Councillor suspended for 'bullying' member of the public
A report published following a hearing at the local authority's Cunninghame House headquarters in Irvine stated that Cllr Reid had breached two parts of the Councillors' Code of Conduct.
The watchdog panel heard that a member of the public was representing local history society [[Kilwinning]] Heritage at last year's meeting.
They were seeking funding from the council by way of presenting an 'expression of interest' at the meeting.
Read More
After hearing evidence from witnesses, the Standards Commission report said that Cllr Reid had been "rude, aggressive and confrontational in his questioning".
It was also found that he "unnecessarily interrupted and spoke over her on various occasions" and he had "given the appearance of belittling her, Kilwinning Heritage and the expression of interest".
The panel acknowledged that Cllr Reid had an important role in scrutinising potential applications to ensure council funds were distributed fairly and in the public interest.
They also noted that he may not have intended to cause any upset.
However, the panel found that his approach was "disproportionate" and that his questioning was "wholly inappropriate".
They were also of the opinion that his conduct may have been viewed as "an attack on both Kilwinning Heritage and on the member of the public".
The panel accepted similar conduct might be characterised as being "robust" and, in certain circumstances, acceptable had it been directed towards other elected members during a political debate.
The panel noted, however, that Cllr Reid, as an elected politician, was in a position of relative power in respect of the member of the public, who was an unpaid volunteer giving up her time for a local heritage society, and it therefore constituted a breach of the code.
They also considered that, as she had been subjected to what the panel considered was effectively an "unwarranted and unexpected public attack", it would be reasonable for the member of the public to have felt "upset, bullied and humiliated" as a result.
It was agreed that the manner in which Cllr Reid conducted himself towards her was both "intimidating and disparaging".
Dr Lezley Stewart, Standards Commission member and chair of the hearing panel, said: 'The requirements for elected members to treat members of the public with respect and to refrain from any conduct that could amount to bullying, are key requirements of the Councillors' Code.
"The panel noted that a failure to comply with the code's provisions in these regards can have a detrimental impact on public confidence in both elected members and local authorities and, in particular, in respect of their expectation that members of the public will be treated appropriately when engaging with them.'
Cllr Reid, who was first elected in 2002 following the Irvine West by-election before being elected a year later for Kilwinning West, said he intends to query the sanction further.
He said: "Given the position I now find myself in, and as the penalty has gone some way beyond the Commissioner's recommendation, I will be looking at lodging an appeal.
"I never at any point set out to upset anyone, only to ensure the use of council funds is spent wisely."
He added: "As a councillor, constituent work is not affected by this decision and I will continue to answer my phone and answer emails for those in need."
While North Ayrshire Labour group chair and deputy leader, Cllr John Bell, branded the sanction as "extremely harsh".
He said: "We are disappointed with the panel's decision. The complaint relates to an informal online meeting of the locality partnership.
"I understand Cllr Reid joined the meeting on a mobile device from a work location, with his camera off. For the panel to hand out a two month suspension in these circumstances seems extremely harsh. Cllr Reid would be right to consider his options.
'What we do know is that Cllr Reid is one of the hardest working councillors in North Ayrshire. Someone who goes above and beyond to represents his constituents on local issues, as well volunteering countless hours to putting on community events such as the forthcoming Picnic in the Park.
"We know that he will continue to represent all of Kilwinning with the same dedication he has since the day he was elected.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
a day ago
- Daily Record
Labour council leader breached code of conduct over financial connection to company director
EXCLUSIVE: The Inverclyde council leader has apologised for the "inadvertent breach" of the councillors' code of conduct. A watchdog has ruled that a Labour council leader breached ethics rules by suggesting a property director he knew could become chair of Greenock's town board. Stephen McCabe named Lord Willie Haughey as a potential independent Chair despite the peer being a director of a firm which rented a house to the councillor. But the Ethical Standards Commissioner said no breach had occurred on the sale of the property or over the rental arrangement. McCabe, who leads Inverclyde council, was the subject of complaints to the Commissioner. According to the Commissioner report, McCabe rents his property from a company of which Haughey, a major Labour donor, is a director. In February 2024, the report states that McCabe informally suggested Haughey as a candidate for the non-remunerated position of Chair of the Greenock Town Board. The Commissioner stated: 'The Respondent did not declare an interest to the Council officers when he made this suggestion. [McCabe] was not part of the decision making when selecting the candidate. Lord Haughey was selected as Chair of the Greenock Town Board.' The Commissioner summarised the first of two issues considered as: '[McCabe failed to declare an interest when he informally suggested that the Council consider Lord William Haughey as a potential independent Chair for the non-remunerated position as Chair of the Greenock Town's Board despite there being a financial connection in that Lord Haughey is the Director of a company which owns and lets the Respondent's property to him.' The Commissioner concluded that the councillor did breach the councillors' code of conduct on this matter. He summarised the second issue under investigation as: 'The Respondent sold his property at a price below market value in order to continue living there. As such, he pays no rent or rent which is lower than the market rent to his landlord. Any different may amount to a gift either on a one off or continuing basis which has not been declared.' The Commissioner said on this issue McCabe did not breach the Code. McCabe told the Record: 'When I became aware in December 2024 that I may have inadvertently breached the Councillors' Code of Conduct I immediately took the highly unusual step of referring myself to the Ethical Standards Commissioner, more than seven weeks before complaints were submitted by the other two complainers. "I co-operated fully with the investigation by the Ethical Standards Commissioner, including sharing very personal information about my marriage break-down and my son's mental health. "I accept the findings of the Commissioner's report and apologise for my inadvertent breach of the Code of Conduct. During 30 years' service as a Councillor, I have never before breached the Code of Conduct. I have received refresher training from the Council's Monitoring Officer on the Code and on managing personal connections. 'I note that the Ethical Standards Commissioner has submitted his report to the Standards Commission for Scotland, and I would hope that considering my self-referral, apology and the refresher training I have undertaken, the Commission will be satisfied that I made a genuine mistake. I am pleased that the Ethical Standards Commissioner has found that I did not breach the Code of Conduct in relation to the sale of my house.'
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Lion's head tap stolen from historic Belper mill
Historians have urged the person who stolen an "invaluable" feature from a historic mill in Derbyshire to bring it Hill, chair of Belper North Mill Trust, said a 19th Century lion's head tap was taken from the gangway bridge attached to the mill on is thought the tap was added to the bridge, which dates back to the 1790s, to provide drinking water for mill workers and those using the route to travel to Ashbourne."We'll be very, very happy to receive it back," said Mr Hill. "You'll be doing a good thing for Belper and for people who know and love the area." The tap was installed beneath the bridge on the A517 Ashbourne Road in 1858 and is an "important" piece of Belper North Mill, which forms part of the Derwent Valley Mills Unesco World Heritage Site."The bridge itself is the oldest part of the North Mill that's above ground, so that dates back to 1795 and the lion's head tap was added later," said Mr Hill."It is invaluable. To whoever has taken it, please return it, because its actual value to anyone else is little or nothing."Everybody is really, really upset about it and we hope our appeal will lead to some common sense and the return of the lion's head tap."Mr Hill has asked for the lion's head to be returned to the North Mill Trust Office at Archway House in Belper.
The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Petty councillors show what's wrong with Scottish democracy
From my perch in the press gallery, two floors above the Aberdeen City Council chambers, I had a birds-eye view of the action. Meeting after meeting, angry councillors flung accusations and cruel words at one another, rowing over seating arrangements and perceived disrespect. That is why I was not surprised this week to hear that a particularly spirited Aberdonian councillor, Jennifer Stewart, was suspended by the Standards Commission for four months after repeatedly alleging that a colleague, the SNP Lord Provost David Cameron, was 'sexist' and a "misogynist'. Mrs Stewart also said that Mr Cameron, in his late 70s, was too old to carry out the duties of his role as council figurehead and top meeting manager. Speaking to the Standards Commission panel deciding her fate, she doubled down on her comments, quipping: 'I've taken the oath and it's my opinion, valued judgement is that the complainer is a misogynist. 'He has been sexist towards me and he looked at me venomously, which may have been due to his age. 'I stand by my words.' The City of Edinburgh Council saw a spate of resignations last year. (Image: Andrea Pistolesi/Getty) And in July, a Conservative councillor in Aberdeenshire was suspended for two months for making inappropriate comments about Gypsy Travellers. It was alleged that Wendy Agnew had suggested that 'gypsies are not British people' during a meeting in November 2023. In June, Falkirk councillor Billy Buchanan was suspended for three months after sending a 'bullying email', whilst in February, Argyll and Bute councillor Alastair Redman was suspended after falsely labelling a teenager as a 'sexual deviant'. That's not to mention the series of by-elections held in recent months after high profile resignations, or the near-weekly Police Scotland reports alleging criminality on the part of various local councillors. One ward in Edinburgh saw three of their representatives quit within four months of each other, with two taking up positions in national politics. A third, Liberal Democrat Louise Spence, who campaigned on her local roots, put her house up for sale the day after being elected, in order to take up a job overseas. She was forced to resign a week later, telling the Daily Record in November 2024: 'I have had a sudden change in personal circumstances which meant I couldn't in all conscience fulfil my role as a councillor. At this time, my focus must be with my family. I have informed my Liberal Democrat colleagues of my changed circumstances and offered my resignation.' Read more: It's not my place to comment on individual cases of councillor misconduct, however some truths are quite clear. Ask any local democracy reporter, and they will tell you that political spats and personal vendettas are the norm. This current crop of councillors, many of whom also work as pencil pushers for their respective parties' MSPs, are making a mockery of local government and the people who voted for them. Too many behave like petulant children, trading barbs at the expense of the taxpayer. Local communities deserve better representation. They deserve people who actually live in the wards they represent, not paper candidates printed out by regional branches. They deserve councillors who care, not those who are only using the office as a launch pad for national politics. Because with friends like these, it's no wonder people are scunnered.
