logo
Why is Kim Sae Ron's ex-manager suing YouTuber covering Kim Soo Hyun case? Kwon Young Chan claims he was 'dad' to actress

Why is Kim Sae Ron's ex-manager suing YouTuber covering Kim Soo Hyun case? Kwon Young Chan claims he was 'dad' to actress

Pink Villa12 hours ago

Kim Sae Ron's former manager, commonly known as Mr K, decided to drag Kwon Young Chan to court, due to facing defamatory comments from him. He claimed that the comments allegedly character assassinated him and ruined his reputation, as reported by psepeter's blog on June 20.
Kim Sae Ron's manager filed defamation suit against YouTuber Kwon Young Chan
On June 19, Mr K, the former manager of the late actress Kim Sae Ron, filed a complaint against YouTuber Kwon Young Chan with Seoul's Seocho Police Station for violating the Information and Communications Network Act (defamation). The charges were based on Kwon Young Chan allegedly spreading false information about Mr K on his YouTube channel, Kwon Young-chan TV, for a period of three months.
He also accused the content creator of exposing his name and identity through his video coverage of the Kim Soo Hyun - Kim Sae Ron dating controversy, alleging it as an invasion of privacy.
Accusations brought by Kwon Young Chan against Kim Sae Ron's former manager
Kwon Young-chan TV videos about Mr K, claimed the latter's involvement in embezzling hospital bills and grooming actress Kim Sae Ron. Mr K, who served as Kim Sae Ron's personal manager after she signed an exclusive contract with Management Run in January 2023, denied these allegations, stating that the emergency medical bills were paid using corporate and company cards, and there was no private relationship or illegal activity involved.
Kwon Young Chan, however, had already reported Mr K for violating medical and personal information laws.
Mr K accused Kwon Young Chan of maligning his fatherly relationship with Kim Sae Ron
Kim Sae Ron's former manager cited his close bond with the actress, saying she trusted him so much that she affectionately called him "dad." "I supported her financially during her hardships and did my best to help her career revival," he stated. Mr K described her death as a "deeply shocking", and he was further devastated by Kwon Young Chan's "inhumane false claims".
He alleged that those defamatory statements severely damaged his reputation, all before he could even "grieve properly" on the actress' untimely passing.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Panchayat 4 Actor Jitendra Kumar On ‘Jitu Bhaiya' Tag: ‘I'd Been Waiting For Roles...'
Panchayat 4 Actor Jitendra Kumar On ‘Jitu Bhaiya' Tag: ‘I'd Been Waiting For Roles...'

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

Panchayat 4 Actor Jitendra Kumar On ‘Jitu Bhaiya' Tag: ‘I'd Been Waiting For Roles...'

Last Updated: Panchayat Season 4 will bring back fan-favourite characters played by Jitendra Kumar, Neena Gupta, Raghubir Yadav, Faisal Malik, Chandan Roy and Sanvikaa. With Panchayat Season 4 set to premiere on June 24, Jitendra Kumar is once again at the centre of conversations around small-town storytelling and powerful performances. In a recent interview with Zoom, Jitendra shared insights into his journey so far, the origin of his iconic screen name 'Jitu Bhaiya," and how shows like Panchayat and Kota Factory helped shape his career. Jitendra rose to fame with his role in Kota Factory, where he played the beloved 'Jitu Bhaiya." Reflecting on how the name became a cultural reference point, he said, 'Wo toh jo character play kiya Kota Factory main Jitu Bhaiya ke naam se toh usme se wo cheez popular hui… Bhaiya hai toh wo aur homely ho jaate hai. That's the reason ki wo term logo ne pakad li aur us naam se baar baar bulate hai." He explained that the simplicity and relatability of the name made it stick with the audience. The actor credits Panchayat and Kota Factory for giving him the creative space he always desired. 'I had been waiting for roles that resonated with the kind of work I wanted to do. With Panchayat and Kota Factory, I got that chance… that's what's also connecting with the audience." Jitendra also spoke about his early start on YouTube, which became the foundation of his fan base. 'Our sketches on YouTube played a big role in building an audience… it helped create a strong viewer base, which later supported shows like Panchayat." He reminisced about how corporate professionals and college students were the first to follow his journey, which later expanded to family audiences with Panchayat. He acknowledged the shift in audience as a significant moment in his career. 'When Panchayat came out, it reached families. It became a show people could enjoy together at home," he said. Panchayat Season 4 will bring back fan-favourite characters played by Jitendra Kumar, Neena Gupta, Raghubir Yadav, Faisal Malik, Chandan Roy, Sanvikaa, Durgesh Kumar, Sunita Rajwar, and Pankaj Jha. First Published: June 21, 2025, 00:12 IST

Filing of PILs inappropriate when statutory remedies are available: HC
Filing of PILs inappropriate when statutory remedies are available: HC

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Filing of PILs inappropriate when statutory remedies are available: HC

Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court has held that invocation of extraordinary jurisdiction by way of a public interest litigation (PIL) is inappropriate and impermissible when a robust and adequate statutory framework already exists for redressal of a particular grievance. "Allowing unfettered recourse to PIL in such instances would amount to a judicial usurpation of legislative foresight and undermine the primary responsibility of the legislature to craft laws. Bypassing these meticulously designed mechanisms through PIL circumvents the intended architecture of grievance redressal and potentially dilutes the role of expert authorities," the high court has said. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel has passed the orders on a petition filed by one Anuj Malik and others. The petitioner sought directions to restrain all online opinion trading platforms, mobile applications, websites, and digital mediums from advertising, promoting, or marketing betting and wagering activities through platforms, including YouTube, X (Twitter), Instagram, Facebook, radio, print media, television, in blatant violation of statutory laws. They argued that despite a robust legal framework in place, the law was being flouted through misleading advertisements and unregulated financial systems. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brigade Grand Dreams 2025 | 12 Month Payment Holiday* Brigade Group Learn More Undo The petitioners further submitted that if appropriate action was not undertaken, such platforms would continue to dupe gullible users. Responding to the plea, the govt informed that there already exists a legal and statutory framework within which any aggrieved person can approach the authorities concerned for redressal of any grievances, as raised by the petitioner. The govt counsel specifically drew the attention of the court to The Haryana Prevention of Public Gambling Act, 2025, which has been notified from April 9, 2025, and submitted that without adverting to the existing statutory framework, approaching this court by way of PIL amounts to bypassing the legislative mandate. After hearing the matter, the bench disposed of the petition, asking the petitioner to raise his grievance before the authorities concerned in terms of extant laws. BOX 'Unwarranted proliferation of litigation' Encouraging indiscriminate PILs, despite available statutory remedies, leads to an unwarranted proliferation of litigation, a burden on constitutional courts, as well as a judicial docket explosion. These risks transform constitutional courts into primary redressal fora rather than their intended role as ultimate arbiters of constitutional questions. Judicial resources, being scant and precious, must be conserved for matters of genuine public importance MSID:: 121975661 413 |

'Exclusively in theatres': Bollywood tests new methods to release movies
'Exclusively in theatres': Bollywood tests new methods to release movies

Business Standard

time2 hours ago

  • Business Standard

'Exclusively in theatres': Bollywood tests new methods to release movies

Bollywood is trying out various scripts to lure audiences back to the big screen. This comes as the rising dominance of over-the-top (OTT) platforms makes it difficult for movies to run for long periods on the silver screen, thus hurting the cinema industry. The latest attempt is by Aamir Khan, who decided to release his film, Sitaare Zameen Par, exclusively in theatres. On Thursday, Multiplex Association of India (MAI) applauded Aamir Khan's decision to release the film exclusively in theatres. This comes after some media reports said that the much-awaited movie is expected to be released on YouTube through a pay-per-view model after its theatre release, and not on OTT platforms. According to a film trade analyst, it is still not confirmed if the RS Prasanna-directed sequel to Taare Zameen Par will be released on YouTube. On the other hand, Girish Wankhede, film trade analyst, said it is highly unlikely for any other movie to be released on YouTube. Selling the rights of movies to streaming platforms helps producers recover a certain amount of their invested budget on the film. Through YouTube, the chances of recovering this money are unlikely. He further noted that Sitaare Zameen Par isn't a mass-audience film like Dangal or PK. These had the possibility of working well on a popular platform like YouTube. While select movies like Chhaava and Raid 2 performed well at the box office (BO), some high-profile ones like Salman Khan's Sikandar, Akshay Kumar's Sky Force, and the latest being Sajid Nadiadwala-produced Housefull 5 have failed to attract the desired footfalls and BO numbers. 'Housefull 5 was not successful because the cost of production was too high (around ₹250 crore). It will, at the most, make around ₹170 crore…Still, the film is in loss,' said Wankhede. After the opening weekend, the movie has seen a spike in its BO collection due to the ticket price offers on Tuesdays. In May, the producers (Maddock Films) of Rajkummar Rao-starrer Bhool Chuk Maaf had suddenly decided to release the movie directly on Amazon Prime Video, which was later released in theatres due to a court order. This order came after PVR INOX took Maddock Films to court for changing its decision to release the movie in theatres. The cumulative BO collection for January-May was up by 27 per cent to ₹4,812 crore compared to the same period last year, according to an Ormax Media report. These attempts by the industry come at a time when film producers are still in a 'wait-and-watch' mode and are thinking twice before starting to work on movies. This comes as several films have not made money at the BO. Some have not even recovered their costs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store