GreenFirst Reports Financial Results for the First Quarter of 2025
TORONTO — GreenFirst Forest Products Inc. (TSX: GFP) ('GreenFirst' or the 'Company') announced results for the first quarter ended March 29, 2025. The Company's interim financial statements ('Financial Statements') and related Management's Discussion and Analysis ('MD&A') for the first quarter ended March 29, 2025 are available on GreenFirst's website at www.greenfirst.ca and on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.
Article content
Article content
Q1 2025 net income from continuing operations was $0.9 million or $0.04 earnings per share (diluted), compared to net loss of $26.6 million or $1.39 loss per share (diluted) in Q4 2024. Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations for Q1 2025 was positive $5.1 million compared to negative $0.9 million in Q4 2024.
Benchmark prices saw increases during the quarter which resulted in an average realized lumber prices of $729/mfbm for Q1 2025 which was higher than the $680/mfbm pricing realized in Q4 2024.
On February 1, 2025, the new U.S. administration issued an executive order imposing new tariffs on imports from Canada, which came into effect on March 4, 2025. These tariffs were subsequently reversed on March 6, 2025. On April 2, 2025, the U.S. administration issued a new executive order imposing a 10% tariff on all imports into the U.S. from all countries, with much higher tariffs applied to certain other goods. However, goods compliant with the USMCA, such as lumber, are exempt from these tariffs. These events contributed to an environment of economic uncertainty during the quarter.
Article content
'We are pleased to report Q1 2025 performance with positive EBITDA and net income from continuing operations, despite economic uncertainty and ongoing potential tariffs on lumber exports to the U.S.
Article content
While sales volumes and production were down due to market conditions and weather-related disruptions in Ontario, strong lumber prices exceeded expectations and supported the company's positive financial results.
Article content
Looking ahead, we remain committed to disciplined capital expenditures and maintaining a strong balance sheet to navigate market volatility and potential headwinds,' said Joel Fournier, CEO of GreenFirst.
Article content
(In thousands of CAD, except per share amounts)
March 29,
December 31,
March 30,
For the quarter ended
2025
2024
2024 (4
)
Net sales from continuing operations (3)
$
71,830
$
69,948
$
72,447
Operating earnings (loss) from continuing operations
1,411
(5,415
)
2,666
Net income (loss)
920
(28,029
)
(13,351
)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
920
(26,647
)
141
Basic earnings (loss) per share
0.04
(1.47
)
(0.75
)
Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
0.04
(1.39
)
0.01
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
0.04
(1.47
)
(0.75
)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations
0.04
(1.39
)
0.01
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations (1)(2)
$
5,060
$
(913
)
$
6,296
Article content
(In thousands of CAD)
March 29,
December 31,
As at
2025
2024
Total assets
$
243,518
$
220,466
Total liabilities
96,126
74,850
Total shareholders' equity
$
147,392
$
145,616
Article content
1
Adjusted EBITDA is a Non‐GAAP measure and does not have standardized meaning under GAAP or IFRS. As a result, it may not be comparable to information presented by other companies. For an explanation and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to related comparable financial information presented in the Financial Statements prepared in accordance with IFRS, refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A.
2
Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA before one-time duties recoveries for the first quarter ended March 29, 2025 was positive $5.1 million compared to positive $6.3 million for the first quarter ended March 30, 2024 and negative $0.9 million for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024.
3
Includes net sales to external parties.
4
Certain prior period amounts have been restated as a result of a change in presentation of the Company's Financial Statements for continuing and discontinued operations under IFRS. Please refer to Note 4 – Discontinued Operations, in the Company's Financial Statements for further information.
Article content
Net sales were $71.8 million in Q1 2025, an increase of approximately 3% compared to Q4 2024. The increase in net sales was primarily driven by higher realized pricing during the quarter, which offset the impact of lower shipments.
Article content
Cost of sales were $62.1 million, a decrease of approximately 9% compared to Q4 2024. The decrease in cost of sales was primarily due to lower shipment volumes during the quarter.
Article content
Other Expenses
Article content
Duties expense of $5.7 million in the first quarter of 2025 were lower than the fourth quarter of 2024 of $6.2 million due to lower shipments. During both quarters the Company was subject to a combined duty rate of 14.4%.
Article content
SG&A expenses were $2.6 million in the first quarter of 2025 compared to $2.8 million in the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024 which is aligned with the Company's initiative to managing its SG&A.
Article content
Liquidity and Borrowings
Article content
At March 29, 2025, the Company had $2.5 million in cash on hand and $40.3 million, less $8.6 million for standby letters of credit, of excess availability under its revolving portion of the credit facility. In addition, the Company also had access to $12.0 million remaining under its equipment financing portion of the credit facility. The Company had drawn down $12.0 million under its revolving portion of the credit facility and $13.0 million (net of repayments) under its equipment financing agreement as at March 29, 2025.
Article content
The economic outlook for the lumber industry reflects a balance of ongoing challenges and emerging opportunities. Macroeconomic concerns are beginning to stabilize, which may support a recovery in lumber demand and pricing. In North America, the housing market is showing signs of recovery after recent volatility. Mortgage rates are expected to ease while price growth moderates in 2025, which should improve affordability for borrowers. This could provide relief to homeowners and support demand in new construction, remodeling, and renovation activity which are all keys factors that are expected to continue driving lumber demand. However, it's hard to say for sure how much mortgage rates will go down and it is also possible they will rise due to the current economic uncertainty.
Article content
Structural market dynamics are also contributing to longer-term demand fundamentals. A persistent shortage of housing inventory in the U.S., the aging of the existing housing stock, and demographic-driven demand are likely to support the lumber market both in the near and long term.
Article content
In the short term, reduced lumber demand and conservative inventory management are creating supply-side pressures. However, continued production curtailments across several regions including British Columbia, Quebec, and other areas of North America could help stabilize or even support lumber prices in the coming months.
Article content
Labour market constraints remain a key challenge for the industry, contributing to higher costs and occasional production disruptions. Inflationary pressures across North America have further increased the cost of critical inputs, placing additional strain on operational efficiency. Staffing challenges and tight wood supply are ongoing risks that could negatively impact production output and margins across the industry. Despite these pressures, continuous improvements in production and processing techniques are driving gains in efficiency and helping reduce costs. Companies with access to capital to invest in modern, efficient equipment are better positioned to enhance long-term competitiveness.
Article content
A growing focus on environmental sustainability is also reshaping the industry landscape. Organizations that prioritize sustainable forest management and environmentally responsible operations are increasingly gaining favor among regulators, consumers, and investors. GreenFirst is aligned with this trend, producing high-quality lumber in a safe and responsible manner. We are committed to protecting our employees and the environment while creating long-term value for our stakeholders. Our renewable building materials sequester carbon and represent a natural solution in the global effort to combat climate change.
Article content
Nonetheless, downside risks remain. Should broader economic conditions or employment levels weaken significantly, or if interest rates remain elevated for an extended period without sufficient adjustments in housing prices, affordability could remain strained. This scenario could suppress new home construction and, in turn, reduce near-term demand for lumber products.
Article content
On February 1, 2025, the new U.S. administration issued an executive order imposing new tariffs on imports from Canada, which came into effect on March 4, 2025. These tariffs were subsequently reversed on March 6, 2025. In parallel, on March 1, 2025, the U.S. administration launched a new trade investigation focused on potential anti-dumping measures targeting imported Canadian lumber. This investigation has contributed to an environment of financial uncertainty for Canadian-based lumber manufacturers.
Article content
The actual impact of any current or future tariffs remains unknown and cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Several factors will influence the outcome, including the effective date and duration of any new trade actions, potential changes in the amount, scope, or nature of the tariffs, and the possibility of countermeasures by the Canadian government. Additionally, any mitigating actions available to the Company or the broader industry may affect the overall impact. We continue to monitor developments closely and assess their potential implications for our operations and financial position.
Article content
References to EBITDA in this document are measures of earnings (loss) before interest and finance costs, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, while references to Adjusted EBITDA reflect EBITDA plus other non-operating costs such as impact of valuation changes on the Company's investments, loss on sale of assets and other non-operating losses. Management believes that certain lenders, investors, and analysts use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as a common valuation measurement and to measure the Company's ability to service debt and meet other payment obligations. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not intended to replace net earnings (loss), or other measures of financial performance and liquidity reported in accordance with GAAP. For more information on non-GAAP measures, please see the Company's MD&A.
Article content
(In thousands of CAD)
For the quarter ended
March 29, 2025
December 31, 2024
March 30, 2024 (3)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
$
920
$
(26,647
)
$
141
Adjustments:
Finance costs, net
440
1,082
1,056
Income taxes
51
4,072
1,539
Depreciation and amortization
3,649
4,502
3,630
EBITDA
5,060
(16,991
)
6,366
Gain on sale of assets
—
16,078
(70
)
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations (1)(2)
$
5,060
$
(913
)
$
6,296
Article content
1
Adjusted EBITDA is a Non‐GAAP measure and does not have standardized meaning under GAAP or IFRS. As a result, it may not be comparable to information presented by other companies. For an explanation and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to related comparable financial information presented in the Financial Statements prepared in accordance with IFRS, refer to the Non-GAAP Measures section in this MD&A.
2
Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA before one-time duties recoveries for the first quarter ended March 29, 2025 was positive $5.1 million compared to positive $6.3 million for the first quarter ended March 30, 2024 and negative $0.9 million for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024.
3
Certain prior period amounts have been restated as a result of a change in presentation of the Company's Financial Statements for continuing and discontinued operations under IFRS. Please refer to Note 4 – Discontinued Operations, in the Company's Financial Statements for further information.
Article content
Earnings Conference Call
Article content
GreenFirst will host a conference call to review the Q1 2025 financial results on Wednesday, March 14, 2025 at 9:00am (Eastern). The live webcast of the earnings conference call can be accessed via web: http://momentum.adobeconnect.com/greenfirst2025/ and via phone: (+1) 416 764 8658 or (+1) 888 886 7786. A replay of the webcast and presentation slides will be available on GreenFirst's website following the conference call.
Article content
About GreenFirst
Article content
GreenFirst Forest Products is a forest-first business, focused on sustainable forest management and lumber production. The Company owns four sawmills located in rich wood baskets proudly operating over six million hectares of FSC® certified public Ontario forest lands (FSC®-C167905). The Company believes that responsible forest practices, coupled with the long-term green advantage of lumber, provide GreenFirst with significant cyclical and secular advantages in building products.
Article content
Certain information in this news release constitutes forward-looking statements under applicable securities laws. Any statements that are contained in this news release that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements are often identified by terms such as 'may', 'should', 'anticipate', 'expect', 'potential', 'believe', 'intend', 'estimate' or the negative of these terms and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and, while GreenFirst considers these assumptions to be reasonable, based on information currently available, they may prove to be incorrect. In addition, forward-looking statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks, including those set out in GreenFirst's public disclosure record filed under its profile on www.sedarplus.ca. Readers are further cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as there can be no assurance that the plans, intentions or expectations upon which they are placed will occur. Such information, although considered reasonable by management at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated. Forward-looking statements contained in this news release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement and reflect our expectations as of the date hereof, and thus are subject to change thereafter. GreenFirst disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Article content
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Post
28 minutes ago
- National Post
Proposed national class action filed against Amazon for breaching privacy of Alexa users
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Lawsuit from Charney Lawyers alleges Alexa products have collected more personal data from Canadian users than Amazon has disclosed An Amazon Echo, a compact smart speaker with Alexa that can play music, retrieve news and weather and control smart home devices. Photo by Luke MacGregor / Bloomberg A proposed class action lawsuit has been filed in the B.C. Supreme Court against Amazon over its Alexa technology. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors The lawsuit, submitted by B.C. law firm Charney Lawyers, alleges that Alexa products have collected more personal data from Canadian users than Amazon has disclosed. It also alleges that the tech giant retained the information, even when users tried to delete it, using it for business purposes such as training artificial intelligence and developing targeted advertising. The class action was filed in B.C., on behalf of representative plaintiff, Joseph Stoney, but its aim is to be national in scope. If the class action is certified by the court, it would cover all Canadian residents who had an Amazon Alexa account between 2014 and July 19, 2023. Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again 'Had they learned about this after signing up for Alexa, users would have discontinued their accounts,' the statement of claim asserts. The essence of the lawsuit is the allegation that Amazon failed to obtain meaningful, informed consent for retention and use of this data. As a result, the alleged data collection and use breached both privacy and consumer protection laws in Canada. 'In its terms of service Amazon made explicit commitments to Alexa users regarding their privacy. However, rather than protecting users privacy, Amazon: (1) kept the data it took from Alexa indefinitely; (2) used that data to train its algorithms, machine learning programs and AI; and (3) failed to fully delete the data when customers asked it to.' The suit sets out that since 2014, Amazon has been developing and selling Amazon 'Echo' devices, which are controlled by its cloud-based voice assistant, Alexa. Alexa can activate intentionally or accidentally, the claim says. Once Alexa begins streaming audio to the cloud, the audio interaction is transcribed to text, the lawsuit states. Then it is processed by an algorithm that instructs the Alexa how to respond to the user. If a request has been processed, a copy of the audio file, the transcription, the resulting instructions to Alexa, and any associated metadata is stored in an Amazon database, the claim alleges. Prior to 2020, users had no way to delete Alexa interaction-related data, and it was stored indefinitely, says the claim. And even though Amazon introduced a deletion function in 2020, it adds, Amazon only deleted the audio file, while retaining a transcription, the instructions, and associated metadata. 'When a user chose to delete the data on one or more of their interactions with Alexa, Amazon changed what was visible to the user so that it appeared that the interactions had been completely deleted even though Amazon was actually retaining everything except the audio file,' the claim says. This advertisement has not loaded yet. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Charney Lawyers also argues that some of this data may have been collected accidentally when Alexa mistook regular sounds for its 'wake word.' This means conversations users never intended for the device might have been picked up, transcribed and saved. The claim notes that in May 2023, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a complaint against Amazon, alleging the company falsely represented that Alexa app users could delete voice recordings, transcripts and metadata. And instead, Amazon allegedly only deleted voice recordings, keeping transcripts and associated metadata. In July 2023, Amazon agreed to pay a US$25-million fine and 'effectively admitted to a number of instances of unlawful data misuse.' The suit seeks damages, repayment of any profits Amazon gained from the use of the data, as well as repayment of the amount users paid for Alexa products and services. For potential participants in the suit, there is a registration page set up by Charney Lawyers for people who want updates or to potentially take part in the action. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.


National Post
28 minutes ago
- National Post
Telus strikes back at Cogeco and defends Joly's decision to uphold CRTC's wholesale internet rules
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. A pedestrian walks past the Telus Harbour building in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Photo by Brent Lewin / Bloomberg OTTAWA — Days after Cogeco's CEO blasted Industry Minister Melanie Joly for authorizing Canada's three major telecommunications companies to resell fibre optics to internet service providers on their respective networks, the only member of the big three telecoms in favour of the measure came to the minister's rescue. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors 'We have a government that's actually very committed to truly bringing competition and better choice for Canadians, I think, and not interested into political interference with their own administrative process,' said Telus chief technology officer Nazim Benhadid. Last week, Joly sided with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) after it decided to allow for greater competition on existing networks for high-speed Internet services across the country. 'By immediately increasing competition and consumer choice, the CRTC's decision aims to reduce the cost of high-speed Internet for Canadians and will contribute toward our broader mandate to bring down costs across the board,' Joly said in a statement. The decision means, for example, that Telus can use other providers' networks to attract thousands of customers in Ontario and Quebec instead of building its own infrastructure. It has angered major players in the sector, such as Bell, Rogers, Eastlink, and Cogeco, who said it would harm them, and the investments needed to improve their networks. They also questioned the potential for cost reduction. In an interview with the National Post, Benhadid cited Statistics Canada to claim that costs in some regions of the country had fallen by 13.5 per cent since the CRTC released the new framework a year ago. He also challenged his competitors to invest in Western Canada, where Telus has a strong presence. 'It's symmetrical. (All these companies) can come and compete in Calgary, Edmonton, Vancouver. Everywhere we serve, our fibre is available. So it's hard to understand this argument that it's not good. They don't want to come and compete in the west. It doesn't work for their strategy,' he said. Most of the sector's key players are based in Ontario and Quebec, with Montreal housing three headquarters. Telus is based in Vancouver, British Columbia. But Benhadid was quick to point out that when he joined Telus in 2000, fresh out of school, the company was a small amalgamation of regional players from Western Canada. This Montreal engineer, a graduate of the École Polytechnique at the Université de Montréal, recalls that the company he joined had only four employees in Quebec's largest city. Today, Telus has more than 6,000 employees in Montreal. 'So it's always been in our DNA to compete and be present across the country,' said Benhadid. During the interview, he often highlighted Cogeco's business model, which includes investments abroad, notably its failed attempt to conquer the Portuguese market two decades ago. This advertisement has not loaded yet. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'Cogeco's strategy is to compete in the U.S., outside of Canada,' said Benhadid. The Telus executive's comments came a few days after the CEO for Cogeco told National Post he wanted to 'ring the alarm bell' because he never thought that 'such a damaging, dangerous decision' as the one Joly made on Aug. 6 'would or could be made.' 'We had high hopes that this new government would make better decisions for business and the Canadian economy,' Frédéric Perron said. 'And what we saw last week, by the minister's decision, is more reminiscent of old Trudeau era, superficial policies.' Many key industry players expected Minister Joly to announce her rejection of the CRTC's decision. But for Telus's CTO, these comments came as a surprise. 'I am surprised, because objectively they don't stand in front of the economic theories test,' Benhadid said. At a time when Prime Minister Mark Carney wants to see Canadian companies invest in Canada, several players in the telecommunications industry say that Joly's decision will not encourage them to do so. Financial analyses they're citing, including from Bank of America and National Bank, predict that such decision would lead to 'a decline in future investments in telecommunications infrastructure.' This file has also become a political melodrama in some corners of Parliament Hill. Since Joly announced her decision on a hot and dry summer evening last week, she has remained silent and did not offer any other comments than the statement she released. On Thursday afternoon, the Bloc Québécois asked the minister to review the decision. 'Maintaining this status quo makes no sense, especially since even two of the three major telecommunications players opposed it. By doing so, Minister Joly will prevent smaller telecommunications players from becoming competitive and growing, and it is the citizens who will pay the price,' said the Bloc's Industry critic Gabriel Ste-Marie. But for Telus, the regulatory issue is settled, and its leadership team is ready to move forward. The company recently announced it will expand broadband services in Ontario and Quebec with $2-billion investment in areas that don't already have fibre. 'So the areas that companies are saying they're not going to invest in we will. And after five years, they will have access to this fibre,' he said. 'So, their strategy is to not compete in Canada. Their strategy is to do something else. And now they're trying to justify their strategic choices.' National Post atrepanier@ Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.

CBC
29 minutes ago
- CBC
Flight attendant union asks jobs minister not to intervene in Air Canada negotiations
More than 10,000 flight attendants are poised to walk off the job around 1 a.m. ET on Saturday, followed by a company-imposed lockout if the two sides can't reach an eleventh-hour deal. The Canadian Union of Public Employees released a statement on Friday afternoon urging Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu "not to intervene" in negotiations by invoking Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, "thereby permitting collective bargaining to continue and allowing the parties to negotiate a resolution." Air Canada had previously asked CUPE to consider binding interest arbitration, which would bring an arbitrator into the negotiations to make decisions on key agenda items that the two sides haven't been able to agree on. After CUPE declined that request earlier this week, Air Canada then asked Hajdu to make a referral under Section 107 that the negotiation be sent to arbitration. Hajdu gave CUPE until noon on Friday to respond. "We thank the union for their response. We strongly urge the parties to work with federal mediators and get a deal done. Time's precious and Canadians are counting on you," Hajdu's press secretary said in a statement to CBC News. Air Canada warned Friday it is cancelling around 500 flights previously scheduled to take off today in anticipation of the work stoppage, with a full stoppage looming Saturday. It said it would notify customers of cancellations through email and text message, adding it recommends against going to the airport unless they have a confirmed booking and their flight still shows as operating. CUPE released new polling by Abacus Data on Friday, suggesting that 59 per cent of Canadians believe the federal government should respect flight attendants' right to take job action, even if it causes travel disruptions. The weighted survey of 1,500 respondents, conducted Thursday and Friday, says 88 per cent of Canadians believe flight attendants should be paid for all work-related duties including boarding, delays and safety checks — a key sticking point in negotiations that has led to the impasse.