Ukrainian Air Force shows programmer behind first interception of a Kinzhal missile
Source: Ukrainian Air Force
Details: The operator's surname is not disclosed; only his first name – Dmytro – is mentioned. He appears in the video with half of his face covered.
Quote from Dmytro: "When the war began, I joined the military. I never thought that I, a simple programmer, would master the Patriot system and shoot down a Kinzhal missile."
More details: Dmytro explained that he and his colleagues did not initially know that it was a Kinzhal missile targeting Kyiv.
Quote: "At that moment, we could see on the screen that it was a ballistic missile, but we initially thought it was just an Iskander. Only after we found the fragments did we realise it was a Kinzhal. Everyone was overjoyed, we congratulated each other. Russia had claimed that the Kinzhal was impossible to intercept, but it turned out that anything can be shot down… This was the first time a Kinzhal hypersonic ballistic missile had been intercepted."
Background:
During the night of 4 May 2023, a Kh-47 Kinzhal hypersonic missile was successfully intercepted over Kyiv for the first time. The news was first reported by Defense Express on 5 May and confirmed by Mykola Oleshchuk, Commander of Ukraine's Air Force, on 6 May.
It was later revealed that the Kinzhal was destroyed by anti-aircraft gunners from the 96th Brigade, who had undergone less than three months of training. On 16 May, they reinforced their success by shooting down six more such missiles.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
25 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump's China gamble
President Trump is abandoning — or actively undermining — core pillars of U.S. strategy toward China in pursuit of a legacy-defining trade deal with Xi Jinping. Why it matters: With tax cuts extended, tariff rates set and billions of dollars of investment flowing into the U.S., Trump is now fixated on the largest remaining puzzle piece in his economic agenda. Other flashpoints in the U.S.–China relationship — Taiwan tensions, tech restrictions, anti-Beijing alliances — have taken a back seat to the lucrative promise of a trade deal. Zoom in: Trump's staggering 50% tariffs on India — punishment for buying Russian oil — are threatening to unravel years of calculated U.S. efforts to position New Delhi as a bulwark against China. Trump has accused India of "fueling the Russian War Machine," while China — the world's top importer of Russian oil — has so far escaped similar punishment. India's nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi has reacted furiously, freezing plans to purchase arms from the U.S. and canceling a high-level defense visit to Washington, according to Reuters. The intrigue: Modi held phone calls this week with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Brazil's President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva — potentially signaling deeper alignment between the BRICS bloc of nations, led by China. Modi also plans to visit China later this month for the first time in seven years. The big picture: For Trump, who's guided more by personal diplomacy than strategic planning, bending U.S. policy to land a flashy summit with Xi is a gamble worth taking. AI: The Trump administration reversed its ban on Nvidia selling its H20 AI chips to China last month, alarming Republican hawks who fear that the move will "supercharge the Chinese AI capabilities commercially and militarily." A White House official stressed to Axios that other AI export controls remain in effect. Taiwan: The Trump administration told Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te to cancel a planned stopover in New York this month en route to Latin America, cognizant that the visit would inflame tensions with China. Lai canceled his trip entirely. Alliances: Trump's strained relationship with Modi could result in the cancellation of this year's Quad summit, an Indo-Pacific security dialogue between the U.S., India, Australia and Japan that Trump embraced in his first term. The Pentagon is also reviewing whether to continue AUKUS, a Biden-negotiated defense pact designed to arm Australia with nuclear-powered submarines. TikTok: Trump has defied a bipartisan U.S. law requiring the Chinese-owned app to be sold or banned — a stark reversal from his first term, when his administration led the charge to label TikTok a national security threat. The other side: Trump officials have left the door open to secondary sanctions on China for purchasing Russian oil, while noting that Beijing already faces steep tariffs and has negotiated a 90-day truce with the U.S. "China is a special case because it is — in one country — our largest trading problem and the biggest military threat," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News. "So it's three-dimensional chess with the Chinese, as opposed to other countries, especially our allies ... The Chinese are tough, but we are tougher," he argued. Between the lines: When it comes to rhetoric, Trump has saved his harshest criticism for traditional U.S. allies — including the European Union — while pledging to fight China "in a very friendly fashion." He frequently touts his strong personal relationship with Xi Jinping, and praised China last month for taking "big steps" to curb the flow of fentanyl. Still, the administration has sought to maintain its tough-on-China reputation during trade talks — taking steps this month like prosecuting Chinese nationals for chip smugglin g and publicly pressuring Intel's CEO to resign over his ties to Beijing. White House spokesman Kush Desai told us: "In just 200 short days, President Trump has remade the global trading order, ended the era of economic surrender, and leveled the playing field for America's industries and workers."
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Zelensky dismisses territory swap proposal ahead of Trump-Putin meeting
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky early Saturday once again dismissed the idea of Ukraine ceding land to Russia in proposed ceasefire talks. 'Of course, we will not give Russia any awards for what it has done,' Zelensky said in a video message posted to Telegram. 'The Ukrainian people deserve peace.' He added that 'all partners' must understand peace and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to an occupier.' The Ukrainian leader's comments come just hours after the White House's imposed deadline for a peace agreement between the nations lapsed. Trump on Friday proposed a land swap as a possible concession in his push to end the more than three-year-long war. 'We're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched. There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both,' Trump told reporters when asked about negotiations. The president also announced that he would meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Aug. 15, after failing to impose increased sanctions on the Kremlin as proposed last month. Trump had originally given Russia a 50-day timeline but later shortened it as Moscow continued its onslaught in Ukraine. Zelensky also argued that any agreements made between Trump and Putin, that do not include Kyiv, will further undermine hopes for de-escalation in the region. 'Any decisions made against us, any decisions made without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace,' he said Saturday. 'They will bring nothing. These are dead decisions; they will never work.' The White House did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment. Earlier this year, Zelensky said he would consider swapping portions of Ukraine for a small pocket of Russian territory, to include parts of Kursk Oblast, captured by Kyiv last year. However, the comments were made prior to the Kremlin's land grabs resulting in the seizure of four Ukrainian border towns in late May. Despite the clear change in heart, Trump signaled hope at the time that discussions would bring an end to the conflict. 'I think we're going to have ceasefire on a lot of areas and so far, that's all held very well,' the president told reporters at the time. 'In getting that ceasefire, they had a lot of guns pointing at each other. You had some soldiers unfortunately surrounded by other soldiers,' he continued. 'They are going to be — I believe we're going to pretty soon have a full ceasefire, and then we're going to have a contract, and the contract's being negotiated, the contract in terms of dividing up the lands, etc., etc. It's being negotiated as we speak.' But the slow negotiation process led to the president becoming more frustrated with both Eastern European leaders, especially after Trump made ending the war quickly a major part of his campaign. On Thursday, the president brushed off reports that he wanted Putin and Zelensky to meet before he would agree to a summit with the Russian leader. 'No, he would like to meet with me, and I'll do whatever I can to stop the killing,' Trump said.
Business Insider
26 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Patriot missile production is surging, but the demand is insatiable
American defense companies are cranking out Patriot interceptors at a record-breaking pace, but demand is surging. Russian missiles are stressing Ukraine's Patriots, leaving it scrambling for more ammo. Iranian missiles have put batteries in the Middle East to the test. Western Europe is realizing it needs to revitalize its depleted air defenses, and the US is recognizing that key stocks are running low and need to be not just refilled, but dramatically expanded. Amid global conflicts and growing worries in the West about a major conflict against a peer-level adversary, air defense missiles are in huge demand. It has driven the companies making the launchers, missiles, seekers, and more, defense companies like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Boeing, to ramp up their production, but the demand is also up. And in a high-end fight, it could skyrocket. Surging production is battling surging demand Patriot batteries are made up of radar and control systems, launcher stations, and interceptor missiles, which altogether make up what is considered to be one of the world's best air defense systems. The weapon can effectively detect and intercept ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, drones, and aircraft. Last year, the US Army awarded Lockheed Martin, which makes the Patriot's PAC-3 MSE interceptor missiles, a contract to bring annual output to 650. It sat at 350 only a few years ago. Interceptor production hit a record-breaking 500 last year, and Lockheed Martin is on track this year to produce more than 600 PAC-3 MSEs for the first time. The company said there would be a "significant increase" for 2027. Meanwhile, Boeing is surging PAC-3 missile seekers, critical components that enable the Patriot system to identify, track, and intercept threats, and Raytheon, which makes Patriot radars and launchers, is boosting PAC-2 interceptor missile production. The global annual production of Patriot missiles is estimated to be somewhere around 850 to 880 per year, according to Fabian Hoffman, an air defense and missile expert at the University of Oslo. That number could hit 1,130 by 2027. Russia, far from the only adversarial nation the West is worried about, is estimated to be producing roughly 840 to 1,020 of its 9M723 Iskander short-range ballistic missiles and the air-launched Kh-47M2 Kinzhal short- to medium-range ballistic missiles a year. Those weapons are only two missiles in a vast arsenal. That imbalance leaves the West with a concerning math problem. Air defenders tend to need to fire two or three interceptors to reliably take out one incoming threat, making things even more complicated. Patriot isn't the only air defense game in town, but it's a key capability that could be stressed without deep stockpiles. Brian Kubik, vice president of PAC-3 programs at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control, told Business Insider that "Lockheed Martin recognizes the critical need for PAC-3 MSE, and we're working closely with the US Army and suppliers to increase our production rate to meet the worldwide demand." "Our robust infrastructure and supply chain provide a strong foundation for increasing production," he explained, adding that the company is "taking proactive steps and making internal investments to help support our suppliers, accelerate delivery, and decrease production roadblocks." Raytheon told Business Insider that "it's more important than ever to co-produce, co-develop, and collaborate to get the best capabilities to the field quickly." It said it has entered into new partnerships to increase production, is increasing its staff, and has also committed nearly $1B to secure critical materials from suppliers and ramp manufacturing for Patriot radars. The company said that "by the end of 2025, Raytheon, along with our suppliers, will accelerate delivery times for Patriot radars by 25%." Patriot GEM-T interceptor production will increase by 150% by 2028, it added. Hoffman cautioned that even if the West's production of missile interceptors, like the Patriots, exceeds Russian conventional ballistic missile production, "this will not solve Europe's problems." And for the US, the threat isn't Russia alone. The Pentagon is eyeing China's growing ballistic missile arsenal and recognizing that it is going to need substantial air defenses. American allies in the Pacific realize that, too. And foes in the Middle East can't be dismissed. Patriots are used by European allies, as well as allies and partner nations in Asia and the Middle East. There are 19 operators worldwide, and that means a lot of competing demand, especially with some nations at war. The West's increased production is starting at a time when interceptor stockpiles appear to be running low in the West, putting extra pressure on production efforts. The challenge in fixing the problem is that the Patriot missiles and batteries take time to make, and in that time, immediate demands compete heavily with stockpiling needs for future fights. Thomas Laliberty, Raytheon's president of land and air defense systems, said last year that "it takes us 12 months to build a Patriot radar, but it takes us 24 months to get all the parts." Meeting global demand often means pulling from existing stockpiles, for both launchers and missiles alike. Strained stockpiles The Pentagon rejected a report from The Guardian last month that said that the US only has about 25% of the Patriot interceptors it needs. Pentagon spokesperson Lt. Col. Bryon McGarry told Business Insider that "the US military has what it needs to fight and win any mission, anywhere, anytime." At the beginning of last month, however, the Pentagon abruptly paused weapons shipments to Ukraine, including Patriot interceptors, amid concerns about US weapons stockpiles. The move was reportedly triggered by Elbridge Colby, the undersecretary of defense for policy and someone who has long been deeply vocal about insufficient US readiness for war with China. Trump reversed the decision on military aid but changed how weapons are being provided to Ukraine, putting cost and stockpile burdens on European allies while the US handles production. Prior to that back-and-forth, the president commented on the Patriots during a press conference, telling a Ukrainian journalist that while the US might be able to get additional systems to Ukraine, "they're very hard to get." "We need them too," Trump said in late June. Though the Pentagon rejected assertions that there is a problem, US officials have previously suggested that there is at least strain. US Navy Adm. Samuel Paparo, the head of US Indo-Pacific Command, said last year that the fighting in the Middle East and Ukraine was eating into the US stockpile, pulling assets away that would be needed in a fight in his priority theater. The admiral said that "to say otherwise would be dishonest." Gen. James Mingus, the vice chief of staff of the Army, said earlier this month that US Patriot battalions as "a very stressed force element." David Shank, a retired Army colonel and the former commandant of the Army Air Defense Artillery School at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, shared with The War Zone that the US was short on Patriot interceptors even in 2021, before Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The war, he explained, has exacerbated longstanding problems with missile stockpiles. There's a clear effort underway to expand US Army stocks as the service aims to quadruple its purchase of interceptors, from 3,376 to 13,773, with a substantial $1.3 billion investment in Patriot missiles, a move that reflects repeated calls from experts and officials for far deeper magazines. What conflicts are showing about the need for air defenses Recent conflicts, specifically the massive missile and drone attacks in Ukraine and in the Middle East, are driving the new demand and showing how critical air defenses are in modern warfare. Ukraine has used its Patriots to protect cities and military infrastructure and to shoot down a Russian aircraft, but it's always in search of more batteries and interceptors. Germany has agreed to provide more, but only on the condition that the US replaces them in six to eight months. There's not enough capacity in existing stocks to easily spare. That means greater demand on producers. NATO is becoming increasingly aware of the value of air defenses. Its secretary general, Mark Rutte, said increased defense spending — an alliance push to spend 5% of GDP on defense — would support a huge "fivefold increase in air defense capabilities." He said that the way Russia is fighting shows why these weapons need to be a top priority. "We see Russia's deadly terror from the skies over Ukraine every day, and we must be able to defend ourselves from such attacks," he said.
