
Immigration rights groups, ACLU lawsuit alleges Alligator Alcatraz preventing detainees from having attorney access
"No protocols exist at this facility for providing standard means of confidential attorney-client communication, such as in-person attorney visitation and phone or video calls that are available at any other detention facility, jail or prison," the lawsuit, filed in the federal Southern District of Florida, said. "The only way that detained people can communicate with the outside world is via infrequent access to collect pay phone calls that are monitored and recorded, and last approximately five minutes."
The lawsuit also alleges that lawyers have been barred from entering the facility in the Everglades and that officials have "made it virtually impossible for detainees, or their counsel, to file documents required to contest their detention with the immigration court."
"No instruction exists as to which immigration courts have been designated for submission of motions for bond redetermination for people detained at Alligator Alcatraz," the lawsuit, filed by attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Immigrant Justice, said. "As a result, detainees held at Alligator Alcatraz effectively have no way to contest their detention."
The ACLU announced the lawsuit Wednesday evening.
The lawsuit names as plaintiffs four men who are detained at the facility, three law firms, a legal services organization and an attorney. It names as defendants federal and state officials and agencies, including U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Gov. Ron DeSantis.
The lawsuit, which alleges First Amendment and due-process violations, was the latest move in the controversy over the detention facility that the state built in recent weeks at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, a remote site used for flight training and surrounded by the Everglades and the Big Cypress National Preserve.
DeSantis and other state and federal officials have touted the facility as helping carry out President Donald Trump's mass deportation efforts for people who are in the country illegally. The project has drawn national attention, with the state Republican Party even selling Alligator Alcatraz merchandise.
But opponents have blasted conditions at the facility and argued it will harm the Everglades and the national preserve. Environmental groups last month filed a separate lawsuit that alleges violations of the National Environmental Policy Act, a federal law that requires evaluating potential environmental impacts before such a project can move forward.
State officials have said the federal government will reimburse Florida for costs related to the Everglades facility. They also announced last month plans to build a second detention facility at North Florida's Camp Blanding, a training site for the Florida National Guard.
DeSantis indicated Wednesday that plans for the Camp Blanding facility would move forward "once there's a demand" for bed space and more detainees are housed at the Everglades site.
"Once there's a demand, then we would be able to go for Camp Blanding. But what I don't want to do is set up Blanding if one is 60 percent full and then the other is 40 percent. I'd rather just channel everyone to Alligator (Alcatraz), since it's easier," DeSantis told reporters at an event in Tampa.
DeSantis said the Everglades facility can "easily" house 3,000 to 4,000 detainees.
"We have not … received that many illegal aliens there yet, but it has grown pretty quickly," the governor said.
Camp Blanding could house fewer detainees and become active "in a week or two," if needed, according to DeSantis.
"I don't want to be creating some structure that can hold 2,000 illegals and then we end up having, like,150 there after a week. And I don't think that's the trend," he said.
DeSantis administration officials did not respond Wednesday to a request for information about the number of detainees being held at the South Florida center.
Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity on June 27 filed the lawsuit about potential environmental impacts. The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida this week filed a motion seeking to join the case.
DeSantis has disputed that the facility threatens the environment, pointing, in part, to the decades-old airport at the site.
Also on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Jose Martinez recused himself from the environmental groups' lawsuit, which was reassigned to U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams. As is typical in such instances, Martinez did not give a reason for stepping aside.
Williams recently drew headlines when she held Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier in civil contempt in a lawsuit stemming from a law passed during a February special legislative session that created state crimes for undocumented immigrants who enter or re-enter Florida.
Williams in April blocked enforcement of the law, ruling that it likely was preempted by federal immigration-enforcement authority. The contempt ruling stemmed from a letter the Uthmeier sent to law enforcement agencies after she blocked the law.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ft. Walton convicted murderer Edward Zakrzewski appeals execution
OKALOOSA COUNTY, Fla. (WMBB) — Convicted murderer Edward Zakrzewski is appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court for a stay of execution. Zakrzewski's lawyers are requesting a stay on the grounds that Florida is an 'Extreme outlier when it comes to capital punishment.' Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the death warrant on July 1st, setting the execution date for July 31st. Zakrzewski killed his wife, Sylvia, and his two children, Edward and Anna, at their home in Ft. Walton Beach on June 9th, 1994. He then drove to Orlando and hopped a flight to Hawaii, changed his name, and moved into a family-run religious commune. He surrendered to police after the family saw his picture on 'Unsolved Mysteries'. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
CISA Cannot Drift: Will Sean Plankey Be The Captain To Lock The Wheel?
UNITED STATES - JULY 24: Sean Plankey, nominee to be director of the Cybersecurity and ... More Infrastructure Security Agency, testifies during his Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee confirmation hearing in Dirksen building on Thursday, July 24, 2025. America's top cyber defense agency is flying without a captain and time is running out. On July 24 President Trump's nominee to lead the agency, Sean Plankey, appeared before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in a well-received confirmation hearing. After months of delays, paperwork issues and a procedural hold by Sen. Ron Wyden the panel appears ready to advance his nomination to the full Senate. Plankey has in recent months been working as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's senior adviser overseeing the Coast Guard, where he also served for years including as a cyber leader. Plankey brought a steady hand and deep operational experience to the confirmation hearing. He cited the significant Coast Guard funding increase in the latest Congressional budget as proof of Noem's willingness to go to bat for cyber and infrastructure security. The Clock Is Ticking On CISA Leadership The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is the nation's digital sentry. It guards civilian federal networks, supports the defense industrial base and shares threat intelligence with private companies that operate essential systems. Yet the agency has been operating with significantly reduced senior leadership and dealing with budget pressures. Since the departure of former CISA Director Jen Easterly earlier this year the agency has lacked steady leadership. Easterly, nominated by President Biden, advanced his administration's agenda by adding misinformation and election security to the CISA mandate. Every week without a confirmed director represents opportunity for adversaries like China and Russia as well as criminal syndicates that constantly probe for vulnerabilities. House Homeland Security Chairman Mark Garbarino warned that every minute without CISA's top leadership benefits nation state actors like Salt Typhoon. In today's threat environment leadership vacuums translate directly into risk. Plankey Brings A Mission First Reset Sean Plankey has been serving as senior adviser for the U.S. Coast Guard to Homeland Security ... More Secretary Kristi Noem. A cyber veteran who served on the National Security Council and as the Department of Energy's most senior cybersecurity official in the first Trump administration, Plankey brings a rare combination of federal experience and operational credibility. Plankey told senators that he would refocus CISA on its congressional mandate which means defending federal systems critical infrastructure and supporting states. He drew a clear line on one of the most politically charged questions facing the agency: content moderation. 'CISA will not do any of that work,' Plankey said when asked about speech policing. His position reflects an effort to keep CISA grounded in its core mission rather than drifting into broader debates over online content. When pressed on election disputes Plankey stayed neutral. He stated simply that elections are run by the states and CISA's role is to provide support not to referee politics. He also signaled strong support for reauthorization of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, a foundational law that enables threat intelligence sharing between private companies and government. Why Narrowing The Mandate Matters Over the years CISA's mission has grown into areas like disinformation and pandemic messaging. That expansion diluted focus and triggered political backlash. Plankey and his supporters in Congress are signaling that it is time to strip away distractions and return to core tasks. This approach does not weaken cyber defense. It strengthens it. When agencies chase every new issue, specially politicized ones, they risk losing sight of the fundamentals. With CISA's responsibilities increasingly tied to civilian infrastructure from pipelines to hospitals clear priorities are essential. Plankey also highlighted two critical programs that expire on September 30. Plankey signaled he is prepared to fight for both programs and stated that he knows how to go to Secretary Noem to request more funding if needed. Congress will need to deliver as well. Civilian Infrastructure Is Now Mission Critical Much of the responsibility for cyber defense is shifting to the networks, utilities and companies that power daily life. The private sector now sits on the front lines and its actions will determine how resilient the nation is in the face of escalating cyber threats. Standards like the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework and modern supply chain security protocols are no longer optional checklists. They are becoming the foundation of national defense. Critical infrastructure operators and the defense industrial base must go beyond compliance and embed these standards into everyday operations. That means segmenting networks, conducting regular threat hunting, hardening endpoints and practicing incident response as rigorously as fire drills. If state and local systems are not hardened, if telecom carriers are not meeting baseline expectations, if airlines, airports, railways, shipping ports, financial institutions and hospitals are not securing critical systems then the entire security structure is at risk. Every weak link becomes an opening for adversaries. Every delay in upgrading defenses becomes a window for attackers. The nation's ability to defend itself now depends as much on the vigilance of power companies, water authorities, transportation hubs, manufacturers, defense suppliers, banks and healthcare networks as it does on any federal agency. This means investing in modern security architectures, implementing continuous monitoring and ensuring that every sector has clear response plans that are tested and updated. Without that collective effort, the country's cyber defense will always be one breach away from failure. CISA Cannot Remain Leaderless. The mission is too important. Sean Plankey brings the right pedigree, a Coast Guard foundation in operational security, a focused mission plan and the credibility to guide the agency forward. He has received broad bipartisan and cybersecurity endorsements. Now is the time to set aside political posturing and focus on the shared goal of securing the nation's digital front lines. The damage from delaying his confirmation is greater than the debate surrounding it. Other agencies can address the issues where consensus does not exist. The hope is that the Senate would move swiftly to confirm him. Every day without leadership at CISA is a day when adversaries gain ground, vulnerabilities deepen and the nation's critical systems face greater risk. The threats are real and accelerating. The country cannot afford hesitation when decisive action is required.


New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
NYC's ‘We're With Colbert' rally for late-night host is a bust with just 20 protesters
What a joke. A Big Apple rally in support of on-his-way-out 'Late Show' host Stephen Colbert drew fewer than two dozen people Sunday — with even the NYPD cops on scene quickly calling it a day since most of the demonstrators left after just a few minutes. Organizers said the 'We're With Colbert' gathering outside the CBS Broadcast Center on Manhattan's West Side said it was meant to be part of a nationwide call for 'integrity.' Advertisement 4 Demonstrators gather outside CBS' offices in Manhattan on Sunday to protest the end of the 'Late Show' with Stephen Colbert. REUTERS 4 Colbert was told this was his last season on CBS, sparking controversy on both sides. CBS 'Our country is not perfect, never has been,' said the event's organizer, who would only identify himself as Matt and said his nickname is 'Slim.' Advertisement 'But we've always had the First Amendment, and now Mango Mussolini is trying to take that from us,' he said, referring to a derogatory nickname for President Trump. CBS said declining viewership and diminishing profits led to its decision to end the show in May 2026, effectively firing the 61-year-old talk-show host Colbert — but critics claim the network bowed to pressure from Trump. 4 CBS officials said the decision to fire Colbert was the result of growing costs and diminishing viewership. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post 4 The number of protesters at Sunday's 'We're With Colbert' rally topped off at about 20 at its peak. REUTERS Advertisement CBS's parent company finalized an $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media shortly after Colbert was told he was on his last season. The merger required federal approval. Colbert has also been among the top talk-show hosts who routinely roast Trump. 'This is a First Amendment attack,' a protester who refused to give her name said of the closing-down of the show. 'We can't stand for that.' Advertisement Still, Colbert has also come under fire for featuring predominantly lefty-leaning guests. According to the right-leaning group MRC NewsBusters, Colbert has had 176 liberal guests and only one Republican on his show since 2022.