
Childhood AD Not Linked to Executive Function Deficits
A cohort study of children in the United Kingdom found that early childhood atopic dermatitis (AD), especially when mild, is not associated with executive function (EF) deficits in middle childhood.
METHODOLOGY:
Researchers analyzed 11,373 children (51.5% boys; > 95% White individuals) from the UK-based Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, with parental reports of AD activity and severity in their children between ages 6 and 81 months.
AD activity and severity of children were assessed using maternal questionnaires at two or more of seven timepoints between 6 months and 7 years of age, focusing on itchy, dry skin rash in joints and creases, such as behind the knees. At 81 months, data was available for 8208 children, 81% had no AD and 19% had varying degrees of AD activity and severity.
Using latent class mixed modeling, researchers classified children into five distinct early childhood AD trajectories: Unaffected/rare (62.90%), early onset resolving (1.09%), persistent mild (31.35%), persistent moderate to severe (0.93%), and worsening (3.74%).
EF, specifically attention regulation, inhibition, and working memory, was measured at ages 8, 10, and 11 years, adjusted for covariates.
TAKEAWAY:
No statistically significant differences were detected across AD trajectories in selective attention, divided attention, and attentional control at ages 8 and 11 years, inhibition at age 10 years, and working memory at ages 8 and 10 years.
Similarly, no statistically significant associations were observed between AD severity status at 81 months and EF outcomes in middle-childhood.
IN PRACTICE:
'The role of EF in the relationship between childhood AD and neuropsychological outcomes is an understudied area,' the authors wrote, 'but together with prior research, the current study supports the conclusion that EF impairment is not a major mechanism driving this relationship, at least in a sample of nonadolescent children with largely mild AD.'
SOURCE:
The study was led by Elle Kim, Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and was published online on May 2025 in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology .
LIMITATIONS:
Only a small portion of the study population experienced moderate or severe disease, which limited the statistical power to detect effects in more severe cases. Other limitations included potential selection bias, lack of information about treatments for AD, and limitation of generalizability to non-UK populations.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health. Some authors reported receiving research and fellowship funding from and having other ties with various sources, including Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceuticals, La Roche Posay. One author also declared holding patents, being a deputy editor, and being a member of the Board of Directors for the International Psoriasis Council and the Medical Dermatology Society.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNET
2 hours ago
- CNET
007 First Light: Here's What James Bond Might Be Up to in His Next Game, Based Mostly on My Hopes and Dreams
More than 70 years after the character first appeared in the novel Casino Royale, James Bond is being reinvented yet again. The latest news comes from IO Interactive, makers of the Hitman games, who announced the title of its upcoming Bond game: 007 First Light, which will be shown off later this week. It has been an interesting year for Bond, with longtime producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson handing creative control over to Amazon MGM Studios in February, and the studio hiring Amy Pascal and David Heyman as their effective replacements. And almost 30 years after the iconic GoldenEye 007 blended espionage elements into first-person shooter gameplay on the N64, we're getting a glimpse of the next incarnation of Bond video games, from a studio that has lots of experience with stealth and subterfuge. The website for First Light describes it as "a wholly original Bond origin story" that will be about Bond earning his 00 status. In Bond lore, agents are only granted 00 status after killing one (sometimes multiple) people as part of an assignment. But guessing that James Bond will have to shoot someone in an upcoming 007 game isn't exactly the boldest prediction. So, what should we expect Bond to be up to in this game? I own all of the Ian Fleming 007 novels and most of the movies and have seen every official Eon-produced Bond film. Based on that extensive experience and (moreso) the willingness to blindly gaze into a crystal ball, here's what I think we might see in First Light. Searching for a missing 007 After decades of books and movies following myriad incarnations of James Bond, a lot has already been explored, but one thing the movies haven't really touched is what happened to the previous 007. That point comes up in the plot of an Anthony Horowitz Bond novel, but is otherwise fresh territory for a game portraying Bond's origins. James inheriting the 007 designation after investigating the disappearance of his predecessor could add new layers of meaning and weight to the title. Discovering Spectre Spectre, the Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion organization, became a recurring antagonist in Fleming's later novels and a frequent presence in Connery films. It's basically a melting pot of criminal organizations from around the world, allowing for conveniently apolitical villainous agendas. Bond unraveling the threads that lead to MI6's first encounter with SPECTRE would be a fun way to nod to the character's history while still treading new ground. Uncovering MI6 corruption Bond himself is prone to going rogue, usually because he of course knows better than the official orders handed to him, so another possible angle is sending him to investigate possible traitorous activity inside his own organization. This could play nicely with the "earning 00 status" element, presenting Bond with situations where he's tasked with taking out former agents gone bad. IO Interactive has said that this will be an original incarnation of Bond -- no Connery, Craig, etc. look-alike. The title teaser shows us a silhouette of the character, but we should get our first proper look at the character in a few days.

Condé Nast Traveler
4 hours ago
- Condé Nast Traveler
15 Best Airbnbs in Edinburgh, From a Converted Warehouse to a Medieval Retreat
Edinburgh is filled with secret retreats for a city-break escape, hidden down cobbled mews or tucked away in friendly neighborhoods. With traditional high ceilings, excellent comforts, quirky interiors, and clever design, these are the ultimate Airbnbs in Edinburgh. All are within walking distance of the Scottish capital's best things to do, the best restaurants in Edinburgh, and the top places to drink in Edinburgh. For more options, see our pick of the best Airbnbs in Scotland. While we have not stayed in every Airbnb featured, we have carefully selected these as recommendations based on their location, design, previous guest reviews, and the fact that they have achieved Airbnb's Superhost status at the time of our research.


Gizmodo
4 hours ago
- Gizmodo
U.S. Immigration Authorities Are Adding Children's DNA To a Criminal Database
As if the regular detainment of children isn't bad enough, documents show that U.S. immigration authorities are adding their DNA to a criminal database. In less than five years, the U.S. has collected DNA samples from over 130,000 minors, including children as young as four. Since 2020, the US Customs and Border Patrol has ramped up its contributions to the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) overseen by the Federal Bureau of Investigations. CODIS stores DNA profiles from convicted offenders, unsolved crime scenes, and missing persons cases for local, state, and federal law enforcement use. The actual, physical DNA samples are stored indefinitely by the federal government. Excluding forensic ones, CODIS currently has 23 million DNA profiles, and as many as 133,539 of them belong to detained children and teenagers, according to documents reviewed by Wired. According to Wired's report, CBP collected samples of between 829,000 and 2.8 million people from October 2020 to the end of 2024. This came after 2020 updated regulations surrounding DNA collection from the Department of Justice that removed the Department of Homeland Security's exemptions. The California Law Review critiqued the DOJ's decision as one that 'may be the first to result in the government's widespread, permanent retention of genetic materials based solely on a status other than a criminal arrest or conviction.' To comply with the DOJ's orders, CBP launched a pilot program that same year to begin collecting more samples from detained immigrants. At the time, CBP said it would collect samples from people between the ages of 14 to 19. However, CBP's policy gives officers some discretion when it comes to younger children and they have taken advantage of that. Per Wired, CBP obtained samples from as many as 227 children under the age of 13. In one case, CBP officers in El Paso, Texas sent samples from a 4-year old child to the FBI for processing. 'In order to secure our borders, CBP is devoting every resource available to identify who is entering our country. We are not letting human smugglers, child sex traffickers, and other criminals enter American communities,' Hilton Beckham, assistant commissioner of public affairs at CBP, told Wired. 'Toward this end, CBP collects DNA samples for submission to [CODIS] from person in CBP custody who are arrested on federal criminal charges, and from aliens detained under CBP's authority who are subject to fingerprinting and not otherwise exempt from the collection requirement.' However, Stephanie Glaberson, the director of research and advocacy at Georgetown University's Center on Privacy and Technology, told Gizmodo via email, 'The revelation that CBP collected DNA from a 4-year-old and added it to CODIS brings the absurdity of the government's DNA program into sharp relief.' Recently, the Center released a report stating that CBP has added 1.5 million DNA profiles to CODIS since 2020 where they are now housed under the 'offender' label. Overall, ICE and CBP's number of collected samples has increased by 5,000 percent but those numbers are even more shocking when broken down into smaller periods of time. According to Wired, officers in Laredo, Texas submitted as many as 3,930 DNA samples to the FBI with 252 listed as 17 or younger. Every sample was collected on a single day in January 2024. Two years ago, the FBI requested a massive increase in funding to continue maintaining the system. With immigration authorities' contributions, CODIS is likely to continue ballooning exponentially. As Georgetown's report explained, there are several limitations on criminal law enforcement obtaining DNA samples. When it comes to immigrants, however, the only limitation is that they must be detained. 'The meaning of the term 'detained' in the immigration context is notoriously broad, vague, and ever-shifting,' the report stated. 'And unlike in the criminal legal systems, ICE and CBP agents do not have to get judicial authorization to detain someone. There is no process for checking to make sure that every time they do detain someone, they meet constitutional requirements.' 'The lack of procedural safeguards means that DHS can amass data at a much quicker rate than police can, but all of the DNS DHS takes is accessible to the police,' the report added. 'No matter the age of the individuals compelled to hand over this most sensitive information, this program is morally bankrupt and unconstitutional,' Glaberson told Gizmodo. 'Collecting migrants' DNA like this serves no legitimate immigration purpose. What it does is place these individuals, their families, and communities under watch for life, and brings us all one huge step closer to genetic surveillance.'