logo
Ohio's transgender school bathroom ban begins this week as law takes effect

Ohio's transgender school bathroom ban begins this week as law takes effect

Yahoo24-02-2025

Getty Images.
A new Ohio law banning transgender students from using school bathrooms and locker rooms that align with their gender identity takes effect Tuesday.
Ohio lawmakers passed the bathroom ban bill and Gov. Mike DeWine signed it into law in November.
The new law requires people at Ohio K-12 public schools and public and private colleges and universities to use the restroom that matches up with their gender assigned at birth. It also bans students from sharing overnight accommodations with people of the opposite sex from their assigned sex at birth at K-12 schools.
However, the law does not prevent a school from having single-occupancy facilities and does not apply to someone helping a person with a disability or a child younger than 10 years old being helped by a parent, guardian or family member.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'Any policy that requires faculty to monitor students' bathroom usage is just bizarre and creepy,' said Dara Adkison, executive director of TransOhio. 'I think that we're going to see schools enforcing and not enforcing to various degrees because many schools are just simply more focused on students' education than monitoring their bathroom use.'
Sam Bates, a transgender high school freshman in Columbus City Schools, is worried about the new law.
'I really hope that the people making these rules are able to put themselves in the shoes of a trans youth trying to just go to the bathroom and think of it that way before they make final decisions,' Bates said.
The American Medical Association officially opposes policies preventing transgender individuals from accessing basic human services and public facilities consistent with gender identity.
Slightly more than half of transgender and nonbinary youth in Ohio considered suicide in 2022, according to the Trevor Project.
Eight Columbus City Schools students spoke out against the new law at a recent school board meeting.
'I go to the restroom to do my business, and then leave,' Austin Tapp, a transgender Columbus City Schools high school student said at the Feb. 18 board meeting. 'I cannot see how I could cause a disruption by using the single-stalled men's restroom at my school, and neither do my teachers or my classmates.'
Several of the students asked how the new law was going to be enforced.
'Teachers can't stand by the bathroom entrance all day, and having surveillance cameras in any restrooms is illegal,' Kaia Aitken, a ColumbusCity Schools student, said during the board meeting.
A couple of the students talked about how the law will be harmful to all students, not just transgender students.
'This does not protect the students,' Mischa Wright, a Columbus City Schools student said. 'It harms them. It creates a circle of hate and judgment and fear for young people in this school system, creating such tension and malice at this age is detrimental to their mental health.'
Enforcing the law will be the biggest issue, said Cleveland attorney Robert Chaloupka.
'It puts the liability on the school, but then doesn't tell the school how to implement that,' he said. 'I think when you're going to create a restriction of this type, then I think it's important to state why this is happening and also how people are supposed to comply with it.'
There is strong potential for litigation once the law takes effect, he said.
'An actual situation is going to happen,' Chaloupka said. 'Maybe somebody is disciplined by a school because the school feels that they violated whatever policy that they put in place due to this law, and then that person possibly challenges the school.'
The ACLU of Ohio has not yet filed a challenge to the new law.
'That doesn't mean that we will not sue,' ACLU of Ohio Spokesperson Celina Coming said in an email. 'We are continuing to closely monitor the implementation of the law.'
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost sent a letter offering guidance to Ohio Department of Education and Workforce Director Stephen Dackin.
'The short answer is that Ohio schools must designate and limit the use of single-sex bathrooms to those who share the same male or female biological sex,' Yost wrote in a letter dated Jan. 29. 'Ohio law requires it, and no federal law requires otherwise. No other legal authority interferes with what was once common sense: Boys use the boys' room, and girls use the girls' room.'
Ohio universities are also getting ready for the new law.
'Bowling Green State University is in the process of making minor changes, including adjusted signage, to those restroom facilities that require updates and is evaluating options to provide students access to additional facilities,' according to the university.
Ohio State University's facilities were determined to be in compliance with the law, according to the university.
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mirror wins 3 awards for covering Arizona's Indigenous communities
Mirror wins 3 awards for covering Arizona's Indigenous communities

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mirror wins 3 awards for covering Arizona's Indigenous communities

Photo via Getty Images Shondiin Silversmith and the Arizona Mirror took home three awards in the Indigenous Journalists Association's annual journalism contest. Silversmith, who began working for the Mirror covering Arizona's Indigenous communities in 2021, was honored on June 12 for her work covering the continuing fallout from the state's sober living home fraud crisis, the challenges that Indigenous voters face when heading to the polls and the role that tribal culture plays for 2SLGTBQ+ people. She was awarded first place for Best Editorial in the IJA contest's professional category for her reporting on the Election Day challenges that Navajo voters had to overcome in order to cast their ballots in 2024. Through the course of her reporting on the day's activities, Silversmith spent nearly 10 hours in her car and logged more than 250 miles as she visited just 10 polling locations. 'On average, the polling stations within the Navajo Nation are about 20 to 30 miles apart, depending on the part of the reservation you live in. But there are places where people may have to drive up to an hour — one way — just to vote,' she wrote. Silversmith also earned a second place for Best Longform/Magazine Story for her continued coverage of the challenges Native people and communities are facing because of the massive Medicaid fraud that victimized tribal members and that state leaders turned a blind eye to for years. For the story, she followed volunteers who scoured the streets of Phoenix to find people who had been displaced after the sober living homes they were living in were abruptly shut down when officials cracked down on the Medicaid fraud. 'We're going through genocide,' one of the activists told her about how bad the crisis has gotten. And she was honored with another second place award for Best Two-Spirit Coverage — an Indigenous term that broadly encompasses LGBTQ+ people — for her reporting on Pride celebrations in tribal communities across Arizona, from the large Navajo Nation to the tiny Hualapai Tribe. 'It's really good to be able to see our own people coming together, not only to celebrate pride but to celebrate their own people that live and work in their community,' one Tohono O'odham celebrant told her. The Indigenous Journalists Association, which was formed in 1983 and originally known as the Native American Press Association, serves and empowers Native journalists through programs and actions designed to enrich journalism and promote Native cultures. Its annual journalism contest recognizes excellence in coverage of Indigenous communities and issues that directly affect Native peoples. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Energy Markets Rattled As Israel-Iran Conflict Escalates
Energy Markets Rattled As Israel-Iran Conflict Escalates

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Energy Markets Rattled As Israel-Iran Conflict Escalates

Infographic with a map showing the location of strikes and explosions following the attack carried ... More out on June 13 by Israel in Iran, according to non-exhaustive data reported by the ISW, as of June 13 at 1525 GMT (Graphic by Valentina BRESCHI and Sylvie HUSSON / AFP) (Graphic by VALENTINA BRESCHI,SYLVIE HUSSON/AFP via Getty Images) This morning the world woke to the kind of news that rattles the oil markets. In the early hours of June 13, Israel launched airstrikes against Iran, reportedly hitting nuclear sites and killing several senior military officials, including Hossein Salami, head of the Revolutionary Guard. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called it a 'strategic action' aimed at neutralizing what he described as existential threats. The reaction in the oil markets was swift. Brent crude jumped nearly 8%, briefly topping $78.50, and West Texas Intermediate wasn't far behind, up over 7%. This sharp reaction occurred even though there's no evidence any oil infrastructure was targeted. But when military conflict suddenly flares up with one of the world's biggest oil producers—and they also happen to control the Strait of Hormuz—the market pays attention. To really grasp the significance, you have to look at the bigger picture. Of course, the tension between Israel and Iran isn't new. It's been simmering for decades, fed by ideology, strategic rivalry, and deep mistrust. Israel views the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential threat. On the flip side, Iran has long backed groups that oppose Israel, both politically and militarily, across the region. This isn't the first time the two countries have clashed, either—most often through cyberattacks, sabotage, and a network of proxy battles stretching from Lebanon to Iraq to Syria. What's changed is the move from mostly covert operations to overt military confrontation between two countries in the world's most important oil-producing region. The timing of the attack increases the market's nervousness. Since the Hamas-led attacks on Israel in October 2023 and the war in Gaza that followed, the region has been on edge. Iran has made no secret of its support for both Hamas and Hezbollah, while Israel has stepped up efforts to push back against Iranian influence. What happened Friday didn't come out of nowhere, but it also marks a serious escalation. Iran may not always dominate headlines, but when it comes to oil and gas, it's one of the world's major players. The country holds some of the largest oil and natural gas reserves on the planet. And despite years of U.S. sanctions, it's still managing to export its crude oil. How? A mix of official exports and not-so-official ones. A lot of barrels end up in China. Others move more quietly through middlemen in Asia. These aren't always transactions that show up in global tracking systems, but they're happening, and the volume adds up. Analysts believe that by 2024, Iran was shipping out more than 1.5 million barrels per day. That's not small potatoes. In a market as tightly balanced as global oil, even minor shifts in supply can move prices. And Iran doesn't just sell oil, it has a major role in shaping policy. As part of OPEC+, it sits at the table with countries like Saudi Arabia and Russia, giving it influence on the global crude oil market. But here's where things get especially tense. Iran doesn't just produce oil—it sits right next to the Strait of Hormuz. That narrow stretch of water handles about 20% of the world's daily oil traffic. Any hint that Iran might interfere there—for example, with drone activity, military drills, or even underwater mines—sends traders scrambling. It doesn't take much to spook the oil markets and send prices shooting higher. When news like this breaks, the markets react quickly. Oil spiked almost immediately, but gold also jumped, while equities took a beating. The S&P 500 was down over 1.5% before lunchtime. The Dow dropped more than 600 points. This time it wasn't a concern over company earnings or interest rates. It was about geopolitical fear—and the flight to safety that always comes with it. Energy names shot higher, as you'd expect. Shares of ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips all moved higher on the assumption that higher crude prices might stick around a while. On the other end of the spectrum, anything tied to transportation, shipping, or industrial manufacturing took a hit—because when oil rises, so do input costs, and profit margins are squeezed. This would be a tricky moment for energy prices to spike under any circumstances. But right now, it's a potential mess. Inflation had been cooling. The Federal Reserve was inching toward a possible rate cut later this year. The market was breathing easier. Now? Not so much. Oil is not just fuel—it's embedded in everything. It moves food, powers planes, heats homes, and keeps production lines moving. Even a short-term rise in crude can work its way into consumer prices. And if this conflict escalates, that rise might not be short-term. The news gives the Fed another reason to hesitate. Rate cuts just became politically and economically harder to justify. In plain terms: if oil stays high, inflation will tick back up. If inflation ticks up, the Fed stays put. And if the Fed stays put, markets don't get the monetary easing they've been pricing in. It's not the first time we've seen conflict in the Middle East send oil prices higher. It probably won't be the last. Go back to the Gulf War, the invasion of Iraq, or even Iran's tanker harassment back in 2019. All those events caused oil to spike—until it became clear that the physical flow of oil wasn't actually disrupted. Then prices settled back down. That might happen this time too. But it's the uncertainty that drives oil prices higher. This isn't a proxy fight or a flashpoint involving non-state actors. It's a direct military hit by one sovereign nation on another—and one of them happens to control one of the most important oil corridors in the world. The risk here isn't hypothetical. It's immediate and tangible. There's a lot we don't know yet, but a few key signals will tell us where things are headed: This wasn't just another Middle East skirmish. It was a serious, calculated military strike—and the consequences are global. Whether this escalates or cools down over the next few days will determine how the market responds, but make no mistake: energy prices just became a frontline risk again. Investors should expect more volatility. Rate cut optimism may have just peaked. And inflation, which was slowly retreating into the background, could be gearing up for a second act. Oil is the world's most important commodity. It's a pressure gauge for global risk. And right now, that needle is climbing fast.

Rokita opinion: Indiana police can arrest unlicensed drivers, including undocumented immigrants
Rokita opinion: Indiana police can arrest unlicensed drivers, including undocumented immigrants

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rokita opinion: Indiana police can arrest unlicensed drivers, including undocumented immigrants

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita issued a new legal opinion on Wednesday, June 11, 2025, affirming that law enforcement officers can arrest and detain individuals — including undocumented immigrants — who are caught driving without a license. (Getty Images) A new opinion issued this week by Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita asserts that law enforcement officers can arrest and detain individuals caught driving without a license — including undocumented immigrants — and book them into a county jail. The Republican attorney general said the opinion, dated June 11, was requested by Jackson County Prosecutor Jeff Chalfant and seeks to address 'a critical public safety issue amid growing concerns about illegal immigration and its impact on Indiana's roads.' Attorney general opinions are legally non-binding. Rokita maintained that drivers who drive without ever having a license — a Class C misdemeanor under Indiana law — cannot be released from a scene because they're unable to provide the information required for a written promise to appear in court. He pointed to a specific state statute allowing traffic offenders to be released without going to jail. But that document must include a valid license number. Because individuals without a license cannot meet that requirement, the opinion concludes they are not eligible for release under state law. By its terms, the (state) statute's release provision does not apply to a person arrested for the misdemeanor of driving without a license. A person who has never been licensed cannot, by definition, provide a driver's license number ... and therefore is not entitled to be released. – opinion issued by Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita 'Hoosiers deserve safe streets, and that starts with ensuring those who break our laws face consequences,' Rokita said in a statement. 'This opinion gives our law enforcement guidance to hold accountable anyone, especially illegal aliens, driving without a license — a crime that puts our communities at risk.' In a Friday news release, his office further held that 'illegal aliens operating motor vehicles pose unique and serious safety risks, and that 'booking an illegal alien at a county jail for driving without a license will ensure that federal authorities are notified of the arrest and able to make arrangements to apprehend the alien if they choose to do so.' Rokita noted that driving without ever being licensed is different from driving on a suspended or revoked license — a violation that's typically treated as an infraction, unless the individual is a repeat offender. The opinion clarifies that law enforcement has full authority to arrest and process individuals who have never received a license. The attorney general emphasized, too, that undocumented immigrants are unable to obtain valid driver's licenses in Indiana, and that some use out-of-state licenses that are not recognized by Indiana law. 'Illegal aliens cannot drive on Indiana roadways because they are barred from obtaining valid licenses, but they do it anyway because they don't respect our laws,' Rokita continued in his statement. 'This opinion should provide clarity on law enforcement's ability to detain these offenders, ensuring they face justice rather than being released back onto our streets.' The opinion also cites U.S. Supreme Court precedents affirming law enforcement's ability to arrest for minor criminal offenses and to hold individuals up to 48 hours pending a court determination of probable cause. 8d858822-085a-40cb-ab2c-7f0cf54e6015 SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store