Homan blasts blue state as report shows it releasing illegals charged with ‘horrific' crimes on low bails
Following a Massachusetts law barring law enforcement cooperation with ICE, illegal child rapists and other serious criminal illegals charged with "horrific crimes" are being released on to the streets on bail as low as $500 and, in some cases, no bail at all.
Responding to these releases, Tom Homan, President Donald Trump's border czar, said that Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healy and Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, both Democrats, "should be ashamed" and that despite their actions, deporting criminal illegals "will be done."
Healey has previously said that Massachusetts is not a sanctuary state. However, a 2017 ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Lunn vs. Commonwealth, bars local and state law enforcement from coordinating with ICE to assist with deportation operations. The ruling stipulates that law enforcement cannot comply with ICE detainers, forcing agencies to release criminal migrants onto the streets.
Last week, Wu renewed her pledge to resist Trump's deportation efforts, saying, "We stand with immigrants," and "No one tells Boston how to take care of our own, not kings, and not presidents who think they are kings."
However, at least seven illegal immigrants charged with serious crimes, including child rape and fentanyl trafficking, were released by local law enforcement agencies in Massachusetts in recent months, according to CBS.
The outlet reported that in one instance, a 39-year-old Honduran national named Juan Alberto Rodezno-Marin, who was charged with indecent assault and battery on a person over 14, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, masked armed robbery and assault to rape, was released on his own recognizance without having to pay bail.
According to an ICE statement, immigration officials had previously arrested and removed Rodezno-Marin twice for illegally re-entering the U.S., in 2008 and 2009.
Despite these crimes and an ICE detainer being filed against him, the Middlesex Superior Court released Rodezno-Marin in December. He was not arrested by ICE until a month later. He is currently in ICE custody.
Meanwhile, ABC reported the Worcester County Jail released two illegal immigrant inmates charged with child rape on bail of just $500.
Another illegal immigrant, Jose Fernando-Perez, a 49-year-old Guatemalan national charged with three counts of forcible rape of a child and three counts of aggravated rape of a child, was released in 2022 on a $7,500 bail with just an order to "stay in his home."
Fernando-Perez was finally arrested by ICE on Feb. 2 of this year.
At the time, Patricia Hyde, ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Boston acting field office director, said Fernando-Perez's "horrific crimes against a minor in our commonwealth" made him "exactly the type of alien we are targeting with our 'worst first' policy."
In northeastern Massachusetts, the Lawrence District Court released another Honduran national, 19-year-old Stivenson Omar Perez-Ajtzalan, on $7,500 bail despite pending charges of aggravated rape of a child with a 10-year age difference.
CBS reported that two other inmates charged with cocaine and fentanyl trafficking were released with bail amounts of $500 and $4,000.
While speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in February, Homan issued a stark warning to Boston and Massachusetts leaders, saying, "You said you doubled down on not helping the law enforcement officers of ICE. I'm coming to Boston, and I'm bringing hell with me."
Today, Homan renewed his criticism of Massachusetts and Boston's anti-ICE policies and announced ICE arrested a total of 370 illegal immigrants in the Boston area during a five-day joint federal agency operation last week.
"I made a promise at CPAC that I was going to Boston after reading about numerous illegal alien child rapists walking the streets of Boston and Massachusetts," he wrote on X. "Mayor Chu [sic] later testified that I was lying. Well, I traveled to Boston last Tuesday, as promised, and we kicked off a five day operation with ICE, FBI, ATF, DEA, US Marshals and DSS. These incredible men and women arrested a total of 370 Illegal aliens in Boston and surrounding areas."
Homan said that a majority of the 370 illegals were "significant criminals," including four wanted for murder as well as drug traffickers, child sex predators and "numerous other violent public safety threats."
"ICE had to find and arrest these illegal alien rapists because Massachusetts and Boston are sanctuaries that refuse to cooperate with ICE. They would rather release these animals back into the community rather than honor ICE detainers or notify ICE when they are scheduled to be released," he said. "These officers and agents made the neighborhoods of Boston and Massachusetts much safer. They risked their own safety by arresting these criminals on the street, rather than a jail."
"Releasing public safety threats back into the public, rather than working with ICE at the jails, puts the public at great risk," he continued. "President Trump's 'all of government effort' to arrest and remove the WORST FIRST is making our communities safer every day. President Trump is a Game Changer who is keeping his promises to the American people. Much more to do, but it will be done!"
Speaking with Fox News Digital, Logan Trupiano, a representative for the Massachusetts Republican Party, said that while both Healey and Wu "utilize emotion and try to make this an issue of empathy … they're not utilizing any empathy when they're allowing illegal immigrants who were arrested for heinous crimes, particularly crimes against children, and released back in the community to re-offend."
"It's absolutely egregious, absolutely ridiculous, and there's no decent argument against [deporting criminal illegals]," said Trupiano. "All they're really doing is just attacking the Trump administration and mischaracterizing the administration's efforts as well as ICE."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's throwing himself a parade while red and blue states join LA in protest
Trump's throwing himself a parade while red and blue states join LA in protest | Opinion I don't know whether June 14 will mark an inflection point, but it will offer a staggering contrast between the power-drunk despotism of Trump and the 'Aw, hell no' attitude of many Americans. Show Caption Hide Caption Armored tanks arrive in DC for Trump's military birthday parade As Washington, D.C. prepares for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, armored tanks have begun to arrive ahead of Saturday's celebration. The false narrative, since President Donald Trump's administration provoked protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Los Angeles, has been that it's a blue-city problem in a blue state with a liberal governor who can't control his citizens. But when protests over Trump's draconian immigrant crackdown and his authoritarian presidency spread across the country, as they will likely do on June 14 with "No Kings" protests expected in more than 2,000 cities and towns, the California narrative will swiftly go 'Poof!' We've already seen anti-ICE protests bubble up in the deep-red state of Texas, with more to follow June 14. Will the No Kings protest in Abilene, Texas, prompt Trump to send in U.S. Marines, as he has done in Los Angeles? Trump won't send the Marines into red states to deal with protesters Neither will the protests planned for Tupelo, Mississippi, or Eureka Springs, Arkansas, or Sebring, Florida, or Worland, Wyoming. But what they will do is show the president, who will be plunked in Washington, DC, watching an entirely unnecessary $45 million military parade that just so happens to coincide with his 79th birthday, that Americans are angry, and not just the ones in those disreputable blue states. Opinion: After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment – only MAGA can protest I don't know whether June 14 will mark an inflection point, but it will certainly offer a staggering contrast between the power-drunk despotism of President Trump and the 'Aw, hell no' attitude of a growing swath of the U.S. population. Sen. Padilla in handcuffs was the latest sign of Trump's authoritarianism On June 12, Americans saw video of a U.S. senator, Alex Padilla, being grabbed and dragged out of an LA news conference featuring Kristi Noem, head of the Department of Homeland Security. Padilla was asking a pointed question before being hauled off and then, in the hallway outside, pushed face first to the ground and handcuffed. That's a good way to boost turnout at this weekend's protests. DHS head Kristi Noem says feds are there to 'liberate' LA Almost as chilling as the administration's manhandling of a sitting U.S. senator was what Noem said during the press conference about the U.S. military presence in Los Angeles: 'We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.' Opinion: Trump's military show of force in LA and DC camouflage his failing presidency That kind of gives away the whole game: Trump administration officials think they can send federal troops into a city and indulge in some causal 'regime change' under the pretense of a bunch of made-up nonsense. That's wildly un-American. Yet U.S. soldiers on June 14 will be forced to take part in a sprawling parade that's at least partially in homage to a man who thinks that's how America is supposed to work? What are we even doing here, folks? 'No Kings' protests will give voice to nationwide disapproval of Trump What has transpired in LA has nothing to do with it being a blue city in a blue state with a Democratic governor. It has to do with the American people, most of whom don't like masked federal goons grabbing their neighbors off the streets and not giving them due process. It has to do with many voters who were promised that President Trump would only target 'dangerous' immigrants, not friends and neighbors, or people who've been part of a community for years. It has to do with Americans who see the handcuffing of a U.S. senator for no justifiable reason as anti-democratic and a dangerous escalation. The big and small protests that will soon envelop small towns and big cities in all 50 states will show Trump and his 'lie first, then lie some more' administration that many Americans reject government-sponsored cruelty. The No Kings events will show the president and his people they can't fool all the people all of the time ‒ not even close. The booing of Trump will only get louder Trump and first lady Melania Trump were booed, rightfully, at the Kennedy Center when they arrived for a musical on June 11. The president's approval rating stinks, and a new Quinnipiac poll found him underwater on every issue, from immigration to trade to the economy. A recent poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that 60% of Americans don't think Trump's military parade is a good use of taxpayer money. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. So here's what's going to happen Saturday. Trump's narrative that liberal strongholds like Los Angeles are bastions of radical protesters will be soundly derailed by the appearance of protesters in states red, blue and purple. The hypocrisy of his calling out California Gov. Gavin Newsom and claiming the state is out of control will be highlighted by the fact that Trump says the same thing about red-state governors dealing with widespread protests. Trump himself will be scowling, hopefully in the rain if the weather forecast holds, as the soldiers he forced to march in front of him go by, their tanks and other vehicles needlessly tearing up the streets of the nation's capital. That mandated, wildly expensive parade to satisfy one small man's ego will be drowned out by myriad protests that will collectively deliver to Trump a message from a growing number of Americans: 'You stink.' Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at
Fox News
39 minutes ago
- Fox News
ICE deportation efforts could be derailed if Congress doesn't act soon
President Donald Trump took office in January with a mandate from the American people to secure our southern border, enforce our laws, and deport the illegal immigrants already present in this country. By most measures, he is already delivering on that promise. Unfortunately, open borders advocates are trying to stand in the way of the president's agenda by blocking the use of additional detention facilities which they have wrongly labeled as unnecessary, dangerous, and inhumane. As a former acting deputy secretary of Homeland Security, I can tell you that this is a false narrative. The simple truth is that the federal government needs more detention facilities, not less. As of last week, arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement during President Trump's second term topped 100,000, and ICE had over 54,000 individuals detained, more than 25% above the 41,000 detention beds funded by Congress. Without more detention facilities, ICE would have no choice but to release detainees, which would present grave dangers to the public. Part of the solution is to maximize the capacity of already existing facilities. Many facilities have more room that could be used, but currently is not, in part, because of limits on detention beds set by Congress. At the same time, the scale of illegal immigration underlines the urgent need for expanded capacity as well. White House Border Czar Tom Homan has asked Congress to fund a record-high 100,000 detention beds. Congress should fulfill that request and exempt ICE facilities from state regulation. Many reporters have presented unverified or unverifiable claims about the "dangers" of immigration detention facilities as if they are facts. They are not. Some "journalists" and op-ed columnists have generalized from anecdotes, while others have implied things that are simply false. But the facts are clear: immigration detention facilities are necessary — and, more often than not, they house public safety and national security threats. ICE prioritizes sending those who pose a threat to public safety to these facilities. The majority of detainees in these detention facilities are convicted criminals. Some Republicans may want tougher immigration policies, and some Democrats may want better conditions for detainees. Congress should consider proposals from both sides. Still, whatever one's views on politics or immigration policy, everyone should agree that now is the time for more detention bed funding, not less — because without more funds, conditions cannot improve for those housed there. Some take umbrage with the fact that the government contracts with private companies, not just state and local officials, to help meet the significant demands for detention beds. This concern is also misplaced. It makes even more sense than usual to use private facilities, as ICE needs to "flex up fast" if it's going to get its deportation numbers up. I would note that administrations from both parties have turned to privately-owned detention facilities and hired private contractors to run government-owned facilities for speed, cost, and experience. While the media may have just begun noticing this now, that doesn't change the fact that these contractors have been doing this work for decades — well before the Trump administration took office. No one is more experienced or qualified to perform this job, and that is exactly what taxpayers should want. Lastly, critics are quick to label these facilities as inhumane. They are far from that. Detention facilities are not prisons, nor are they intended to punish. They are also not meant to be luxury hotels or permanent residences. There are certain standards that facilities are required to meet to secure and fulfill their contracts. The contractors who operate them have highly professional employees, many of whom are veterans, and follow established protocols to manage even the most challenging situations. For example, facilities must provide English-limited detainees with certain translation services. They must provide detainees with food, toiletries and daily opportunities for recreation outside of their rooms, including the use of exercise equipment. Detainees are given free medications as necessary, free medical care that is generally of a much higher quality than they would receive in their own countries, and whether anyone likes it or not, they have access to pro bono legal assistance. Despite a massive influx of illegal immigrants in recent years, detention facilities maintain living standards that are, in many cases, better living conditions than the deportees ever knew in their own countries — and they do so at no expense to the deportee. People are entitled to their own beliefs about immigration policy; however, the law requires the deportation of those here unlawfully. Carrying out this provision of law would be impossible without the use of detention facilities, as has been done humanely and professionally for decades. Given the sheer number of deportable illegal immigrants inside our borders at the moment, we need federal access to more local, state, and private detention facilities. Now is the time to expand their use. Public safety and respect for our laws demand it.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Obama Isn't Going to Save You
For those who are paying attention and care at all about human decency, the Trump administration's political chaos and social instability is a challenge that's making some well-meaning people say some strange things. One of the strangest can be attributed to Obama derangement syndrome. O.D.S. sounds sensible enough. Barack Obama was a popular president. His approval rating was a solid 59 percent when he left office. That was just a little off from his high of 69 percent in 2009. YouGov data from this year ranks him as the second-most-popular politician, after Jimmy Carter. More important than how much people still like Obama, is that a lot of people felt really good about themselves when he was president. Nostalgia is a heck of a drug. Compared with Joe Biden and President Trump, Obama looks healthy. His speech at the Democratic National Convention last year showed that he still has the juice. And the moment feels important. Trump took the country into dangerous territory this week. He attempted to take control of the California National Guard and has deployed a Marine battalion to rein in protesting Angelenos. Meanwhile, a line of tanks will soon fête the president in his Army birthday parade, a galling display of authoritarian theater. This week the writer Mark Leibovich leveled up dinner party and social media murmurs about Obama's whereabouts with an essay asking why the former president has been missing in action. The question speaks to an accepted truth: The Democratic Party lacks leadership. Senator Chris Murphy, Senator Cory Booker and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez offer glimmers of a charismatic party head waiting in the wings. But Obama is the complete package with a track record. That idea has enough common-sense appeal to feel right. Unfortunately, it is absolute madness. I don't know which Obama some of my peers remember, but the ex-president was fairly consistent. He governed as a moderate who, at one time, would have been recognizable as a Reaganite. Only in the rightward drift of today's Overton window does Obama's presidency seem radically leftist. As the Democratic Party's leader, he chastised those on the left, threw in the occasional respectability politics about young Black men and sagging pants and gave us an imperfect but critical stop on the road to universal health care. He was a decent president of historical import, but he was still very much a product of his times. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
