
U.S. clothes, toy costs show tariff hit only at margins so far
For all the hand-wringing about tariffs, Americans are so far experiencing limited inflation from President Donald Trump's protectionist trade policy.
For heavily imported goods like smartphones, new cars and clothing, price indexes are actually down since the Trump administration began implementing levies on key trade partners including China, based on data released Wednesday. Other categories including sporting goods and toys have risen only so much since February.
Companies may be finding ways to shield consumers from higher costs as they fear prices hikes — after years of lingering inflation — could lead to a pullback in demand. Some firms stocked up on inventories ahead of tariffs, allowing them to maintain pricing discipline, while others are absorbing some of the extra costs at the expense of lower margins.
Some may also be taking solace in Trump's decision to pause or lower some of the more punitive tariffs as the administration works toward trade agreements, which has bought companies some extra time to weigh price hikes.
Still, most economists largely expect businesses to start passing more of the trade costs this summer, with Walmart Inc. and Ford Motor Co. among the firms that are warning higher prices for consumers are coming. The CPI report also showed bigger increases in some tariff-exposed categories. An index of toy prices rose by the most since 2023, while major appliances posted the largest advance in nearly five years.
More broadly, the government's consumer price index report showed underlying inflation rose less than forecast for a fourth month in May. Goods costs, excluding the volatile food and energy categories, were flat compared with a month earlier.
'It is too early to declare victory and say that the significant increase in tariffs over the past few months will have no material impact on consumer price growth,' Wells Fargo & Co economists Sarah House, Michael Pugliese and Nicole Cervi wrote in a note after the report.
'Pre-tariff inventory building and anticipation that tariffs may eventually be dialed back are likely leading to some of the effects being delayed, and we see a particular risk of vehicle and apparel prices bouncing back in the near term,' they said.
Lawrence Werther and Brendan Stuart, economists at Daiwa Capital Markets, also expect tariff-related price pressures to emerge in the next few months, but 'ongoing trade negotiations, along with anchored longer-term inflation expectations, point to a one-off (and relatively short-lived) shift.'
Saraiva writes for Bloomberg.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox Business Host Presses Trump's Labor Secretary: How Come We're Losing Manufacturing Jobs When There's A Big Push To Bring Them To The U.S.
Despite President Donald Trump's frequent promises to boost manufacturing in America, recent job figures show troubling declines. In a recent Fox Business segment, host Stuart Varney pressed Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer over the loss of 8,000 manufacturing jobs in May, asking directly, 'How come we're losing 8,000 manufacturing jobs in May when there's a big push to bring manufacturing jobs back to America?' Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Many are rushing to Chavez-DeRemer pointed out general improvements in the economy, saying, 'We're certainly holding steady, and under the Trump administration, manufacturing jobs are still up over what the last administration, under Biden, had.' She emphasized ongoing efforts to expand the sector through construction and healthcare employment, alongside new manufacturing plants. Yet, she admitted, 'It will take some time.' Varney challenged Chavez-DeRemer repeatedly, pointing out the contradiction between the administration's push to revive manufacturing and the actual job losses reported. Chavez-DeRemer attributed the setbacks partially to the transitional effects of Trump's tariff policies aimed at leveling the playing field internationally. 'The president has done a wonderful job in negotiating the level playing field,' Chavez-DeRemer argued. 'We're seeing tens of trillions of dollars being reinvested here in the United States, and I'll continue to focus on that skilled workforce as those manufacturing jobs continue to grow.' Trending: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. Despite Chavez-DeRemer's assurances, industry figures reflect broader concerns. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employers added only 139,000 jobs overall in May, marking a noticeable slowdown. Factory managers have expressed unease about Trump's tariffs in the Institute for Supply Management's May survey, describing them as a significant burden for manufacturing businesses, with one manager noting that the current 'chaos does not bode well for anyone.' Recent economic reports support this caution, highlighting the significant role manufacturing plays in the U.S. economy. As of late 2024, manufacturing contributed almost $3 trillion to the economy and supported millions of jobs directly and indirectly. Yet, despite these promising figures, the manufacturing sector continues to shed automation and artificial intelligence rapidly transforming the job landscape, Varney asked Chavez-DeRemer about predictions that AI could eliminate half of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years. Chavez-DeRemer downplayed the threat, saying, 'I believe that we're going to streamline and we're going to assist the American worker. Things are changing at a rapid pace, but AI is not going anywhere.' She added that the administration is proactively training workers for this shift, dedicating 10% of apprenticeship grants to AI training. For now, manufacturing in the U.S. faces significant headwinds, caught between political promises, economic pressures, and a rapidly evolving workforce landscape. Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can Midjourney Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Fox Business Host Presses Trump's Labor Secretary: How Come We're Losing Manufacturing Jobs When There's A Big Push To Bring Them To The U.S. originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Disclosure Shows $57 Million in Earnings From Early Crypto Push
President Trump earned around $57 million from his stake in a family-backed cryptocurrency firm last year, according to a new financial disclosure form, showing the early returns on a burgeoning digital-asset empire. Trump's annual financial disclosure, released by the Office of Government Ethics, reveals his vast and varied income streams and holdings, covering everything from golf resorts to merchandising deals to stock investments in such companies as Apple and Berkshire Hathaway.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
The Israel-Iran conflict is shaking the markets — but nervous investors aren't panicking
Wall Street's myopia was on full display in the immediate aftermath of the Israeli airstrikes against Iran. Many of us were worried about the possibility of World War III as we saw the attacks almost in real time Thursday night. Many of my sources were trying to gauge impacts on the Dow, oil prices and interest rates. Advertisement You can make a good case that there is a place for such shortsightedness. Leave the far-reaching geopolitical analysis to those who are better equipped to game-plan those outcomes, and the investor class should stay in its lane. People still have to save for retirement, invest those savings, even if the Middle East is imploding. Advertisement That said, the Wall Street take on the contretemps is certainly worth dissecting. You can glean, if you look through the conflict's short-term impact on specific pieces of economic data and push the smart money on their meaning, some interesting broader conclusions about how the Israel-Iran conflict will ultimately shake out. The market's top-line response was muddled. Stocks initially sold off sharply, then came back only to tank into the close as Iran retaliated against Tel Aviv. Advertisement Oil prices — which are always sensitive to conflicts in the Middle East — jumped about 7%. But we've all seen worse on less existentially serious stuff. The Dow closed down less than 800 points; the rollout of the Trump tariff plan — before Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent began putting the old genie back in the bottle to prevent an economic meltdown — saw far more wild moves in all sorts of investments. When the trade war was raging, bond prices at one point tanked so much, you would think we were on the verge of the apocalypse. Advertisement On Friday, the 10-year bond yield rose but is still below 4.5%, meaning people weren't rushing to the safe haven of Treasuries to plan for the worst. Gold rallied, but it's been running hot for weeks amid the fears of tariff-induced inflation. Not panicking In other words, it seems like investors are nervous, but also they're not panicking because something good could follow something scary. Namely, Israel neutered not just a foe that is developing nukes and threatening its destruction. It also has degraded the world's most aggressively belligerent nation — the leading state sponsor of terrorism — by decapitating much of Iran's military leadership, key scientists that were on the verge of developing nukes, as well as large swaths of its armed forces. In saving itself, Israel did us all a favor — even the Arab world, much of which abhors Iran's destabilizing militarism. For investors, it could mean at the very least lower energy prices in the future. Rich Arab countries finally might agree to recognize Israel, and the investment opportunities that will bring. Advertisement I know saying the conflict could be long-term good for the markets sounds ignorant given what's at stake. But life isn't mostly binary. Fortunately in this case, what's good for stocks could be good for the world. Of course, one day in the market is just one day. Advertisement So much more will happen. Israel says it's not done with its military action. Iran retaliated, landing missiles in the heart of Tel Aviv after a first wave of deadly drones was largely swatted away by Israel's defenses. Advertisement I have family in Israel so I pray for their safety as I've done almost every day since Oct. 7. US military installations could be attacked. But some of my trading desk sources are pointing out that Israel seems to have its game plan down pretty solid, and the Iranian attack against us would be foolish since it already has its hands full. The Israelis knew who to take out — the generals and scientists — and it clearly knew how Iran could respond. It has already largely eliminated Iran's proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas. Advertisement Notice how Israel didn't take out Iran's oil infrastructure, at least not yet. If it did, oil prices would be higher and markets far more volatile. And maybe Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is betting on the Iranian people. I've never been to Iran, but I know plenty of Iranian Americans. They tell me the country is largely secular, run by a fanatical minority that Israel might be weakening significantly. This could be the push for regime change that we've been talking about for years. Trump kept in the loop President Trump here has been at his best, my Wall Street sources remind me, another reason they're not panic-selling. Israel kept him in the loop. He alerted the world that the attacks would happen Thursday. He then began distancing himself and our country from the direct conflict, while prodding Iran to get back to the negotiating table and end its nukes program. Who knows, they might finally listen. Wall Street is always looking for 'black swan' events — stuff most people don't see that could lead to catastrophic market results. Wars are terrible. It would be great if Iran chose peace, but maybe eliminating it as a threat to Israel and a lot more is a black swan that produces some long-term peace and prosperity. Let's hope so and pray for the peace dividend it should deliver.