Moscow's sphere of influence. Story continues below advertisement Zelenskyy has strongly condemned suggestions that Ukraine should have to give up any territory seized by Russia, noting Ukraine's territorial borders are enshrined in the country's constitution and any changes will need to be approved democratically by the Ukrainian people. Trump said Monday he's 'a little bit bothered' by that. He also said that, after his meeting with Putin, 'The next meeting will be with Zelenskyy and Putin' but it could also be a meeting with 'Putin and Zelenskyy and me.' Zelenskyy warned on Monday that any concessions to Russia would not persuade it to stop fighting and more pressure was needed on the Kremlin, which he noted was showing no signs it was preparing to wind down its military operations. 'Russia refuses to stop the killings, and therefore must not receive any rewards or benefits,' he wrote on X. 'Concessions do not persuade a killer.' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz invited Zelenskyy, Trump and a number of European leaders to meetings on Wednesday, his office said Monday. Other invitees included U.S. Vice-President JD Vance, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and the leaders of France, Italy, Britain, Finland and Poland. Carney's office and the office of Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand have not responded to questions about whether Canada has been invited to take part. Story continues below advertisement —With files from the Canadian Press, The Associated Press and Reuters
