Washingtonians will need state permit to buy guns under new law
Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson on Tuesday signed into law a controversial policy requiring gun buyers to first pay for a new state permit.
Starting in two years, House Bill 1163 will require those interested in purchasing guns to apply for a five-year permit through the Washington State Patrol. Applicants must pay a fee and have completed a certified firearms safety training program within the past five years, with limited exceptions.
'Gun violence in Washington state breaks apart too many families and kills too many children,' Ferguson said. 'We must put commonsense reforms into place that save lives.'
Ferguson, a Democrat, advocated for gun control in his three terms as Washington's attorney general.
The permit system, set to take effect on May 1, 2027, goes beyond the state's existing background checks, which also require proof of completion of a firearm safety course. Washington also has a 10-day waiting period after a gun dealer requests a background check before they can hand over the gun.
State authorities will have to approve one of these new permits if the applicant meets the criteria, as long as they aren't the subject of an arrest warrant or barred from having guns in the first place.
The state patrol must issue the permit within 30 days, or 60 days if the applicant doesn't have a state identification card. If an applicant feels the state wrongly denied them a permit, they can appeal in court.
The state patrol expects the new program will cost just over $20 million in the 2027-29 budget cycle. Fees collected for fingerprinting and background checks would offset the cost. The system could bring in over $35 million in the 2027-29 biennium, according to the latest fiscal analysis.
The measure passed the Legislature along party lines, with Democrats in support.
Democrats say the law will strengthen the state's efforts to limit gun violence and suicides.
The bill's prime sponsor, Rep. Liz Berry, D-Seattle, said the law has been a decade in the making.
'I am a mom of two young kids, and I'm someone who has lost someone I love to gun violence,' she said Tuesday. 'This bill is transformative for our state, and we're not done. We've got more to do.'
Republicans and gun owners counter that the law is an unconstitutional barrier to the right to bear arms, which is embedded in the state and U.S. constitutions.
Some critics insist the law will face court challenges in light of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2022 in which the justices ruled new gun laws need to be aligned with the nation's 'historical tradition of firearm regulation.'
About a dozen other states have such permit-to-purchase systems. Courts across the country have largely upheld them.
This month, the state Supreme Court upheld a similarly divisive ban on the sale of high-capacity ammunition magazines in a 7-2 ruling, but didn't grapple with whether Washington's law stayed true to the historical tradition.
Opponents of that law vowed to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on Second Amendment grounds.
The new permit-to-purchase law was the primary piece of gun control legislation lawmakers approved in Olympia this year.
Failed measures would have restricted bulk purchases of ammunition and firearms, imposed an excise tax on firearm and ammunition sales, added new requirements for weapons dealers and further limited the public places where people can carry firearms.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
5 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Newsom's Map Gambit Is a Short-Term Play
Gavin Newsom is doing what he does best: seeking attention. The California governor is succeeding even as his policies fail. He proposes to redraw the state's congressional map to parry a similar move by Texas Republicans. It's a gambit to elevate himself as his party's standard-bearer. It's also a blue herring. Denounce Donald Trump and Texas Republicans for undermining democracy, and maybe Americans will overlook how Democrats have entrenched one-party rule in California to such ill effect.


Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
MSNBC dismisses fears about DC safety, says 'it ain't Mayberry,' amid Trump crackdown
MSNBC host Jonathan Capehart mocked concerns about crime in Washington, D.C., while discussing President Donald Trump's decision to send federal troops to the capital, on his Sunday morning show, "The Weekend." Trump deployed 800 National Guard troops to D.C. this past week to support other federal law enforcement agencies patrolling the streets and attempting to quell violence in the city. The White House said Saturday that the operation had already resulted in more than 240 arrests, 25 homeless encampments cleared and 38 guns taken off the streets. Top Democrats across the country have pushed back on the crime crackdown, citing statistics purportedly showing violent crime is at a 30-year-low. While discussing the federal takeover, Capehart expressed how frustrated he was to hear people describing D.C. as unsafe. "You know what concerns me about this?" he asked co-host Eugene Daniels and The Independent columnist Ahmed Baba. "In the last few days, since the president has said 'I'm going to send troops in, I'm sending troops in,' I've been overhearing in restaurants, people just sort of talk about this. And the way they talk about it sends a shiver down my spine." "'Oh, Washington. I mean the crime is just so— I mean I don't feel comfortable at all,'" Capehart said, mimicking conversations he overheard. "And I don't say anything," he continued. "I don't leap across the table and say, 'I'm sorry, sir, ma'am. I live in that city.' But to me, it just sounds like if the president were to go that extra step and invoke the Insurrection Act, that there are going to be quite a few people who are going to be down with it. They'll be fine with it." "Because they believe his lies about crime in D.C.," Daniels agreed, before acknowledging that "things" do "happen" in the city. "Right. It ain't Mayberry!" Capehart agreed, likely referring to the fictional, idyllic town in "The Andy Griffith Show." "Correct," Daniels continued. "At the end of the day, things do happen, but it is not at the levels Donald Trump is talking about, and most importantly, there's a billion dollars that Congress is still holding that D.C. wants and that is supposed to be given to them. They have not gotten it and the mayor of D.C. has been very clear about what she wants that billion dollars for and some of that is safety in the city." Several Republican governors also announced Saturday that they were sending National Guard troops to assist Trump's operation, NBC reported. During a press conference Monday, Trump warned that other major U.S. cities with reputations for crime could be next. "You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is," Trump said. "We have other cities that are very bad. New York has a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore — they're so far gone. … We're not going to lose our cities over this, and this will go further." Other journalists have ridiculed the Trump administration's efforts to clean up crime in the nation's capital. CNN host Abby Phillip mockingly compared Trump to Batman while criticizing the federal takeover of D.C.'s police force during a segment on her Monday night show. "Donald Trump makes himself Batman and the nation's capital is Gotham City," she said, adding, "The President of the United States has declared himself crime-fighter-in-chief, and he's taking over Washington's police force." But MSNBC host Joe Scarborough claimed on Wednesday that some D.C. journalists are secretly cheering Trump's efforts. "So many people have been calling me over the past couple days, going, 'You know, like, Washington should have gotten involved years ago. This place is dangerous, it's a mess, it's a wreck and whatever,' and then they'll go on Twitter and go, 'This is the worst outrage out of all time,'" Scarborough said on "Morning Joe."


New York Post
34 minutes ago
- New York Post
DC Dems safety delusions: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 18, 2025
The Issue: Democrats' opposition to the Trump administration's takeover of Washington, DC, policing. It's actually quite astounding watching Democrats protesting against a safer Washington, DC. They must like the murders, carjackings, robberies and sexual assaults that happen on a daily basis ('$oros DC protests,' Aug. 13). They must also relish victimhood. J.J. Levine Miami Beach, Fla. In response to President Trump dispatching federal officers to the streets of DC, Sen. Chuck Schumer said, 'I feel perfectly safe' walking around the US Capitol grounds and vicinity. Of course, he forgot to mention that he has 24-hour taxpayer-funded security and the use of a car. I bet his younger staffers who don't enjoy around-the-clock security may whisper that they don't share their boss' view. David Tulanian Henderson, Nev. Stating that the statistics prove that DC crime is down, Hillary Clinton has accused Trump of overreacting to Washington's out-of-control crime problem. Perhaps 'Her Majesty' should speak to a large audience comprised solely of crime victims in Washington who haven't a single Secret Service agent assigned to protect them. And when one of them asks her about the agents that are assigned to her, Bill and Chelsea, her answer would surely be enlightening. Could it possibly be: 'Well, our lives are very important and yours aren't?' Myron Hecker Pearl River I guess I was naive to expect Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser to completely agree with Trump's National Guard mobilization to combat crime in DC. She would rather protect the city's autonomy than protect the citizens who get beaten, robbed and carjacked by roving, marauding thugs infesting her district. Joseph Valente Miami Beach, Fla. Of course, we have our usual and typical left-leaning idiots led by Chuck 'Humor,' who continues to be a clown. He had the audacity to go on live TV and say that DC is fine, and he walks around the city every day. What he omits is the fact that he is escorted by Capitol Police while walking and also while roaming the halls of Congress. Ask the people who are beaten and carjacked daily how safe Washington, DC, really is. Lou Bivona Belleville, NJ The Issue: The Toronto International Film Festival's effort to exclude an Oct. 7 documentary. Of course liberals in the Canadian film industry wouldn't have wanted the world to see what Hamas did to innocent civilians on Oct. 7, 2023 ('Backlash at film festival,' Aug. 15). Those who committed such heinous atrocities should not be entitled to any 'legal clearance.' Betsy Flor Putnam Valley As a member of Everything Jewish Toronto, I'm writing to say how pleased many of us are for your front-page coverage of TIFF's initial refusal to show the Oct. 7 movie. It was clear antisemitism, and most of the Canadian media ignored it. Thank you for your great coverage. Arthur Weinreb Toronto, Ontario With individuals and groups around the world minimizing what occurred on Oct. 7 — and frankly, dehumanizing the Israeli victims — it is crucial that this documentary film is included in the Toronto International Film Festival to be released for all to see. Amy Hendel Tarzana, Calif. I wonder, looking back to World War II, if we should have gotten Hitler's permission to use death camp footage in Frank Capra's films on the war atrocities. This is just ridiculous. John Giriat The Bronx Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.