logo
Rumours, rock-star cardinals and street cleaning: Rome gets ready for conclave

Rumours, rock-star cardinals and street cleaning: Rome gets ready for conclave

The Guardian03-05-2025

Some journalists brave the warm spring sun, others seek respite in the shade of the Vatican's colonnades. Whatever their strategy, the aim is the same: to spot the red-capped cardinals emerging from Synod Hall and try to elicit from them a clue as to who will succeed Pope Francis.
The men responsible for picking a new pontiff are enjoying rock-star status in Rome this week as they prepare for conclave: the secret, centuries-old ritual of electing a leader of the Catholic church that is due to begin on 7 May.
Marina García Diéguez is among the journalists partaking in the daily stakeout. She is a conclave novice, but was quick to suss out the cunning ways the cardinals try to avoid the gaggle of reporters.
'Each one has his own strategy,' said Diéguez, who works for the Spanish radio station Cadena Ser and Mediaset España. 'Some already have cars with blacked-out windows waiting for them, so they can make a sharp exit. Others remove their red skullcaps and leave by foot, taking a route that crosses St Peter's Square, where they can get lost among the tourists, before escaping through Via della Conciliazione.' It was at that point, she advised, that you stood a good chance of catching one.
Diéguez had managed to obtain quotes from a couple, including Fernando Filoni, an Italian cardinal whose name cropped up this week among the favourites for pope. The Guardian's attempt to give chase was not as successful. 'I don't speak English, which at this precise moment, is a very good thing,' said an Argentinian cardinal, before politely adding, in Italian: 'But we are working very well together,' and striding off.
About 180 cardinals from all over the world have been gathering each morning this week at Synod Hall to get to know each other and to share their visions of the church, but ultimately to establish a clear pope contender. Of that number, 133 are eligible to vote after two dropped out of the conclave for health reasons.
Eight in 10 of the voters were appointed by Francis, with 20 becoming cardinals only in December. Francis made a point of selecting cardinals from places where there had never previously been one, such as Myanmar, Haiti and Rwanda. Until this past week or so, many had never met.
During conclave, the men will be sequestered in their humble lodgings at Casa Santa Marta, the guesthouse where Pope Francis lived during his 12-year papacy, and the Sistine Chapel, where the voting takes place.
The cardinals swear an oath of silence before each pre-conclave meeting and will do so again when the election begins.
But until they are sequestered, it is in the bars and restaurants in the area surrounding the Vatican where the real talking happens, with some mischievous cardinals exploiting the press while they can to leak titbits or to discredit the main candidates.
Al Passetto di Borgo, a restaurant in Borgo Pio, has been a favourite among Rome's clergy for years. According to a framed newspaper article hanging on the wall, this was the place where cardinals, over carbonara and tiramisu, plotted to ensure the election of Joseph Ratzinger in the 2005 conclave.
Seán Patrick O'Malley, an American cardinal who leads a commission tasked with preventing clerical abuse against minors, was among the diners this week. Aged 80, O'Malley is too old to vote but has been named by some church-watchers as a possibility for pontiff. Another diner was Donald Wuerl, who in 2018 resigned as archbishop of Washington over his handling of a sexual abuse scandal.
Showing a photo on his phone of a plain-clothed Wuerl in Al Passetto di Borgo, the restaurant's owner, Antonello Fulvimari, said: 'He's been coming here since 1969.'
The only information Fulvimari had been able to glean from his prestigious clients this week was that they wanted the conclave over 'as soon as possible'. 'They all want to get home,' he added. 'But this is where the real decisions get made.'
Another popular restaurant is Marcantonio, although according to a waiter, the presence of cardinals has petered out because of journalists.
Cardinals who want to spread rumours tend to resort to the veteran Vatican reporters from the Italian press. They have sought to diminish the credibility of some leading contenders – for example Pietro Parolin, the Vatican's secretary of state – by claiming they have health issues. Luis Antonio Tagle, a reformer from the Philippines and a strong favourite, has also had a rough ride from conservative cardinals after a video of him singing John Lennon's Imagine emerged on the internet.
Another meeting point is reportedly Caffe dei Papi, a coffee bar tucked away from the main hubbub on Via Vespasiano. 'But I never know when they are here,' said Ilda, the bar's manager. 'I just read about it in the newspaper.'
Unsurprisingly, the main chatter in the bar has revolved around who will be elected pope. 'I think it should be someone who embraces everyone,' said Ilda.
Vincenzo Aru, a building concierge who works nearby, is a lapsed Catholic and therefore indifferent. 'I'm just happy they've cleaned the streets,' he said. 'The only time that happens around here is when a pope dies.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump polls well on immigration, amid Los Angeles protests
Trump polls well on immigration, amid Los Angeles protests

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump polls well on immigration, amid Los Angeles protests

The poll was conducted before Trump ordered the National Guard into Los Angeles on June 8. More: 'I would': Trump says he'd arrest California Gov. Gavin Newsom Under Trump, immigration authorities have ordered arrests and deportations across the country. In San Diego, agents raided an Italian restaurant on June 6, arresting multiple kitchen workers. Sometimes violent demonstrations ignited in Los Angeles that same day over immigration raids. Local law enforcement, responding to the protests were joined by members of the California National Guard on June 8, ordered there by Trump over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom. More: Illegal border crossings at record lows as Trump crackdown spreads Newsom has asked the president to withdraw troops, criticized him on social media for "fanning the flames," and said the state is suing the Trump administration. Trump has called the move necessary, writing on Truth Social, "These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists." A small majority of polled voters are backing his overall approach immigration. Fifty-four percent told CBS News and YouGov they approve of the administration's deportation efforts. A little over 40% said they think Trump's crackdown is making America safer. Most of that support came from his base: 93% of Republicans said they approved, compared to 18% of Democrats. Meanwhile, 49% of independents agreed. More: Finneas teargassed in LA protests: 'They're inciting this' Invoking wartime powers to stop what he calls an "invasion," Trump has said repeatedly his administration is targeting violent criminals who are in the country illegally. A majority of voters said they believe all or some illegal immigrants should be deported, in a Pew Research Center survey earlier this year. Of those who said "some," 97% agreed people who committed violent crimes should be forced to leave. More: Massachusetts high school student granted bail by immigration court However, the Trump administration's aggressive efforts have ensnared some immigrants accused of or charged with nonviolent offenses and some with no criminal record at all. And the hurried pace of the deportations has ignored due process, experts and advocates say. Despite receiving most of his support from voters on immigration policy, Trump's overall ratings remain at a dip. Polls in early June show him between 45% and 50% approval. Contributing: Lauren Villagran

Rachel Reeves spending review: What will be in the spending review and what does it mean for Scotland?
Rachel Reeves spending review: What will be in the spending review and what does it mean for Scotland?

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Rachel Reeves spending review: What will be in the spending review and what does it mean for Scotland?

The Spending Review will be delivered by Chancellor Rachel Reeves on Wednesday. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Chancellor Rachel Reeves will deliver the Spending Review on Wednesday, in what is expected to lead to a significant amount of money for Scotland. While some areas with the greatest uptick in spending are devolved, the nature of the Barnett Formula means the Scottish Government will be allocated extra funds, in what The Scotsman understands will be a significant increase. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Reform UK has suggested the Barnett Formula and block funding grant from Westminster should go to be replaced with more tax powers for the Scottish Parliament The formula is used to work out the level of public spending for each of the devolved administrations. The Barnett Formula aims to be fair mechanism by giving each of the devolved administrations the same pounds-per-person change in funding. Here's what is expected to be in the spending review and what it means for Scotland. Winter fuel Scottish pensioners now face being worse off than those in England and Wales after the UK government confirmed its U-turn over the winter fuel payment. The Chancellor announced on Monday the payment, worth up to £300 for each recipient, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it because anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year will now get the payment automatically. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, Scotland has already created a devolved benefit of £100 for all pensioner households, which is less generous than the UK government version, potentially leaving hundreds of thousands of Scots worse off than their English and Welsh counterparts. With Holyrood being sent more money through the Barnett Formula, Scottish Labour has urged the Government at Holyrood to increase its payments. Energy UK energy secretary Ed Miliband endured a battle with the Treasury over funding, but is now expecting several big announcements. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (centre), Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (right) and Ed Miliband, Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary (left), during a visit to St Fergus Gas Terminal, a clean power facility in AberdeenshirePicture: Jeff J Mitchell/PA Wire Most notably, the UK government has announced a £14.2 billion investment to build the Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk - a project that could boost energy in Scotland, despite being based elsewhere. For Scotland, it is also understood the government is set to commit to a multi-decade, multi-billion redevelopment of HMNB Clyde, with funding in the hundreds of millions for the next few years. There are also hopes the Chancellor could finally sign off on the Acorn project. Based near Peterhead, it has been in the pipeline for years and would allow fossil fuels to continue to be burnt without, in theory, releasing harmful carbon emissions. The project is seen as key to scaling up the low-carbon hydrogen sector in Scotland and future plans for Grangemouth, but the technology has not yet been demonstrated at commercial scale. One way or the other, a decision is expected during the spending review. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Health Wes Streeting's department is expected to get one of the biggest funding boosts, which will in turn lead to more money for Scotland through the Barnett Formula. Shortly after the statement from Ms Reeves, the UK government will publish groundwork for its NHS ten-year plan. This will give an idea of the financial boost to Scotland and also what Labour might try to do to NHS Scotland if they win the Holyrood election next year.

Reform needs Zia Yusuf
Reform needs Zia Yusuf

New Statesman​

time2 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

Reform needs Zia Yusuf

After the turmoil created by the resignation of Zia Yusuf as chairman of Reform UK, and then his return 48 hours later in a new role, the risibly titled 'leader of the DOGE unit', Nigel Farage's anti-system party started the week determined to regain control. While Yusuf was interviewed in the coveted 8.10am slot on the BBC's Today programme on 9 June, Farage was in Wales. There he delivered a speech, fusing right and left populism, aimed at disaffected Labour voters. He took credit for Labour's U-turn on restoring the winter fuel allowance to most pensioners, accused Keir Starmer of being in a 'blind panic' about Reform (he had previously boasted that he was living rent free in the prime minister's head), said he would like to see the return of coal mines to Wales and pledged to reopen the Port Talbot steel blast furnaces. All in a morning's work. As the so-called Conservative and Unionist party withers in Scotland and Wales, Reform, dismissed as an English nationalist party, is supplanting it; without any significant infrastructure or organisation in Scotland, Reform improbably won 26 per cent of the vote in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election last week, which Labour took from the SNP. John Swinney, the SNP leader, had declared before the vote that Labour could not win. Don't follow his racing tips. Support for Labour has collapsed in Wales, and, according to the latest YouGov poll, Reform is second behind Plaid Cymru in the contest for next year's Senedd elections. The mood in the old industrial heartlands of Wales is no different from the red wall areas of England: one of mass disaffection. Starmer's advisers believe the next general election will be a straight contest between Labour and Reform and it's one they think they can win, not least because they expect progressives, as well as crypto Liberal Democrats, to fall into line when confronted by the prospect of a Farage premiership. That might turn out to be another progressive delusion. The greater challenge for Farage, as framed by Dominic Cummings, who caricatures Reform as being little more than 'Nigel Farage and an iPhone', is this: can the party attract elite talent? They were once antagonists, but Cummings is now one of the most astute analysts of Farageism. 'Does he want to find people to be chancellor etc who are better than the old parties?' Cummings wrote in a long Substack post, prefaced by the obligatory blizzard of quotations from Bismarck, Churchill, Nietzsche, Mao, Thucydides and James Marriott. 'Can he exploit the surging energy for new politics among the young, can he hoist a sail and let that force blow him along to greater victories over his enemies? Or does he blow the chance and let that energy be captured by others?' When I spent a day with Farage on the Essex coast last summer as he campaigned in the general election, he told me, as I wrote at the time, that he believed he had done more than any other politician to defeat the far right in Britain. 'If you think I'm bad enough, imagine what might come after me,' he said. 'But while I'm here that person will not emerge.' Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Farge is adept at simultaneously deflecting and attracting the nativist right, which is why his party is split. Rupert Lowe, a boorish Monday Club-style reactionary now sitting as an independent in the Commons having been banished from Reform, represented a hardline faction that is obsessed with Islam. That faction is closer, in spirit and intent, than Farage can tolerate to European far-right parties such as the Sweden Democrats and the Afd in Germany. I was reporting from a Reform rally in Quendon, near Saffron Walden, in Essex, in February, when Lowe demanded the deportation of rape gangs 'and members of their families'. He later posted on Facebook that he had been 'instructed by Farage's team, sanctioned by him, to remove a call to deport all complicit foreign national family members'. He claimed he was being censored. Shortly afterwards, he was out, having also clashed with Yusuf. Farage wants to position Reform as a mainstream centre-right alternative to the Conservatives, but he also wants 'to move the needle' on what counts as acceptable political discourse. Angela Jenkyns, the new Reform mayor of Greater Lincolnshire, said something similar when I asked her about her recent comments about putting asylum seekers in tents. 'I was talking about illegal migrants, not asylum seekers,' she told me while conceding that some of her statements were deliberately outrageous. 'You've misquoted me there. But it should be like in France, a contained area [of tents] – look at the stats, look at the people coming through. The majority are males, economic migrants.… It's about fairness for the British people. I'd never say that about asylum seekers. The tent thing was intended to be provocative to make the public realise that people have had enough. People should not be put up in hotels when British people are struggling to pay their taxes. I know I'm a glutton for my own punishment, but the thing is, I always know what I'm saying.' Sarah Pochin also knew what she was saying when she asked her question in the Commons about banning the burqa. Yusuf, who has endured repugnant racial abuse online, was correct to call the question 'dumb', on multiple levels. Why prioritise such an issue with your first question as an MP when it was not even party policy? The answer is that Pochin, who won the Runcorn and Helsby by-election, was cynically, opportunistically (choose the most appropriate adverb) 'laying down a marker' as one her allies put it to me. This is who she is and what she wants. In his BBC interview with Yusuf, who is a British Muslim of Sri Lankan heritage, Nick Robinson suggested that he provided 'cover' for Farage. The implication was that he was a useful idiot. That is one view. Another is that as a Goldman Sachs alumnus who earned as much as £30 million from the sale of a business, and has since demonstrated his competence by professionalising the party, Zia Yusuf has the kind of experience Reform must attract if is to become anything more than an anti-system protest movement. That was the real reason Farage was desperate not to lose him. [See more: Will Labour's winter fuel U-turn work?] Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store