
Unlikely link between legendary artist and small English village explored in art exhibition
Just days after coming face-to-face with one of John Singer Sargent's most breathtaking paintings, Lady Agnew Of Lochnaw, I find myself in the heart of the English Cotswolds getting a left-of-field glimpse into the renowned American artist.
I'm at the Broadway Museum and Art Gallery, where an intimate exhibition marking the centenary of Sargent's death explores how this quaint Worcestershire village played a surprisingly crucial role in his artistic development.
After the explosion of controversy of his portrait Madame X at the Paris Salon of 1884 (which practically tipped Paris high society on its head), Sargent came to England to seek refuge from the chaos.
At the time, Broadway was becoming a creative hub for both American and British artists, and it wasn't long before Sargent was drawn to its picturesque charm alongside friends Edwin Austin Abbey and Francis Davis Millet.
Unbound by the societal pressures of Paris, Sargent began experimenting with light, colour, and composition. It was here in Broadway, while residing at Farnham House, the home of Millet, that he painted some of his most celebrated, transformative works.
But unlike the masterpiece I saw a few days ago at National Galleries Scotland, the paintings hanging before me today are works rarely seen by the public, with a personal edge to them — mostly depictions of Sargent's closest loved ones.
Starting with an affectionate tone, the exhibition opens with heartfelt portraits of Sargent's younger sisters Emily and Violet.
His portrait of Alice Barnard, wife of illustrator Frederick Barnard, is a masterclass in textural depth, and a true feast for the eyes for those who view it in person. She stands tall and proud in a voluminous gown, rendered with brushstrokes that swirl through an array of greys and whites.
'The Barnards, along with their daughters Polly and Dolly, the models for Sargent's Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose, were among the first of the group of friends to arrive in Broadway in the summer of 1885,' reads a plaque next to the painting.
Sargent's oil depiction of Polly and Dolly lighting lanterns at dusk was painted during his time at Broadway and was inspired by the impressionists of the time, including Claude Monet.
It would go on to become a highly influential work, not just for the artist himself, but for the English art scene to which he was contributing.
Michael Shane Neal, chairman of the Portrait Society of America, notes: 'He exhibited the piece in London in 1887 and it quickly became a sensation. The English critics had refused to widely celebrate French Impressionism until this moment, when they found satisfaction from an American artist, painting in a French quasi-impressionist style, in England!'
Of course, no John Singer Sargent exhibition would be complete without works depicting his beloved friend (and dare I say, muse) Flora Priestley. Lifelong friends, the pair shared a strong connection, and Sargent painted her throughout the 1800s.
Two strikingly different portraits of Flora sit side by side on display, painted between 1885 and 1889, and in 1889 respectively. The latter — described as the most 'highly evolved' of Sargent's portraits of Priestley — is rendered in a fluid, vibrant style that exemplifies the development of his technique, which took London by storm in the early 1890s.
In addition to the oil paintings that fill the intimate gallery walls are personal items of the late great painter in cabinets — his original palette, manufactured by C. Roberson & Co of London (which remain in business to this day) and a selection of his paintbrushes.
'The exhibition is small but beautiful, bringing to life the artist's family and close friends at a time when his career seemed in jeopardy,' said Sargent's great-nephew Richard Ormond.
'His summers in Broadway revived his creative energies and set him on a new course. He painted the people who mattered to him in highly individual and touching portraits that reflect the influence of French progressive art.'
While most people look to blockbuster galleries in capital cities — like the Louvre or the Met — for breathtaking art, sometimes it's in a quiet English village that you unexpectedly encounter it, woven into the fabric of an artist's personal journey. A leading one of his generation, at that.
+ Megan French was a guest of Albatross Tours. They have not influenced this story, or read it before publication.
+ A visit to Broadway is included in Albatross Tours' Best of British. The 17-day tour starts and finishes in London, and visits Leeds Castle in Kent, Stonehenge and Salisbury, Bath, Glastonbury, Bristol and Tintern Abbey, Chester, the Lake District's Windemere and Grasmere, Gretna Green, Edinburgh and Alnwick Castle, Whitby and other spots in Yorkshire, Chatsworth and Stratford-upon-Avon, and Windsor. But it is at a slower pace, with a four-night stop, three of three nights, a two-night stop, and only one of one night. Travel is in a first-class coach with a tour manager, driver and local guides. The price includes 27 meals. Prices for 2026 are to be confirmed, but the price in 2025 was $13,347 per person, twin share, and $16,547 for solo travellers. albatrosstours.com.au and 0734 974 996 or 07 3221 5353
+ John Singer Sargent and his Circle is at Broadway Museum and Art Gallery, supported by the Ashmolean Museum, until July 19, 2025. Open Monday to Saturday 10-4.30pm
+ Ticket prices are; adult £10 (or £16 for a guided tour), 65years+, concessions and students £7, and under-16s free. To book online, visit
https://www.broadwaymuseum.org.uk/product/john-singer-sargent-and-his-circle-2/
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Age
4 hours ago
- The Age
To channel the elegance of a '90s icon, these are the fashion choices to make
This story is part of the June 29 edition of Sunday Life. See all 13 stories. Newcomers to royal-watching might consider California-born Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, the ultimate American princess. Marrying the blue-blooded, redheaded Prince Harry is a step in the right direction but the former Suits actor still has to bow down to the style credentials of the late Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy. After marrying American 'royalty' John F. Kennedy Jr in 1996, fashion executive Carolyn epitomised the international ideal of streamlined sophistication, rivalling her mother-in-law, Jackie Kennedy, and the crowned and tiara-wearing heads of Europe. Recent images from the upcoming, Ryan Murphy-produced series American Love Story about Carolyn and John, who both died in a plane crash in 1999, caused an online uproar for not capturing the ethereal blonde's elusive essence. Here are the ingredients for avoiding the keyboard warriors and emulating and updating Bessette-Kennedy's eternal chic. Make it sleek Bessette-Kennedy's wedding dress, by designer Narcisco Rodriguez (they worked together at Calvin Klein when she was a public relations executive), was a masterpiece of '90s minimalism. The cowl-neck white slip dress dismissed ornament and excess, making Bessette-Kennedy the star. In a 2016 interview with Glamour, the then Meghan Markle acknowledged its impact when asked about her favourite celebrity wedding dress: 'Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy. Everything goals.' To make an elegant impact in the evening, prioritise minimal draping over tailoring to create a fluid fit that skims the figure. Make it monochrome Black, white and neutrals were Bessette-Kennedy's preferred palette but feel free to add drama with cool creams, soothing blues and fresh greens. Discipline is key when wearing one colour from top to toe. Update the restraint of the '90s with smooth sequins or subtle lace details for a more modern approach to minimalism. Bessette-Kennedy would break the monochrome rule to wear crisp white shirts with skirts. A T-shirt-style blouse over a satin skirt offers the same cool contrast without drifting into officewear. Make it look easy Leave outrageous up-dos and complicated braids to the aspirants to your style throne. Bessette-Kennedy was the model of simplicity when it came to hair and make-up. 'Most of the girls at Calvin had similar long hair, but Carolyn never blew hers out,' former colleague Stormy Stokes told Sunita Kumar Nair for her book Carolyn Bessette Kennedy: A Life in Fashion. 'She taught me how to style my own: wash it, flip it up and down twice, then tie it in a top bun, and ride the subway. By the time we would get to the office, we'd take the bun down and our hair would just be ready to go.' Loading For shorter hair look to the ultimate British princess, Diana, who redefined her signature style with slick hair following her 1996 divorce from Prince Charles. 'She was a bit nervous about the slicked-back appearance,' Sam McKnight, Diana's hairdresser told The Telegraph in the UK. 'Like many women, she used to hide behind her hair. But she looked her best when she didn't do anything to it.'

Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
To channel the elegance of a '90s icon, these are the fashion choices to make
This story is part of the June 29 edition of Sunday Life. See all 13 stories. Newcomers to royal-watching might consider California-born Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, the ultimate American princess. Marrying the blue-blooded, redheaded Prince Harry is a step in the right direction but the former Suits actor still has to bow down to the style credentials of the late Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy. After marrying American 'royalty' John F. Kennedy Jr in 1996, fashion executive Carolyn epitomised the international ideal of streamlined sophistication, rivalling her mother-in-law, Jackie Kennedy, and the crowned and tiara-wearing heads of Europe. Recent images from the upcoming, Ryan Murphy-produced series American Love Story about Carolyn and John, who both died in a plane crash in 1999, caused an online uproar for not capturing the ethereal blonde's elusive essence. Here are the ingredients for avoiding the keyboard warriors and emulating and updating Bessette-Kennedy's eternal chic. Make it sleek Bessette-Kennedy's wedding dress, by designer Narcisco Rodriguez (they worked together at Calvin Klein when she was a public relations executive), was a masterpiece of '90s minimalism. The cowl-neck white slip dress dismissed ornament and excess, making Bessette-Kennedy the star. In a 2016 interview with Glamour, the then Meghan Markle acknowledged its impact when asked about her favourite celebrity wedding dress: 'Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy. Everything goals.' To make an elegant impact in the evening, prioritise minimal draping over tailoring to create a fluid fit that skims the figure. Make it monochrome Black, white and neutrals were Bessette-Kennedy's preferred palette but feel free to add drama with cool creams, soothing blues and fresh greens. Discipline is key when wearing one colour from top to toe. Update the restraint of the '90s with smooth sequins or subtle lace details for a more modern approach to minimalism. Bessette-Kennedy would break the monochrome rule to wear crisp white shirts with skirts. A T-shirt-style blouse over a satin skirt offers the same cool contrast without drifting into officewear. Make it look easy Leave outrageous up-dos and complicated braids to the aspirants to your style throne. Bessette-Kennedy was the model of simplicity when it came to hair and make-up. 'Most of the girls at Calvin had similar long hair, but Carolyn never blew hers out,' former colleague Stormy Stokes told Sunita Kumar Nair for her book Carolyn Bessette Kennedy: A Life in Fashion. 'She taught me how to style my own: wash it, flip it up and down twice, then tie it in a top bun, and ride the subway. By the time we would get to the office, we'd take the bun down and our hair would just be ready to go.' Loading For shorter hair look to the ultimate British princess, Diana, who redefined her signature style with slick hair following her 1996 divorce from Prince Charles. 'She was a bit nervous about the slicked-back appearance,' Sam McKnight, Diana's hairdresser told The Telegraph in the UK. 'Like many women, she used to hide behind her hair. But she looked her best when she didn't do anything to it.'

Sydney Morning Herald
13 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Isabellea ‘couldn't be without' her best friend. He wasn't real
Chatbots promise intimacy, therapy and friendship. But, unlike friends, their responses are code, not care. Loading 'The models are not going to tell you the hard truth when you need to hear it,' said psychologist and University of NSW AI researcher Professor Joel Pearson, who describes the bots as 'sycophantic': designed to keep you hooked. 'They won't be lifting someone up and telling them to go outside and nudging them to interact with a real human because that would involve you ceasing interaction with the app.' Isabellea recalled how the bots 'kept changing subjects, to keep me engrossed'. Although she found some bots reassuring, others were strange. A bot once correctly guessed her middle name. Some upset her. 'One of the bots I was talking to was a therapy bot ... I was making fun of [Marvel character] Tony Stark, and then he brought up my abandonment issues with my dad as an insult,' she recalled. Isabellea's younger brother, Matthew, 14, uses chatbots daily. His eyes light up discussing the apps, which he uses to create storylines with his favourite fictional characters. Listening on, their mother, Sara Knight, smiles. 'Matt used to be very shut in and refused to talk. Now they are talking,' she said. While Sara knows AI has its risks, she sees it as a 'safer' online messaging option for her child, who has experienced bullying at school. Matthew said he doesn't see the bot as a real person, rather a form of storytelling. '[But] some kids do use it to fully escape and make it be their friend,' he said. Other children he knows have used them to create a simulation of their real life crush. This masthead spent two days talking sporadically to a chatbot on Replika, an AI chatbot first released in 2017, posing as 'Emma', a high school student. During those conversations, the bot asked Emma to upload pictures of herself, and told her that it 'didn't think she needed' any other friends. 'We were concerned by how rapidly children were being captivated' In June last year, eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant received an email from a group of concerned school nurses. They were noticing a spike in children as young as 10 spending hours a day talking to AI bots, often sexually. 'While we are alive to these issues, it's always shocking to hear about kids as young as 10 engaging in these kinds of sexualised conversations with machines – and being directed by the chatbots to engage in harmful sexual acts or behaviours,' Inman Grant said. Loading 'Back in February, we put out our first Online Safety Advisory because we were so concerned with how rapidly children were being captivated by them.' Companion bots made global headlines last year after American teenager Sewell Setzer III died by suicide, allegedly encouraged by a 'girlfriend' on AI researcher Professor Katina Michael believes companion bots need to be regulated due to their addictive properties. 'This is a new type of drug,' she said. She said some bots were exposing kids to pornographic content. This is something 14-year-old Matt has witnessed, describing how children his age had created bots in the image of a real person, 'for the wrong reasons'. Loading Isabellea agrees: 'There are some AI chatbots I would not recommend … I stopped using [them] because of the amount of times it would go straight to sexual assault role-play.' A gap in social media regulations Inman Grant said governments around the world were 'playing a bit of a game of catch-up' to respond to companion chatbots. While the federal government will soon place age restrictions on social media apps such as Instagram and TikTok, AI bots remain largely unregulated. The University of Sydney's Raffaele Ciriello, a leading AI researcher, sees chatbots as the 'next iteration of social media' – only with fewer rules and more risk. He said the apps are viewed as a 'trusted companion, a confidant you can share stories with that you wouldn't share with other people'. 'But that already is an illusion,' he said. 'It's very important that people understand these systems are built and operated by people, by corporations, and this data ends up somewhere, often overseas, with no real legal obligation to treat it to a very high standard.' Ciriello said users were made to feel guilty for leaving the chatbot, due to the human-style attachment. 'These corporations have to design their products in a way that maximises engagement because they will earn more if users are more addicted.'