
Commission cuts feedback amid races to push Critical Medicines Act
The Critical Medicines Act is designed to address severe shortages of essential medicines in the EU, including antibiotics, insulin, and painkillers, particularly those that are difficult to source or depend on limited manufacturers or suppliers.
Várhelyi committed to deliver the proposed legislation within the rapid timeline during his initial appearance as Health Commissioner, despite no deadline being set by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
But stakeholders have raised doubts about the feasibility of an expedited process on such a complex issue, and whether due process such as an impact assessment and proper consultation will be by-passed.
The latest Commission agenda tentatively schedules the Act for release on 11 March - exactly 100 days after the new Commission took office - barely meeting the self-imposed deadline.
Call for high-speed evidence
The Commission published its call for evidence - typically a key step in gathering feedback before a legislative initiative is presented - meaning that the executive intends to proceed without an impact assessment. Such assessments are intended to ensure evidence-based policymaking and were introduced in 2022 under the EU's Better Regulation principles.
'As there is pressing urgency to address the policy problem identified, the act will be adopted without an impact assessment,' the Commission stated in its paperwork, adding that a staff working paper will be published within three months of the proposal's adoption to provide evidence and analysis of its expected impacts.
To justify this, the Commission points to the final recommendations of the Critical Medicines Alliance, a consultation body of 250 stakeholders established in April 2024 to analyze supply chain vulnerabilities. These recommendations are expected on 12 February 2025, and will supposedly inform the development of the Critical Medicines Act.
Meanwhile the call for evidence will only be open for four weeks, closing at the end of February - roughly 10 days before the expected publication of the act.
Among the stakeholders invited to provide feedback are EU member states, civil society and patient organizations, business and trade associations, public health sector procurers, academia, international organizations, and the general public.
The interservice process—where all relevant directorates within the Commission review and give formal opinions—usually takes at least 10 working days, a former senior Commission official told Euronews. The source added that this could be shortened to just four days if pushed through for political reasons by von der Leyen's cabinet.
Additional time is also required for the so-called 'legal scrubbing' and translations into all official EU languages, making it clear that the text will likely be finalised only a few days after the Critical Medicines Alliance's conclusions - and well before the consultation period ends.
'That means that, in a cynical move, the call for evidence will be a pure formality, and stakeholders won't be heard at all,' the former Commission official told Euronews.
'We deeply rely on comprehensive engagement of our members and advisors and the formulation of detailed, consensus-based positions to effectively influence policy,' Alessandro Gallina, Senior Policy Manager at European Public Health Alliance (EPHA) told Euronews.
He added that quick turnarounds can strain capacity to mobilise resources, gather expert opinions, and forge a unified stance, resulting in less effective advocacy and potentially leading to policies that do not fully address the nuances of public health needs.
Similarly, the European Patients Forum (EPF), together with EPHA members of the Critical Medicines Alliance, told Euronews that they do not consider the timeframe sufficient for meaningful stakeholder participation or for the European Commission to develop a legislative act "grounded in robust evidence and a comprehensive impact assessment."
While recognising the importance of addressing medicines shortages, the patients' organisation added that any legislative initiative must be carefully designed to ensure it effectively tackles the issue and provides tangible benefits to patients.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
EU Commission reacts to Poland's alleged misuse of recovery funds
On Friday, the news website reported that a map appeared on the National Recovery Plan (NRP) website, showing companies that had received subsidies from the European Union. What began as a simple publication online quickly sparked a dispute online, particularly on X, as users began to point out examples of alleged misallocations of EU funds. Politicians and the media subsequently commented on the matter, calling for answers. The expenditures of companies that received EU grants allegedly included company yachts, solariums, furniture, and coffee machines. Poland qualified for almost €60 billion in funding from the EU's Reconstruction and Resilience Fund. Such allocations were aimed at rebuilding member states' economies after the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to receive the funding, each EU country had to submit a National Recovery Plan (NERP) detailing how the funds would be spent to support post-pandemic economies. Under the former Law and Justice (PiS) government, Poland's access to funding was blocked by the EU due to a rule-of-law dispute between the bloc and its member state. Unblocking reconstruction funds was a key election promise made by Donald Tusk and his Civic Platform party ahead of the 2023 parliamentary elections. Some €280 million was earmarked for the hospitality sector, which suffered heavy losses due to successive pandemic-related lockdowns. A dedicated website presented requests from businesses in the sector, but this service has since become unavailable. Nevertheless, media reports have emerged detailing how some of the money was spent, including on yachts, saunas, solariums, and furniture. The issue of KPO aid to the hotel and catering industry was addressed by Prime Minister Donald Tusk during a speech given on Friday. "I will not accept any waste of KPO funds" - said the Prime Minister. Polish president's reaction Numerous politicians, from both the left and the right, quickly reacted to accusations of misallocation of funds, a number of politicians. Among them was the recently-inaugurated president of Poland, Karol Nawrocki. "I am often asked by journalists where we should get the money for [my proposed programs]. Today is a very important day [regarding this matter]. We have found out how the NRP funds have been distributed in Poland. I do not want funds on behalf of 10.5 million Poles spent on saunas, solariums and coffee machines. I want funding for Polish families," Nawrocki said during a speech on Friday. The Regional Public Prosecutor's Office in Warsaw has begun preliminary investigations into media reports of irregularities in the awarding of grants from the NRP. The President of the Polish Agency for Enterprise Development, Katarzyna Duber-Stachurska, was dismissed after doubts emerged about how EU funds were spent. European Commission intervention European Commission spokesman Maciej Berestecki stressed in an interview with Polish radio station RMF FM that "Poland is obliged to take clarifying action" on the awarding of KPO grants". Poland will now have to submit a payment request in November so that the European Commission can assess the projects' compliance with the NRP criteria. According to the Commission's press service, "It is the duty of Member States to take all appropriate measures to protect the financial interests of the Union." The Commission has the possibility to intervene if the Polish authorities do not react appropriately, above all in situations of fraud. "If we see that this does not work, the European Public Prosecutor's Office and OLAF [the Commission's anti-fraud office] will step in," they explained.


Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Orbán says Europe risks being 'sidelined' if Trump-Putin talks happen
Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said on Friday that Europe risks being "sidelined" if a summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss ending the war in Ukraine takes place. Speaking to Hungary's state broadcaster, Orbán said "if the Russian-American summit comes, that's good, because there can finally be peace. But the Europeans will be left out of this, we will be sidelined in managing the security issues of our own continent." Orbán added that "as soon as possible", whether that be before or after the potential Russia-US meeting, there should be a Russian-European summit on the war. Orbán, a harsh critic of the European Union, suggested that such a meeting should not be led by leaders of European institutions. "Their knowledge would be scarce in Moscow," he said. Instead, Orbán said French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz should "negotiate on behalf of Europe." Orbán is widely considered to be Putin's closest partner in the EU and has maintained friendly relations with the Kremlin even after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. "In my opinion, if Europe wants to take the decisions about its future into its own hands, it cannot sit at home like an upset toddler, talking bad about the Russian president," Orbán said. While most EU countries have offered political, financial, and military support to Kyiv, Hungary has charted a starkly different course, refusing to supply Ukraine with weapons or to allow their transit through Hungarian territory, demanding sanctions relief and rapprochement with Russia. Brussels has long been at odds with Budapest over perceived democratic backsliding. The EU is currently withholding approximately €9.5 billion in COVID-19 recovery funding and €8.4 billion in cohesion funds over those concerns. Brussels and Budapest over the years have been at loggerheads on a range of issues, most recently that of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, but the situation has been made worse by the financial issue. In March, Orbán vowed to rid his country of those he claims work for the interests of foreign powers, saying his right-wing government will eliminate a global "shadow army" serving the European Union and a "liberal American empire." The Hungarian leader, in power since 2010, has accelerated his longstanding efforts to crack down on critics such as media outlets, civil rights and anti-corruption groups, which he says have undermined Hungary's sovereignty by receiving financial assistance from international donors. Orbán, an ally of Trump, has applauded the US administration's actions to dismantle the US Agency for International Development, claiming, with no evidence, that it was used to fund liberal causes in Hungary aimed at toppling his government.


France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Is the mere announcement of a Trump-Putin Meeting enough to delay sanctions on Russia?
06:59 07/08/2025 'Wildfires in south of France becoming more widespread, challenging to manage over past 10-15 years' Europe 07/08/2025 'Highest tariffs since Great Depression': In 1930's, trade plummeted and global depression deepened Americas 07/08/2025 'Plastic pollution really begins when we're making plastics and extracting oil, gas from the ground' Environment 07/08/2025 EU faces major export decline amid sluggish growth in key member states Americas 06/08/2025 Failing to tackle climate change will mean more wildfires ahead Environment 06/08/2025 Italy approves $15.5B plan for longest suspension bridge to Sicily Europe 06/08/2025 Nuclear weapons states no longer respect 'legal commitment to non-proliferation treaty' Asia / Pacific 06/08/2025 'The memories of the horrors of nuclear war and radiation seem to be lost on today's leaders' Asia / Pacific 06/08/2025 US envoy Witkoff meets Putin as Trump's sanctions deadline nears Europe