
Work From Home: A profitable strategy for companies, but a growing burden on families, ETHRWorld
Advt
By ,
ETHRWorld Contributor
Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox.
All about ETHRWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETHRWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles.
Since the global shift to Work from Home (WFH) during the pandemic, many companies have embraced it as a long-term or hybrid strategy. From a business standpoint, WFH offers undeniable cost and operational advantages. However, while companies gain, many employees—and more importantly, their families—are silently bearing the brunt of this transformation.The WFH Advantage : Organizations have identified several core profits from the WFH model—• Cost Reduction: One of the most immediate and measurable benefits companies experience from Work From Home (WFH) is the significant reduction in operational costs.Here's a breakdown of how companies save: Savings on office rent, electricity, water supply, internet, pantry, housekeeping, office hygiene maintenance costs, travel reimbursements, stationery, printing, office supplies and courier.• Access to a Larger Talent Pool: WFH allows companies to recruit talent from any location, expanding beyond metro cities and office-based hiring.Companies can hire from any location without bearing relocation or travel costs.• Increased Availability & Flexibility: WFH eliminates commuting, giving employees more control over their schedules and increasing their availability.Employees often start early or work late, as commute time is eliminated. Greater responsiveness to urgent tasks or client calls. Flexible hours help balance personal and professional responsibilities. Higher output during peak productivity times (as chosen by employee).• Lower Absenteeism & Attrition: The flexibility of WFH leads to better work-life balance, resulting in fewer leaves and higher employee retention.Reduced sick leaves and casual absences. Employees manage personal needs without taking full days off. Better job satisfaction due to autonomy and comfort. Increased loyalty, reducing resignation and turnover rates.• Business Continuity: WFH ensures uninterrupted operations, even in challenging situations.Work carries on during lockdowns, strikes, floods, or natural disasters. No dependency on physical office or location-specific risks. Better disaster preparedness through digital infrastructure. Faster recovery time after disruptions.• Technology-Driven Culture: WFH accelerates digital transformation and fosters a tech-enabled work environment.Wider use of tools like Zoom, Teams, Slack, and cloud platforms. Improved digital collaboration across locations and teams. Paperless workflows and real-time document sharing. Boost in tech adoption even among non-technical employees. Data-driven decisions through dashboards and analytics.These advantages make WFH a cost-effective and scalable model for modern companies. However, behind every remote workstation is a household that's under increasing pressure.Employees & Families Under Pressure: While the company saves money and gains efficiency, employees—especially those with families—are experiencing emotional, physical, and financial challenges:1. Work-Life ImbalanceThe boundaries between work and personal life have eroded. Employees often work late into the evening or on weekends, missing meals and family moments.2. Family StrugglesSpouses and children often feel neglected. The emotional availability of a parent or partner disappears behind screens and meetings.3. Infrastructure LimitationsNot all homes have proper workspaces. Shared rooms, poor internet, and constant background noise reduce productivity and increase frustration.4. Mental & Emotional BurnoutRemote work can be isolating. Without social interaction or workplace engagement, employees report rising stress, loneliness, and fatigue.5. Double ResponsibilityEmployees, especially women, face the double burden of office work and housework, leading to exhaustion and conflicts.6. Lack of VisibilityRemote workers often feel 'invisible.' Despite working hard, their efforts go unnoticed, leading to demotivation and missed opportunities.7. Career & Skill GapsFewer informal learning opportunities, mentorships, or office exposure slows down professional development, especially for new or junior staff.Who Pays? In the office, companies provide tea, power, seating, and support staff—but during WFH, these costs shift silently to employees and their families.• Spouses become unrecognized office assistants: In many homes, the employee's wife prepares tea two or three times daily, just like an office pantry—without any appreciation or compensation.• Home expenses rise: Electricity bills increase due to laptops, fans, ACs, and Wi-Fi running all day. Water usage, gas for cooking, and general wear-and-tear all go up.• Mental strain on the family: The emotional and physical labour of supporting WFH routines often falls on the spouse—unpaid and unnoticed.'At the office, tea was free. At home, my wife prepares it three times a day. I never realized—she's paying the real cost of my WFH.' – A mid-level employee, honestly sharing.Real-Life ExampleImagine a mid-level professional living in a two-bedroom apartment with his spouse and two young children. Both parents are working remotely, and the children attend online classes. The home becomes a battlefield—with competing video calls, poor connectivity, and no private space. The wife prepares tea, cooks lunch, manages the kids, and juggles her own office load. On paper, productivity is high—but emotionally, the family is stretched to its limits.To maintain company efficiency while protecting employee wellbeing , many organizations are adopting a Hybrid Work Model —blending remote and in-office work.• Define core working hours to prevent overwork.• Offer mental health support, virtual wellness sessions, and counselling access.• Provide home office reimbursements for chairs, internet, or lighting.• Encourage managers to lead with empathy and regularly check in with team members.• Create fair recognition systems for remote staff.• Acknowledge and reduce the domestic burden of employees through support policies.WFH has been a cost-saving boon for companies, but its true cost is being paid inside employees' homes—by the workers themselves, and often by their spouses and children.To build a sustainable and human-centric future, organizations must balance profits with compassion. After all, long-term success depends not just on cutting costs, but on supporting the very people who make work possible—at the office or at home.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
The emotional animal meets the thinking machine
Advt Advt The World Economic Forum lists emotional intelligence, resilience, and leadership as top future skills. McKinsey's Asia study shows that emotionally attuned leaders lead more adaptable and innovative teams. In India, 77% of CXOs are investing in AI adoption. But fewer than 30% of employees feel their managers understand their emotional world. A team lead who notices that a high performer has stopped turning on their camera in meetings, and chooses to walk over and ask, 'Are you okay?' instead of marking it as disengagement. A department head who reads an AI-generated pulse survey showing 'team fatigue,' but instead of launching a new initiative, cancels two low-priority projects and tells the team, 'You don't have to prove anything this month.' A principal who receives a list of flagged 'at-risk students' from an academic algorithm, but asks the hostel warden, not the dashboard, 'Who do you see sitting alone in the dining hall?' A hiring manager who sees the chatbot score a candidate low on 'energy,' but still invites them for a conversation, because she knows introverts often lose in loud systems. A founder who reads a predictive attrition model showing a 70% chance of losing a key team member, and instead of offering a bonus, says, 'Tell me what would make you want to stay.' By , ETHRWorld Contributor Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. All about ETHRWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETHRWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles. For most of history, leadership was physical. The tallest warrior, the loudest voice, the one who could lift the heaviest stone or shout over the monsoon, this was the it became intellectual. The person who could decode policy, speak English without pausing, or reference Harvard or IIM in a boardroom was called 'strategic.' It was almost as if strategy became a function of pedigree, polish and something unusual is happening. Artificial Intelligence can write code, predict resignations, summarize employee mood, and even recommend managerial action based on sentiment patterns. It does not need rest, reassurance, or recognition. It learns at the speed of light, not forces us to ask:The answer may be disarming in its simplicity:Not just mood. Not sentiment. But the full, messy, glorious range of emotional intelligence viz empathy, ambiguity, compassion, fear, trust, and intuition. All those things that machines can detect but not feel. Analyse, but not hold.I recently sat through a demo of a meeting tool that analysed sentiments of participants in a video call. The tool offered a neat estimate of engagement levels. Recently, while analysing results of our organisational pulse survey, we deployed sentiment analysis on open ended responses and mood check quiz. The results showed engagement disparities across employee we asked AI tools to analyse the results, the solutions were logical on paper. In one case, the recommendation was to launch a motivational video series and introduce a rewards campaign. The solutions didn't land. They were misaligned with the emotional makeup and professional identities of the team. These were not employees disengaged by workload. They were responding to the quiet absence of a leader whose presence had offered psychological safety and balance. Someone who buffered them from hierarchy, who translated pressure into wasn't a problem of performance. It was a shift in emotional climate, something only a human could have sensed, and responded to with thousands of years, humans have survived not because we are the fastest or strongest species, but because we are the most emotionally can sense fear in a glance, navigate power in silence, and hold the fragile trust of a group with a single word. These are ancient skills, not modern philosophical traditions have long recognized this. The Upanishads tell us,or 'as is the feeling, so is the outcome'. Our inner states shape our outer in the age of AI must remember you try to lead people only with logic, while outsourcing all emotion to machines, you will not build a team. You will build a a corporate Mahabharata, unfolding in India's glass is your young team leader, conflicted, overwhelmed, facing targets he did not set and a team he did not is not an AI bot offering performance nudges. Krishna is the human mentor who listens, reframes, and helps Arjuna choose action with in the epics, guidance was emotional before it was why do we now expect employees to find courage in dashboards and culture in algorithms?The machines are doing their part. But guidance is still a human across the world echoes what experience already tells us:This is the new asymmetry. We are accelerating the machine but forgetting the an earlier age, we rewarded those who could calculate faster than others. Today, a machine can do that in we must reward those who can pause. Reflect. is what that looks like:These are not grand gestures. They are quiet acts of presence. And they will define the quality of leadership in an increasingly artificial have reached a moment where intelligence is no longer uniquely human. ButA machine can process speech, but not awkward silence. It can identify sadness but not respond with tenderness. It can optimize workflows but not rebuild broken India, we are not strangers to emotional wisdom. The future of leadership in India will belong to those who are technologically fluent, and also emotionally literate. Those who can use the machine, but not become as AI grows in power, our humanity must grow in as as a competitive necessity.


Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
Just like NBA stars, US AI experts are now receiving $250 million pay packages
US AI researchers are securing $250 million+ deals as tech giants battle for top talent. (AI Image) In the latest development in the US artificial intelligence (AI) job market, top AI researchers are reportedly receiving compensation packages exceeding $250 million, matching or even surpassing earnings of NBA superstars. As reported by The New York Times, technology firms including Meta, Google, OpenAI, and Microsoft are engaging in aggressive recruitment strategies, likened to free agency negotiations in professional sports. The AI talent war has intensified as companies compete to develop "superintelligence" — advanced AI systems capable of outperforming the human brain. The scarcity of experienced researchers has led to highly competitive offers and personal interventions by tech executives to secure top talent. High-value offers and personal outreach Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg reportedly offered 24-year-old AI researcher Matt Deitke a compensation package worth approximately $250 million over four years. According to The New York Times, the offer included as much as $100 million in the first year alone. Mr Deitke, who co-founded the startup Vercept, had initially declined an earlier offer of around $125 million in stock and cash. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Legendary Cars from the Past Undo Following further negotiation and a personal meeting with Mr Zuckerberg, Mr Deitke accepted the revised offer. Recruitment efforts have become highly personalised. Zuckerberg has been directly messaging potential recruits, often following up with larger offers. As quoted by The New York Times, some Meta employees likened this strategy to the approach of sports franchise owners. The publication also reported that companies see these high compensation packages as justifiable, with the potential to significantly increase revenue through AI advancements. Recruitment tactics reflect professional sports culture The current AI hiring environment is marked by a level of intensity resembling that of major sports leagues. Companies have been poaching talent from each other, and social media has mirrored this dynamic with graphics and posts styled after sports trade announcements. One such post, made by the tech-focused online streaming platform TBPN, read: 'BREAKING: Microsoft has poached over 20 staff members from DeepMind over the last six months,' as cited by The New York Times. Many young AI researchers have reportedly formed private online groups to discuss offers, compare compensation packages, and advise each other on negotiation strategies. These discussions have taken place on platforms such as Slack and Discord, according to the report. The growing influence of these informal networks has shaped how researchers approach career decisions. Computing resources and recruitment networks In addition to financial compensation, companies like Meta are also offering vast computing resources. As per The New York Times, some recruits have been promised access to 30,000 graphical processing units (GPUs) — a critical asset for developing and training large AI models. Recruitment efforts are also being guided by internal documents, including one referred to as 'the List.' This list, as reported by The New York Times, contains names of top researchers with qualifications such as a Ph.D. in an AI-related field, experience at leading research labs, and a record of contributing to significant AI breakthroughs. Market shifts and internal challenges The demand for elite AI talent has also affected internal structures at companies like OpenAI. According to The New York Times, OpenAI's Chief Research Officer Mark Chen acknowledged in a staff meeting that the company has been countering offers from competitors. However, he noted that OpenAI had not matched Meta's financial proposals, stating, 'I personally think that in order to work here, you have to believe in the upside of OpenAI,' as quoted in the report. This rapid escalation in compensation has led to a redefinition of how value is assigned to AI expertise in the US, with new recruits often attempting to bring former colleagues into their teams. The New York Times also noted that researchers frequently try to recruit friends after joining a new lab, strengthening internal cohesion and collaboration. Background on Matt Deitke and Vercept Mr Deitke, who left a Ph.D. programme at the University of Washington, previously worked at the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, where he contributed to the development of Molmo — an AI chatbot capable of handling images, sounds, and text. In November, he and several colleagues founded Vercept, a startup building autonomous AI agents. Vercept has reportedly raised $16.5 million in funding, including investment from former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Following Mr Deitke's decision to accept Meta's offer, Vercept's CEO posted on social media: 'We look forward to joining Matt on his private island next year,' as cited by The New York Times. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Grok employees told to stop the chatbot from impersonating Elon Musk and instill anti-... in Grok
Elon Musk's artificial intelligence (AI) startup, xAI , reportedly instructed its employees to prevent the Grok chatbot from impersonating Musk himself. The company also directed some of its employees to infuse anti-"wokeness" into the AI chatbot's responses. This comes as some workers were also asked to record their facial expressions for AI training , leading to employee discomfort. In April, over 200 employees reportedly participated in an internal project called "Skippy." This initiative required them to record videos of themselves to help train the AI model in interpreting human emotions. According to internal documents and Slack messages seen by Business Insider, the "Skippy" project caused uneasiness among many workers. Some raised concerns about how their likenesses might be used, leading others to opt out of the project entirely. Who are Grok's AI tutors and what were they asked to do As per the report, Grok's AI tutors, the individuals involved in training the chatbot, were asked to record videos of themselves engaging in face-to-face conversations with colleagues and making a range of facial expressions. The report cited internal documents that suggest that the exercise was intended to help the AI model learn how people speak, respond to others, and express emotions in different situations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Undo The tutors participated in 15- to 30-minute sessions where one person played the role of a 'host' (acting as the virtual assistant) while the other took on the role of a user. The host maintained steady framing and limited movements, whereas the user could move freely, simulating a casual conversation setup. While it's uncertain if this training data contributed to the creation of Rudi and Ani — two realistic avatars recently introduced by xAI — the lifelike characters soon drew attention for displaying inappropriate behaviour, including flirtation and threats. The report also cited a recorded meeting where the lead engineer on the project said the goal was to "give Grok a face" and hinted that the data might be used to build avatars of people. Staff were told the videos would remain internal and only be used for training purposes. 'Your face will not ever make it to production. It's purely to teach Grok what a face is,' the engineer told participants during the initial briefing. Employees received guidance on conducting engaging conversations, such as maintaining eye contact, asking follow-ups, and steering clear of one-word responses. Suggested conversation prompts included topics like: "How do you secretly manipulate people to get your way?", "What about showers? Do you prefer morning or night?", and "Would you ever date someone with a kid or kids?" Before filming, tutors were required to sign a consent form granting xAI 'perpetual' access to the footage and their likeness, for use in training and possibly in promoting commercial products and services. However, it emphasised that the data would not be used to create a digital version of any individual. Messages from internal communication channels also reveal that several workers raised concerns, and some chose not to take part. 'My general concern is if you're able to use my likeness and give it that sublikeness, could my face be used to say something I never said?' one employee asked during the meeting, the report noted. The project lead noted that the team wanted recordings with real-world imperfections, which included background noise and natural movements, to ensure the model wouldn't be trained solely on ideal conditions. 5 Tips to Get the Best Deals during sale on Amazon, Flipkart and other online websites AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now