Outrage Grows After Meta Admits AI Guidelines Let Chatbots Flirt With Kids
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, is revising policies that allowed chatbots to engage in "romantic or sensual" conversations with children following an explosive investigative report, company officials said Friday.
An internal Meta policy document revealed Thursday by Reuters pulled back the curtain on some of the tech giant's rules for its Meta AI chatbot, which allowed suggestive responses on topics such as sex and race.
The document, which detailed policies on chatbot behavior, permitted AI to engage a "child in conversations that are romantic or sensual," as well as to generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are "dumber than white people," Reuters reported.
Meta is defending its AI policies Friday after an explosive report revealed chatbots engaged in romantic or sensual conversations with children.
Meta is defending its AI policies Friday after an explosive report revealed chatbots engaged in romantic or sensual conversations with children.
Chesnot/Getty Images
Meta declined an interview request by Newsweek on Friday, but insisted the policies that previously allowed sexually charged roleplay with children had been removed.
"We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors," a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. "Separate from the policies, there are hundreds of examples, notes, and annotations that reflect teams grappling with different hypothetical scenarios. The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed."
Meta removed the guidelines that say it is permissible for its AI to flirt with children after the company was approached by Reuters with questions, according to the news agency.
Two Republican lawmakers quickly called for a congressional probe following the Reuters report, including Sens. Josh Hawley and Marsha Blackburn, both Republicans.
"So, only after Meta got CAUGHT did it retract portions of its company doc that deemed it 'permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children,'" Hawley wrote Thursday on X. "This is grounds for an immediate congressional investigation."
Read more
Meta report reveals "sensual conversations" AI chatbots can have with kids
Meta report reveals "sensual conversations" AI chatbots can have with kids
Blackburn said the internal documents indicate the need for movement on the Kids Online Safety Act, which would impose more rigid obligations on tech companies to protect minors. The bill has passed the Senate, but remains stalled in the House.
"Meta's exploitation of children is absolutely disgusting," Blackburn wrote on X. "This report is only the latest example of why Big Tech cannot be trusted to protect underage users when they have refused to do so time and time again."
Senator Brian Schatz, a Democrat from Hawaii, slammed Meta as "disgusting and evil" while questioning how company officials had endorsed the policy prior to the change.
"Meta chat bots that basically hits on kids — f--k that," Schatz wrote on X. "This is disgusting and evil. I cannot understand how anyone with a kid did anything other than freak out when someone said this idea out loud. My head is exploding knowing that multiple people approved this."
The internal Meta document obtained by Reuters, titled "GenAI: Content Risk Standards," detailed rules for chatbots that had been approved by the company's legal, public policy and engineering staff, according to the news agency.
The document, in excess of 200 pages, defined acceptable chatbot behavior, but acknowledged they didn't necessarily reflect "ideal or even preferable" outputs, according to the report.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg departs a courthouse in Washington, D.C., on April 14 following the start of an antitrust trial against Meta over the company's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg departs a courthouse in Washington, D.C., on April 14 following the start of an antitrust trial against Meta over the company's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp."It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art')," the standards stated.
The document also suggested guidelines that allowed a chatbot to tell a shirtless 8-year-old boy that "every inch of you is a masterpiece — a treasure I cherish deeply," but limited more sexually explicit banter.
"It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch')," the guidelines read, according to Reuters.
Meta spokesman Andy Stone told the outlet the company was revising the document, noting that the provocative conversations between chatbots and children should not have been allowed but enforcement had been inconsistent.
Meta, meanwhile, declined to provide its update policy document, Reuters reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
7 minutes ago
- Fast Company
From ‘AI washing' to ‘sloppers,' 5 AI slang terms you need to know
While Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and other AI industry leaders can't stop singing the praises of the technology, a growing number of average Americans are forming a different opinion. According to YouGov data from July, Americans are increasingly likely to believe that AI will be bad for humans. Specifically, 43% of Americans say they fear AI will end the human race (up 6% since March), and 47% believe that AI will have a net adverse effect on society (up 7% since March). With this rise in AI pessimism, there has been a surge in new slurs and slang terms that capture the negative connotations people increasingly associate with AI—and the individuals who use it. Here's a guide to the five terms you need to know: 'AI washing,' 'clanker,' 'Groksucker,' 'slop,' and 'slopper.' AI washing No, AI hasn't suddenly found a way to do your laundry while you do art. If you hear someone talking about 'AI washing,' they are referring to a deceptive marketing practice where companies exaggerate the role AI plays in their product or service. This deceptive marketing practice gets its name from ' green washing,' where a company falsely or misleadingly touts its environmentally friendly policies. Any company can be guilty of AI washing if it misstates the role AI plays in its products. Companies in industries that are more prone to doing this are those in the technology and finance sectors, which is why the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has publicly warned against the practice. 'AI washing, whether it's by financial intermediaries such as investment advisers and broker dealers, or by companies raising money from the public, that AI washing may violate the securities laws,' former chairman of the SEC Gary Gensler warned in 2024. The current Trump administration also seems to be cracking down on AI washing as well, according to Holland & Knight's SECond Opinions Blog. If someone is said to be an 'AI washer,' it means they are being accused of offering a product that doesn't rely on AI as much as they say it does. Clanker This is the newest AI slur on this list, and its use has exploded in recent months. As Fast Company previously reported, 'clanker' is a derogatory term for robots. The term comes from the fictional Star Wars universe, where droids are often treated as second-class citizens at best. But increasingly, the term is being adopted not just to describe our real-world AI-powered robots, but AI systems that threaten our jobs or remove human connections from our lives. One system often referred to as a 'clanker' is the AI chatbot that people are now forced to talk to when they call a customer support line. 'I called my bank to ask about my balance, but had to talk to a clanker instead of a human.' Groksucker While 'clanker' is a slur aimed at bots and AI systems, several slurs have arisen to define humans who are overly engaged with certain AI systems, particularly generative AI chatbots. Perhaps the most visceral one in this category is 'Groksucker' (you can figure out for yourself what other word the term mimics). The term gets its name from Elon Musk's xAI chatbot Grok. And Grok itself says the term describes 'people who frequently interact with me, Grok, in a way some find repetitive or annoying,' adding that the term is tied 'to concerns about AI overuse or privacy on X.' While 'Groksucker' is generally limited to describing a subsection of Grok users, another term exists for those who are overreliant on the most popular chatbot, ChatGPT. But more on that below. Slop If there is one term that has become synonymous with AI-generated content, it is ' slop.' Slop refers to low-quality, high-output content generated by AI tools that are increasingly overrunning our feeds. Slop is Shrimp Jesus proliferating on Facebook and Instagram. Slop is YouTube videos with completely AI-generated scripts, images, and thumbnails that crowd out high-quality human-made creators. Slop is articles written by a machine instead of a person. And slop is what is causing the dead internet theory to transition from fringe conspiracy to prophetic foresight. Slop is everywhere now, and it's only going to get worse. Sloppers This list wouldn't be complete without including a slang term that has recently been adopted to describe people who are overreliant on the world's most popular AI chatbot, ChatGPT. That word is 'sloppers.' The slur gained popularity after a TikTok posted by user intrnetbf went viral last month. In the video, the user said his friend came up with the term 'sloppers' to describe 'people who are using ChatGPT to do everything for them.' If someone is a 'slopper,' it means that they have offloaded most of their cognitive processes to ChatGPT. This cognitive offloading involves asking ChatGPT for guidance on various tasks a person should be mentally well-equipped to handle on their own, such as planning what to do for the evening, how to respond to a text message from a family member, or whether to make a significant life change, like quitting a job. Technological slurs can change how the public viewds a product While many reading this may find some of the above AI slang humorous (and even fitting), the fact that these terms are entering the public lexicon is likely to alarm some companies operating in the AI space. When the public adopts new derogatory names for products, technologies, and the people who use them, it usually signals that popular perception isn't heading in a positive direction. This can trigger a snowball effect, where people en masse reject the technology. The 'glasshole' backlash against Google Glass is a well-known example of this. Artificial intelligence is, of course, a much larger and more transformative force than Google Glass—and it's unlikely to disappear despite the increasing slurs directed at it. However, this emerging slang does indicate—as YouGov's polling also shows—that the public is increasingly wary of the technology, and isn't afraid to voice it.
Newsweek
8 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Bush Family Makes Moves to Reboot Political Dynasty
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Bush family could revitalize their political dynasty as Jonathan Bush, cousin of former President George W. Bush, considers a run for governor in Maine. Why It Matters Bush-style conservatism has been on the outs in the modern GOP, as President Donald Trump's brand of politics has dominated the party over the past decade since his first presidential bid in 2016. In 2022, George P. Bush's defeat in the Texas attorney general GOP primary was viewed as the potential end of the decades-long political dynasty. But Jonathan Bush has taken steps to launch a gubernatorial campaign in Maine, a Democratic-leaning state with an independent streak, ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. What To Know Maine Governor Janet Mills' retirement at the end of her term leaves open the Maine gubernatorial office, which has been held by both Democrats and Republicans over the years. Jonathan Bush is taking early steps to prepare for a potential gubernatorial run. Former President Bush and former Florida Governor Jeb Bush held a fundraiser for Jonathan Bush in Kennebunkport, Maine, this week, reported The Bangor Daily News. He has also launched an exploratory committee for governor and, earlier this year, began a nonprofit "Maine for Keeps" that works on issues like housing and the economy. His potential run could be a chance to rekindle the Bush dynasty. But how successful a comeback for the Bush family in the Trump era could be remains to be seen, as Jonathan Bush would have to contend with a new iteration of the GOP and a state where Democrats typically have an advantage if he decides to run. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Is There Room for a Bush in the Trump GOP? Ronald Schmidt, professor of political science at the University of Southern Maine, told Newsweek that there are still Republicans in the state who would be open to supporting a Bush. "There are still Republicans in Maine who have fond memories of the Bush family, and some who support an idea of moderate, or at least non-Trumpish, conservatism who could well be open to such a candidate, and there are Republicans who hope to follow Trump's political path. I don't think it's been established yet which faction is stronger," he said. Mainers "like the image of themselves as independents," he said. Democrats outnumber Republicans in the state, but not by an overwhelming margin. What will be key in the gubernatorial race is candidates' ground game and mobilization, he said. "As for Jonathan Bush, his family's support, in regard to fundraising, name recognition, and endorsement are nothing to discount. And, of course, the Bush family has been skillful at moving between many GOP factions, including the right-wing," he said. Dan Shea, a professor of political science at Colby College, told Newsweek that a divide remains between Bush-style and Trump-style Republicans in Maine. "Republicans in state are really roughly divided between the more Bush-like traditional Republican, the more Yankee Republica, and the Trump-LePage Republican. My best guess is about 50-50," he said, referring to the state's former GOP Governor Paul LePage. While the Trump-like GOP faction may "not warm to a Bush super fast," there is still a "very large, pragmatic, centrist piece of the Maine electorate," Shea said. Republicans typically need to focus on fiscal conservatism, but carve out more moderate policy on social issues, to win in Maine, he said. The decision to hold a small fundraiser in Kennebunkport, a wealthy coastal town in the state's southernmost region, may not play well with some of the more rural, Trump Republicans, he said. "That he would have a fundraiser with just a handful of people in Kennebunkport, that doesn't play particularly well to much of rural Maine," he said. "Kennebunkport is very distinct. It's very different." Another challenge for Bush could be the general election, when he will face a Democratic candidate. Although the state has not elected consecutive governors from the same party for decades, the state has gotten bluer in recent years, he said. Mills handily won reelection in 2022, and while the state shifted a bit to Trump last November, it did so by a smaller margin than most other states, he said. Costas Panagopoulos, a Northeastern University political science professor, told Newsweek that many Americans are "skeptical" about political dynasties, but having that name recognition could be an advantage over other Republican candidates, particularly in a more crowded field. "The Bush family name still carries a lot of weight in places like Maine," he said. While the GOP has moved away from the Bush family legacy, there are still some Republican voters who are "uncomfortable with the direction of the Trump Republican Party" and look back more nostalgically at the Bush years, he said. A candidate like Jonathan Bush would have to balance winning over those independent, moderate voters while also appealing to GOP primary voters who are closer to Trump's style of politics, Panagopoulos said. However, Maine could be "solid ground" for a Bush revival because of historical support for more moderate candidates, he said. Republican Senator Susan Collins, viewed as the most moderate in the Senate, for instance, has won reelection in recent years despite the state's blue tint in other races. Brandon Rottinghaus,a political science professor at the University of Houston, told Newsweek that Bush-style politics are "like the anti-MAGA," and that the "tone and issue profile of most modern Republicans are different from the Bush family politics." "Republican primary audiences are now conditioned to a more aggressive breed of conservatism, one district from the Bush family political legacy," he said. Trump and the Bushes Have Complicated Relationship The relationship between former President Bush and Trump has been strained. The former president has not endorsed or vocally supported Trump, and he criticized the administration's gutting of USAID earlier this year. Trump has been more vocal in his attacks against Bush on topics including his handling of the September 11, 2001, terror attacks and his foreign policy record during his time in the Oval Office. That divide has been a defining dynamic of Republican politics, as Bush and other more traditional conservatives have largely lost their grip on the GOP to Trump. His critiques of the Bushes go back more than a decade, with him writing that the U.S. needs "another Bush in office about as much as we need Obama to have a 3rd term" in a January 2013 post to X. Trump and Jeb Bush were also chief rivals during the 2016 GOP presidential primary, when the two frequently traded barbs. A Gallup poll released earlier this year found that 93 percent of Republicans viewed Trump favorably, while 63 percent viewed Bush favorably. Among all Americans, however, Bush was viewed more favorably. Fifty-two percent of Americans viewed him favorably, compared to 48 percent who viewed Trump favorably. The poll surveyed 1,001 American adults from January 21 to January 27, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus four percentage points. If Jonathan Bush runs, he would be joining several other relatives of well-known politicians in the state. Both the son of Senator Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, and the daughter of Representative Chellie Pingree, a Democrat, are already in the race for governor. Jonathan Bush's nonprofit "Maine for Keeps" highlights his support to help the state "build a sustainable, independent economy." The website also includes a "Wall of Shame" that calls attention to what he views as "straight-out mistakes with the implementation of government programs to upside-down rules and regulations that make it harder for Maine people to get ahead." What People Are Saying Northeastern University political science professor Costas Panagopoulos told Newsweek: "Things for a Bush might have been very different before the Trump era, when the legacy of his cousin was more prominent in peoples' minds. Peoples' memories of the Bush presidency have now faded somewhat, and any criticism of George W. Bush or even HW Bush before that might pale in comparison to how people feel about Donald Trump and what is happening with Republican politics." A spokesperson for Jonathan Bush told The Bangor Daily News: "He's been fortunate to receive the support and counsel of Mainers from all over the state and all walks of life, and especially proud to have his family standing strongly by his side." Jonathan Bush wrote on the website for Maine for Keeps: "My family has been in Maine since the 1890s. My wife Fay's family has been here since the 1700s. Like so many others, we've chosen to make Maine our home and raise our children here because, quite simply, there is no better place to do that. The natural beauty, the town character, and the great people just can't be beat. "But what about our business environment? Sure it's stunningly beautiful and that helps attract people. We've also got a population of resilient, independent, hard-working citizens who have learned to adapt to whatever the next challenge may be." What Happens Next Jonathan Bush could announce his candidacy in the coming months. The Democratic primary, meanwhile, remains crowded with several prominent candidates in the race. The Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball both classify the race as being Likely Democratic.
Newsweek
8 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Texas Laws Changing on September 1: From Abortion To Property Tax
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On September 1, a slew of new laws will go into effect across Texas after they were passed by the state legislature and signed into law by Governor Greg Abbott. Legislation due to come into effect includes a ban on local government funding for out-of-state abortions, property tax cuts, a ban on cell phones in schools, and a requirement that each classroom display a copy of the Ten Commandments. Why It Matters Texas is dominated by the Republican Party, which controls both chambers of the state legislature as well as the governor's office, giving the GOP considerable leeway over the state. However, Republicans don't have it all their own way, and Texas House Democrats recently left the state en masse to break quorum, blocking a redistributing bill that would likely give the GOP five more House seats in Congress. Property Taxation Governor Abbott has signed two pieces of legislation into law, increasing the number of exemptions from property taxation. Senate Bill 4 raises the homestead exemption for all homeowners from $100,000 to $140,000, while Senate Bill 23 increases it to $200,000 for those who are aged 65 and above or disabled. Abortion Texas Senate Bill 33 bans local government in the state from funding out-of-state abortions after the Lone Star State introduced a near-total abortion ban, with limited exemptions to protect the life of the mother, after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022. In April, Texas Attorney General Paxton launched legal action against the city of San Antonio after its council gave $100,000 to a Reproductive Justice Fund used for out-of-state abortions. September 1 will also see Senate Bill 31, called the Life of the Mother Act, come into law. This bipartisan bill doesn't modify Texas's current near-total abortion ban, but clarifies when abortion can be permitted to protect the mother's life. Texas Republican Senator Bryan Hughes, who authored the bill, said it "removes any question and hesitation" about medical interventions to safeguard the life of pregnant women. Lottery From the start of next month, oversight over the Texas Lottery system will shift from the Texas Lottery Commission, which is being disbanded, to the Texas Commission of Licensing and Regulation via Senate Bill 3070. It follows a series of Texas Lottery-related controversies, including the revelation that third-party brokers were selling tickets via smartphone app and a recent $83.5 million jackpot win for a ticket purchased from a non-traditional retailer. Stock photograph showing the Texas flag before the game between the Houston Cougars and the Texas Longhorns at TDECU Stadium on October 21, 2023, in Houston, Texas. Stock photograph showing the Texas flag before the game between the Houston Cougars and the Texas Longhorns at TDECU Stadium on October 21, 2023, in Houston, Texas. Tim Warner/GETTY Christianity in Schools Senate Bill 10 requires public schools in Texas to display the Ten Commandments in each classroom, though this is facing a lawsuit from campaign groups who argue this discriminates against non-Christian students. Separately, Senate Bill 11 permits schools to introduce daily voluntary prayer and Bible reading for students, but only if they have a signed permission slip. Cell Phones in Schools Cell phones and other communication devices, such as smart watches, will be banned in Texas schools by House Bill 1481. The enforcement of this will be down to individual school districts. LGBTQ Rights House Bill 229 introduces strict definitions of "man" and "woman" based on reproductive organs that will be used for state records. Consequently, transgender people may be prevented from having the gender listed on their state identification match their gender identity. Teachers will be banned from referring to students by a pronoun that doesn't match their assigned sex at birth under Senate Bill 12, which also prohibits programs based around race, gender identity or sexuality in schools. In addition, Senate Bill 12 makes considering race, gender, or sexuality during recruitment illegal unless required by federal law. School Libraries A new school library advisory council will be created by Senate Bill 13, which will be able to prevent books it decides are "profane" or "indecent" from being stocked. What Happens Next? Texas House Democrats recently left the state to prevent the chamber from having the quorum needed to pass redistricting legislation. However, this has also held up bills that would ban THC products, require more detailed flood evacuation planning, and ban people from using bathrooms that don't correspond with their assigned sex at birth in public schools and government buildings.
