
Biochar boom? South Africa bets on super charcoal for green jobs
The chips eventually go up a conveyer belt into a converter, where they are heated and turned into a type of 'biochar' called activated carbon - a charcoal that stores carbon and could help to cut planet-heating carbon dioxide emissions.
"I used to be a maid, I never thought I would work in an industry that also helps lives and helps the environment," said Nyathi, a controller at the plant in Brakpan owned by Adsorb, a South African manufacturer of activated carbon.
South Africa is a coal-rich country but has been the poster child for international efforts to shift towards cleaner energy and industries.
But funding challenges, high unemployment rates and political divides have stalled these efforts, raising questions about how this transition should happen.
Darryl Phipps, a chemical engineer, and the manager of the Adsorb plant where Nyathi works, said he thinks the plant in the town of Brakpan, east of Johannesburg, is the first of its kind globally.
This is because it uses self-sustaining energy - the heat in the converter - to turn wood chips directly into activated charcoal or steam-activated biochar, which allows for greater binding of organic molecules to its surface and has clean flue gas as its only byproduct.
Some proponents see the biochar sector as one answer to both job creation and carbon capture, but the young industry is struggling with a lack of South African data and funding support, experts say.
READ | Researcher finds a way for fruit peels to power camera flashes, jumpstart cables
Globally, the industry was valued US$600 million in 2023, up 97% from 2021, according to the International Biochar Initiative (IBI).
Biochar and activated carbon have been praised by some researchers, farmers and industry experts for improving soil quality and water retention, absorbing toxins and capturing carbon.
When used as a fertiliser, biochar improves water-holding capacity which helps plants survive drought conditions, according to research publisher Frontiers.
Initial studies into South Africa's agricultural sector have showed that biochar improved both maize yield and soil health, but researchers called for further, long-term research, according to the University of Venda.
The South African Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) did not respond to requests for comment on the size and prospects for the country's biochar sector.
But workers like Nyathi are hopeful.
"If the company grows, I grow with the company," she said.
Carbon capture and job creation
South Africa's high unemployment rates, funding cuts and size of the coal industry have slowed down the move towards clean energy and green jobs.
Phipps said Adsorb's converter could be replicable in other parts of South Africa and the world.
Adsorb uses wood chips from pallet repair centres that originally come from responsibly managed forests.
When the wood is heated at one thousand degrees Celsius, the gas generated first makes biochar and then activated charcoal.
Activated charcoal has more absorption capacity than biochar and can also be used as an industrial pollutant removal, according to academic journal Science of The Total Environment.
The gas generated is then incinerated to create clean thermal energy and Adsorb is looking to recover this into electricity, said Phipps.
Adsorb captured approximately 750 tonnes of CO2 in 2024 and supplies activated charcoal to fertiliser, animal feed and cosmetic industries, and has eyes on water treatment, mine rehabilitation and cleaning mercury out of coal gas.
"Processing centres could be established in areas where there were previously mines or coal plants," said Phipps.
"This could involve communities generating biomass and supplying it to these processing centres. If enough plants are rolled out it could eventually create jobs in the tens of thousands," he estimated.
READ | Hive hydrogen seeks proposals to develop multibillion-rand SA plant
Data and funding needs
Despite the enthusiasm, experts said data on biochar is scarce and estimates on the size of the market in South Africa vary widely, potentially due to different classifications of what constitutes biochar.
Romain Pirard, an environmental economist from the School for Climate Studies at Stellenbosch University, said to his knowledge there is "no centralisation of information or any sort of policy specific to biochar".
Finding willing customers is also a challenge for the promotion of biochar, said Phipps.
"Farmers are extremely cost-sensitive, and if there's anything that increases the cost, it damages the sales potential," he said.
Pirard said subsidies to incentivise farmers "to use biochar in place of chemical fertilisers" - and using invasive, alien trees as a form of biomass - could help biochar "take off".
The Department of Environmental Affairs, the predecessor to the DFFE, said in a 2015 report that "consideration could be given by government to subsidising" small biochar businesses. The DFFE did not immediately respond to the Thomson Reuters Foundation's request for a comment.
Despite showing potential as a green job creator, attempts to create a biochar association to centralise data and information on initiatives have not led anywhere, and the feasibility of the sector "remains to be demonstrated", Pirard said.
But Phipps is adamant they are on to something big - if more finance arrives.
"From my children's perspective, I want to leave behind a legacy, something positive that gave back rather than just extracted wealth from the world," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fast Company
18 hours ago
- Fast Company
Trump rollback on clean energy subsidies stalls major solar, wind projects and manufacturing plans
Singapore-based solar panel manufacturer Bila Solar is suspending plans to double capacity at its new factory in Indianapolis. Canadian rival Heliene's plans for a solar cell facility in Minnesota are under review. Norwegian solar wafer maker NorSun is evaluating whether to move forward with a planned factory in Tulsa, Oklahoma. And two fully permitted offshore wind farms in the U.S. Northeast may never get built. These are among the major clean energy investments now in question after Republicans agreed earlier this month to quickly end U.S. subsidies for solar and wind power as part of their budget megabill, and as the White House directed agencies to tighten the rules on who can claim the incentives that remain. This marks a policy U-turn since President Donald Trump's return to office that project developers, manufacturers and analysts say will slash installations of renewable energy over the coming decade, kill investment and jobs in the clean energy manufacturing sector supporting them, and worsen a looming U.S. power supply crunch as energy-hungry AI infrastructure expands. Solar and wind installations could be 17% and 20% lower than previously forecast over the next decade because of the moves, according to research firm Wood Mackenzie, which warned that a dearth of new supplies could slow the expansion of data centers needed to support AI technology. Energy researcher Rhodium, meanwhile, said the law puts at risk $263 billion of wind, solar, and storage facilities and $110 billion of announced manufacturing investment supporting them. It will also increase industrial energy costs by up to $11 billion in 2035, it said. 'One of the administration's stated goals was to bring costs down, and as we demonstrated, this bill doesn't do that,' said Ben King, a director in Rhodium's energy and climate practice. He added the policy 'is not a recipe for continued dominance of the U.S. AI industry.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The Trump administration has defended its moves to end support for clean energy by arguing the rapid adoption of solar and wind power has created instability in the grid and raised consumer prices – assertions that are contested by the industry and which do not bear out in renewables-heavy power grids, like Texas' ERCOT. Power industry representatives, however, have said all new generation projects need to be encouraged to meet rising U.S. demand, including both those driven by renewables and fossil fuels. Consulting firm ICF projects that U.S. electricity demand will grow by 25% by 2030, driven by increased AI and cloud computing – a major challenge for the power industry after decades of stagnation. The REPEAT Project, a collaboration between Princeton University and Evolved Energy Research, projects a 2% annual increase in electricity demand. With a restricted pipeline of renewables, tighter electricity supplies stemming from the policy shift could increase household electricity costs by $280 a year in 2035, according to the REPEAT Project. The key provision in the new law is the accelerated phase-out of 30% tax credits for wind and solar projects: it requires projects to begin construction within a year or enter service by the end of 2027 to qualify for the credits. Previously the credits were available through 2032. Now some project developers are scrambling to get projects done while the U.S. incentives are still accessible. But even that strategy has become risky, developers said. Days after signing the law, Trump directed the Treasury Department to review the definition of 'beginning of construction.' A revision to those rules could overturn a long-standing practice giving developers four years to claim tax credits after spending just 5% of project costs. Treasury was given 45 days to draft new rules. 'With so many moving parts, financing of projects, financing of manufacturing is difficult, if not impossible,' said Martin Pochtaruk, CEO of Heliene. 'You are looking to see what is the next baseball bat that's going to hit you on the head.' About face Heliene's planned cell factory, which could cost as much as $350 million, depending on the capacity, and employ more than 600 workers, is also in limbo, Pochtaruk said in an interview earlier this month. The company needs more clarity on both what the new law will mean for U.S. demand, and how Trump's trade policy will impact the solar industry. 'We have a building that is anxiously waiting for us to make a decision,' Pochtaruk said. Similarly, Mick McDaniel, general manager of Bila Solar, said 'a troubling level of uncertainty' has put on hold its $20 million expansion at an Indianapolis factory it opened this year that would create an additional 75 jobs. 'NorSun is still digesting the new legislation and recent executive order to determine the impact to the overall domestic solar manufacturing landscape,' said Todd Templeton, director of the company's U.S. division that is reviewing plans for its $620 million solar wafer facility in Tulsa. Five solar manufacturing companies – T1 Energy, Imperial Star Solar, SEG Solar, Solx and ES Foundry – said they are also concerned about the new law's impact on future demand, but that they have not changed their investment plans. The policy changes have also injected fresh doubt about the fate of the nation's pipeline of offshore wind projects, which depend heavily on tax credits to bring down costs. According to Wood Mackenzie, projects that have yet to start construction or make final investment decisions are unlikely to proceed. Two such projects, which are fully permitted, include a 300-megawatt project by developer US Wind off the coast of Maryland and Iberdrola's 791 MW New England Wind off the coast of Massachusetts. Neither company responded to requests for comment. 'They are effectively ready to begin construction and are now trapped in a timeline that will make it that much harder to be able to take advantage of the remaining days of the tax credits,' said Hillary Bright, executive director of offshore wind advocacy group Turn Forward.


News24
18 hours ago
- News24
Ford recalls thousands more vehicles in SA
Ford Motor Company of Southern Africa has recalled over 1 000 Ford Ranger and Ford Everest models in southern Africa, it said on Thursday. This follows hot on the heels of two other recalls — 2 872 EcoSport vehicles and 1 796 Puma models. A total of 1 050 Ranger and Everest models with 3.0L V6 engines, built between June 2022 and March 2025, were recalled after the company identified a risk that the left-side camshaft sprocket could fracture and cause the engine to stall, increasing the risk of an accident, a spokesperson said. In South Africa, 995 of these vehicles are affected, with the rest distributed across Botswana, Namibia and Eswatini. The Pumas — some models built between November 2021 and September 2024 — were recalled over a potential engine fire hazard relating to a possible weakness in the fuel system. The EcoSport recall, meanwhile, relates to certain models built between April 2021 and July 2022. In some vehicles, the front half shafts may not have been inserted fully into the transmission during assembly. If the half shaft disengages, engine power can be lost while driving. There's also a risk of vehicle rollaway if it's placed in 'park' without application of the park brake, Ford said. As with the Ranger and Everest recall, the majority of the affected Puma and EcoSport models are in South Africa. These recalls are the latest in a series plaguing Ford both locally and internationally. Since 21 May 2025, there have been more than 30 Ford recalls in the US alone. In 2024, another major recall in that country saw 140 000 vehicles recalled over faulty oil pumps. '[Ford Motor Company of Southern Africa] is contacting affected customers and advising them to contact their preferred dealer to schedule an appointment. The dealer will inspect the vehicle and carry out the necessary repairs. This service will be performed on all affected vehicles at no charge to the customer,' Ford said on Thursday. 'Our commitment, together with our dealer partners, is to provide customers with the highest level of service and support.' Customers can check whether their vehicle is affected by this or any other recall by visiting the Ford website.


News24
18 hours ago
- News24
Ramaphosa warns Trump's tariffs highlight urgency to diversify vehicle exports
@PresidencyZA/X Ramaphosa urges the auto sector to reduce reliance on US exports. BMW's new hybrid model aligns with green mobility priorities. Government pledges incentives for electric vehicles (EVs) production and mineral processing. President Cyril Ramaphosa has warned that the newly announced tariffs by the US could pose significant risks to SA's automotive exports, urging the sector to diversify its markets and increase domestic value creation. A 30% tariff on SA's exports to the US is set to be implemented on 1 August. Speaking at the launch of BMW's new X3 plug-in hybrid electric vehicle at its Rosslyn plant in Pretoria on Thursday, Ramaphosa praised the company's continued investment in the country but cautioned that reliance on a few export destinations, such as the US and Europe, could leave the local industry exposed. 'The recent announcement on tariffs by the US, of course, has a huge impact on all of us,' said Ramaphosa. It further underscores the need for us to diversify our export base and to accelerate domestic value creation as well. President Cyril Ramaphosa He said while BMW's decision to export the new X3 to Europe was welcomed, SA must also expand its footprint across the continent, particularly within the Southern African Development Community. 'We need to open our eyes and our ears and see where else our vehicles can go,' the president said. SA's automotive sector contributes 4.9% to the country's GDP and supports more than 115 000 direct jobs. Ramaphosa described the industry as the 'lead spine' of the country's industrial strategy and said the BMW Group's role in its development was both longstanding and crucial. He said BMW's decision to produce hybrid vehicles locally aligns with the country's transition to a low-carbon economy and the global push towards green mobility. 'We are committed and determined to ensure that there is an enabling regulatory and policy environment to make it easier for companies like BMW to continue to innovate,' he said. This includes support through the Automotive Production and Development Programme, the Electric Vehicle White Paper, and targeted incentives for battery cell production, clean mobility research and critical mineral beneficiation. Ramaphosa also praised the company's broader economic contribution, including its training academy, the Youth Employment Service programme and its investment in digital skills through its IT hub. He said BMW's continued presence and reinvestment, including its R4.2 billion pledge at the SA Investment Conference, was a sign of trust in local workers, who the company refers to as 'associates'. 'You are now going to be producing a high-end vehicle for the world market,' he said to the BMW staff at the plant. It will come from your hands, as associates of this company. The Rosslyn plant was BMW's first production facility built outside Germany and has operated in the country for more than 50 years. Ramaphosa described the plant as a model of industrial transformation, job creation and inclusive growth.