UK govt U-turns on disability benefit cuts after Labour MPs revolt
LONDON, June 27 — The UK government backed down on Friday on controversial plans to slash disability and sickness benefits after a a major rebellion by MPs — a blow to Prime Minister Keir Starmer's authority.
Only days after the Labour leader insisted he would plough ahead with the reforms, Care Minister Stephen Kinnock confirmed concessions had been made to rebel MPs who had threatened to scupper the proposed reforms.
A total 126 of Labour's more than 400 MPs publicly backed a move to block the proposals, forcing the third government U-turn in less than a month.
The turnaround comes just under a year since Starmer swept to power in a landslide election victory.
A spokesperson for Starmer's Number 10 office said the government had 'listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system'.
It said a revised package of measures would preserve the welfare system for those 'who need it, by putting it on a sustainable footing'.
The concessions, due to be set out in parliament later on Friday, include a 'staggered approach' to the reforms, Kinnock said.
This means that the narrower eligibility criteria proposed will only apply to new claimants, not those already receiving the benefit payments.
'What's clear from the announcement today is that it's going to be a more staggered process whereby people who are existing claimants are protected,' Kinnock said.
The government U-turn comes at the close of a bumpy first year in power for Starmer during which finance minister Rachel Reeves has struggled to generate growth from a sluggish UK economy.
Rethinks have also been announced in the past month of other policies that were previously robustly defended.
On June 9, the government declared it had reversed a policy to scrap a winter heating benefit for millions of pensioners, following widespread criticism, including from its own MPs.
Less than a week later, on June 14, Starmer announced a national enquiry focused on a UK child sex exploitation scandal that had attracted the attention of US billionaire Elon Musk.
Starmer had previously resisted calls for an enquiry into the so-called 'grooming gangs' — that saw girls as young as 10 raped by groups of men mostly of South Asian origin — in favour of a series of local probes.
Kinnock said he was now confident that the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment (Pip) Bill, which contains the welfare reforms, would make it through a parliamentary vote due on Tuesday.
Starmer's government had hoped to make savings of £5.0 billion (RM29 billion) as a result of the changes that have now been partly abandoned. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
41 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Following Nato summit, Trump and Europe still at odds over Putin's ambitions
THE HAGUE, June 27 — For US President Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin is a man looking for an off-ramp to his bloody three-year assault on Ukraine. But according to Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte, the Russian leader may be just getting started. If the alliance does not invest in its defence capabilities, Rutte warned the annual Nato summit on Tuesday, Russia could attack an alliance country within three years. By most measures, this year's Nato summit in The Hague was a success. Member states largely agreed to a US demand to boost defence spending to 5 per cent of gross domestic product. Trump, who once derided the alliance as a 'rip-off,' said his view had changed, while a budding bromance blossomed between him and Rutte, who compared the US president to a stern 'daddy' managing his geopolitical underlings. But the summit, which ended on Wednesday, also highlighted the widening gap between how the US and Europe see the military ambitions of Russia, the bloc's main foil. That is despite some lawmakers in Trump's own Republican Party hardening their rhetoric in recent weeks, arguing that while the president's ambition to negotiate an end to Russia's war in Ukraine is laudable, it is now clear that Putin is not serious about coming to the table. In a Wednesday press conference, Trump conceded that it was 'possible' Putin had territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine. But he insisted that the Russian leader — buffeted by manpower and materiel losses — wanted the war to end quickly. 'I know one thing: He'd like to settle,' Trump said. 'He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed Trump's view in a sideline interview with Politico, saying the US was holding off on expanding its sanctions against Moscow, in part to keep talks going. 'If we did what everybody here wants us to do — and that is come in and crush them with more sanctions — we probably lose our ability to talk to them about the ceasefire,' he said. The message from others at the summit was starkly different. A senior Nato official told reporters in a Tuesday briefing that Putin was not in fact interested in a ceasefire — or in engaging in good-faith talks at all. 'Regardless of battlefield dynamics, we continue to doubt that Russia has any interest in meaningful negotiations,' the official said. Russia's ambitions, the senior official said, go beyond control of 'certain territories at their administrative lines,' as Rubio put it. Putin is instead bent on imposing his 'political will' on neighbouring states. Rutte put the Russian threat in existential terms. 'If we do not invest now,' he said on Tuesday, 'we are really at risk that the Russians might try something against Nato territory in three, five or seven years.' Russia strategy remains elusive The US is not the only Nato member with a more optimistic view of Russia. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a longtime Trump ally and critic of European institutions, said Russia was 'not strong enough to represent a real threat to Nato.' Still, as the alliance's largest contributor and most powerful member, Washington's position is a central preoccupation in most Nato capitals. The White House, asked for comment, referred to Trump's comments at the Wednesday press conference. In response to a request for comment, a separate Nato official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, disputed that there were differing assessments within the alliance, pointing to a Nato declaration on Wednesday which referenced the 'long-term threat posed by Russia.' The Russian embassy in Washington referred to Thursday comments by Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, who criticised Nato for wasting money on defence. 'It seems that only by invoking the fabricated 'Russian threat' will it be possible to explain to ordinary people why their pockets are being emptied once again,' she said. The US State Department and the Ukrainian embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment. The lack of a common understanding about Putin's goals will complicate future diplomatic plans to wind down the war, said Philippe Dickinson, the deputy director of the Transatlantic Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council and a former British diplomat. 'To reach a peace agreement, it's not just something that Trump and Putin can agree themselves,' Dickinson said. 'There does need to be European involvement. That needs to mean that there is some sort of sharing of views among allies on what Putin is trying to achieve.' European leaders likely have not given up on trying to change Trump's views on Russia, Dickinson said. But they were always unlikely bring up thorny conversations at the Nato summit. The alliance's main goal was to simply get through it without major blowups, he said, an aim that was accomplished. Still, peace came at a cost - the lack of substantive discussion around Ukraine and Russia, he argued, was conspicuous. 'The lack of a Russia strategy is a real glaring omission from what the summit could have produced,' Dickinson said. — Reuters
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Starmer scales back UK welfare cuts amid Labour rebellion
LONDON: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer sharply scaled back planned welfare cuts on Friday to quell a rebellion by lawmakers in his governing Labour Party, the latest U-turn to dent his authority just a year after winning power. Planned changes to make it tougher to collect some disability and sickness benefits would now apply only to new applicants, while the millions of people who already rely on the benefits will no longer be affected, the government said. More than 100 Labour lawmakers had publicly opposed Starmer's reforms, which sought to shave 5 billion pounds ($7 billion) per year off a rapidly rising welfare bill. The rebellion had meant Starmer faced a potential defeat in a vote on the changes in parliament next week - a year after he won a landslide majority in a national election. 'We have listened to MPs (members of parliament) who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system,' a spokesperson for Starmer's office said. In a letter to lawmakers, work and pensions minister Liz Kendall confirmed that only new claimants would be subject to the planned tightening of eligibility. 'Our reform principles remain; to target funding for those most in need and make sure the system is sustainable for the future to support generations to come,' Kendall said. Labour lawmaker Meg Hillier, who chairs an influential parliamentary committee and had spearheaded the efforts to water down the bill, welcomed the government's move as 'a good and workable compromise'. U-TURN The government did not set out the cost of the change in policy. Care minister Stephen Kinnock said that details would come in the next budget, which is due in the autumn. Ruth Curtice, chief executive of think tank Resolution Foundation and a former senior finance ministry official, said the compromise would reduce the government's savings by around 3 billion pounds a year of the original planned 5 billion. It was the third big U-turn for Starmer's government, following a reversal in unpopular cuts to payments to pensioners for fuel to heat homes in the winter, and a decision to hold an inquiry into the authorities' response to gangs that groomed girls for sex, after having said no such inquiry was needed. Starmer has argued that Britain's disability benefits system is too costly to sustain, and makes it too difficult for people who can work to do so, by penalising them for their earnings. Campaigners said that even if existing claimants are exempt, the changes would still harm too many people. Disability UK, a charity, said it rejected a 'two-tier system' that would deny new claimants benefits that existing claimants can receive. 'It is not a massive concession to have a benefit system where future generations of disabled people receive less support than disabled people today,' said Mikey Erhardt, the group's policy lead. The opposition Conservative Party's work and pensions policy chief, Helen Whately, said the decision was humiliating for Starmer, and represented a missed opportunity to cut the welfare bill. 'Starmer ducked the challenge - leaving taxpayers to pick up the bill,' she said in a post on X. Annual spending on incapacity and disability benefits already exceeds Britain's defence budget and is set to top 100 billion pounds by 2030, according to official forecasts, up from 65 billion pounds now. But the plans to cut payments to some of the most vulnerable in society have proven particularly painful for lawmakers in the centre-left Labour Party, which founded the state-run National Health Service and sees itself as the protector of the welfare state built after World War Two. Despite Starmer's concessions, one Labour lawmaker, Peter Lamb, said he would still vote down the bill 'alone' if necessary. 'To me, it's insufficient when better options have repeatedly been put forward and ignored,' Lamb said on X. ($1 = 0.7275 pounds)
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Amnesty says Cambodia is enabling brutal scam industry
Barbed wire fences are seen outside a shuttered Great Wall Park compound where Cambodian authorities said they had recovered evidence of human trafficking, kidnapping and torture during raids on suspected cybercrime compounds in the coastal city of Sihanoukville, Cambodia Sept 21, 2022. - Reuters file photo BANGKOK: Human rights group Amnesty International accused Cambodia's government on Thursday (June 26) of "deliberately ignoring" abuses by cybercrime gangs that have trafficked people from across the world, including children, into slavery at brutal scam compounds. The London-based group said in a report that it had identified 53 scam centres and dozens more suspected sites across the country, including the nation's capital, Phnom Penh. The prison-like compounds were ringed by high fences with razor wire, guarded by armed men and staffed by trafficking victims forced to defraud people across the globe, it said, with those inside subjected to punishments including shocks from electric batons, confinement in dark rooms, and beatings. Amnesty said its findings revealed a "pattern of state failures" that allowed the billion-dollar industry to flourish, including failures to investigate human rights abuses, identify and assist victims, and regulate security companies and tools of torture. Cambodian government spokesman Pen Bona said the country rejected allegations of inaction, pointing to a task force led by Prime Minister Hun Manet formed in January and saying the report was "exaggerated". He said Cambodia was one of the victims of the scam industry and wanted cooperation rather than blame. While Cambodia has overseen raids that have freed some trafficked workers, Amnesty said it found more than two-thirds of scam compounds were either not investigated by police or had continued to operate even after police interventions. Two compounds did appear to have been shut down, the group said. During rescue efforts, police did not enter compounds but met representatives who handed over only the victim who had called for help, the group said, while some survivors were beaten by their bosses after trying to contact the police. The government spokesman did not respond to those claims. "Deceived, trafficked and enslaved, the survivors of these scamming compounds describe being trapped in a living nightmare - enlisted in criminal enterprises that are operating with the apparent consent of the Cambodian government,' said Amnesty International's Secretary General Agnes Callamard. Cambodia emerged during the pandemic as a hub for the global scam industry as mostly Chinese-led criminal groups repurposed unused casinos and hotels as scam centres housing as many as 100,000 people, according to the United Nations. Similar enclaves have flourished in Myanmar and Laos. The industry in Cambodia now generates more than US$12.5 billion annually - half of the country's GDP, according to the United States Institute for Peace. Thailand and Cambodia have traded barbs over the scam issue in recent days as border tensions have heated up, with the Thai prime minister calling for a crackdown in Cambodia and another government official calling the country a hub for cybercrime. The criminal gangs entice trafficking victims with fake job offers posted on social media and then force them to financially exploit people online including through fake romances or "pig-butchering' schemes in which the scammer builds trust with a victim before stealing their money, Amnesty said. Nine out of 58 survivors interviewed by Amnesty were children, the group said, including a 16-year-old boy from China who was kicked and barred from leaving. Amnesty said it had confirmed the death of a Chinese child in one compound. An 18-year-old Thai survivor told Reuters he was trafficked to a compound in Phnom Penh in 2023 and then, when he tried to leave, sold to another compound close to the Vietnamese border. The man, who asked not to be named, was forced to use deepfake video software to pose as an older attractive man to lure Thai women into handing over their money. After almost a year, he threw himself out of a window, injuring himself, and escaped after hiding in a hospital. - Reuters
